Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T05:23:48.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Dyadic Interaction Analysis

from Part II - Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

By
Valentín Escudero ,
Minsun Lee  and
Myrna L. Friedlander
Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 45 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. S., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Williams, T., Melton, J., & Clements, M. L. (2008). Premarital precursors of infidelity. Family Process, 47, 243–259. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00251.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., & Quera, V. (1996). Detecting group differences in sequential association using sampled permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 446–457. doi:10.3758/BF03200524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavior Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 554–559. doi:10.3758/BF03203604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1958). Naven. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. H. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251–264. doi:10.1002/bs.3830010402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baucom, K. J. W., Baucom, B. R., & Christensen, A. (2015). Changes in dyadic communication after traditional and integrative behavioral couple therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baucom, K. J. W., Sevier, M., Eldrigde, K. A., & Doss, B. D. (2011). Observed communication in couples two years after integrative and traditional behavioral couple therapy: Outcome and link with five-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 565–576. doi:10.1037/a0025121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bavelas, J. B., Rogers, L. E., & Millar, F. E. (1985). Interpersonal conflict. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 9–26). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392–423. doi.org/10.1037/h0037024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyebach, M., & Escudero Carranza, V. (1997). Therapeutic interaction and dropout: Measuring relational communication in solution-focused therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 173–212. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, M. L., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Before they said “I do”: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 613–626. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00041.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, N. F., & Marziali, E. (1994). The association between global and specific measures of the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 31, 17–27. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.31.1.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., & Cox, G. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 559–564. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtright, J. A., Fairhurst, G. T., & Rogers, L. E. (1989). Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 773–802. doi:10.2307/256568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtright, J. A., Millar, F. E., & Rogers-Millar, L. E. (1979). Domineeringness and dominance: Replication and expansion. Communication Monographs, 46, 179–192. doi:10.1080/03637757909376005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggly, S., & Tzelepis, A. (2001). Relational control in difficult physician-patient encounters: Negotiating treatment for pain. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 323–333. doi:10.1080/108107301317140814Google ScholarPubMed
Eide, H., Quera, V., Graugaard, P., & Finset, A. (2003). Physician-patient dialogue surrounding patients’ expression of concern: Applying sequence analysis to RIAS. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, P. M., & Rogers, L. E. (1973). New procedures for analyzing relational communication. Family Process, 12, 245–267. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1973.00245.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, V., & Rogers, L.E. (2004a). Observing relational communication. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Escudero, V., & Rogers, L. E. (2004b). Analyzing relational communication. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Escudero, V., Rogers, L. E., & Gutierrez, E. (1997). Patterns of relational control and nonverbal affect in clinic and nonclinic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 5–29. doi:10.1177/0265407597141001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T. (2004). Organizational relational control research: Problems and possibilities. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 197–215). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., Green, S., & Courtright, J. (1995). Inertial forces and the implementation of a socio-technical systems approach: A communication study. Organization Science, 6, 168–185. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.2.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1043–1062. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, M. L. (1982). Counseling discourse as a speech event: Revision and extension of the Hill Counselor Verbal Response Category System. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 425–429. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.29.4.425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, M. L. (1993). Does complementarity promote or hinder client change in brief therapy?: A review of the evidence from two theoretical perspectives. The Counseling Psychologist, 21, 457–486. doi:10.1177/0011000093213010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, M. L., Siegel, S. M., & Brenock, K. (1989). Parallel processes in counseling supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 149–157. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (Ed.). (1996). What predicts divorce?: The measures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. The Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 737–745. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003). Observing gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples’ relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflictual interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65–91. doi:10.1300/J082v45n01_04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data: Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherington, L., & Allen, G. J. (1984). Sex and relational communication patterns in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 287–294. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.31.3.287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherington, L., Escudero, V., & Friedlander, M. L. (2005). Couple interaction during problem discussions: Toward an integrative methodology. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 191–207. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0503_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., & Strupp, H. H. (1986). Structural analysis of social behavior: Application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 27–31. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.1.27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interactions: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. L., & Jacob, T. (2000). Sequential interactions in the marital communication of depressed men and women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 4–12. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. W., & Barké, K. H. (1981). Investigation of transactional communication relationship patterns in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 471–480. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. W., & Tracey, J. G. (2003). Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 267–275. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. W., Wettersten, K. B., Mull, H., Moberly, R. L., Merkley, K. B., Corey, A. T. (1998). Relationship formation and relational control as correlates of psychotherapy quality and outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 322–337. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1887). Relational dimensions of interpersonal dynamics. In Roloff, M. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Explorations in interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 117–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Millar, F. E., Rogers, L. E., & Bavelas, J. B. (1984). Identifying patterns of verbal conflict in interpersonal dynamics. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñiz de la Peña, C., Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., and Heatherington, L. (2012). How do therapists ally with adolescents in family therapy? An examination of relational control communication in early sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 339–351. doi:10.1037/a0028063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notarius, C. I., & Markman, H. J. (1981). The Couples Interaction Scoring System. In Filsinger, E. & Lewis, R. (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches (pp. 112–127). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Notarius, C. I., Markman, H. J., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). The Couples Interaction Scoring System: Clinical issue. In Filsinger, E. (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment: A sourcebook for family therapy (pp. 117–136). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
O’Hair, D. (1989). Dimensions of relational communication and control during physician-patient interactions. Health Communication, 1(2), 97–115. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0102_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Weiss, R. L., & Hops, H. (1976). Training of marital skills: Some problems and concepts. In Leitenberg, H. (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy (pp. 242–254). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2000). Quantification strategies in behavioral observation research. In Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 297–315). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Raymond, L., Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., Ellis, M. V., & Sargent, J. (1993). Communication processes in structural family therapy: Case study of an anorexic family. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 308–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.29.4.425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehman, U. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2006). A cross-cultural analysis of the demand-withdraw marital interaction: Observing couples from a developing country. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 755–766. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. E., Castleton, A., & Lloyd, S. A. (1996). Relational control and physical aggression in satisfying marital relationships. In Cahn, D. D. & Lloyd, S. A. (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 218–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222–239. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00270.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roter, D. (1977). Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: The effects of patient question-asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Education Monographs, 5, 281–330. doi:10.1177/109019817700500402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter Interaction Analysis System: Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 243–251. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabourin, T. C. (1995). The role of negative reciprocity in spouse abuse: A relational control analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 271–283. doi:10.1080/00909889509365431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strong, S. R., Hills, H. I., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B. N., Strickland, D., & Meyer, C. W. III (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 798–810. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Tomm, K. (2014). Introducing the IPscope: A systematic assessment tool for distinguishing interpersonal patterns. In Tomm, K., St. George, S., Wulff, D., & Strong, T. (Eds.), Patterns in interpersonal interactions: Inviting relational understandings for therapeutic change (pp. 13–35). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, J. G., Bludworth, J., & Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision: An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49, 330–343. doi:10.1037/a0026246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracey, T. J., & Miars, R. D. (1986). Interpersonal control in psychotherapy: A comparison of two definitions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 585–592. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198607)42:4<585::aid-jclp2270420407>3.0.CO;2-L3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tracey, T. J., & Ray, P. B. (1984). Stages of successful time-limited counseling: An interactional examination. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 13–27. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.1.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. M., Callahan, E. J., Flynn, N., & Williams, J. (1991). Relational control in physician-patient encounters. Health Communication, 3, 17–36. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0301_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Friederichs-Fitzwater, M. M., & Gilgun, J. (2001). Relational control in physician-patient encounters. Health Communication, 13, 75–87. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_07CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wampold, B. E. (1989). Kappa as a measure of pattern in sequential data. Quality and Quantity, 23, 171–187. doi:10.1007/BF00151902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wampold, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In Kratochvill, T. R. & Levin, J. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Watson, K. M. (1982). An analysis of communication patterns: A method for discriminating leader and member roles. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 107–120. doi:10.2307/256027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Wigginton Cecil, D. (1998). Relational control patterns in physician-patient clinical encounters: Continuing the conversation. Health Communication, 10, 125–150. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1002_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R. N., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1985). Two approaches to marital interaction: Relational control patterns in marital types. Communication Monographs, 52, 236–252. doi:10.1080/03637758509376108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, P. J., & Feurer, I. D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events of behaviors. In Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 317–333). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×