Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:29:21.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Violence in the name of human rights

from Part II - Interconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Simon Chesterman
Edited by
Conor Gearty  and
Costas Douzinas
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Three months after NATO concluded its seventy-eight-day campaign over Kosovo, Secretary-General Kofi Annan presented his annual report for 1999 to the UN General Assembly. In it, he presented in stark terms the dilemma confronting those who privileged international law over the need to respond to gross and systematic violations of human rights:

To those for whom the greatest threat to the future of international order is the use of force in the absence of a Security Council mandate, one might ask – not in the context of Kosovo – but in the context of Rwanda: If, in those dark days and hours leading up to the genocide, a coalition of States had been prepared to act in defense of the Tutsi population, but did not receive prompt Council authorization, should such a coalition have stood aside and allowed the horror to unfold?

The hypothetical presented here neatly captured the ethical dilemma as many of the acting states sought to present it. Could international law truly prevent such ‘humanitarian’ intervention?

The problem, however, is that this was not the dilemma faced in the context of Rwanda. Rather than international law restraining a state from acting in defence of the Tutsi population, the problem in 1994 was that no state wanted to intervene at all. When France, hardly a disinterested actor, decided to intervene, its decision was swiftly approved in a Council resolution (though reference to ‘impartiality’, a two-month time-limit and five abstentions suggested wariness about France’s motivation).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 134 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, A. J., Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities (Cambridge: Polity, 2009)Google Scholar
Chesterman, S., Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law, Oxford Monographs in International Law (Oxford University Press 2001)Google Scholar
Evans, G., The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution 2008)Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, R. O. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge University Press 2003)CrossRef
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre December 2001)
Lillich, R. B. (ed.), Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia 1973)
Orford, A., Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orford, A.International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, J., Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? (Oxford University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, F. R., Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, 2nd edn (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers 1997)Google Scholar
Wheeler, N., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford University Press 2000)Google Scholar
Chesterman, S., Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law, Oxford Monographs in International Law (Oxford University Press 2001)Google Scholar
Haas, P. M., Hird, J. A. and McBratney, B. (eds.), Controversies in Globalization: Contending Approaches to International Relations (Washington, DC: CQ Press 2009) 188–99.
Annan, K. A., Address to the General Assembly (UN, UN Press Release SG/SM/7136, New York, 20 September 1999)Google Scholar
ICISS, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottowa: International Development Research Centre December 2001)Google Scholar
D’Amato, A., ‘The Invasion of Panama was a Lawful Response to Tyranny’ (1990) 84 American Journal of International Law520.Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, F., Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, 3rd edn (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers 2005)Google Scholar
Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report (Oxford University Press 2000) 4.Google Scholar
Rubin, J., ‘Countdown to a Very Personal War’, Financial Times (London), 30 September 2000Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Thoughts on Kind-Hearted Gunmen’, in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia 1973) 146.Google Scholar
Chesterman, S., ‘“Leading from Behind”: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya’ (2011) 25 Ethics & International Affairs279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R. A., ‘The United Nations and the Rule of Law’ (1994) 4 Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems628Google Scholar
Evans, M., ‘Conflict Opens “Way to New International Community”: Blair’s Mission’, The Times, 23 April 1999

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×