Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T14:18:14.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Nuns

from Part II - Structure and materiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Mette Birkedal Bruun
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

What do we mean when we refer to a medieval Cistercian nun? How many houses of Cistercian nuns were there in the Middle Ages? The answers to these questions are not clear-cut. Ever since the nineteenth century, when Leopold Janauschek produced his influential listing of Cistercian abbeys, the study of medieval Cistercian nuns has been a study of inconsistencies, confusions and omissions. Janauschek intended to produce a survey of Cistercian women’s houses but, in fact, never published this work. His influential Originum Cisterciensium therefore includes male abbeys only, and thereby paved the way for a modern scholarly tradition which tended to treat medieval Cistercian nuns as peripheral players in the wider Cistercian story. One of the great editorial projects of twentieth-century Cistercian scholarship, Canivez’s publication of the General Chapter’s statutes, had the unintended consequence of confusing the study of Cistercian nuns even further. Many Cistercian nunneries are absent from the statutes, despite having existed for centuries. With modern scholars paying such close attention to the statutes, and with the statutes referring rarely or never to a certain female house, for many years it was easy to believe that the Cistercian Order’s approach to the religious lives of women was one of neglect (at best) or suspicion and rejection (at worst). The first statute reference to nuns being ‘incorporated’ (formally accepted into the Order) was in 1213. Despite the fact that the 1213 statute refers to nuns ‘already’ incorporated, the inference has often been drawn that the Order refused to admit women as members until the early thirteenth century. Likewise, the statutes for 1228 state that no monasteries of nuns were to be built in the name or under the jurisdiction of the Order, nor were female houses to be united to the Order. The same statute mentions that nuns were free to emulate Cistercian customs, but that the General Chapter would take no responsibility for their spiritual care or visitation. For many scholars, this statute seemed to sum up perfectly an Order which, in its foundational medieval period, was reluctant to include nuns within its fold.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Janauschek, L., Originum Cisterciensium Tomus i (Vienna, 1877)
Smith, D.M. (ed.), English Episcopal Acta i (London, 1980)
Idung of Prüfening, ‘A Dialogue between Two Monks’, in J. O’Sullivan et al. (trans.), Cistercians and Cluniacs: The Case for Cîteaux, CF 33 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1977)
Berman, C.H. (trans.), Women and Monasticism in Medieval Europe: Sisters and Patrons of the Cistercian Reform (Kalamazoo, MI, 2002)
Elder, E.R. (ed.), The New Monastery: Texts and Studies on the Earliest Cistercians, CF 60 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1998)
Guignard, P. (ed.), Les monuments primitifs de la règle cistercienne, publiés d’après les manucrits de l’ abbaye de Cîteaux (Dijon, 1878)
Connor, E., ‘The Royal Abbey of Las Huelgas and the Jurisdiction of Its Abbesses’, Cistercian Studies, 23 (1988), 128–55Google Scholar
Hinnebusch, J.F. (ed.), The Historia Occidentalis of Jacques de Vitry (Fribourg, 1972)
Lucet, B. (ed.), La codification cistercienne de 1202 et son évolution ultérieure (Rome, 1964)
France, J., Medieval Images of Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, CS 210 (Kalamazoo, MI, 2007)Google Scholar
De Ganck, R. and Hasbrouck, J.B. (trans.), The Life of Beatrice of Nazareth, 1220–1268, CF 50 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1991)Google Scholar
Lewis, G.J. and Lewis, J. (trans.), Gertrude the Great of Helfta: Spiritual Exercises, CF 49 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1989)Google Scholar
Barratt, A., The Herald of God’s Loving-Kindness, Books 1 and 2, CF 35 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1991)Google Scholar
Barratt, A., The Herald of God’s Loving-Kindness, Book 3, CF 63 (Kalamazoo, MI, 1999)Google Scholar
Harrison, A., ‘“I Am Wholly Your Own”: Liturgical Piety and Community among the Nuns of Helfta’, Church History, 78 (2009), 549–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartal, R., ‘“Where Has Your Beloved Gone?”: The Staging of the Quarere Deum on the Murals of the Cistercian Convent of Chełmno’, Word and Image, 16 (2000), 270–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, A., ‘Une forme ancienne du Rosaire au moyen âge chez les Cisterciennes de Saint-Thomas-sur-Kyll’, Collectanea Cisterciensia, 66 (2004), 140–52Google Scholar
Waddell, C., ‘The Vidi aquam and the Easter Morning Procession: Pages from the Prayerbook of a Fifteenth-Century Cistercian Nun’, Liturgy O.C.S.O., 21:3 (1987), 3–56Google Scholar
Griesser, B., ‘Registrum Epistolarum Stephani de Lexinton abbatis de Stanlegia et de Savigniaco. Pars Altera’, ASOC, 8 (1952), 181–378Google Scholar
Cawley, M. (trans.), Send Me God: The Lives of Ida the Compassionate of Nivelles, Nun of La Ramée, Arnulf, Lay Brother of Villers, and Abundus, Monk of Villers (Turnhout, 2003)CrossRef
Freeman, E., ‘A Cistercian Monk Writes to a Cistercian Nun: John Godard’s Treatise for the Abbess of Tarrant, England, c.1250’, CSQ, 45 (2010), 331–51Google Scholar
Mikkers, E., ‘Deux lettres inédites de Thomas, chantre de Villers’, COCR, 10 (1948), 161–73Google Scholar
Griesser, B., ‘Engelhard von Langheim und sein Exempelbuch für die Nonnen von Wechterswinkel’, Cistercienser Chronik, 70 (1963), 55–73Google Scholar
Meyer, P., ‘Bribes de littérature anglo-normande’, Jahrbuch für romanische und englische Literatur, 7 (1866), 37–57Google Scholar
Jordan, E., ‘Patronage, Prayers and Polders: Assessing Cistercian Foundations in Thirteenth-Century Flanders and Hainaut’, Cîteaux, 53 (2002), 99–125Google Scholar
Berman, C.H., ‘New Light on the Economic Practices of Cistercian Women’s Communities’, Medieval Feminist Forum, 41 (2006), 75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Nuns
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Nuns
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Nuns
  • Edited by Mette Birkedal Bruun, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Cistercian Order
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9780511735899.011
Available formats
×