Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:13:26.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Reed Stevens ,
Aditya Johri  and
Kevin O’Connor
Edited by
Aditya Johri  and
Barbara M. Olds
Reed Stevens
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Kevin O’Connor
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The focus of our chapter is on current research-based understandings of professional engineering work. We argue for the relevance of these understandings to engineering education. We will also argue, as others have as well (Barley, 2004; Trevelyan, 2007, 2010; Vinck, 2003), that research on professional engineering work is too sparse. Therefore a good part of this chapter is oriented in a programmatic, agenda setting direction.

From the perspective of engineering education, the sparseness of research on professional engineering work is puzzling for a number of reasons. First, engineering education is often reorganized against the backdrop of claims about what professional engineering work is now or will be in the future. Without trustworthy and specific representations of engineering work practice and of the dispositions, skills, and identity orientations of professional engineers, how are engineering educators to know whether engineering education is preparing engineering students to be successful, creative, or impactful engineers? A prominent consensus report from the National Academy of Engineering highlights a “disconnect between engineers in practice and engineers in academe” (National Academy of Engineering [NAE], 2005, pp. 20–21). The report stated that “the great majority of engineering faculty, for example, have no industry experience. Industry representatives point to this disconnect as the reason that engineering students are not adequately prepared, in their view, to enter today's workforce” (National Academy of Engineering [NAE], 2005, pp. 20–21). It is important that a focus on “preparation” of future engineers not be tied to an agenda that solely emphasizes what professional engineering “needs” and economic competitiveness. It also is possible to organize an engineering educational system to prepare recent graduates to be change agents and participants in new social movements within engineering work practice. However, in either case, concrete images of engineering work are critical resources for rethinking engineering education and making empirically based assessments of progress.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , pp. 119 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueireo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L.,…Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education: Centennial Special Issue, 100(1), 48–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S., McGlamery, T.Nathans-Kelley, T., & Nicometo, C. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyang, S. Y. (2004). Engineering: An endless frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. (2004). What we know (and mostly don't know) about technical work. In Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P., & Tolbert, P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. S. (2006, March/April). Offshoring: The next Industrial Revolution? Foreign Affairs, 113–128.
Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007, July/August). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the Web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change.
Bucciarelli, L. (1988). An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 9(3), 59–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. L., & Kuhn, S. (1997). Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit. In Barley, R. & Orr, J. E. (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L. (1992). CAD/CAM saves the nation?: Toward an anthropology of technology. Knowledge and Society, 9, 143–168.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (2004). Knowledge and professional identity in engineering. History and Technology, 20(4), 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C.,…Nichols-Belo, A. (2006). The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faulkner, W. (2008). Nuts and bolts and people. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures: Observations from the field. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2008). “I wish that I belonged more in the whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 103–115.Google Scholar
Friesen, M. (2011). Immigrants’ integration and career development in the professional engineering workplace in the context of social and cultural capital. Engineering Studies, 3(2), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainsburg, J., Rodriguez-Lluesma, C., & Bailey, D. E. (2010). A ‘knowledge profile’ of an engineering occupation: Temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.Google Scholar
Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.Google Scholar
Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (1995). Making space: A comparison of mathematical work at school and in professional design practice. In Star, S. L. (Ed.), Cultures of computing (pp. 118–145). London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hess, D. J., Breyman, S., Campbell, N., & Martin, B. (2007). Science, technology, and social movements. In Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johri, A. (2010). Open organizing: Designing sustainable work practices for the engineering workforce. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 278–286.Google Scholar
Johri, A. (2011). Sociomaterial Bricolage: The creation of location-spanning work practices by global software developers. Information and Software Technology, 53(9), 955–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korte, R., Sheppard, S., & Jordan, W. (2008). A qualitative study of the early work experiences of recent graduates in engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 111–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE) (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (1977). America by design. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K. (2001). Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a geographically distributed situated learning project. Linguistics and Education, 12, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, K. (2003). Communicative practice, cultural production, and situated learning: Constructing and contesting identities of expertise in a heterogeneous learning context. In Wortham, S. & Rymes, B. (Eds.), Linguistic anthropology of education (pp. 63–91). London: Praeger.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K., & Allen, A. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1), 160–175.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K., Bailey, T., Garrison, L., Jones, M., Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H.,…Stevens, R. (2007). Sponsorship: Engineering's tacit gatekeeper. In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Penuel, W., & O’Connor, K. (2010). Learning research as a human science: Old wine in new bottles? National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 268–283.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, D. F. (2006). Shaping the discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 263–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D., Pawley, A., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education. NWSA, 21(2), 21–40.Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. W. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. G., & McIlwee, J. S. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. (2003). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., & Holland, D. (2001). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent's narrative. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, North America. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Smith, T., & Rivkin, J. (2008). A replication tudy of Alan Blinder's “How many US jobs might be offshorable?” Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper (08-104).
Steering Committee of the National Engineering Education Research Colloquies. (2006). Special report: The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. R. (1999). Disciplined perception: Comparing the development of embodied mathematical practices in school and at work. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 1999. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 06A.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. (2000). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In Lampert, M. & Blunk, M. L. (Eds.), (Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., Amos, D.Jocuns, A. & Garrison, L. (2007). Engineering as lifestyle and a meritocracy of difficulty: Two pervasive beliefs among engineering students and their possible effects. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., Garrison, L., & Satwicz, T. (2007). “Mathematics” as a shifting object across the early career of an engineer. Paper presented at Invited Symposium for Education and the Professions Division, AERA, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of the undergraduate curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2005 Association of the Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L. (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(1–2), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevelyan, J. P. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies 2(3), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevelyan, J. P., & Tilli, S. (2007). Published research on engineering work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(4), 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinck, D. (Ed.) (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, R. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Will-Zocholl, M., & Schmiede, R. (2011). Engineers’ work on the move: Challenges in automobile engineering in a globalized world. Engineering Studies 3(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngjin, Y., Lyytinen, K. J., Boland, R. J., & Berente, N. (2010). The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges. A Report on the Research Workshop Digital Challenges in Innovation Research. Retrieved from
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class: Work and politics among American engineers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×