Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:46:28.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Applied Research in Diverse Communities: Ethical Issues and Considerations

from Section II - Ethical Issues in Working with Diverse Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2018

By
Justin C. Perry  and
Adam M. Voight
Edited by
Mark M. Leach  and
Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel
Mark M. Leach
Affiliation:
University of Louisville, Kentucky
Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Applied Psychological Ethics , pp. 340 - 365
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ball, J. & Janyst, P. (2008). Enacting research ethics in partnerships with indigenous communities in Canada: “Do it in a good way.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3, 33–51.Google Scholar
Bond, L. A. & Hauf, A. M. C. (2007). Community-based collaboration: An overarching best practice in prevention. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buki, L. P. (2014). The relevance of counseling psychology in addressing major social issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 42, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desimone, L M. & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 1–22.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A. & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.Google Scholar
Maiter, S., Simich, L., Jacobson, N., & Wise, J. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6, 305–325.Google Scholar
Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 462–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 684–697.Google Scholar
Nation, M., Bess, K., Voight, A., Perkins, D. D., & Juarez, P. (2011). Levels of community engagement in youth violence prevention: The role of power in sustaining successful university-community partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, J. C., Cusner, A., & Pickett, L. L. (2015). Fostering adolescent work and career readiness. In Juntunen, C. & Schwartz, J. (Eds.), Counseling across the lifespan: Prevention and treatment (2nd edn., pp. 147–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Perry, J. C., Wallace, E. W., & Pickett, L. L. (2017). Underserved urban community interventions. In Jackson, M., Casas, M., Suzuki, L., & Alexander, C. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (4th edn., pp. 456–471). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roos, V., Visser, M., Pistorius, A., & Nefale, M. (2007). Ethics and community psychology. In Duncan, N., Bowman, B., Roos, V., Pillay, J., & Naidoo, A. (Eds.), Community psychology: Analysis, context, and action (pp. 392–407). Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1, 80–95.Google Scholar
Serrano-Garcia, I. (1994). The ethics of the powerful and the power of ethics. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, N. (2006). Re-conceptualizing the Belmont Report: A community-based participatory research perspective. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silka, L., Cleghorn, G. D., Grullón, M., & Tellez, T. (2008). Creating community-based participatory research in a diverse community: A case study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3, 5–16.Google Scholar
Smith, L., Rosenzweig, L., & Schmidt, M. (2010). Best practices in the reporting of participatory action research: Embracing both the forest and the trees. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 1115–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sue, D. W., Arredondo, P., & McDavis, R. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htmlGoogle Scholar
Zins, J. & Elias, M. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 233–255.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×