Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:35:45.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - The Hidden Classroom: How Gender Stereotypes Impact Academic Achievement

from Part III - Interventions from Educational and Social/Personality Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Antonya M. Gonzalez ,
Hee Jae Julie Oh  and
Andrew S. Baron
Edited by
Frank C. Worrell ,
Tammy L. Hughes  and
Dante D. Dixson
Frank C. Worrell
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Tammy L. Hughes
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Pittsburgh
Dante D. Dixson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Stereotypes associating math more with men and boys than women and girls have been identified as a contributing factor to women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. Unfortunately, these stereotypes emerge as early as elementary school and begin to shape young girls’ math achievement and interest. This chapter documents the sources both in and outside of the school environment that contribute to the development of these stereotypes and reviews evidence for the relationship between children’s stereotypes and their math achievement. Furthermore, this chapter reviews recent research on interventions to increase young girls’ engagement in math-related fields. Strategies are provided for caregivers and educators to help change stereotypes about math and gender and disrupt the impact of these stereotypes on girls’ behavior.

Keywords

stereotypesprejudicegendersocial cognitionmathematicseducation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology , pp. 295 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambady, N., Paik, S. K., Steele, J., Owen-Smith, A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.003Google Scholar
Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12, 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00371Google Scholar
Baron, A. S. (2015). Constraints on the development of implicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12105Google Scholar
Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.xGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20166Google Scholar
Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107Google Scholar
Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256Google Scholar
Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., et al. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350, 196–198. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7427Google Scholar
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355, 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524Google Scholar
Block, K., Gonzalez, A. M., Choi, C. J. X., Wong, Z. C., & Baron, A. S. (2018). Malleability of children’s implicit gender stereotypes and self-concept. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Bottía, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Parker, A. D. (2015). The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM major in college. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–46.Google Scholar
Cao, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2016). The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 113, 7475–7480. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524268113Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57, 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0296-xGoogle Scholar
College Board. (2016). 2016 College-bound seniors: Total group profile. Retrieved from https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/sat/total-group-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Common Core Standards Initiative. (2016). Common core standards for mathematics. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347Google Scholar
Cvencek, D., Kapur, M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) Math achievement, stereotypes, and math self-concept among elementary-school students in Singapore. Learning and Instruction, 39, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.04.002Google Scholar
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.xGoogle Scholar
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kapur, M. (2014). Cognitive consistency and math–gender stereotypes in Singaporean children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.018Google Scholar
Danaher, K., & Crandall, C. S. (2008). Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1639–1655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00362.xGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237644Google Scholar
De Cohen, C. C., & Deterding, N. (2009), Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01020.xGoogle Scholar
Del Río, M. F., & Strasser, K. (2013). Preschool children’s beliefs about gender differences in academic skills. Sex Roles, 68, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0195-6Google Scholar
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Carey, S. (2011). Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82, 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01577.xGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Steffens, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. (2011). Understanding women’s achievement choices: Looking back and looking forward. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414829Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.26Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1086/494229Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415616201Google Scholar
Economics and Statistics Administration. (2017). STEM jobs: 2017 update. Retrieved from www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/reports/stem-jobs-2017-update.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fong, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2014). Math placement: The importance of getting it right for all students. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.Google Scholar
Galdi, S., Cadinu, M., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls’ math performance. Child Development, 85, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12128Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. M., Dunlop, W., & Baron, A. S. (2017). Malleability of implicit associations across development. Developmental Science, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12481Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. M., Steele, J. R., & Baron, A. S. (2017). Reducing children’s implicit racial bias through exposure to positive outgroup exemplars. Child Development, 88, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12582Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2Google Scholar
Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013834Google Scholar
Keller, C. (2001). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600544Google Scholar
Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.xGoogle Scholar
Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254Google Scholar
Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26, 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615592630Google Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061Google Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Social group membership increases STEM engagement among preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 53, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000195Google Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013Google Scholar
McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2010). Technology and young children: How 4–7 year olds perceive their own use of computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.002Google Scholar
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar
Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 747–759 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014 (NSB document No. 14–01). Arlington VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering 2017 special report (NSF document no. 17–310). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Nürnberger, M., Nerb, J., Schmitz, F., Keller, J., & Sütterlin, S. (2015). Implicit gender stereotypes and essentialist beliefs predict preservice teachers’ tracking recommendations. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1027807Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. Paris: Programme for International Student Assessment, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-enGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128973Google Scholar
Passolunghi, M. C., Rueda Ferreira, T. I., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). Math–gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 3470–3476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.005Google Scholar
Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2011). Development of racial, ethnic, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82, 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01668.xGoogle Scholar
Régner, I., Steele, J. R., Ambady, N., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Huguet, P. (2014). Our future scientists: A review of stereotype threat in girls from early elementary school to middle school. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27, 13–51.Google Scholar
Schmader, T., Forbes, C. E., Zhang, S., & Mendes, W. B. (2009). A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208330450Google Scholar
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440Google Scholar
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0Google Scholar
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336Google Scholar
Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., Prescott, A., & Pieper, K. (2012). Career selection: Role of parent’s profession, mass media and personal choice. An executive report. Los Angeles, CA: Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2011). Education in Canada: Attainment, field of study and location of study (NHS publication No. 99–012-X2011001). Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Stearns, E., Bottía, M. C., Davalos, E., et al. (2016). Demographic characteristics of high school math and science teachers and girls’ success in STEM. Social Problems, 63, 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv027Google Scholar
Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019920Google Scholar
Stricker, L. J., & Ward, W. C. (2004). Stereotype threat, inquiring about test takers’ ethnicity and gender, and standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02564.xGoogle Scholar
Supekar, K., Iuculano, T., Chen, L., & Menon, V. (2015). Remediation of childhood math anxiety and associated neural circuits through cognitive training. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 12574–12583. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-15.2015Google Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144Google Scholar
Tomasetto, C., Alparone, F. R., & Cadinu, M. (2011). Girls’ math performance under stereotype threat: The moderating role of mothers’ gender stereotypes. Developmental Psychology, 47, 943–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024047Google Scholar
Valla, J. M., & Williams, W. M. (2012). Increasing achievement and higher-education representation of underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A review of current K-12 intervention programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 18, 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMInorScienEng.2012002908Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×