Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:55:56.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Transformation of Northern Agriculture, 1910–1990

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Alan Olmstead
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Paul Rhode
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stanley L. Engerman
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Robert E. Gallman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

American farms and farmers ”ain’t what they used to be.” To start with, there are not so many of them. In 1910, 32 million people, comprising 35 percent of the nation’s population, lived on 6.4 million farms. By 1990 only 1.8 percent of the U.S. population (4.6 million people), remained on America’s 2.1 million farms. Although dwindling in numbers, the remaining farm work force is highly productive; in 1990, the typical farm worker produced fifteen times as much as his counterpart in 1910. Over this period, the differences between farmers and non-farmers have diminished, so it is now difficult even to define either the farm sector or who is a farmer. Today one-half of people who work on northern farms do not live on farms, and one-half of the people who live on farms work off farms. In 1989 the average income per northern farm was $46,500; but 51 percent came from non-farm sources and another 12 percent from government payments.

Powerful forces have reshaped northern agriculture. Mechanical and biological innovations dramatically increased farm productivity and changed the nature of farm work. The transportation and communication revolutions integrated the farm with the rest of society. The growth in non-farm wages put enormous pressure on agricultural labor markets. And twenty years of depression forged a new farm policy. In 1910 northern agriculture closely approximated the competitive ideal; today it is a highly regulated industry. Federal programs originally justified as emergency measures have proven very difficult to end as Jefferson’s once resourceful farmers have become dependent on government handouts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, Samuel R. et al., Modern Corn Production, 3rd ed. (Champaign, 1986).Google Scholar
Anderson, Kym and Hayami, Yujiro, The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection (Sydney, 1986)Google Scholar
Antle, John M., “The Structure of US Agricultural Technology, 1910–78,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumel, C. Phillip et al., “Alternatives for Solving the Local Rural Road and Bridge Problem” both in Gillis, William R., ed., Profitability and Mobility in Rural America (University Park, PA, 1989).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Murray R., Farm Policies of the United States, 1790–1950: A Study of Their Origins and Development (New York, 1953)Google Scholar
Binswanger, Hans P., “The Measurement of Technical Change Biases with Many Factors of Production,” American Economic Review 64 (1974)Google Scholar
Bond, J. J. and Umberger, D. E., Technical and Economic Causes of Productivity Changes in US Wheat Production, 1949—76, USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1598 (Washington, D.C., 1979)Google Scholar
Bonnen, James T. and Browne, William P., “Why is Agricultural Policy So Difficult to Reform,” in Kramer, Carol S., ed., The Political Economy of U.S. Agriculture: Challenges for the 1990s (Washington, D.C., 1989).Google Scholar
Brodell, A. P. and Ewing, J. A., Use of Tractor Power, Animal Power, and Hand Methods in Crop Production, U.S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Farm Management Report FM-69 (Washington, D.C., 1948)Google Scholar
Brodell, A. P. et al., Harvesting Small Grains and Soybeans and Methods of Storing Straw, U.S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Farm Management Report FM-91 (Washington, D.C., 1952)Google Scholar
Brooks, R. Charles, “Structure and Performance of the US Broiler Industry,” Farm Structure: A Historical Perspective on Changes in the Number and Size of Farms, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, 96th Cong., 2d sess. (Washington, D.C., 1980).Google Scholar
Brown, D. Clayton, Electricity for Rural America: The Fight for the REA, Contributions in Economics and Economic History No. 29 (Westport, CT, 1980)Google Scholar
CarterGardiner, (1988) and Gardner, Bruce L., “Changing Economic Perspectives on the Farm Problem,” Journal of Economic Literature 30 (1992).Google Scholar
Carter, Colin A. and Gardiner, Walter H., Elasticities in International Agricultural Trade (Boulder, 1988).Google Scholar
Cochrane, Willard W., The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis (Minneapolis, 1979).Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Dana G., Development and Spread of Semi-Dwarf Varieties of Wheat and Rice in the United States, USDA Agricultural Economic Report No. 455 (Washington, D.C., 1980).Google Scholar
David, Paul A., “The Mechanization of Reaping in the Ante-Bellum Midwest,” in Rosovsky, Henry, ed., Industrialization in Two Systems: Essays in Honor of Alexander Gerschenkron (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
de Hevesy, Paul, World Wheat Planning and Economic Planning in General (London, 1940)Google Scholar
Dupree, A. Hunter, Science in the Federal Government: A History of Policies and Activities to 1940 (Cambridge, MA, 1957).Google Scholar
Edwards, Clive A., et al., Sustainable Agricultural Systems (Ankeny, IA, 1990)Google Scholar
Elwood, Robert E., Lewis, Arthyr A., and Strubel, Ronald A., Changes in Technology and Labor Requirements in Livestock Production, Works Progress Administration, National Research Project, WPA Report No. A-14 (Washington, D.C., 1941)Google Scholar
Ensminger, M. E., Animal Science, 7th ed. (Danville, IL, 1977)Google Scholar
Evenson, Robert et al., “Economic Benefits from Research: An Example from Agriculture,” Science 205 (Sep. 14, 1979)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, Deborah, The Business of Breeding: Hybrid Corn in Illinois 1890–1940 (Ithaca, 1990)Google Scholar
Fox, Austin, The Demand for Farm Tractors in The United States: A Regression Analysis, U.S. Agricultural Economic Report No. 103 (Washington, D.C., 1962)Google Scholar
Funk, W. C., What the Farm Contributes Directly to the Farmer’s Living, USDA Farmers’ Bull. No. 635 (1914)Google Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L., “Causes of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs,” Journal of Political Economy 95 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L., “Why, How, and Consequences of Agricultural Policies: United States,” in Agricultural Protectionism in the Industrialized World, Sanderson, Fred H., ed., (Washington D.C., 1990).Google Scholar
Gray, R. B., Development of the Agricultural Tractor in the United States, USDA Information Series No. 107 (Beltsville, MD, 1954)Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, “Hybrid Corn: An Explanation of the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica 25 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, “Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations,” Journal of Political Economy 66 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadwiger, Don F. and Cochran, Clay, “Rural Telephones in the United States,” Agricultural History 58 (1984).Google Scholar
Hamilton, David E., From New Day to New Deal: American Farm Policy From Hoover to Roosevelt, 1928–33 (Chapel Hill, 1991).Google Scholar
Hasselbrook, Chuck and Hegyes, Gabriel, Choices for the Heartland: Alternative Directions in Biotechnology and Implications for Family Farming, Rural Community, and the Environment (Ames, 1989)Google Scholar
Hayami, Yujiro and Ruttan, Vernon W., Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, revised and expanded ed. (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
Hightower, Jim, Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times (Cambridge, MA, 1978).Google Scholar
Hillman, Jimmye S., “Policy Issues Relevant to United States Agricultural Trade,” in McCalla, Alex F. and Josling, Timothy E., Imperfect Markets in Agricultural Trade (Montclair, 1981)Google Scholar
Huffman, Wallace and Evenson, Robert, Science for Agriculture: A Long Term Perspective (Ames, 1993).Google Scholar
Johnson, William H. and Lamp, Benson J., Principles, Equipment and Systems for Corn Harvesting (Wooster, OH: Agricultural Consulting Associates, 1966)Google Scholar
Knapp, Joseph G., The Advance of American Cooperative Enterprise, 1920–1945 (Danville, 1973)Google Scholar
Linden, Peter H., “Historical Patterns in Agricultural Policy,” in Timmer, C. Peter, ed., Agriculture and the State (Ithaca, 1991).Google Scholar
Luttrell, Clifton B., The High Cost of Farm Welfare (Washington D.C., 1989)Google Scholar
Malenbaum, Wilfred, The World Wheat Economy, 1885—1939 (Cambridge, MA, 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manglesdorf, Paul G., “Hybrid Corn,” Scientific American 185 (1951)Google Scholar
Markham, Jesse W., The Fertilizer Industry: Study of An Imperfect Market (Nashville, 1958)Google Scholar
Masucci, Robert H., “Regional Differences in Per Capita Farm and Nonfarm Income,” Agricultural Economics Research 12 (1960).Google Scholar
Nelson, Donald L., “Extension Involvement in Rural Transportation,” both in Gillis, William R., ed., Profitability and Mobility in Rural America (University Park, PA, 1989).Google Scholar
Newbery, David M. G. and Stiglitz, Joseph E., The Theory of Commodity Price Stabilization: A Study in the Economics of Risk (New York, 1981)Google Scholar
Olmstead, Alan L. and Rhode, Paul, “Induced Innovation in American Agriculture: A Reconsideration,” Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA, 1965)Google Scholar
O’Mary, Clayton C. and Dyer, Irwin A., Commerical Beef Cattle Production, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia, 1978).Google Scholar
Parker, William, “Agriculture,” in Davis, Lance E. et al., American Economic Growth: An Economist’s Histroy of the United States, (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Persley, J., Beyond Mendel’s Garden: Biotechnology in the Services of World Agriculture (Wallingford, England, 1990)Google Scholar
Quick, Graeme and Buchele, Wesley, The Grain Harvesters (St. Joseph, MI, 1978).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Wayne D., “Advances in American Agriculture: The Mechanical Tomato-Harvester as a Case Study,” Technology and Culture 9 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Wayne and Baker, Gladys L., Price-Support and Adjustment Programs from 1933 through 1978: A Short History, U.S. Economic Research Service (Washington, D.C., 1979)Google Scholar
Reganold, John P. et al., “Sustainable Agriculture,” Scientific American 262 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. (New York, 1983)Google Scholar
Russel, Darrell A. and Williams, Gerald G., “History of Chemical Fertilizer Development,” Soil Science Society of America Journal 41 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saloutos, Theodore, The Farmer and the New Deal (Ames, 1982).Google Scholar
Schaller, N. (compiler), Proceedings of Phase I Workshop, Social Science Agricultural Agenda Project (Minneapolis: Spring Hill Conference Center, June 9–11, 1987).Google Scholar
Schedvin, C. B., Australia and the Great Depression: A Study of Economic Development and Policy in the 1920s and 1930s (Sydney, 1970)Google Scholar
Schertz, Lyle P. and others, Another Revolution in U.S. Farming? (Washington, D.C., 1979)Google Scholar
Schmidt, G. H., Van Vleck, L. D., and Hutjens, M. F., Principles of Dairy Science, 2nd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, 1988)Google Scholar
Schultze, Charles L., The Distribution of Farm Subsidies: Who Gets the Benefits? (Washington, D.C., 1971).Google Scholar
Shideler, James H., Farm Crisis, 1919–1923 (Berkeley, 1957)Google Scholar
Sundquist, W. Burt et al., A Technology Assessment of Commercial Corn Production in the United States, Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. No. 546 (St. Paul, 1982)Google Scholar
Tracy, Michael, Government and Agriculture in Western Europe, 1880–1988, 3rd ed. (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
,U.S. Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Farm Income Situation, FIS-142 (1949)
,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Agriculture: 1945, II, General Report (Washington, D.C., 1947).
,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Agriculture: 1950, II, General Report (Washington, D.C., 1952)
,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington, D.C., 1992)
,U.S. Bureau of the Census, Rural and Rural Farm Population 1987, CPR Series P-27 No. 61 (Washington, D.C., 1988)
,U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, An Assessment of the United States Food and Agricultural Research System (Washington, D.C., 1981).
,U.S. Economic Research Service, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector, 1988, Production and Efficiency Statistics, ECIFS 8–5 (Washington, DC, 1990).
,U.S. Economic Research Service, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: National Financial Summary, 1989, ECIFS 9–2 (Washington, D.C., 1991).
,U.S. Economic Research Service, Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1989
,U.S. Economic Research Service, Embargoes, Surplus Disposal, and U.S. Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 564 (Washington, D.C., 1986)
,U.S. Office of Technology Assessment, Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, OTA-F-285 (Washington, D.C., 1986)
,USDAYearbook, 1922 (Washington, D.C., 1923).
,USDA, 1919 Yearbook (Washington, D.C., 1920).
,USDA, 1936 Yearbook of Agriculture (Washington, D.C., 1936)
,USDA, Agricultural Resources: Inputs: Situation and Outlook, AR-15 (Washington, D.C., 1989).
,USDA, Agricultural Statistics 1967 (Washington, D.C., 1967)
,USDA, Agricultural Statistics 1984 (Washington, D.C., 1984)
,USDA, Rural Lines USA, Misc. Publ. No. 811 (Washington, D.C., 1960).
,USDA, Year book of Agriculture, 1943—1947: Science in Farming (Washington, D.C., 1947)
Wik, Reynold M., “The Radio in Rural America During the 1920s,” Agricultural History 55 (1981)Google Scholar
Williams, Robert C., Fordson, Farmall, and Poppin’ Johnny: A History of the Farm Tractor and Its Impact on America (Urbana, 1987).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×