Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:14:14.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Ethics and Community Psychology

from Part I - Foundational Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2021

Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Affiliation:
Long Island University, New York
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we link community psychology values, particularly social justice, to intervention contexts, examining the essential role of ethics in the development and implementation of intervention strategies. We also review the status of ethical guidelines in community-based research. Three factors particularly critical to the development and implementation of successful interventions are whether the intervention is appropriate for the setting, whether the roles of the intervenor and participant are clearly articulated, and whether the intervention itself is sustainable. From these we identify three factors central in assessing any ethical concerns within the community psychology arena: taking the variable features of context into account; ensuring meaningful participant involvement; and addressing the sustainability of interventions.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Community Psychology
Interdisciplinary and Contextual Perspectives
, pp. 70 - 85
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines.pdf.Google Scholar
Bennett, C., Anderson, L., Cooper, S., et al. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health. Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. (2016). “It’s the way that you do it”: Developing an ethical framework for community psychology research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(3–4), 294302. doi.org/10.1007/ajcp.12037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R., & Morris, M. (2017a). Complicating narratives: Defining and deconstructing ethical challenges in community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 491501. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12177Google Scholar
Campbell, R., & Morris, M. (2017b). The stories we tell: Introduction to the special issue on ethical challenges in community psychology research and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 299301. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, E. R., & Langhout, R. (2017). Sensitive topics, missing data, and refusal in social network studies: An ethical examination. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 327335. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12195Google Scholar
Fairweather, G. W. (1967). Methods for experimental social innovation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Fairweather, G. W., & Tornatzky, L. G. (1977). Experimental methods for social policy research. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Foulks, E. F. (1989). Misalliances in the Barrow Alcohol Study. American Indian and Native Alaska Mental Health Research, 2(3), 717. doi.org/10.5820/aian.0203.1989.7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García, M. A., Morse, G. S., Trimble, , et al. (2017). Partnership with the people: Skillful navigation of culture and ethics. In Stewart, S. L., Moodley, R., & Hyatt, A. (Eds.), Indigenous cultures and mental health counseling: Four directions for integration with counselling psychology (pp. 199218). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
García, M. A., & Tehee, M. (Eds.). (2014). Society of Indian Psychologists commentary on the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. www.aiansip.org.Google Scholar
Haarlammert, M., Birman, D., Oberoi, A., & Moore, W. J. (2017). Inside-out: Representational ethics and diverse communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 414423. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12188Google Scholar
Hook, J. N., & Watkins, C.E. Jr. (2015). The cornerstone of positive contact with culturally different individuals and groups? American Psychologist, 70(7), 661662. doi.org/10.1037/a0038965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, K. (Ed.). (2019). Evaluation failures: 22 tales of mistakes made and lessons learned. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Javdani, S., Singh, S., & Sichel, C. E. (2017). Negotiating ethical paradoxes in conducting a randomized controlled trial: Aligning intervention science with participatory values. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 439449. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12185Google Scholar
Julian, D. A., II Smith, T., & Hunt, R. A. (2017). Ethical challenges inherent in the evaluation of an American Indian/Alaskan Native Circles of Care project. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 336345. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kia-Keating, M., Santacrose, D., & Liu, S. (2017). Photography and social media use in community-based participatory research with youth: Ethical considerations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 375384. doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, J. (2002). The spirit of community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 4363. doi.org/10.1023/A:1014368000641Google Scholar
Kesten, S. M., Perez, D. A., Marques, D. S., Evans, S. D., & Sulma, A. (2017). Fight, flight or remain silent? Juggling multiple accountabilities throughout the formative stage of a neighborhood revitalization initiative. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 450458. doi.org/ 10.1002/ajcp.12191Google Scholar
Kloos, B., Hill, J., Thomas, E., et al. (2011). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities. New York: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., et al. (2013, May 21). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Research Center Internet & Technology Report. www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/Google Scholar
Maton, K. (2000). Making a difference: The social ecology of social transformation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 2757. doi.org/10.1023/A:1005190312887Google Scholar
Maton, K. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 421. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9148-6Google Scholar
McDonald, K. E. (2012). “We want respect”: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(4), 263274. doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263Google Scholar
McDonald, K. E., & Keys, C. (2008). How the powerful decide: Access to research participation by those at the margins. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 7993. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9192-xGoogle Scholar
McDonald, K. E., Keys, C. B., & Balcazar, F. E. (2007). Disability, race ethnicity and gender: Themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1–2), 145161. doi.org/10.1007/s10494-007-9094-3Google Scholar
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 623. doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371378. doi.org/10.1037/h0040525CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero, M., & Winkler, M. I. (2014). Iberian and Latin American ethics in community psychology: The contradiction between facts and academician’s perception. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(8), 9971014. doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21667Google Scholar
Mose, G.B., & Gillum, T.L. (2015). Intimate partner violence in African immigrant communities in the United States: Reflections from the IDVAAC African women’s roundtable on domestic violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 25(1), 113. DOI:10.1080/10926771.2016.1090517Google Scholar
Nelson, G., Prilleltensky, I., & MacGillivary, H. (2001). Building value-based partnerships: Toward solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 649677. doi.org/10.1023/A:1010406400101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, P. A. (2007). Using system differences to orchestrate change: A systems-guides intervention model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39(3–4), 393403. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9105-4Google Scholar
Padmavati, R. (2012). Community mental health services for the mentally ill: Practices and ethics. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(5), 504510. doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2012.712953Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I. (2001). Value-based praxis in community psychology: Moving toward social justice and social action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 747778. doi.org/10.1023/A:1010417201918Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I. (2003). Understanding, resisting, and overcoming oppression: Toward psychopolitical validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 195201. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023043108210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privitera, G. J. (2016). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Pullman, M. D., Ague, S., Johnson, T., et al. (2013). Defining engagement in adolescent substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3–4), 347358. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9600-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, M. (1998). Multicultural/multiracial psychology: Mestizo perspectives in personality and mental health. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 125. doi.org/10.1007/BF00896357Google Scholar
Santiago-Rivera, A. I., Morse, G. S., Hunt, A., & Lickers, H. (1998). Building a community-based research partnership: Lessons from the Mohawk Nation of Akwesasne. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(2), 163174. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199803)26:2<163::AID-JCOP5>3.0.CO;2-YGoogle Scholar
Sarason, S. (2004). What we need to know about intervention and interventionists. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3–4), 275277. doi.org/10.1023/b:ajcp.0000027012.08088.dfGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. E., Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). Youth initiated mentoring: Investigating a new approach to working with vulnerable adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(1–2), 155169. doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9585-3Google Scholar
Sonn, A., & Fisher, A. T. (2003). Identity and oppression: Differential responses to an in‐between status. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1–2), 117128. doi.org/10.1023/A:1023030805485Google Scholar
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2019). Strategic prevention framework: Sustainability. Retrieved February 27, 2019 from www.samhsa.gov/capt/applying-strategic-prevention-framework/sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117129. doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0233Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont report. Washington, DC: Office for Human Research Protections.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). Reflections on the Stanford Prison Experiment: Genesis, transformations, and consequences. In Blass, T. (Ed.), Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm (pp. 193237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×