Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T09:11:14.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.2 - The Behaviour of Sex Offenders

from Part II - Psychology and Criminal Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

By
Kari Davies ,
Heather Flowe  and
Teresa da Silva
Edited by
Jennifer M. Brown  and
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Jennifer M. Brown
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the types of behaviour seen in sex offending. It covers how behaviour has been used to create typologies of offending, as well as how both internal factors – such as fantasy and offender characteristics, and external factors – such as the number of offenders present and the cultural influence on behaviour – can affect sex offender behaviour. It also explores how behaviour can be conceptualised as a pattern demonstrated across a series of offences, and the factors that can affect the consistency of this behaviour. Finally, this chapter outlines how our understanding of sex offender behaviour can contribute to the investigation, assessment, management, and treatment of sex offenders.

Keywords

BehaviourConsistencySex OffendingSex OffenderSerial Offending
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology , pp. 195 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., & Skinner, L. J. (1980). Aggressive behavior and sex. Psychiatric Clinics, 3, 133–151.Google Scholar
Abel, G. G., & Blanchard, E. B. (1974). The role of fantasy in the treatment of sexual deviation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 467–475.Google Scholar
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of non-incarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25.Google Scholar
Alish, Y., Birger, M., Manor, N., Kertzman, S., Zerzion, M., Kotler, M., & Strous, R. D. (2007). Schizophrenia sex offenders: A clinical and epidemiological comparison study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 459–466.Google Scholar
Alison, L., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., & Ormerod, D. (2002). The personality paradox in offender profiling: A theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, L., McManus, M. A., Giles, S., & Houston, E. (2017). Female sex offenders: An analysis of crime scene behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 3839–3860.Google Scholar
Arndt, W. B., Foehl, J. C., & Good, F. E. (1985). Specific sexual fantasy themes: A multidimensional study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 472–480.Google Scholar
Bamford, J., Chou, S., & Browne, K. D. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the characteristics of multiple perpetrator sexual offences. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 28, 82–94.Google Scholar
Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2008). The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed.). Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Serin, R. C., Amos, N. L., & Preston, D. L. (1994). Comparisons between sexual and nonsexual rapist subtypes: Sexual arousal to rape, offense precursors, and offense characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 95–114.Google Scholar
Bartels, R. M., & Gannon, T. A. (2011). Understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and their correlates. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 16, 551–561.Google Scholar
Beauregard, E., & Proulx, J. (2002). Profiles in the offending process of nonserial sexual murderers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 386–399.Google Scholar
Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Ward, T. (2005). Sexual murderers’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1366–1389.Google Scholar
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bourke, P., Ward, T., & Rose, C. (2012). Expertise and sexual offending: A preliminary empirical model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2391–2414.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 63, 702–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R., Dworkin, E., & Cabral, G. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women’s mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 225–246.Google Scholar
Cann, J., Friendship, C., & Gozna, L. (2007). Assessing crossover in a sample of sexual offenders with multiple victims. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corovic, J., Christianson, S. Å., & Bergman, L. R. (2012). From crime scene actions in stranger rape to prediction of rapist type: Single‐victim or serial rapist? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 764–781.Google Scholar
Criminal Justice and Courts Services Act (2000). Multi-agency public protection arrangements. Home Office. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/43/contentsGoogle Scholar
da Silva, T., Woodhams, J., & Harkins, L. (2014). Heterogeneity within multiple perpetrator rapes: A national comparison of lone, duo, and 3+ perpetrator rapes. Sexual Abuse, 26, 503–522.Google Scholar
Dale, A., Davies, A., & Wei, L. (1997). Developing a typology of rapists’ speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 653–669.Google Scholar
Dandescu, A., & Wolfe, R. (2003). Considerations on fantasy use by child molesters and exhibitionists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 297–305.Google Scholar
Davies, K., Alrajeh, D., & Woodhams, J. (2018). An investigation into the process of comparative case analysis conducted by analysts working in the Serious Crime Analysis Section in the United Kingdom. An official report submitted to the Serious Crime Analysis Section.Google Scholar
Davies, A., & Dale, A. (1996). Locating the stranger rapist. Medicine, Science and the Law, 36, 146–156.Google Scholar
de Heer, B. (2016). A snapshot of serial rape: An investigation of criminal sophistication and use of force on victim injury and severity of the assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 598–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deu, N., & Edelmann, R. J. (1997). The role of criminal fantasy in predatory and opportunistic sex offending. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 18–29.Google Scholar
Eaton, N. R., South, S. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). The Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS) approach to personality and the concept of personality disorder: Integrating clinical and social-cognitive research. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 208–217.Google Scholar
Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freimuth, T. (2002). High risk sexual offenders: The association between sexual paraphilias, fantasies, and psychopathy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0066805Google Scholar
Gannon, T. A., & Cortoni, F. (2010). Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannon, T. A., Waugh, G., Taylor, K., Blanchette, K., O’Connor, A., Blake, E., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2014). Women who sexually offend display three main offense styles: A reexamination of the descriptive model of female sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 26, 207–224.Google Scholar
Gee, D., & Belofastov, A. (2007). Profiling sexual fantasy. In Kocsis, R. (Ed.), Criminal profiling: International theory, research, and practice (pp. 49–71). Humana Press.Google Scholar
Gee, D. G., Devilly, G. J., & Ward, T. (2004). The content of sexual fantasies for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 16, 315–331.Google Scholar
Golge, Z. B., Yavuz, M. F., Mudderrisoglu, S., & Yavuz, M. S. (2003). Turkish university students’ attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 49, 653–661.Google Scholar
Grant, T., & Woodhams, J. (2007). Rape as social activity: An application of investigative linguistics. In Cotterill, J. (Ed.), The language of sexual crime (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greendlinger, V., & Byrne, D. (1987). Coercive sexual fantasies of college men as predictors of self‐reported likelihood to rape and overt sexual aggression. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 1–11.Google Scholar
Greenall, P. V., & West, A. G. (2007). A study of stranger rapists from the English high security hospitals. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 151–167.Google Scholar
Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Groth, A. N., Hobson, W. F., & Gary, T. S. (1982). The child molester: Clinical observations. Journal of Social Work & Human Sexuality, 1, 129–144.Google Scholar
Grubin, D., Kelly, P., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Linking serious sexual assaults through behaviour (Vol. 215). Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/2655606/94jdsq7cw1i8wok.pdf?1425085330=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DLinking_serious_sexual_assaults_through.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, J. (2014, June 26). Jimmy Savile: Timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering. Guardian, www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timelineGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 123–142.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136.Google Scholar
Hauffe, S., & Porter, L. (2009). An interpersonal comparison of lone and group rape offences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 469–491.Google Scholar
Hazelwood, R. R., & Warren, J. (1990). The criminal behavior of the serial rapist. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 59, 11–16. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/fbileb59&id=52&men_tab=srchresultsGoogle Scholar
Hazelwood, R. R., & Warren, J. I. (2004). Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 307–318.Google Scholar
Heil, P., Ahlmeyer, S., & Simons, D. (2003). Crossover sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse, 15, 221–236.Google Scholar
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) & Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of the Crown Prosecution Service (HMICPS) (2012). Forging the links: Rape investigation and prosecution. www.hmic.gov.uk/media/forging-the-links-rape-investigation-andprosecution-20120228.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (2000). Relapse prevention: Assessment and treatment implications. In Laws, D. R., Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 102–122). Sage.Google Scholar
Kaufman, K. L., Wallace, A. M., Johnson, C. F., & Reeder, M. L. (1995). Comparing female and male perpetrators’ modus operandi: Victims’ reports of sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 322–333.Google Scholar
Kendall, D., McElroy, H., & Dale, A. (1999). Developments in offender profiling: The analysis of rapists’ speech. Police Research and Management, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23–52). Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kocsis, R. N., Cooksey, R. W., & Irwin, H. J. (2002). Psychological profiling of offender characteristics from crime behaviors in serial rape offences. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 144–169.Google Scholar
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42495/9241545615_eng.pdf;jsessionid=5D37EA49271C1E280E2255DA0B981D72Google Scholar
Leclerc, B. (2013). New developments in script analysis for situational crime prevention: moving beyond offender scripts. In Leclerc, B. & Wortley, R. (Eds.), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses (pp. 221–236). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclerc, B., Carpentier, J., & Proulx, J. (2006). Strategies adopted by sexual offenders to involve children in sexual activity. In Wortley, R. & Smallbone, S. (Eds.), Situational prevention of child sexual abuse (pp. 251–270). Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496.Google Scholar
Lonsway, K. A., & Archambault, J. (2012). The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: Future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women, 18, 145–168.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, M. J., Snowden, P. R., Wood, P. J. W., & Mills, H. E. (1983). Sadistic fantasy, sadistic behaviour and offending. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 20–29.Google Scholar
Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Eccles, A. (1991). Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martineau, M. M., & Corey, S. (2008). Investigating the reliability of the Violent Crime Linkage Analysis System (ViCLAS) crime report. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 23, 51–60.Google Scholar
Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2000) Adult and adolescent female sex offenders. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11, 75–88.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., & Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look (NCJ155282). The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/ victcost.pdfGoogle Scholar
Miranda, A. O., & Corcoran, C. L. (2000). Comparison of perpetration characteristics between male juvenile and adult sexual offenders: Preliminary results. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 179–188.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.Google Scholar
Morabito, M. S., Pattavina, A., & Williams, L. M. (2019). It all just piles up: Challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processing. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 3151–3170.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. E., & Truman, J. L. (2018). Criminal victimization, 2017 (NCJ 252472). The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: Clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8, 5–21.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2017). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending September 2017. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/ crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2017Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2018). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending September 2018. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/ crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2018#no-change-in-the-most-common-types-ofviolent-crimeGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Schlesinger, L. B., Pinizzotto, A. J., & Davis, E. F. (2008). Serial and single‐victim rapists: Differences in crime‐scene violence, interpersonal involvement, and criminal sophistication. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26, 227–237.Google Scholar
Park, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Group size does matter: Differences among sexual assaults committed by lone, double, and groups of three or more perpetrators. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22, 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Person, E. S., Terestman, N., Myers, W. A., Goldberg, E. L., & Salvadori, C. (1989). Gender differences in sexual behaviors and fantasies in a college population. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 15, 187–198.Google Scholar
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labelling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.Google Scholar
Robertiello, G., & Terry, K. J. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 508–518.Google Scholar
Rossmo, D. K. (1997). Geographic profiling. In Jackson, J. L. & Bekerian, D. A. (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 159–175). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Saad, N. (2018). Harvey Weinstein’s accusers: Full list includes fledgling actresses and Hollywood royalty. www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-weinstein-accuserslist-20171011-htmlstory.htmlGoogle Scholar
Salfati, C. G., & Bateman, A. L. (2005). Serial homicide: An investigation of behavioural consistency. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 121–144.Google Scholar
Sample, L. L., & Bray, T. M. (2006). Are sex offenders different? An examination of rearrest patterns. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santtila, P., Junkkila, J., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2005). Behavioural linking of stranger rapes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 87–103.Google Scholar
Sleath, E., & Woodhams, J. (2014). Expectations about victim and offender behaviour during stranger rape. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 798–820.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (2000). Offence characteristics of psychotic men who sexually assault women. Medicine, Science and the Law, 40, 223–228.Google Scholar
Snook, B., Luther, K., & MacDonald, S. (2014). Linking crimes with spatial behavior: A need to tackle some remaining methodological concerns. In Woodhams, J. & Bennell, C. (Eds.), Crime linkage: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83–106). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sorochinski, M., & Salfati, C. G. (2010). The consistency of inconsistency in serial homicide: Patterns of behavioural change across series. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 109–136.Google Scholar
Studer, L. H., Clelland, S. R., Aylwin, A. S., Reddon, J. R., & Monro, A. (2000). Rethinking risk assessment for incest offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 15–22.Google Scholar
Templeman, T. L., & Stinnett, R. D. (1991). Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a “normal” sample of young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 137–150.Google Scholar
Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225–235.Google Scholar
Vettor, S. L. (2011). Offender profiling: A review, critique, and an investigation of the influence of context, perceptions, and motivations on sexual offending. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Ward, T. (1999). Competency and deficit models in the understanding and treatment of sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 298–305.Google Scholar
Warren, J. I., & Hazelwood, R. R. (2002). Relational patterns associated with sexual sadism: A study of 20 wives and girlfriends. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 75–89.Google Scholar
Warren, J., Hazelwood, R., & Dietz, P. (1996). The sexually sadistic serial killer. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41, 970–974.Google Scholar
Wijkman, M., Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2010). Women don’t do such things! Characteristics of female sex offenders and offender types. Sexual Abuse, 22, 135–156.Google Scholar
Williams, K. S., & Bierie, D. M. (2005). An incident-based comparison of female and male sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 27, 235–257.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D. (1978). The secrets of sexual fantasy. Dent.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., & Bennell, C. (Eds.). (2014). Crime linkage: Theory, research, and practice. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., Hollin, C. R., & Bull, R. (2007). The psychology of linking crimes: A review of the evidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 233–249.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., Hollin, C., & Bull, R. (2008). Incorporating context in linking crimes: An exploratory study of situational similarity and if‐then contingencies. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 1–23.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., Hollin, C. R., Bull, R., & Cooke, C. (2012). Behavior displayed by female victims during rapes committed by lone and multiple perpetrators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 415–452.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., & Komarzynska, K. (2014). The effect of mental disorder on crime scene behavior, its consistency, and variability. In Woodhams, J. & Bennell, C. (Eds.), Crime linkage: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 55–82). CRC Press.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., & Labuschagne, G. N. (2012). South African serial rapists: The offenders, their victims and their offences. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 544–574.Google Scholar
Woodhams, J., & Toye, K. (2007). An empirical test of the assumptions of case linkage and offender profiling with serial commercial robberies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 59–85.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×