Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Economics of Antitrust-IP
- Part II Institutional Design: Country Overviews
- Part III Monopolization
- Part IV Competitor Collaboration
- 16 Drug Patent Settlements
- 17 Copyright Licensing and the EU Digital Single Market Strategy
- 18 Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing
- Part V Vertical Relations
- Part VI Mergers in High Technology
- Index
- References
18 - Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing
from Part IV - Competitor Collaboration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Economics of Antitrust-IP
- Part II Institutional Design: Country Overviews
- Part III Monopolization
- Part IV Competitor Collaboration
- 16 Drug Patent Settlements
- 17 Copyright Licensing and the EU Digital Single Market Strategy
- 18 Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing
- Part V Vertical Relations
- Part VI Mergers in High Technology
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Areeda, Phillip E. and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2010. Antitrust Law, Vol. 7, New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Baron, Justus and Delcamp, Henry. 2015. The Strategies of Patent Introduction into Patent Pools. Economics of Innovation and New Tech, 24, 776.Google Scholar
Baron, Justus and Pohlmann, Tim. 2015. The Effect of Patent Pools on Patenting and Innovation – Evidence from Contemporary Technology Standards (Northwestern Univ. Working paper, 2015), available at www.law.northwestern.edu/research-faculty/searlecenter/innovationeconomics/documents/Baron_Pohlmann_effect_of_patents.pdf.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Christina and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2011. Concerted Refusals to License Intellectual Property Rights. Harv. Bus. L. Rev. Bull., 1, 21.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Christina and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2012. Creation Without Restraint: Promoting Liberty and Rivalry in Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Jay Pil and Gerlach, Heiko. 2013. Patent Pools, Litigation and Innovation (Cesifo Working Paper, Oct. 24). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2344689.Google Scholar
Dequiedt, Vianney and Versaevel, Bruno. 2013. Patent Pools and Dynamic R&D Incentives. Int’l Rev. L. & Econ., 36, 59.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. 2004. Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 3.Google Scholar
Greene, Hillary. 2010. Patent Pooling Behind the Veil of Uncertainty: Antitrust, Competition Policy, and the Vaccine Industry. B.U. L. Rev., 90, 1397.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. and Eisenberg, Rebecca S.. 1998. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Sci., 280, 698.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Erik N. and Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2015. Tying Arrangements. In Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2010. Harvard, Chicago and Transaction Costs Economics in Antitrust Analysis. Antitrust Bull., 55, 613.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2015a. Antitrust and the Patent System: A Reexamination, OSU L.J., 76, 467.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2015b. Federal Antitrust Policy: the Law of Competition and its Practice (5th edn.). St. Paul, MN: West Academic.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark D., Lemley, Mark A., Leslie, Christopher R., and Carrier, Michael A. 2015. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lampe, Ryan and Moser, Petra. 2010. Do Patent Pools Encourage Innovation? Evidence from the 19th-Century Sewing Machine Industry. J. Econ. Hist., 70, 898.Google Scholar
Lampe, Ryan and Moser, Petra. 2013. Patent Pools and Innovation in Substitutes – Evidence from the 19th-Century Sewing Industry. RAND J. Econ., 44, 757.Google Scholar
Lampe, Ryan and Moser, Petra. 2016. Patent Pools, Competition, and Innovation – Evidence from 20 United States Industries under the New Deal. J. L. Econ. & Organ., 32, 1.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. 1997. The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law. Tex. L. Rev., 75, 993.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. 2002. Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations. Calif. L. Rev., 90, 1889.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. and Shapiro, Carl. 2007. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking. Tex. L. Rev., 85, 2163.Google Scholar
Lerner, Josh, Strojwas, Marcin, and Tirole, Jean. 2007. The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules. Rand J. Econ., 38, 610.Google Scholar
Mattioli, Michael. 2014. Power and Governance in Patent Pools. Harv. J.L. & Tech., 27, 421.Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P. 1996. Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations. Cal. L. Rev., 84, 1293.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2011. The Rise and Fall of the First American Patent Thicket: The Sewing Machine War of the 1850s. Ariz. L. Rev., 53, 1654.Google Scholar
Muller, Florian. 2014. Analysis of 222 Smartphone Patent Assertions. Available at www.fosspatents.com/2014/10/analysis-of-222-smartphone-patent.html.Google Scholar
Orr, Justin R. 2013. Patent Aggregation: Models, Harms, and the Limited Role of Antitrust. Berkeley Tech. L. J., 28, 525.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santore, Rudy, McKee, Michael, and Bjornstad, David. 2010. Patent Pools as a Solution to Efficient Licensing of Complementary Patents? Some Experimental Evidence. J.L. & Econ., 53, 167.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 2001. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting. In Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, Daniel G. and Baumol, William J.. 2005. Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power. Antitrust L.J., 73, 1.Google Scholar
US Dep’t of Justice and FTC. 2007. Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by