Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Catullus
- The Cambridge Companion to Catullus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Situating Catullus
- Chapter 2 Literary Liaisons
- Chapter 3 Catullan Intertextuality
- Chapter 4 Gender and Sexuality
- Chapter 5 Catullan Themes
- Chapter 6 Language and Style
- Chapter 7 Catullus and Metre
- Chapter 8 Catulli Carmina
- Chapter 9 Catullus and Augustan Poetry
- Chapter 10 Rewriting Catullus in the Flavian Age
- Chapter 11 The Manuscripts and Transmission of the Text
- Chapter 12 Editions and Commentaries
- Chapter 13 Catullus in the Renaissance
- Chapter 14 Catullus and Poetry in English since 1750
- Abbreviations and Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Abbreviations and Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Catullus
- The Cambridge Companion to Catullus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Situating Catullus
- Chapter 2 Literary Liaisons
- Chapter 3 Catullan Intertextuality
- Chapter 4 Gender and Sexuality
- Chapter 5 Catullan Themes
- Chapter 6 Language and Style
- Chapter 7 Catullus and Metre
- Chapter 8 Catulli Carmina
- Chapter 9 Catullus and Augustan Poetry
- Chapter 10 Rewriting Catullus in the Flavian Age
- Chapter 11 The Manuscripts and Transmission of the Text
- Chapter 12 Editions and Commentaries
- Chapter 13 Catullus in the Renaissance
- Chapter 14 Catullus and Poetry in English since 1750
- Abbreviations and Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Catullus , pp. 363 - 398Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abbreviations and Bibliography
Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (1875–1912). 56 vols. Leipzig
Catalogue of Books Printed in the XVth Century now in the British Museum (1908–1971). 10 vols. London
Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (2002–10). Brill’s New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. Leiden/Boston
Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (1960– ). Rome
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013).The Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford
Keil, H. (ed.) (1857–70). Grammatici Latini. 8 vols. Leipzig
Gesamtkatalog der Wiegendrucke. www.gesamtkatalogderwiegendrucke.de
Incunabula Short Title Catalogue. istc.bl.uk
Steinby, E. M. (ed.) (1993–2000). Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. 6 vols. Rome
Neue Deutsche Biographie (1953– ). Berlin
Page, D. L. (1962). Poetae Melici Graeci. Oxford
Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (1876– ). Leipzig/Berlin
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010). Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Poetry into Hellenistic Poetry. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1992). ‘British Latin: the text, interpretation and language of the Bath curse tablets’, Britannia 23.1–26Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1995). ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, JRS 85.86–134Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1999). ‘Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999) 97–133Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. (eds.) (1999). Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. (eds.) (2016). Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change? CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2004). Plauto in Catullo. Edizioni e saggi universitari di filologia classica 63. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2009). ‘Catull. 67.1s.: incipit della ianua o explicit della Coma?’, Paideia 66.521–40Google Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2011). ‘Una rilettura di Catull. 1.8s.: lo snodo tra dedica a Nepote e invocazione alla Musa’, in Biondi, (2011) 1–21Google Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2012). ‘Lepos, mores, pathos, furor, risus … Per una “ri-sistemazione” di alcuni carmina catulliani’, in Morelli, (2012) 171–202Google Scholar
Albertini, A. (1953). ‘Calfurnio bresciano: la sua edizione di Catullo (1481)’, Commentari dell’Ateneo di Brescia 29–79. BresciaGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. C. (1990). Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Phoenix Suppl. 26. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Allenspach, J. and Frasso, G. (1980). ‘Vicende, cultura e scritti di Gerolamo Squarzafico, Alessandrino’, IMU 23.233–92Google Scholar
Ancona, R. (2002). ‘The untouched self: Sapphic and Catullan Muses in Horace, Odes 1.22’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature 161–86. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1874). ‘Santen, Laurens or Louw van’, in van der Aa, A. J. (ed.), Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden (Haarlem, 1852–1878, 21 vols.). Vol. 17.101–4Google Scholar
Aranjo, D. (2005). ‘Catulle au début du XXe siècle: une anthologie’, Babel: Littératures plurielles 12.145–76Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003). ‘Lusus und Gloria – Plinius’ Hendecasyllabi (Epist. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4)’, in Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.), Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit 3–13. Munich/LeipzigCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, D. (1979). ‘PLAVTVS VORTIT BARBARE. Plautus, Bacchides 526–61 and Menander Dis Exapaton 102–12’, in West, and Woodman, (1979) 17–34Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1975). ‘Domina at Catullus 68, 68: mistress or chatelaine?’, RhM 118.124–9Google Scholar
Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds.) (2009). New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 1: Syntax of the Sentence. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Balmer, J. (2013). Piecing Together the Fragments: Translating Classical Verse, Creating Contemporary Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Balsamo, J. and Galand-Hallyn, P. (eds.) (2000). La Poétique de Jean Second et son influence au XVIe siècle. Les Cahiers de l’humanisme 1. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barbaud, T. (2008). ‘Catulle versus Horace: révolte et sagesse poétiques’, REL 86.80–96Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993). ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSCP 95.333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001). ‘Horace and iambos: the poet as literary historian’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi, (2001) 141–64Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005). ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book 320–42. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (2010). ‘Forerunners of Romance -mente adverbs in Latin prose and poetry’, in Dickey, andChahoud, (2010) 339–53Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.) (2012). Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Bausi, F., Campanelli, M., Gentile, S., Hankins, J. (eds.) (2013). Autografi dei letterati italiani. Il Quattrocento. Tomo I. RomeGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (1994). ‘The Roman and the foreign: the cult of the “Great Mother” in Imperial Rome’, in Thomas, N. and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History and the State 164–89. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Bellandi, F. (2012). ‘Catullo e la politica romana’, in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e ciuitas: Transizioni dalla Reppublica all’Impero, in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci 47–71. PisaGoogle Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005). ‘Catulle et les affrontements politico-littéraires à Rome à la fin de la république’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence de Catulle et des élégiaques latins (Actes du colloque tenu à Tours 28–30 novembre 2002) 131–48. Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar
Bertone, S. (2018). ‘Innovazione e continuità tra le edizioni aldine di Catullo curate dall’Avanzi (Ald. 1502 – Ald. 1515)’, Paideia 73.2071–84Google Scholar
Bessone, F. (2014). ‘Polis, court, empire: Greek culture, Roman society, and the system of genres’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Flavian Poetry and its Greek Past 215–33. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Bessone, F. and Fucecchi, M. (eds.) (2017). The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age. Berlin/BostonGoogle Scholar
Billanovich, G. (1959). ‘Dal Livio di Raterio (Laur. 63, 19) al Livio del Petrarca (B. M., Harl. 2493’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 2.103–78Google Scholar
Billanovich, G. (1988). ‘Il Catullo della Cattedrale di Verona’, in Krämer, S. and Bernhard, M. (eds.), Scire litteras. Forschungen zum mittelalterlichen Geistesleben (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Abhandlungen, nf 99) 35–57. MunichGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. (2009). The Scroll and the Marble. Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Biondi, G. G. (2011). Il Liber di Catullo: tradizione, modelli e Fortleben, Quaderni di Paideia 14. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Biondi, G. G. (2015). ‘Catullus, Sabellico (& Co.) and … Giorgio Pasquali’, in Kiss, (2015a) 29–52Google Scholar
Black, R., Kraye, J., and Nuvoloni, L. (eds.) (2016). Palaeography, Manuscript Illumination and Humanism in Renaissance Italy: Studies in Memory of A. C. de la Mare. Warburg Institute Colloquia 28. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bleisch, P. (1999). ‘The empty tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past in Aeneid 6.494-547’, CA 18.187–226Google Scholar
Bonadeo, A. (2017) ‘Scattered remarks about the ‘non-genre’ of Statius’ Siluae’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 157–66Google Scholar
Bonnet, M. (1877). Review of Baehrens’s Teubner edition of Catullus, Revue Critique d’Histoire et de Littérature 4.58–65Google Scholar
Bonvicini, M. (2012). Il novus libellus di Catullo: trasmissione del testo, problematicità della grafia e dell’interpunzione. Quaderni di Paideia 15. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Boulet, J. (2009). ‘“Will he rise and recover[?]”: Catullus, castration, and censorship in Swinburne’s “Dolores”’, Victorian Poetry 47.747–58Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1979). ‘Vivamus, mea Lesbia in the English Renaissance’, English Literary Renaissance 9.199–224Google Scholar
Braund, D. (1996). ‘The politics of Catullus 10: Memmius, Caesar and the Bithynians’, Hermathena 160.45–57Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003). Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1971, 1982). Horace on Poetry. Vol. 2 The Ars Poetica and Vol. 3 Epistles Book II. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1955, 1968, 1986). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. 3 vols. Cleveland/AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Burrus, V. (2007). ‘Mapping as metamorphosis: initial reflections on gender and ancient religious discourses’, in Penner, T. and Vander Stichele, C. (eds.), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses 1–10. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (1984). The Manuscript Tradition of Propertius. Phoenix Suppl. 17. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2006). ‘The Fabella of Sulpicia (“Epigrammata Bobiensia” 37)’, Phoenix 60.70–121Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2007). ‘History and transmission of the text’, in Skinner, (2007a) 13–34Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2008a). ‘The poetic treatment of atque from Catullus to Juvenal’, Mnem. 61.386–413Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2015a). ‘cui uideberis bella: the influence of Baehrens and Housman on the text of Catullus’, in Kiss, (2015a) 107–28Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (ed.) (2015b). Varro Varius: The Polymath of the Roman World. Cambridge Classical Journal Suppl. 39. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (1973). ‘Catullus’ “basia” poems (5, 7, 48)’, Mnemosyne 26.15–22 (= (2012a) 6–12)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (1974). ‘Venusta Sirmio: Catullus 31’, in Woodman and West (1974) 1–16 (= (2012a) 18–35)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2003). ‘Catullus in and about Bithynia: Poems 68, 10, 28 and 47’, in Braund and Gill (2003) 163–90 (= (2012a) 99–121)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2005). ‘Catullus 45: text and interpretation’, CQ 55.534–41 (= (2012a) 36–46)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2012b). ‘Poem 45: the wooing of Acme and Septimius’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 112–29Google Scholar
Campana, P. (2012). Il ciclo di Gellio nel liber catulliano: Per una nuova lettura di Catull. 74, 80, 88, 89, 90, 91, 116. PisaGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. A. (1960). ‘Galliambic poems of the 15th and 16th centuries: sources of the Bacchic Odes of the Pléiade School’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 22.490–510Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2017). ‘Bi-partition and non-distinction of poetical genres in Martial’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 103–116Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.) (2001). Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
Cavazza, S. (2013). ‘Negri, Palladio (Palladius FUSCUS)’, online at www.treccani.it, cf. DBI 78.157Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (1991). ‘Il fiore reciso dall’ aratro: ambiguità di una similitudine (Catull. 11, 22–24)’, QUCC 37.83–100Google Scholar
Cenerini, F. (1989). ‘O colonia quae cupis ponte ludere longo (Cat. 17): Cultura e politica’, Athenaeum 67.41–55Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2010). ‘Idiom(s) and literariness in classical literary criticism’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010) 42–64Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2016). ‘Varro’s Latin and Varro on Latin’, in Ferri, and Zago, (2016) 15–32Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2018). ‘Verbal mosaics: speech patterns and generic stylization in Lucilius’, in Breed, B. W., Keitel, E. and Wallace, R. (eds.), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century Rome 132–161. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cheney, P. and Hardie, P. (eds.) (2015). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 2 1558–1660. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Chevallier, R. (1977). ‘La géographie de Catulle’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 187–193Google Scholar
Cignolo, C. (2002). Terentiani Mauri de litteris, de syllabis, de metris. 1 Introduzione, testo critico e traduzione italiana. 2 Commento, appendici e indici. Bibliotheca Weidmanniana, Collectanea grammatica Latina, 2.1 and 2. Hildesheim/Zurich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Clare, R. J. (1997). ‘Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: allusion and exemplarity’, PCPS 42.60–88Google Scholar
Clark, C. (2008). ‘The poetics of manhood? Nonverbal behavior in Catullus 51’, CP 103.257–81Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1987). Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R. (1999). ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse, and the poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 21–93Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007). ‘Virile tongues: rhetoric and masculinity’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric 83–96. Chichester/Malden, Mass.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation. Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. IthacaGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015). Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Corradino dall’Aglio, G. F. (1738). Cajus Valerius Catullus in integrum restitutus. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003). The Fragmentary Latin Poets. (Revision of 1st edn., 1993.) OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. (2015). ‘On not being Archilochus properly: Cato, Catullus and the idea of iambos’, MD 74.9–52Google Scholar
Crabbe, A. (1977). ‘ignoscenda quidem … Catullus 64 and the fourth Georgic’, CQ 27.342–51Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1970). ‘ΟΙ ΝΕΩΤΕΡΟΙ, poetae novi, and cantores Euphorionis’, CQ 20.322–7Google Scholar
Csapodi, C., and Csapodi-Gárdonyi, K. (1969). Biblioteca Corviniana. The Library of King Matthias Corvinus of Hungary. Translated from German by Z. Horn. ShannonGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. C. (1983). ‘An Italian Catullus. Edinburgh, Nat. Lib. of Scotland, Adv. MS. 18.5.2’, Scriptorium 37.122–5Google Scholar
David-de Palacio, M.-F. (2005). Reviviscences romaines. La latinité au miroir de l’esprit fin-de-siècle. BernGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (1995). Aldus Manutius: Printer and Publisher of Renaissance Venice. LondonGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1976). ‘The return of Petronius to Italy’, in Alexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T. (eds.), Medieval Learning and Literature. Essays Presented to Richard William Hunt 220–51. OxfordGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1985). ‘New research on humanistic scribes in Florence’, in Garzelli, A., Miniatura fiorentina del rinascimento 1440–1525: un primo censimento (Inventari e Cataloghi Toscani 18 and 19) 1.393–600Google Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1996). ‘Vespasiano da Bisticci as producer of classical manuscripts in fifteenth-century Florence’, in Chavannes-Mazal, C. A. and Smith, M. M. (eds.), Medieval Manuscripts of the Latin Classics: Production and Use 166–207. Los Altos Hills/LondonGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C., and Thomson, D. F. S. (1973). ‘Poggio’s earliest manuscript?’, Italia Medioevo e Umanistica 16.179–95Google Scholar
de la Mare, A. C., and Nuvoloni, L. (2009). The Handwriting of the Italian Humanists. Vol. 2: Bartolomeo Sanvito: The Life and Work of a Renaissance Scribe. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dench, E. (2005). Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
De Robertis, T. (2016). ‘I primi anni della scrittura umanistica’, in Black, et al. (2016) 55–85Google Scholar
De Robertis, T., Tanturli, G., and Zamponi, S. (2008). Coluccio Salutati e l’invenzione dell’umanesimo. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series, 7. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Devine, A. M. and Stephens, L. D. (2006). Latin Word Order: Structured Meaning and Information. OxfordGoogle Scholar
De Vries, [S. G.] (1911). ‘Vossius (Isaac)’, Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek 1.1519–25Google Scholar
Dewar, M. (2014). Leisured Resistance: Villas, Literature and Politics in the Roman World. LondonGoogle Scholar
Dibdin, T. F. (1827). An Introduction to the Knowledge of Rare and Valuable Editions of the Greek and Latin Classics. Vols. 1–2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. (2000). ‘O dee ree PIE: the vocative problems of Latin words ending in –eus’, Glotta 76.32–49Google Scholar
Doering, F. W. (1788–92). C. Valerii Catulli carmina varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustrata. 2 vols. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Doering, F. W. (1826). C. Valerius Catullus ex editione Frid. Guil. Doeringi, rev. J. Naudet. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E. and Gervais, K. (eds.) (2015). The Brill Companion to Statius. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Döpp, S. (2005). ‘Munera et Musarum et Veneris: Catull c. 68 in der Entwicklungsgeschichte der römischen Elegie’, in Tar, I. and Meyer, P. (eds.), Studia Catulliana in memoriam Stephani Caroli Horváth (1931–1966), Acta Universitatis Szegediensis Acta Antiqua et Archaeologica xxix 5–19. SzegedGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. (2013). ‘Militia amoris: fighting in love’s army’, in Thorsen (2013) 194–206Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le (2012). ‘Three problems in Poem 66’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 153–83Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le (2017). ‘Contextualising Catullus: a re-examination of 66.1–14’, in Woodman, A. J. and Wisse, J. (eds.), Word and Context in Latin Poetry. Studies in Memory of David West (PCPS/CCJ Suppl. 40) 13–42. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, T. [= A. J.] (eds.) (2012). Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dyson, S. L. (1985). ‘The Transpadane frontier’, in The Creation of the Roman Frontier 42–86. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. (1989). ‘Greek into Latin: a note on Catullus and Sappho’, Latomus 48.590–600Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (1992). ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature 6.181–203. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Evrard, E. (2005). ‘Polymètres et épigrammes de Catulle. Analyse quantitative du vocabulaire et de la syntaxe des propositions’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence de Catulle et des elégiaques latins (Actes du colloque tenu à Tours, 28–30 novembre 2002) 65–83. Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar
Evrard-Gillis, J. (1976). La récurrence lexicale dans l’oeuvre de Catulle. Etude linguistique. ParisGoogle Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. (1983). La ripetizione lessicale nei poeti latini: Venti anni di studi (1960–1980). BolognaGoogle Scholar
Fain, G. L. (2008). Writing Epigrams: The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. (Collection Latomus 312.) BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004). Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991). Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic. New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farron, S. (1993). Vergil’s Aeneid: A Poem of Grief and Love. Mnemosyne Suppl. 122. Leiden/New York/CologneGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (1992).‘“Shall I compare thee … ?”: Catullus 68b and the limits of analogy’, in T. [=A. J.] Woodman andPowell, J. (eds.), Author and Audience in Latin Literature 33–44. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010). ‘Fathers and sons: the Manlii Torquati and family continuity in Catullus and Horace’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman 205–23. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2012). ‘Representation and the materiality of the book in the polymetrics’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 29–47Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2000). ‘Non inter nota sepulchra: Catullus 101 and Roman funerary ritual’, CA 19.209–31 (= Gaisser (2007a) 399–426)Google Scholar
Fernandelli, M. (2015). Chartae laboriosae: Autore e lettore nei carmi maggiori di Catullo (c. 64 & 65). ParmaGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. (2011). ‘The language of Latin epic and lyric poetry’, in Clackson, J. (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language 344–66. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. and Zago, A. (eds.) (2016). The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about Language in the Roman World. TurnhoutGoogle Scholar
Fiesoli, G. (2006). ‘Giovannantonio Volpi lettore di Catullo: i modelli, il metodo, la fortuna’, Seicento e Settecento 1.1–44Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1988). ‘Power and impotence in Horace’s Epodes’, Ramus 17.176–91 (= Lowrie, M. (ed.) (2009), Horace: Odes and Epodes 141–59. Oxford)Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995). Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, H. G., III. (1988). New Aldine Studies: Documentary Essays on the Life and Work of Aldus Manutius. San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. (2000). Quinto Ennio Annali (libri I–VIII): Introduzione, testo critico con apparato, traduzione. Vol. 1. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. et al. (2002). Quinto Ennio Annali (libri I–VIII): Commentari (Book 7: Tomasco, D.). Vol. 2. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Fo, A. (2002). ‘Ancora sulla presenza dei classici nella poesia italiana contemporanea’, Semicerchio: rivista di poesia comparata 26–27.24–52Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (1978). ‘“Reverse similes” and sex roles in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 11.7–26Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1978). ‘Leonora and Neaera: a consideration of George Buchanan’s erotic poetry’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 40.513–24. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. (1980). ‘George Buchanan’s court poetry and the Pléiade’, French Studies 34.137–52Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1997). ‘Jean Salmon Macrin’s Epithalamiorum liber and the joys of conjugal love’, in Ford, P. and De Smet, I. (eds.), Eros et Priapus: érotisme et obscénité dans la littérature néo-latine 65–84. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. (2011). ‘Obscenity and the Lex Catulliana: uses and abuses of Catullus 16 in French Renaissance poetry’, in Roberts, H., Peureux, G. and Wajeman, L. (eds.), Obscénités Renaissantes 48–60. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P., Bloemendal, J. and Fantazzi, C. (eds.) (2014). Brill’s Encyclopedia of the Neo-Latin World. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1987). ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble 185–98. Bristol/Oak Park, Ill.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1989). ‘First thoughts on closure: problems and prospects’, MD 22.75–122 (= (2000) 239–83)Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2002b). ‘Masculinity under threat? The poetics and politics of inspiration in Latin poetry’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature 141–59. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. (2015). ‘The bisexuality of Orpheus’, in Masterson, Sorkin and Robson, (2015) 335–51Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, E. A. (1985). ‘Catullus to Caecilius on good poetry (c. 35)’, AJP 106.213–21Google Scholar
Frenz, B. and Stelte, I. (2012). ‘Catullus’, in Walde, C. (ed.), The Reception of Classical Literature (Brill New Pauly Supplement 5) 92–102. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (1994). ‘The question of genre and metre in Catullus’ polymetrics’, QUCC 46.95–108Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2013). ‘Seruitium amoris: the interplay of dominance, gender and poetry’, in Thorsen (2013) 180–93Google Scholar
Gaca, K. L. (2008). ‘Reinterpreting the Homeric simile of Iliad 16.7–11: the girl and her mother in ancient Greek warfare’, AJP 129.145–71Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1977). ‘Mythological exempla in Propertius 1.2 and 1.15’, AJP 98.381–91Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1992). ‘Catullus’, in Brown, V. (ed. in chief), Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries vii.197–292. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1995). ‘Threads in the labyrinth: competing views and voices in Catullus 64’, AJP 116.579–616Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (2009). Catullus . Blackwell Introductions to the Classical World. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (2015). ‘From Giovanni Pontano to Pierio Valeriano: five Renaissance commentators on Latin erotic poetry’, in Kraus, C. S., Stray, C. (eds.), Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre 275–98. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2007). ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius 59–75. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2012). ‘Putting on the yoke of necessity: myth, intertextuality and moral agency in Catullus 68’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 184–211Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2018). ‘Between pastoral and elegy: the discourse of desire in Catullus 45’, Paideia 73.1589–1604Google Scholar
Gardner, H. H. (2007). ‘Ariadne’s lament: the semiotic impulse of Catullus 64’, TAPA 137.147–79Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. (2007). ‘Kritisch-exegetische Überlegungen zu Catullgedichten’, Acta Ant. Hung. 47.1–41Google Scholar
Gebhardus, I. (1621). Cai Valeri Catulli, Albi Tibulli, Sexti Aureli Properti Quae exstant. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Giardina, G. (2011). ‘Per il testo e la interpretazione di Catullo 1.9-10’, Prometheus 37.56–60Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012). Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Steel, C. (2010). ‘The indistinct literary careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and their Reception 118–37. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Giesecke, A. L. (2000). Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion. Cross-generic Imitation of the De Rerum Natura in Early Augustan Poetry. Zurich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ginguené, P.-L. (1813). ‘Corradino dall’Aglio (Jean-François)’, in Michaud, L.-G. (ed.), Biographie universelle ancienne et moderne (Paris, 1811–1828, 54 vols.). Vol. 9.647–8Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995). Making Men: Sophists and Self-presentation in Ancient Rome. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, C. (1992). Carmina Priapea: Einleitung, Übersetzung, Interpretation und Kommentar. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2001). ‘The erotic eye: visual stimulation and cultural conflict’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek Under Rome 154–94. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1974). ‘O patrona virgo’, in Evans, J. A. S. (ed.), Polis and Imperium 253–64. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965). The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams. 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gow, A. S. F (1968). The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip and Some Contemporary Epigrams. 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. (2016). ‘Girls will be boys and boys will be girls, or, what is the gender of Horace’s Epodes?’, in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds.), Horace’s Epodes: Context, Intertexts, and Reception 103–30. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. (1983). Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship. Vol. 1 Textual Criticism and Exegesis. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Granarolo, J. (1971). D’Ennius à Catulle. Recherches sur les antécédents romains de la ‘poésie nouvelle’. ParisGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. N. ed. trans. (2017). Aldus Manutius: Humanism and the Latin Classics, The I Tatti Renaissance Library 78. Cambridge, Mass./LondonGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. R. (1998). ‘The manhandling of Maecenas; Senecan abstractions of masculinity’, AJP 119 .607–32Google Scholar
Grazzini, S. (2005). ‘La subscriptio del codice G di Catullo (Paris. lat. 14137)’, MD 55.163–71Google Scholar
Green, P. (2005). The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition Translated with Commentary. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1995). ‘The Catullan ego: fragmentation and the erotic self’, AJP 116. 77–93Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1997). ‘Journey to the remotest meadow: a reading of Catullus 11’, Intertexts 1.147–55Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1998). The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore/LondonGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1999). ‘Refiguring the female voice: Catullus translating Sappho’, Arethusa 32.1–18Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2006). ‘Catullus, Caesar and Roman masculine identity’, Antichthon 40.49–64Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1985). ‘The creation of characters in the Aeneid’, in id., Latin Poets and Roman Life 183–97. LondonGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. G. (1983). ‘Catullus, Poem 4: a neglected interpretation revived’, Phoenix 37.123–8Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1985). ‘Literary allusion in Virgil, Aeneid 9.435ff.’, Vergilius 31.40–4Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1995). ‘Catullus’ Coma Berenices and Aeneas’ farewell to Dido’, TAPA 125.47–59Google Scholar
Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2017). The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Grossi Turchetti, M. L. (2004). Manoscritti datati della Biblioteca nazionale Braidense di Milano. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Guarini, A. (1521). Alexandri Guarini Ferrariensis in C. V. Catullum Veronensem per Baptistam Patrem Emendatum Expositiones. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1998). Poetic Garlands. Hellenistic Garlands in Context. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2012). ‘Catullus and the Garland of Meleager’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 79–111Google Scholar
Hale, W. G. (1897). ‘First annual report of the managing committee of the American School of Classical Studies in Rome’, AJA 1.5–68Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1973). ‘The role of women in Roman Elegy: counter-cultural feminism’, Arethusa 6.103–24Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1996). ‘Nec castrare velis meos libellos: sexual and poetic lusus in Catullus, Martial and the Carmina Priapea’, in Klodt, C. (ed.), Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag 321–44. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. (1983). Statius and the Silvae: Poets, Patrons, and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1992). ‘Augustan poets and the mutability of Rome’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus 59–82. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2012). ‘Virgil’s Catullan plots’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 212–38Google Scholar
Harless, T. C. (1764). ‘Ioannes Franciscus Conradinus de Allio (d’Aglio)’, in id., De Vitis Philologorum Nostra Aetate Clarissimorum, 4 vols. (Bremen, 1764–72). Vol. 1.107–11Google Scholar
Harris, B. F. (1980). ‘Bithynia: Roman sovereignty and the survival of Hellenism’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.7.2.857–901Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2000). ‘The need for a new text of Catullus’, in Reitz, C. (ed.), Vom Text zum Buch 63–79. St. KatharinenGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2001). ‘Some generic problems in Horace’s Epodes: or, on (not) being Archilochus’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001) 165–86Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2004). ‘Altering Attis: ethnicity, gender and genre in Catullus 63’, Mnemosyne 57.520–33 (= Nauta and Harder (2005) 11–24)Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2009). ‘Catullus in New Zealand’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English 295–323. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (forthcoming). ‘Roman traces: Michael Longley and Latin poetry’, in Tyler, M. (ed.), The Imaginary Oarsman: Essays on the Poetry of Michael Longley. Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. R. (1989). ‘Catullus 11: along for the ride’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 5.98–116. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (1999). ‘Suck it and see: Horace, Epode 8’, in id., Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry 93–113. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (2006). ‘Oxford Reds’: Classic Commentaries on Latin Classics: R. G. Austin on Cicero and Virgil, C. J. Fordyce on Catullus, R. G. and R. G. M. Nisbet on Cicero. LondonGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995). ‘Dividing poems’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M. D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance 117–48. SpoletoGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2001). ‘Catullian iambics, Catullian iambi’, in Carvarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi, (2001) 117–40Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2015). ‘Catullus 62, 67 and other Catullan dialogues’, in Kiss, (2015a) 129–51Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Ricottilli, L. (2003). La lingua d’uso latina. Augmented translation of J. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Umgangssprache (3rd edn., Heidelberg 1951) by L. Ricottilli. 3rd edn. (1st edn. 1980). BolognaGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Santyr, A. (1965). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Handbuch der Altertumswissennschaft 2.2.2). MunichGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1992). ‘The nuptial rite in Catullus 66 and Callimachus’ poetry for Berenice’, ZPE 91.21–8Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2000). ‘Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: “womanufacture” in Catullus’, PCPS 46.28–44Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2006). ‘Staging the reader response: Ovid and his “contemporary audience” in Ars and Remedia’, in Gibson, R., Green, S. and Sharrock, A. (eds.), The Art of Love. Bimillenial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris 40–53. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2019). ‘Catullus as epigrammatist’, in Henriksén, C. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epigram 441–57. HobokenGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. and Martindale, C. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 3: 1660–1790. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1998). The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2000). ‘Horace and Catullus: the case of the suppressed precursor in Odes 1.22 and 1.32’, CW 94.25–37Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2003). ‘The Catullan corpus, Greek epigrams, and the poetry of objects’, CQ 53.206–21 (= (2008) 109–30)Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008). Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2012). ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 48–78Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2003). ‘Catullus 2 and 3: a programmatic pair of Sapphic epigrams’, Mnemosyne 56.551–65Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2014). ‘Play on the proper names of individuals in the Catullan corpus: wordplay, the iambic tradition, and the late Republican culture of public abuse’, JRS 104.51–72Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2009). ‘Catullus in the playground’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English 82–96. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. and Tomasco, D. (eds.) (2009). Quinto Ennio, Annali (Frammenti di collocazione incerta): Commentari. Con un’avvertenza di E. Flores. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). ‘On linguistic aspects of translation’, in Brower, R. A. (ed.), On Translation 232–9. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1998). ‘Introduction: constructions of gender and genre in Roman comedy and elegy’, Helios 25.3–16Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003). Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
James, S. L. (2012). ‘Elegy and New Comedy’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy 253–68. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Janan, M. (1994). ‘When the Lamp is Shattered’: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale/ EdwardsvilleGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1967). The Tragedies of Ennius. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 10. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1995). ‘Two features of the style of Catullus’ Phalaecian epigrams’, Sileno 21.63–82Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1996a). ‘The language of Catullus 17 and that of its immediate neighbours in the transmitted collection’, Sileno 22.137–63Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1999). ‘The arrangement and the language of Catullus’ so-called polymetra with special reference to the sequence 10–11–12’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999) 335–75Google Scholar
Johannsen, N. (2006). Dichter über ihre Gedichte: die Prosavorreden in den Epigrammaton Libri Martialis und in den Silvae des Statius. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. S. (2012). Horace’s Iambic Criticism: Casting Blame (Iambikē Poiēsis). Mnemosyne Suppl. 334. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2009) ‘The ancient book’, in Bagnall, R. S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology 256–81. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. (2008). ‘Catullus’ libellus, the mixing of genres, and the evidence of Carm. 1, 50, and 46’, Mnem. 61 .130–37Google Scholar
Jorink, E., and Van Miert, D. (eds.) (2012). Isaac Vossius (1618–1689). Between Science and Scholarship. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kahane, A. (2017). ‘Virgil’s epitaph, Donatus’ Life, biography and the structure of time’, PVS 29.161–85Google Scholar
Kay, N.M. (2010). ‘Colloquial Latin in Martial’s epigrams’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010) 318–30Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2016). ‘Naming the elegiac mistress: elegiac onomastics in Roman inscriptions’, in Keith, A. and Edmonson, J. (eds.), Roman Literary Cultures: Domestic Politics, Revolutionary Poetics, Civic Spectacle 59–88. Phoenix Suppl. 55. Toronto/Buffalo/LondonGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993). The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1999). ‘“Cf.”: analogies, relationships and Catullus 68’, in Braund, S. and Mayer, R. (eds.), amor : roma. Love and Latin Literature 30–43. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1974). The Classical Text: Aspects of Editing in the Age of the Printed Book. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (2002). ‘Ovid’s language and style’, in Weiden Boyd, B. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid 27–89. Leiden/Boston/CologneGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2009). ‘Catullus 68. Edited with an introduction and detailed commentary.’ Diss. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2011). Review of D. S. McKie, Essays in the Interpretation of Roman Poetry (Cambridge 2009), Exemplaria Classica 15.257–71Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012a). ‘A correction and more on Girolamo Avanzi’s last edition of Catullus (ca. 1535)’, Exemplaria Classica 16.75–80Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012b). ‘A Renaissance manuscript of Catullus, Tibullus and Propertius. Budapest, Országos Széchényi Könyvtár, Codex Latinus Medii Aevi 137 and Cologny, Bibliotheca Bodmeriana, MS. Bodmer 141’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 52.249–71Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012c). ‘Towards a catalogue of the surviving manuscripts of Catullus’, Paideia 67.607–19Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2013a). Catullus Online: An Online Repertory of Conjectures for Catullus. www.catullusonline.orgGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2013b). ‘Two humanistic conjectures in Catullus: 55.17 papillae and 61.140 soli’, Exemplaria Classica 17.63–70Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (ed.) (2015a). What Catullus Wrote: Problems in Textual Criticism, Editing and the Manuscript Tradition. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2015b). ‘Introduction: a sketch of the textual tradition’, in Kiss, (2015a) xiii–xxxGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2015c). ‘The lost Codex Veronensis and its descendants: three problems in Catullus’s manuscript tradition’, in Kiss, (2015a) 1–27Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2016). ‘The protohistory of the text of Catullus’ in Velaza, J. (ed.), From the Protohistory to the History of the Text (Studien zur klassischen Philologie 173) 125–40. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2018). ‘The transmission of the poems of Catullus: the role of the incunabula’, Paideia 73.2151–74Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2020). ‘Catullus Online: a digital critical edition of the poems of Catullus with a repertory of conjectures’, in Chronopoulos, S., Maier, F., Novokhatko, A. (eds.), Digitale Altertumswissenschaften: Thesen und Debatten zu Methoden und Anwendungen, 99–114. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (forthcoming). ‘Giovanni Francesco Corradino dall’Aglio and a manuscript of Catullus that he did not invent’Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds.) (1996). I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome. AustinGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds.) (2000). I, Claudia II: Women in Roman Art and Society. AustinGoogle Scholar
Klooster, J. (2011). Poetry as Window and Mirror: Positioning the Poet in Hellenistic Poetry. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1977). Catullus’ Indictment of Rome: The Meaning of Catullus 64. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (2000). ‘Self, sex, and empire in Catullus: the construction of a decentered identity’, in Bécares Botas, V., et al. (eds.), Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina 213–231. MadridGoogle Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2012). ‘Short mythological epic in Neo-Latin literature’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception 519–36. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. (2008). ‘Magni viri: Caesar, Alexander, and Pompey in Cat. 11’, Philologus 152.223–29Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2013). ‘Caesar, Lucretius and the dates of De Rerum Natura and the Commentarii’, CQ 63.772–79Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1924). Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Reprinted 1964. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2014). ‘Me, myself, and I: multiple (literary) personalities in Catullus 35’, CW 107.367–81Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001a). Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001b). ‘Arbitria urbanitatis: language, style, and characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37’, CA 20.239–72Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2007). ‘Catullus and elite republican social discourse’, in Skinner, (2007a) 212–32Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2012). ‘How to avoid profanity in Latin: an exploratory study’, MD 68.9–38Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1976). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. 3rd edn. 2 vols. HanoverGoogle Scholar
Laird, A. (1997). ‘Approaching characterisation in Virgil’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil 282–93. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1996). ‘Multas per gentes et multa per aequora uectus (Cat. c. 101), Catullo fra Omero ed Apollonio Rodio’, Emerita 64.255–60Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2015). ‘Illa domus, illa mihi sedes: on the interpretation of Catullus 68’, in Hunter, R. and Oakley, S. P. (eds.), Latin Literature and its Transmission: Papers in Honour of Michael Reeve 194–224. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2009). Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, Mass./LondonGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. W. (1972). Studies in Catullan Verse: An Analysis of Word Types and Patterns in the Polymetra. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Louis, N. (2010). Commentaire historique et traduction du Diuus Augustus de Suétone. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Lowry, M. (1979). The World of Aldus Manutius: Business and Scholarship in Renaissance Venice. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1990). ‘The origin and development of the Catullan style in Neo-Latin poetry’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O. (eds.), Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition 183–97. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyles, K. (2004). Vietnam ANZACs: Australian & New Zealand Troops in Vietnam 1962–72. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994). ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41.187–204 (= (2007) 167–83)Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998). ‘Love and death: Laodamia and Protesilaus in Catullus, Propertius, and others’, CQ 48.200–12 (= (2007) 211–26)Google Scholar
McKie, D. S. (1977). ‘The Manuscripts of Catullus: recension in a closed tradition’. Diss. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
McKie, D. S. (1986). ‘Salutati, Poggio, and Codex M of Catullus’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., and Jocelyn, H. D. (eds.), Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink (PCPS Suppl. 15) 66–86. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1973). ‘Catullus 116’, CQ 23.304–9 (= (1983) 181–6; = Gaisser (2007a) 35–45)Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1974). ‘A use of myth in ancient poetry’, CQ 24.82–93 (= (1983) 159–70)Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2016). ‘Analytic and synthetic forms of the comparative and superlative from early to late Latin’, in Adams, and Vincent, (2016) 340–66Google Scholar
Manuzio, A. (2017). Humanism and the Latin Classics, ed. and trans. by J. N. Grant. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2008). The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2015). ‘Uncluttered spaces, unlittered texts: Pliny’s villas as editorial places’, in Marchesi, I. (ed.), Pliny the Bookmaker 223–51. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Markley, A. A. (2004). Stateliest Measures: Tennyson and the Literature of Greece and Rome. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1992). ‘Horace, Ovid and others’, in Jenkyns, R. (ed.), The Legacy of Rome: A New Appraisal 177–214. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Maselli, G. (1994). Affari di Catullo: Rapporti di proprietà nell’immaginario dei Carmi. BariGoogle Scholar
Mastandrea, P., Perrelli, R., Biondi, G. G., Zurli, R. and Viparelli, V. (eds.) (2007). Musisque Deoque: A Digital Archive of Latin Poetry. www.mqdq.itGoogle Scholar
Masterson, M., Sorkin, N. and Robson, J. (eds.) (2015). Sex in Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Merli, E. (2017). ‘The festinatio in Flavian poetry: a clarification’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 139–55Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. (2001). ‘Wooden wit: tabellae in Latin poetry’, in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-five years at Yale 201–12. New HavenGoogle Scholar
Meyers, T. L. (ed.) (2004). Uncollected Letters of Algernon Charles Swinburne. Vol. 3. 1890–1909. LondonGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1994). Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: The Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1998). ‘Catullan consciousness, the “care of the self” and the force of the negative in history’, in Larmour, D. H. J., Miller, P. A. and Platter, C. (eds.), Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity 171–203. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004). Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2005). ‘Il Liber Catulli di Terenziano Mauro: l’ Attis e le convenzioni del libro latino’, Segno e Testo 3.71–91Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (ed.) (2008). Epigramma longum. Da Marziale alla tarda antichità / From Martial to late antiquity. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino, 29–31 maggio 2006. CassinoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (ed.) (2012). Lepos e mores. Una giornata su Catullo. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino, 27 maggio 2010. CassinoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2014). ‘La legge di Postumia. Una lettura di Catull. 27’, Rationes Rerum: Rivista di filologia e storia 4.103–26Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2017). ‘Catullus 23 and Martial. An epigrammatic model and its ‘refraction’ throughout Martial’s libri’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 116–35Google Scholar
Morelli, G. M. (2011–12). Caesii Bassi de metris, Atilii Fortunatiani de metris Horatianis. Collectanea Grammatica Latina. 2 vols. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. D. (2007 [Unpublished]). ‘Who was “Mentula”?’, American Philological Association, 138th Annual Meeting (San Diego, Calif., January 4–7, 2007), Abstracts, p. 221Google Scholar
Morgan, J. D. (2008). ‘The addressee of Catullus’ Poem 68a’, The Classical Outlook 85.141–50Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G. (1977). ‘Nescio quid febriculosi scorti: a note on Catullus 6’, CQ 27.338–41Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1955). ‘Catullus in the Neo-Latin poetry of France before 1550’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 17.365–94Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1963). ‘Catullus and the poetry of the Renaissance in France’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 25.25–56Google Scholar
Munday, J. (2008). Introducing Translation Studies. Theories and Applications. 2nd edn. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T. (1998). ‘Cicero’s first readers: epistolary evidence for the dissemination of his works’, CQ 48.492–505Google Scholar
Muse, K. (2009). ‘Fleecing Remus’ magnanimous playboys: wordplay in Catullus 58.5’, Hermes 137.302–13Google Scholar
Muzzioli, G. (1959). ‘Due nuovi codici autografi di Pomponio Leto’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 2.337–51Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (2012). ‘Catullan contexts in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 239–254Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1966). Catullus. Carmina. Codex Oxoniensis bibliothecae Bodleianae Canonicianus class. lat. 30. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. (1999). ‘The goat, the gout, and the girl: Catullus 69, 71, and 77’, Mnemosyne 52.266–76Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2002). Poetry for Patrons. Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Mnem. Suppl. 206. Leiden/Boston/CologneGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2004). ‘Catullus 63 in a Roman context’, Mnemosyne 57.596–628 (= Nauta and Harder (2005) 87–119)Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2005). ‘Hephaestion and Catullus 63 again’, in Nauta and Harder (2005) 143–8Google Scholar
Navarro Anatolín, F. (1996). Lygdamus. Corpus Tibullianum III.1–6: Lygdami Elegiarum Liber. Trans. J. J. Zoltowski. Mnem. Suppl. 154. Leiden/New York/CologneGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2020). ‘How Ennian was Latin epic between the Annals and Lucretius?’, in Damon, C. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History 188–210. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. (2013a). ‘Architectural ecphrasis in Roman poetry’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature 57–80. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. (2013b). ‘Impersonating Hypsipyle: Statius’ Thebaid and Medieval lament’, Dictynna 10.2–18Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1990). Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, M. C. (2010). ‘Parchment codices in a new text of Galen’, Greece & Rome 57.378–86Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970, 1978). A Commentary on Horace Odes: Book I and Book II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Noonan, J. D. (1986). ‘Myth, humor and the sequence of thought in Catullus 95’, CJ 81.299–304Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. (1995). Anacreon Redivivus: A Study of Anacreontic Translation in Mid-Sixteenth-Century France. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1994). ‘“They might be giants”: inconsistency and indeterminacy in Vergil’s war in Italy’, Colby Quarterly 30.206–26Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1996). ‘Sostratus Suppl. Hell. 733: a lost, possibly Catullan-era elegy on the six sex changes of Tiresias’, TAPA 126.173–210Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2007). Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oksala, P. (1964). Vom Gebrauch geographischer Namen bei den römischen Lyrikern der Blütezeit: Catull, Vergil, Horaz. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Oldfather, W. A. (1943). ‘The most extreme case of elision in the Latin language?’, CJ 38.478–9Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1991). ‘Canidia, canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s Epodes’, Arethusa 24.107–38Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1965). Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen. Eine Typologie. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Ormand, K. (2009). Controlling Desires: Sexuality in Ancient Greece and Rome. Westport, Conn.Google Scholar
Pächt, O. and Alexander, J. J. G. (1966–73). Illuminated Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library Oxford. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (2010). ‘The power of the epistolary preface from Statius to Pliny’, CQ 60.194–201Google Scholar
Page, D. (1955). Sappho and Alcaeus. An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. and Ellis, R. (1875). ‘Scaliger’s Liber Cujacianus of Propertius, Catullus, &c.’, Hermathena 2.124–58Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1963). ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti fra Catullo e gli epigrammisti dell’ Antologia’, in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni 562–87. TurinGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2003). ‘Ego maenas: Maenadism, marriage, and the construction of female identity in Catullus 63 and 64’, Helios 30.101–26Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2007). ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus’ wedding poems’, in Skinner, (2007a) 276–92Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1968). ‘Arte allusiva’, in Pagine stravaganti di un filologo 2.275–82. Florence (= Stravaganze quarte e supreme (Venice 1951) 111–20 = Terze pagine stravaganti (Florence 1942) 185–7)Google Scholar
Passerat, J. (1608). Commentarii in C. Val. Catullum, Albium Tibullum et Sex. Aur. Propertium. ParisGoogle Scholar
Pavlock, B. R. (1979). ‘“Frater Ave atque Vale”: Tennyson and Catullus’, Victorian Poetry 17.365–76Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (2011). ‘Unlocking Aeneid 6.460: Plautus’ Amphitryon, Euripides’ Protesilaus and the referents of Callimachus’ Coma’, CJ 106 .149–219Google Scholar
Peruzzi, M. (ed.) (2008). Ornatissimo codice. La biblioteca di Federico di Montefeltro. Vatican CityGoogle Scholar
Petoletti, M. (2004). ‘Catullo, Properzio e Tibullo nella biblioteca di Francesco Petrarca’, in Ballarani, M., Frasso, G., Monti, C. M. (eds.), Manoscritti e libri a stampa nella Biblioteca Ambrosiana 102–5. MilanGoogle Scholar
Petrini, M. (1997). The Child and the Hero: Coming of Age in Catullus and Vergil. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginning to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Platter, C. L. (1995). ‘Officium in Catullus and Propertius: a Foucauldian reading’, CP 90.211–24Google Scholar
Pleitner, K. (1849). Des Q. Valerius Catullus Epigramme an und über C. Jul. Caesar und Mamurra. SpeyerGoogle Scholar
Portuese, O. (2013). Il carme 67 di Catullo: introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Possanza, D. M. (2004). Translating the Heavens. Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1982). ‘Catullus 11: the ironies of integrity’, in id., Essays on Latin Lyric, Elegy, and Epic 13–29. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (2016). ‘The sense of two endings: how Virgil and Statius conclude’, ICS 41.85–149Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. and Ramsey, J. T. (2017). ‘Reconstructing the chronology of Caesar’s Gallic Wars’, Histos 11.1–74Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A. (eds.) (1992). Feminist Theory and the Classics. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ramírez de Verger, A. (ed.) and Pérez Vega, A. (trans.) (2005). C. Valerii Catulli Carmina – Catulo, Poemas. HuelvaGoogle Scholar
Ramler, K. W. (1793). Kajus Valerius Katullus in einem Auszuge Lateinisch und Deutsch. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. and Raaflaub, K. A. (2017). ‘Chronological tables for Caesar’s wars (58–45 bce)’, Histos 11.162–217Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1978). ‘The identity problems of Q. Cornificius’, CQ 28.188–201 (= (1991) 272–88)Google Scholar
Reitz, B. (2013). Building in Words: Representations of the Process of Construction in Latin Literature. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (1993). ‘Not before homosexuality: the materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman law against love between men’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 3.523–73Google Scholar
Ricottilli, L. (1982). ‘Tra filologia e semiotica: ripristino e interpretazione di una formula allocutiva (quid tu? quid uos?)’, MD 9.107–51Google Scholar
Ridenour, G. M. (1988). ‘Swinburne’s imitations of Catullus’, The Victorian Newsletter 74. 51–7Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989). ‘The use of myth in Latin epithalamia from Statius to Venantius Fortunatus’, TAPA 119.321–48Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2013). ‘Propertius 1.3: sleep, surprise, and Catullus 64’, BICS 56.89–115Google Scholar
Roche, P. (2016). ‘Latin prose literature: author and authority in the prefaces of Pliny and Quintilian’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome 434–49. Chichester/Malden, Mass.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (1998). ‘Pliny’s Catullus: the politics of literary appropriation’, AJP 128.265–304Google Scholar
Roman, L. (2001). ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91.113–45Google Scholar
Roman, L. (2015). ‘Statius and Martial: poetic self-fashioning in Flavian Rome’, in Dominik, , Newlands, and Gervais, (2015) 444–61Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2011). ‘I tria corda di Stazio, poeta Greco, romano e napoletano’, in Bonadeo, A., Canobbio, A. and Gasti, F. (eds.), Filellenismo e identità romana in età flavia 15–34. PaviaGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G. (2015). ‘The Silvae: poetics of impromptu and cultural consumption’, in Dominik, , Newlands, , and Gervais, (2015) 54–72Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (2009). ‘Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification – the contribution of particles’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009) 317–442Google Scholar
Rostand, E. (trans.), Benoist, E. (ed., comm.), Thomas, E. (comm.) (1879–90). Les poésies de Catulle. ParisGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. A. (2003). ‘Beyond satire: Horace, popular invective and the segregation of literature’, JRS 93.35–65Google Scholar
Rühl, M. (2006). Literatur gewordener Augenblick. Die Silven des Statius im Kontext literarischer und sozialer Bedingungen von Dichtung. Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008). Fasti Sacerdotum. A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BC to AD 499. Trans. D. M. B. Richardson. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Schatzmann, A. (2012). Nikarchos II: Epigrammata. Einleitung, Texte, Kommentar. Hypomnemata 188. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Scherf, J. (1996). Untersuchungen zur antiken Veröffentlichung der Catullgedichte. Spudasmata 61. Hildesheim/Zürich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. (2018). The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Schoell, F. L. (1915). ‘George Chapman and the Italian Neo-Latinists of the Quattrocento’, Modern Philology 13.215–238Google Scholar
Scholderer, V. (1924). ‘Printing at Venice to the end of 1481’, The Library ser. iv, 5. 129–52 = id. (1966). Fifty Essays in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Bibliography, ed. D. E. Rhodes, 74–89. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Schulze, W. (1904). Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen. Reprinted 1991, with additional appendix by O. Salomies. ZurichGoogle Scholar
Schwabe, L. (1886). Catulli Veronensis Liber ad optimos codices denuo collatos. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1994). ‘“Shakehands, Catull”. Catullus-Rezeption in der deutschsprachigen Lyrik der Gegenwart’, AU 2.34–49Google Scholar
Selden, D. (1992). ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity 461–512. New York/London (= Gaisser (2007a) 490–559)Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1970). ‘The prosecution of Roman magistrates-elect’, Phoenix 24.162–5Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980). Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. A. (2014). ‘Socration or Philodemus? Catullus 47 and prosopographical excess’, CJ 109.385–405Google Scholar
Sillig, C. I. (1830). Review of Doering, rev. Naudet (1826), Lachmann (1829) and three other works in Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik No. 5, Vol. 2.259–97Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2019). ‘New light and old texts: Galen and his own books’ in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise περὶ ἀλυπιìας (de indolentia) in Context: A Tale of Resilience. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1972). ‘The unity of Catullus 68: the structure of 68a’, TAPA 103.495–512Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1979). ‘Parasites and strange bedfellows: a study in Catullus’ political imagery’, Ramus 8.137–52Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1981). Catullus’ Passer: The Arrangement of the Book of Polymetric Poems. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1989). ‘Vt decuit cinaediorem: power, gender, and urbanity in Catullus 10’, Helios 16.7–23Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1993). ‘Ego mulier: the construction of male sexuality in Catullus’, Helios 20.107–30 (= Hallett and Skinner (1997) 129–50)Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2003). Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2007b). ‘Authorial arrangement of the collection: debate past and present’, in Skinner (2007a) 35–53Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2015). ‘A review of scholarship on Catullus 1985-2015’, Lustrum 57.91–360Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1969). ‘Metrical variations and some textual problems in Catullus’, BICS 16.38–43 (= Gaisser (2007a) 45–55)Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. (1989). ‘Forms of literary criticism in Catullus: polymetrics vs epigram’, CP 89.312–19Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2013). The Roman Poetry of Love: Elegy and Politics in a Time of Revolution. LondonGoogle Scholar
Spies, A. (1930). Militat omnis amans: Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Starr, R. J. (1987). ‘The circulation of literary texts in the Roman world’, CQ 37.213–23Google Scholar
Stead, H. (2016). A Cockney Catullus: The Reception of Catullus in Romantic Britain 1795–1821. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Stehle(Stigers), E. (1997). ‘Retreat from the male: Catullus 62 and Sappho’s erotic flowers’, Ramus 6.83–102Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1979). ‘Ovids Liebeskunst und die Ehegesetze des Augustus’, Gymnasium 86.323–52Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (2000). ‘Lesbia und Juventius: ein erotisches Liederbuch im Corpus Catullianum’, in id., Apocrypha. Entlegene Schriften 79–99. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (2005). ‘Writing (on) bodies: lyric discourse and the production of gender in Horace Odes 1.13’, CP 100.52–82Google Scholar
Swann, B. W. (1994). Martial’s Catullus: The Reception of an Epigrammatic Rival. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (1990/2001). Catull. Eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil. Die grossen Gedichte. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2006). ‘Propertian textual criticism and editing’, in Günther, H.-C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Propertius 45–65. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1993). ‘Catullus 79: personal invective or political discourse?’, PLLS 7.31–45Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1997). ‘Friendship, politics, and literature in Catullus: Poems 1, 65 and 66, 116’, CQ 47. 482–500 (= Gaisser (2007a) 369–98)Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2007). ‘Social commentary and political invective’, in Skinner, (2007a) 333–54Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2011). ‘Invective identities in Pro Caelio’, in Smith, C. J. and Corvino, R. (eds.), Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric 165–79. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (2013). ‘Catullus and Lesbia translated in women’s historical novels’, in Hardwick, L. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Classics in the Modern World: A Democratic Turn 275–86. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982). ‘Catullus and the polemics of poetic reference (Poem 64.1–18)’, AJP 103.144–64 (= Thomas (1999) 12–32)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983). ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman poetry’, CQ 33.92–113 (= Thomas (1999) 68–100)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1984). ‘Menander and Catullus 8’, RhM 127.308–16 (= Thomas (1999) 44–52)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1986). ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSCP 90.171–98 (= Thomas (1999) 114–41)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1993). ‘Sparrows, hares, and doves: a Catullan metaphor and its tradition’, Helios 20.131–42 (= Thomas (1999) 52–67)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999). Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, O. (1992). Ritual and Desire: Catullus 61 and 62 and Other Ancient Documents on Wedding and Marriage. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1970). ‘The codex Romanus of Catullus: a collation of the text’, RhM 113.97–110Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1973). ‘A new look at the manuscript tradition of Catullus’, YCS 23.113–29Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1997). Catullus Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Phoenix Suppl. 34. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1994). Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (2005). The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method, ed. and trans. G. W. Most. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1975). ‘Orazio e Catullo’, in id., Poeti latini (e neolatini): note e saggi filologici 253–75. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1998a). Poeti latini (e neolatini): note e saggi filologici. V serie. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1998b). ‘Introduzione a Catullo: la poesia degli affetti’, in Traina, (1998a) 19–50 (orig. publ. in Catullo, I canti, trans. E. Mandruzzato, Milan 1982, 5–38)Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1998c). ‘Compresenze strutturali in Catullo’, in Traina, (1998a) 51–68 (orig. publ. in ΜΟΥΣΑ. Scritti in onore di G. Morelli, Bologna 1997, 283–96)Google Scholar
Trimble, G. C. (2012). ‘Catullus and “comment in English”: the tradition of the expurgated commentary before Fordyce’, in Stray, C. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Expurgating the Classics: Editing Out in Greek and Latin 143–62. LondonGoogle Scholar
Trimble, G. C. (2013). ‘Catullus 64 and the prophetic voice in Virgil’s fourth Eclogue’, in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic 263–77. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. (2006). ‘Embracing the young man in love: Catullus 75 and the comic adulescens’, Antichthon 40.19–34Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1908). ‘The Identification of the Manuscripts of Catullus Cited in Statius’ Edition of 1566’. Diss. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1960a). ‘The transmission of the text of Catullus’, in Studi in Onore di Luigi Castiglioni 2.1025–57. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Vance, N. and Wallace, J. (eds.) (2015). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 4: 1790–1880. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988). Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, transl. D. Pellauer. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Volpi, G. (1710). C. Valerius Catullus, Albius Tibullus E. R., Sex. Aurelius Propertius. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Volpi, G. (1737). C. Valerius Catullus, et in eum Jo. Antonii Vulpii … novus commentarius locupletissimus. PaduaGoogle Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (2003). Literatur als Brücke. Studien zur Rezeptionsgeschichte und Komparatistik. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
De Vos, M. (2014). ‘From Lesbos she took her honeycomb: Sappho and the “female tradition” in Hellenistic poetry’, in Pieper, C. and Ker, J. (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World: Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values VII, 410–34. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Vossius, I. (1684). Cajus Valerius Catullus Et in eum Isaaci Vossii Observationes. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. (1982). ‘A note on the phonostylistics of Latin: (s) in Plautus’, Glotta 60.120–4Google Scholar
Watson, A. G. (1979). Catalogue of Dated and Datable Manuscripts c.700–1600 in the department of Manuscripts, The British Library. LondonGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (1995). ‘Horace’s Epodes: the impotence of iambos?’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration 188–202. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (2007). ‘The Epodes: Horace’s Archilochus?’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace 93–104. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (2012). ‘Catullus, inurbanitas and the Transpadanes’ in Morelli, A. M. (2012) 151–69Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, T. [=A. J.] (eds.) (1979). Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wharton, D. (2009). ‘On the distribution of adnominal prepositional phrases in Latin prose’, CP 104.184–207Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. (1934). Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (1993). Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MassCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (2010). Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1879). ‘Die Galliamben des Kallimachos und Catullus’, Hermes 14.194–9Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1924). Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos. Vols. 1–2. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2015). The Roman Audience. Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wong, A. (2017). The Poetry of Kissing in Early Modern Europe: From the Catullan Revival to Secundus, Shakespeare and the English Cavaliers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1966). ‘Some implications of otium in Catullus 51.13–16’, Latomus 25.217–26Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2000). Review of J. Godwin, Catullus: The Shorter Poems (Warminster 1999), BMCR 05.14Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2002). ‘Biformis Vates: the Odes, Catullus, and Greek Lyric’, in T. [= A. J.] Woodman and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace 53–64. Cambridge (= (2012) 41–58)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2003). ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1’, in Braund and Gill (2003) 191–216 (= (2012) 121–44)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2006). ‘Catullus 51: a suitable case for treatment?’, CQ 56.610–11 (= (2012) 24–6)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2012b). ‘A covering letter: Poem 65’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 130–52Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2015a). Lost Histories: Selected Fragments of Roman Historical Writers. Histos Suppl. 2. Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
Woodman, T. [= A. J.] and Powell, J. (eds.) (1992). Author and Audience in Latin Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, T. [= A. J.] and West, D. (eds.) (1974). Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. (2009). ‘Ovid’s Catullus and the neoteric moment in Roman poetry’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid 252–64. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. (2012). ‘Catullus the Roman love elegist?’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy 25–38. Malden, Mass./OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamponi, S. (2016). ‘Aspetti della tradizione gotica nella littera antiqua’, in Black, et al. (2016) 105–25Google Scholar
Zeiner, N. (2005). Nothing Ordinary Here: Statius as Creator of Distinction in the Silvae. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983/2007). ‘Catullus, Ennius, and the poetics of allusion’, ICS 8.251–66 (= Gaisser, (2007a) 198–216)Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018). Critics, Compilers and Commentators. An Introduction to Roman Philology 200 BCE–800 CE. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1955). ‘Moribunda ab sede Pisauri’, Studia Oliveriana 3.57–69 (= (1978) 187–99)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1957). ‘Calfurnio editore di Catullo’, Atene e Roma 2.157–9 (= (1978) 105–8)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1958). ‘Ricerche sulla tradizione manoscritta di Catullo’, Bollettino per l’edizione nazionale dei classici 6.79–99 (= (1978) 79–104)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1964). ‘Some metrical and prosodical features of Catullus’ poetry’, Phoenix 18.193–205Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. (2004). ‘Between text and music: the reception of Virgilian speeches in early Virgilian manuscripts’, MD 52.107–26Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, T. (2007). ‘Anglo-American Catullus since the mid-twentieth century’, IJCT 13.409–30Google Scholar
Zukofsky, L. and Zukofsky, C. (1969). Catullus (Gai Valeri Catulli Veronensis liber). LondonGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010). Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Poetry into Hellenistic Poetry. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1992). ‘British Latin: the text, interpretation and language of the Bath curse tablets’, Britannia 23.1–26Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1995). ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, JRS 85.86–134Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1999). ‘Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999) 97–133Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. (eds.) (1999). Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. (eds.) (2016). Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change? CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2004). Plauto in Catullo. Edizioni e saggi universitari di filologia classica 63. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2009). ‘Catull. 67.1s.: incipit della ianua o explicit della Coma?’, Paideia 66.521–40Google Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2011). ‘Una rilettura di Catull. 1.8s.: lo snodo tra dedica a Nepote e invocazione alla Musa’, in Biondi, (2011) 1–21Google Scholar
Agnesini, A. (2012). ‘Lepos, mores, pathos, furor, risus … Per una “ri-sistemazione” di alcuni carmina catulliani’, in Morelli, (2012) 171–202Google Scholar
Albertini, A. (1953). ‘Calfurnio bresciano: la sua edizione di Catullo (1481)’, Commentari dell’Ateneo di Brescia 29–79. BresciaGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. C. (1990). Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Phoenix Suppl. 26. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Allenspach, J. and Frasso, G. (1980). ‘Vicende, cultura e scritti di Gerolamo Squarzafico, Alessandrino’, IMU 23.233–92Google Scholar
Ancona, R. (2002). ‘The untouched self: Sapphic and Catullan Muses in Horace, Odes 1.22’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature 161–86. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1874). ‘Santen, Laurens or Louw van’, in van der Aa, A. J. (ed.), Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden (Haarlem, 1852–1878, 21 vols.). Vol. 17.101–4Google Scholar
Aranjo, D. (2005). ‘Catulle au début du XXe siècle: une anthologie’, Babel: Littératures plurielles 12.145–76Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003). ‘Lusus und Gloria – Plinius’ Hendecasyllabi (Epist. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4)’, in Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.), Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit 3–13. Munich/LeipzigCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, D. (1979). ‘PLAVTVS VORTIT BARBARE. Plautus, Bacchides 526–61 and Menander Dis Exapaton 102–12’, in West, and Woodman, (1979) 17–34Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. (1975). ‘Domina at Catullus 68, 68: mistress or chatelaine?’, RhM 118.124–9Google Scholar
Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds.) (2009). New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 1: Syntax of the Sentence. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Balmer, J. (2013). Piecing Together the Fragments: Translating Classical Verse, Creating Contemporary Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Balsamo, J. and Galand-Hallyn, P. (eds.) (2000). La Poétique de Jean Second et son influence au XVIe siècle. Les Cahiers de l’humanisme 1. ParisGoogle Scholar
Barbaud, T. (2008). ‘Catulle versus Horace: révolte et sagesse poétiques’, REL 86.80–96Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993). ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSCP 95.333–65Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001). ‘Horace and iambos: the poet as literary historian’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi, (2001) 141–64Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005). ‘The search for the perfect book: a PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book 320–42. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Scheidel, W. (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. (2010). ‘Forerunners of Romance -mente adverbs in Latin prose and poetry’, in Dickey, andChahoud, (2010) 339–53Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.) (2012). Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Bausi, F., Campanelli, M., Gentile, S., Hankins, J. (eds.) (2013). Autografi dei letterati italiani. Il Quattrocento. Tomo I. RomeGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (1994). ‘The Roman and the foreign: the cult of the “Great Mother” in Imperial Rome’, in Thomas, N. and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History and the State 164–89. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Bellandi, F. (2012). ‘Catullo e la politica romana’, in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e ciuitas: Transizioni dalla Reppublica all’Impero, in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci 47–71. PisaGoogle Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005). ‘Catulle et les affrontements politico-littéraires à Rome à la fin de la république’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence de Catulle et des élégiaques latins (Actes du colloque tenu à Tours 28–30 novembre 2002) 131–48. Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar
Bertone, S. (2018). ‘Innovazione e continuità tra le edizioni aldine di Catullo curate dall’Avanzi (Ald. 1502 – Ald. 1515)’, Paideia 73.2071–84Google Scholar
Bessone, F. (2014). ‘Polis, court, empire: Greek culture, Roman society, and the system of genres’, in Augoustakis, A. (ed.), Flavian Poetry and its Greek Past 215–33. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Bessone, F. and Fucecchi, M. (eds.) (2017). The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age. Berlin/BostonGoogle Scholar
Billanovich, G. (1959). ‘Dal Livio di Raterio (Laur. 63, 19) al Livio del Petrarca (B. M., Harl. 2493’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 2.103–78Google Scholar
Billanovich, G. (1988). ‘Il Catullo della Cattedrale di Verona’, in Krämer, S. and Bernhard, M. (eds.), Scire litteras. Forschungen zum mittelalterlichen Geistesleben (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse Abhandlungen, nf 99) 35–57. MunichGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. (2009). The Scroll and the Marble. Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Biondi, G. G. (2011). Il Liber di Catullo: tradizione, modelli e Fortleben, Quaderni di Paideia 14. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Biondi, G. G. (2015). ‘Catullus, Sabellico (& Co.) and … Giorgio Pasquali’, in Kiss, (2015a) 29–52Google Scholar
Black, R., Kraye, J., and Nuvoloni, L. (eds.) (2016). Palaeography, Manuscript Illumination and Humanism in Renaissance Italy: Studies in Memory of A. C. de la Mare. Warburg Institute Colloquia 28. LondonGoogle Scholar
Bleisch, P. (1999). ‘The empty tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past in Aeneid 6.494-547’, CA 18.187–226Google Scholar
Bonadeo, A. (2017) ‘Scattered remarks about the ‘non-genre’ of Statius’ Siluae’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 157–66Google Scholar
Bonnet, M. (1877). Review of Baehrens’s Teubner edition of Catullus, Revue Critique d’Histoire et de Littérature 4.58–65Google Scholar
Bonvicini, M. (2012). Il novus libellus di Catullo: trasmissione del testo, problematicità della grafia e dell’interpunzione. Quaderni di Paideia 15. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Boulet, J. (2009). ‘“Will he rise and recover[?]”: Catullus, castration, and censorship in Swinburne’s “Dolores”’, Victorian Poetry 47.747–58Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1979). ‘Vivamus, mea Lesbia in the English Renaissance’, English Literary Renaissance 9.199–224Google Scholar
Braund, D. (1996). ‘The politics of Catullus 10: Memmius, Caesar and the Bithynians’, Hermathena 160.45–57Google Scholar
Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003). Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. ExeterGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1971, 1982). Horace on Poetry. Vol. 2 The Ars Poetica and Vol. 3 Epistles Book II. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1955, 1968, 1986). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. 3 vols. Cleveland/AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Burrus, V. (2007). ‘Mapping as metamorphosis: initial reflections on gender and ancient religious discourses’, in Penner, T. and Vander Stichele, C. (eds.), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses 1–10. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (1984). The Manuscript Tradition of Propertius. Phoenix Suppl. 17. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2006). ‘The Fabella of Sulpicia (“Epigrammata Bobiensia” 37)’, Phoenix 60.70–121Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. (2007). ‘History and transmission of the text’, in Skinner, (2007a) 13–34Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2008a). ‘The poetic treatment of atque from Catullus to Juvenal’, Mnem. 61.386–413Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2015a). ‘cui uideberis bella: the influence of Baehrens and Housman on the text of Catullus’, in Kiss, (2015a) 107–28Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (ed.) (2015b). Varro Varius: The Polymath of the Roman World. Cambridge Classical Journal Suppl. 39. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (1973). ‘Catullus’ “basia” poems (5, 7, 48)’, Mnemosyne 26.15–22 (= (2012a) 6–12)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (1974). ‘Venusta Sirmio: Catullus 31’, in Woodman and West (1974) 1–16 (= (2012a) 18–35)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2003). ‘Catullus in and about Bithynia: Poems 68, 10, 28 and 47’, in Braund and Gill (2003) 163–90 (= (2012a) 99–121)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2005). ‘Catullus 45: text and interpretation’, CQ 55.534–41 (= (2012a) 36–46)Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2012b). ‘Poem 45: the wooing of Acme and Septimius’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 112–29Google Scholar
Campana, P. (2012). Il ciclo di Gellio nel liber catulliano: Per una nuova lettura di Catull. 74, 80, 88, 89, 90, 91, 116. PisaGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. A. (1960). ‘Galliambic poems of the 15th and 16th centuries: sources of the Bacchic Odes of the Pléiade School’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 22.490–510Google Scholar
Canobbio, A. (2017). ‘Bi-partition and non-distinction of poetical genres in Martial’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 103–116Google Scholar
Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds.) (2001). Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
Cavazza, S. (2013). ‘Negri, Palladio (Palladius FUSCUS)’, online at www.treccani.it, cf. DBI 78.157Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (1991). ‘Il fiore reciso dall’ aratro: ambiguità di una similitudine (Catull. 11, 22–24)’, QUCC 37.83–100Google Scholar
Cenerini, F. (1989). ‘O colonia quae cupis ponte ludere longo (Cat. 17): Cultura e politica’, Athenaeum 67.41–55Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2010). ‘Idiom(s) and literariness in classical literary criticism’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010) 42–64Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2016). ‘Varro’s Latin and Varro on Latin’, in Ferri, and Zago, (2016) 15–32Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2018). ‘Verbal mosaics: speech patterns and generic stylization in Lucilius’, in Breed, B. W., Keitel, E. and Wallace, R. (eds.), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century Rome 132–161. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Cheney, P. and Hardie, P. (eds.) (2015). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 2 1558–1660. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Chevallier, R. (1977). ‘La géographie de Catulle’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 187–193Google Scholar
Cignolo, C. (2002). Terentiani Mauri de litteris, de syllabis, de metris. 1 Introduzione, testo critico e traduzione italiana. 2 Commento, appendici e indici. Bibliotheca Weidmanniana, Collectanea grammatica Latina, 2.1 and 2. Hildesheim/Zurich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Clare, R. J. (1997). ‘Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: allusion and exemplarity’, PCPS 42.60–88Google Scholar
Clark, C. (2008). ‘The poetics of manhood? Nonverbal behavior in Catullus 51’, CP 103.257–81Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1987). Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R. (1999). ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse, and the poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 21–93Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007). ‘Virile tongues: rhetoric and masculinity’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric 83–96. Chichester/Malden, Mass.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation. Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. IthacaGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015). Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Corradino dall’Aglio, G. F. (1738). Cajus Valerius Catullus in integrum restitutus. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003). The Fragmentary Latin Poets. (Revision of 1st edn., 1993.) OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. (2015). ‘On not being Archilochus properly: Cato, Catullus and the idea of iambos’, MD 74.9–52Google Scholar
Crabbe, A. (1977). ‘ignoscenda quidem … Catullus 64 and the fourth Georgic’, CQ 27.342–51Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1970). ‘ΟΙ ΝΕΩΤΕΡΟΙ, poetae novi, and cantores Euphorionis’, CQ 20.322–7Google Scholar
Csapodi, C., and Csapodi-Gárdonyi, K. (1969). Biblioteca Corviniana. The Library of King Matthias Corvinus of Hungary. Translated from German by Z. Horn. ShannonGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, I. C. (1983). ‘An Italian Catullus. Edinburgh, Nat. Lib. of Scotland, Adv. MS. 18.5.2’, Scriptorium 37.122–5Google Scholar
David-de Palacio, M.-F. (2005). Reviviscences romaines. La latinité au miroir de l’esprit fin-de-siècle. BernGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (1995). Aldus Manutius: Printer and Publisher of Renaissance Venice. LondonGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1976). ‘The return of Petronius to Italy’, in Alexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T. (eds.), Medieval Learning and Literature. Essays Presented to Richard William Hunt 220–51. OxfordGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1985). ‘New research on humanistic scribes in Florence’, in Garzelli, A., Miniatura fiorentina del rinascimento 1440–1525: un primo censimento (Inventari e Cataloghi Toscani 18 and 19) 1.393–600Google Scholar
de la Mare, A. C. (1996). ‘Vespasiano da Bisticci as producer of classical manuscripts in fifteenth-century Florence’, in Chavannes-Mazal, C. A. and Smith, M. M. (eds.), Medieval Manuscripts of the Latin Classics: Production and Use 166–207. Los Altos Hills/LondonGoogle Scholar
de la Mare, A. C., and Thomson, D. F. S. (1973). ‘Poggio’s earliest manuscript?’, Italia Medioevo e Umanistica 16.179–95Google Scholar
de la Mare, A. C., and Nuvoloni, L. (2009). The Handwriting of the Italian Humanists. Vol. 2: Bartolomeo Sanvito: The Life and Work of a Renaissance Scribe. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dench, E. (2005). Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. OxfordGoogle Scholar
De Robertis, T. (2016). ‘I primi anni della scrittura umanistica’, in Black, et al. (2016) 55–85Google Scholar
De Robertis, T., Tanturli, G., and Zamponi, S. (2008). Coluccio Salutati e l’invenzione dell’umanesimo. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series, 7. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Devine, A. M. and Stephens, L. D. (2006). Latin Word Order: Structured Meaning and Information. OxfordGoogle Scholar
De Vries, [S. G.] (1911). ‘Vossius (Isaac)’, Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek 1.1519–25Google Scholar
Dewar, M. (2014). Leisured Resistance: Villas, Literature and Politics in the Roman World. LondonGoogle Scholar
Dibdin, T. F. (1827). An Introduction to the Knowledge of Rare and Valuable Editions of the Greek and Latin Classics. Vols. 1–2. LondonGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. (2000). ‘O dee ree PIE: the vocative problems of Latin words ending in –eus’, Glotta 76.32–49Google Scholar
Doering, F. W. (1788–92). C. Valerii Catulli carmina varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustrata. 2 vols. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Doering, F. W. (1826). C. Valerius Catullus ex editione Frid. Guil. Doeringi, rev. J. Naudet. ParisGoogle Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E. and Gervais, K. (eds.) (2015). The Brill Companion to Statius. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Döpp, S. (2005). ‘Munera et Musarum et Veneris: Catull c. 68 in der Entwicklungsgeschichte der römischen Elegie’, in Tar, I. and Meyer, P. (eds.), Studia Catulliana in memoriam Stephani Caroli Horváth (1931–1966), Acta Universitatis Szegediensis Acta Antiqua et Archaeologica xxix 5–19. SzegedGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. (2013). ‘Militia amoris: fighting in love’s army’, in Thorsen (2013) 194–206Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le (2012). ‘Three problems in Poem 66’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 153–83Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le (2017). ‘Contextualising Catullus: a re-examination of 66.1–14’, in Woodman, A. J. and Wisse, J. (eds.), Word and Context in Latin Poetry. Studies in Memory of David West (PCPS/CCJ Suppl. 40) 13–42. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, T. [= A. J.] (eds.) (2012). Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dyson, S. L. (1985). ‘The Transpadane frontier’, in The Creation of the Roman Frontier 42–86. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. (1989). ‘Greek into Latin: a note on Catullus and Sappho’, Latomus 48.590–600Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (1992). ‘Apples, blood and flowers: Sapphic bridal imagery in Catullus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature 6.181–203. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Evrard, E. (2005). ‘Polymètres et épigrammes de Catulle. Analyse quantitative du vocabulaire et de la syntaxe des propositions’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence de Catulle et des elégiaques latins (Actes du colloque tenu à Tours, 28–30 novembre 2002) 65–83. Clermont-FerrandGoogle Scholar
Evrard-Gillis, J. (1976). La récurrence lexicale dans l’oeuvre de Catulle. Etude linguistique. ParisGoogle Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. (1983). La ripetizione lessicale nei poeti latini: Venti anni di studi (1960–1980). BolognaGoogle Scholar
Fain, G. L. (2008). Writing Epigrams: The Art of Composition in Catullus, Callimachus and Martial. (Collection Latomus 312.) BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004). Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991). Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic. New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Farron, S. (1993). Vergil’s Aeneid: A Poem of Grief and Love. Mnemosyne Suppl. 122. Leiden/New York/CologneGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (1992).‘“Shall I compare thee … ?”: Catullus 68b and the limits of analogy’, in T. [=A. J.] Woodman andPowell, J. (eds.), Author and Audience in Latin Literature 33–44. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010). ‘Fathers and sons: the Manlii Torquati and family continuity in Catullus and Horace’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman 205–23. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2012). ‘Representation and the materiality of the book in the polymetrics’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 29–47Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2000). ‘Non inter nota sepulchra: Catullus 101 and Roman funerary ritual’, CA 19.209–31 (= Gaisser (2007a) 399–426)Google Scholar
Fernandelli, M. (2015). Chartae laboriosae: Autore e lettore nei carmi maggiori di Catullo (c. 64 & 65). ParmaGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. (2011). ‘The language of Latin epic and lyric poetry’, in Clackson, J. (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language 344–66. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. and Zago, A. (eds.) (2016). The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about Language in the Roman World. TurnhoutGoogle Scholar
Fiesoli, G. (2006). ‘Giovannantonio Volpi lettore di Catullo: i modelli, il metodo, la fortuna’, Seicento e Settecento 1.1–44Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1988). ‘Power and impotence in Horace’s Epodes’, Ramus 17.176–91 (= Lowrie, M. (ed.) (2009), Horace: Odes and Epodes 141–59. Oxford)Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995). Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, H. G., III. (1988). New Aldine Studies: Documentary Essays on the Life and Work of Aldus Manutius. San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. (2000). Quinto Ennio Annali (libri I–VIII): Introduzione, testo critico con apparato, traduzione. Vol. 1. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Flores, E. et al. (2002). Quinto Ennio Annali (libri I–VIII): Commentari (Book 7: Tomasco, D.). Vol. 2. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Fo, A. (2002). ‘Ancora sulla presenza dei classici nella poesia italiana contemporanea’, Semicerchio: rivista di poesia comparata 26–27.24–52Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. (1978). ‘“Reverse similes” and sex roles in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 11.7–26Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1978). ‘Leonora and Neaera: a consideration of George Buchanan’s erotic poetry’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 40.513–24. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. (1980). ‘George Buchanan’s court poetry and the Pléiade’, French Studies 34.137–52Google Scholar
Ford, P. (1997). ‘Jean Salmon Macrin’s Epithalamiorum liber and the joys of conjugal love’, in Ford, P. and De Smet, I. (eds.), Eros et Priapus: érotisme et obscénité dans la littérature néo-latine 65–84. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P. (2011). ‘Obscenity and the Lex Catulliana: uses and abuses of Catullus 16 in French Renaissance poetry’, in Roberts, H., Peureux, G. and Wajeman, L. (eds.), Obscénités Renaissantes 48–60. GenevaGoogle Scholar
Ford, P., Bloemendal, J. and Fantazzi, C. (eds.) (2014). Brill’s Encyclopedia of the Neo-Latin World. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1987). ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble 185–98. Bristol/Oak Park, Ill.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1989). ‘First thoughts on closure: problems and prospects’, MD 22.75–122 (= (2000) 239–83)Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2002b). ‘Masculinity under threat? The poetics and politics of inspiration in Latin poetry’, in Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature 141–59. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. (2015). ‘The bisexuality of Orpheus’, in Masterson, Sorkin and Robson, (2015) 335–51Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, E. A. (1985). ‘Catullus to Caecilius on good poetry (c. 35)’, AJP 106.213–21Google Scholar
Frenz, B. and Stelte, I. (2012). ‘Catullus’, in Walde, C. (ed.), The Reception of Classical Literature (Brill New Pauly Supplement 5) 92–102. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (1994). ‘The question of genre and metre in Catullus’ polymetrics’, QUCC 46.95–108Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2013). ‘Seruitium amoris: the interplay of dominance, gender and poetry’, in Thorsen (2013) 180–93Google Scholar
Gaca, K. L. (2008). ‘Reinterpreting the Homeric simile of Iliad 16.7–11: the girl and her mother in ancient Greek warfare’, AJP 129.145–71Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1977). ‘Mythological exempla in Propertius 1.2 and 1.15’, AJP 98.381–91Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1992). ‘Catullus’, in Brown, V. (ed. in chief), Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries vii.197–292. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1995). ‘Threads in the labyrinth: competing views and voices in Catullus 64’, AJP 116.579–616Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (2009). Catullus . Blackwell Introductions to the Classical World. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (2015). ‘From Giovanni Pontano to Pierio Valeriano: five Renaissance commentators on Latin erotic poetry’, in Kraus, C. S., Stray, C. (eds.), Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre 275–98. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2007). ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius 59–75. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2012). ‘Putting on the yoke of necessity: myth, intertextuality and moral agency in Catullus 68’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 184–211Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2018). ‘Between pastoral and elegy: the discourse of desire in Catullus 45’, Paideia 73.1589–1604Google Scholar
Gardner, H. H. (2007). ‘Ariadne’s lament: the semiotic impulse of Catullus 64’, TAPA 137.147–79Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. (2007). ‘Kritisch-exegetische Überlegungen zu Catullgedichten’, Acta Ant. Hung. 47.1–41Google Scholar
Gebhardus, I. (1621). Cai Valeri Catulli, Albi Tibulli, Sexti Aureli Properti Quae exstant. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Giardina, G. (2011). ‘Per il testo e la interpretazione di Catullo 1.9-10’, Prometheus 37.56–60Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012). Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Steel, C. (2010). ‘The indistinct literary careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and their Reception 118–37. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Giesecke, A. L. (2000). Atoms, Ataraxy, and Allusion. Cross-generic Imitation of the De Rerum Natura in Early Augustan Poetry. Zurich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ginguené, P.-L. (1813). ‘Corradino dall’Aglio (Jean-François)’, in Michaud, L.-G. (ed.), Biographie universelle ancienne et moderne (Paris, 1811–1828, 54 vols.). Vol. 9.647–8Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995). Making Men: Sophists and Self-presentation in Ancient Rome. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, C. (1992). Carmina Priapea: Einleitung, Übersetzung, Interpretation und Kommentar. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2001). ‘The erotic eye: visual stimulation and cultural conflict’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek Under Rome 154–94. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1974). ‘O patrona virgo’, in Evans, J. A. S. (ed.), Polis and Imperium 253–64. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965). The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams. 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gow, A. S. F (1968). The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip and Some Contemporary Epigrams. 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. (2016). ‘Girls will be boys and boys will be girls, or, what is the gender of Horace’s Epodes?’, in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds.), Horace’s Epodes: Context, Intertexts, and Reception 103–30. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. (1983). Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship. Vol. 1 Textual Criticism and Exegesis. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Granarolo, J. (1971). D’Ennius à Catulle. Recherches sur les antécédents romains de la ‘poésie nouvelle’. ParisGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. N. ed. trans. (2017). Aldus Manutius: Humanism and the Latin Classics, The I Tatti Renaissance Library 78. Cambridge, Mass./LondonGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. R. (1998). ‘The manhandling of Maecenas; Senecan abstractions of masculinity’, AJP 119 .607–32Google Scholar
Grazzini, S. (2005). ‘La subscriptio del codice G di Catullo (Paris. lat. 14137)’, MD 55.163–71Google Scholar
Green, P. (2005). The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition Translated with Commentary. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1995). ‘The Catullan ego: fragmentation and the erotic self’, AJP 116. 77–93Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1997). ‘Journey to the remotest meadow: a reading of Catullus 11’, Intertexts 1.147–55Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1998). The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore/LondonGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1999). ‘Refiguring the female voice: Catullus translating Sappho’, Arethusa 32.1–18Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2006). ‘Catullus, Caesar and Roman masculine identity’, Antichthon 40.49–64Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1985). ‘The creation of characters in the Aeneid’, in id., Latin Poets and Roman Life 183–97. LondonGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. G. (1983). ‘Catullus, Poem 4: a neglected interpretation revived’, Phoenix 37.123–8Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1985). ‘Literary allusion in Virgil, Aeneid 9.435ff.’, Vergilius 31.40–4Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1995). ‘Catullus’ Coma Berenices and Aeneas’ farewell to Dido’, TAPA 125.47–59Google Scholar
Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2017). The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Grossi Turchetti, M. L. (2004). Manoscritti datati della Biblioteca nazionale Braidense di Milano. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Guarini, A. (1521). Alexandri Guarini Ferrariensis in C. V. Catullum Veronensem per Baptistam Patrem Emendatum Expositiones. VeniceGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (1998). Poetic Garlands. Hellenistic Garlands in Context. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2012). ‘Catullus and the Garland of Meleager’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 79–111Google Scholar
Hale, W. G. (1897). ‘First annual report of the managing committee of the American School of Classical Studies in Rome’, AJA 1.5–68Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1973). ‘The role of women in Roman Elegy: counter-cultural feminism’, Arethusa 6.103–24Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1996). ‘Nec castrare velis meos libellos: sexual and poetic lusus in Catullus, Martial and the Carmina Priapea’, in Klodt, C. (ed.), Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag 321–44. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A. (1983). Statius and the Silvae: Poets, Patrons, and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1992). ‘Augustan poets and the mutability of Rome’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus 59–82. LondonGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2012). ‘Virgil’s Catullan plots’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 212–38Google Scholar
Harless, T. C. (1764). ‘Ioannes Franciscus Conradinus de Allio (d’Aglio)’, in id., De Vitis Philologorum Nostra Aetate Clarissimorum, 4 vols. (Bremen, 1764–72). Vol. 1.107–11Google Scholar
Harris, B. F. (1980). ‘Bithynia: Roman sovereignty and the survival of Hellenism’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.7.2.857–901Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2000). ‘The need for a new text of Catullus’, in Reitz, C. (ed.), Vom Text zum Buch 63–79. St. KatharinenGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2001). ‘Some generic problems in Horace’s Epodes: or, on (not) being Archilochus’, in Cavarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi (2001) 165–86Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2004). ‘Altering Attis: ethnicity, gender and genre in Catullus 63’, Mnemosyne 57.520–33 (= Nauta and Harder (2005) 11–24)Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2009). ‘Catullus in New Zealand’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English 295–323. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (forthcoming). ‘Roman traces: Michael Longley and Latin poetry’, in Tyler, M. (ed.), The Imaginary Oarsman: Essays on the Poetry of Michael Longley. Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. R. (1989). ‘Catullus 11: along for the ride’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 5.98–116. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (1999). ‘Suck it and see: Horace, Epode 8’, in id., Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry 93–113. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (2006). ‘Oxford Reds’: Classic Commentaries on Latin Classics: R. G. Austin on Cicero and Virgil, C. J. Fordyce on Catullus, R. G. and R. G. M. Nisbet on Cicero. LondonGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995). ‘Dividing poems’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M. D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance 117–48. SpoletoGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2001). ‘Catullian iambics, Catullian iambi’, in Carvarzere, Aloni and Barchiesi, (2001) 117–40Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2015). ‘Catullus 62, 67 and other Catullan dialogues’, in Kiss, (2015a) 129–51Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Ricottilli, L. (2003). La lingua d’uso latina. Augmented translation of J. B. Hofmann, Lateinische Umgangssprache (3rd edn., Heidelberg 1951) by L. Ricottilli. 3rd edn. (1st edn. 1980). BolognaGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Santyr, A. (1965). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Handbuch der Altertumswissennschaft 2.2.2). MunichGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (1992). ‘The nuptial rite in Catullus 66 and Callimachus’ poetry for Berenice’, ZPE 91.21–8Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2000). ‘Lesbia, the poet, and the two faces of Sappho: “womanufacture” in Catullus’, PCPS 46.28–44Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2006). ‘Staging the reader response: Ovid and his “contemporary audience” in Ars and Remedia’, in Gibson, R., Green, S. and Sharrock, A. (eds.), The Art of Love. Bimillenial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia Amoris 40–53. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2019). ‘Catullus as epigrammatist’, in Henriksén, C. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epigram 441–57. HobokenGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, D. and Martindale, C. (eds.) (2012). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 3: 1660–1790. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1998). The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2000). ‘Horace and Catullus: the case of the suppressed precursor in Odes 1.22 and 1.32’, CW 94.25–37Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2003). ‘The Catullan corpus, Greek epigrams, and the poetry of objects’, CQ 53.206–21 (= (2008) 109–30)Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008). Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2012). ‘Booking lovers: desire and design in Catullus’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 48–78Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2003). ‘Catullus 2 and 3: a programmatic pair of Sapphic epigrams’, Mnemosyne 56.551–65Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2014). ‘Play on the proper names of individuals in the Catullan corpus: wordplay, the iambic tradition, and the late Republican culture of public abuse’, JRS 104.51–72Google Scholar
Jackson, A. (2009). ‘Catullus in the playground’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English 82–96. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G. and Tomasco, D. (eds.) (2009). Quinto Ennio, Annali (Frammenti di collocazione incerta): Commentari. Con un’avvertenza di E. Flores. NaplesGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1959). ‘On linguistic aspects of translation’, in Brower, R. A. (ed.), On Translation 232–9. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1998). ‘Introduction: constructions of gender and genre in Roman comedy and elegy’, Helios 25.3–16Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003). Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
James, S. L. (2012). ‘Elegy and New Comedy’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy 253–68. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Janan, M. (1994). ‘When the Lamp is Shattered’: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale/ EdwardsvilleGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1967). The Tragedies of Ennius. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 10. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1995). ‘Two features of the style of Catullus’ Phalaecian epigrams’, Sileno 21.63–82Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1996a). ‘The language of Catullus 17 and that of its immediate neighbours in the transmitted collection’, Sileno 22.137–63Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1999). ‘The arrangement and the language of Catullus’ so-called polymetra with special reference to the sequence 10–11–12’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999) 335–75Google Scholar
Johannsen, N. (2006). Dichter über ihre Gedichte: die Prosavorreden in den Epigrammaton Libri Martialis und in den Silvae des Statius. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. S. (2012). Horace’s Iambic Criticism: Casting Blame (Iambikē Poiēsis). Mnemosyne Suppl. 334. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2009) ‘The ancient book’, in Bagnall, R. S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology 256–81. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. (2008). ‘Catullus’ libellus, the mixing of genres, and the evidence of Carm. 1, 50, and 46’, Mnem. 61 .130–37Google Scholar
Jorink, E., and Van Miert, D. (eds.) (2012). Isaac Vossius (1618–1689). Between Science and Scholarship. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Kahane, A. (2017). ‘Virgil’s epitaph, Donatus’ Life, biography and the structure of time’, PVS 29.161–85Google Scholar
Kay, N.M. (2010). ‘Colloquial Latin in Martial’s epigrams’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010) 318–30Google Scholar
Keith, A. (2016). ‘Naming the elegiac mistress: elegiac onomastics in Roman inscriptions’, in Keith, A. and Edmonson, J. (eds.), Roman Literary Cultures: Domestic Politics, Revolutionary Poetics, Civic Spectacle 59–88. Phoenix Suppl. 55. Toronto/Buffalo/LondonGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993). The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1999). ‘“Cf.”: analogies, relationships and Catullus 68’, in Braund, S. and Mayer, R. (eds.), amor : roma. Love and Latin Literature 30–43. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1974). The Classical Text: Aspects of Editing in the Age of the Printed Book. Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (2002). ‘Ovid’s language and style’, in Weiden Boyd, B. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid 27–89. Leiden/Boston/CologneGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2009). ‘Catullus 68. Edited with an introduction and detailed commentary.’ Diss. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2011). Review of D. S. McKie, Essays in the Interpretation of Roman Poetry (Cambridge 2009), Exemplaria Classica 15.257–71Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012a). ‘A correction and more on Girolamo Avanzi’s last edition of Catullus (ca. 1535)’, Exemplaria Classica 16.75–80Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012b). ‘A Renaissance manuscript of Catullus, Tibullus and Propertius. Budapest, Országos Széchényi Könyvtár, Codex Latinus Medii Aevi 137 and Cologny, Bibliotheca Bodmeriana, MS. Bodmer 141’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 52.249–71Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2012c). ‘Towards a catalogue of the surviving manuscripts of Catullus’, Paideia 67.607–19Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2013a). Catullus Online: An Online Repertory of Conjectures for Catullus. www.catullusonline.orgGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2013b). ‘Two humanistic conjectures in Catullus: 55.17 papillae and 61.140 soli’, Exemplaria Classica 17.63–70Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (ed.) (2015a). What Catullus Wrote: Problems in Textual Criticism, Editing and the Manuscript Tradition. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2015b). ‘Introduction: a sketch of the textual tradition’, in Kiss, (2015a) xiii–xxxGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2015c). ‘The lost Codex Veronensis and its descendants: three problems in Catullus’s manuscript tradition’, in Kiss, (2015a) 1–27Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2016). ‘The protohistory of the text of Catullus’ in Velaza, J. (ed.), From the Protohistory to the History of the Text (Studien zur klassischen Philologie 173) 125–40. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
Kiss, D. (2018). ‘The transmission of the poems of Catullus: the role of the incunabula’, Paideia 73.2151–74Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (2020). ‘Catullus Online: a digital critical edition of the poems of Catullus with a repertory of conjectures’, in Chronopoulos, S., Maier, F., Novokhatko, A. (eds.), Digitale Altertumswissenschaften: Thesen und Debatten zu Methoden und Anwendungen, 99–114. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kiss, D. (forthcoming). ‘Giovanni Francesco Corradino dall’Aglio and a manuscript of Catullus that he did not invent’Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds.) (1996). I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome. AustinGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B. (eds.) (2000). I, Claudia II: Women in Roman Art and Society. AustinGoogle Scholar
Klooster, J. (2011). Poetry as Window and Mirror: Positioning the Poet in Hellenistic Poetry. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1977). Catullus’ Indictment of Rome: The Meaning of Catullus 64. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (2000). ‘Self, sex, and empire in Catullus: the construction of a decentered identity’, in Bécares Botas, V., et al. (eds.), Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina 213–231. MadridGoogle Scholar
Korenjak, M. (2012). ‘Short mythological epic in Neo-Latin literature’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception 519–36. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. (2008). ‘Magni viri: Caesar, Alexander, and Pompey in Cat. 11’, Philologus 152.223–29Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2013). ‘Caesar, Lucretius and the dates of De Rerum Natura and the Commentarii’, CQ 63.772–79Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1924). Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Reprinted 1964. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2014). ‘Me, myself, and I: multiple (literary) personalities in Catullus 35’, CW 107.367–81Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001a). Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001b). ‘Arbitria urbanitatis: language, style, and characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37’, CA 20.239–72Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2007). ‘Catullus and elite republican social discourse’, in Skinner, (2007a) 212–32Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2012). ‘How to avoid profanity in Latin: an exploratory study’, MD 68.9–38Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1976). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. 3rd edn. 2 vols. HanoverGoogle Scholar
Laird, A. (1997). ‘Approaching characterisation in Virgil’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil 282–93. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Landolfi, L. (1996). ‘Multas per gentes et multa per aequora uectus (Cat. c. 101), Catullo fra Omero ed Apollonio Rodio’, Emerita 64.255–60Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2015). ‘Illa domus, illa mihi sedes: on the interpretation of Catullus 68’, in Hunter, R. and Oakley, S. P. (eds.), Latin Literature and its Transmission: Papers in Honour of Michael Reeve 194–224. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2009). Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, Mass./LondonGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J. W. (1972). Studies in Catullan Verse: An Analysis of Word Types and Patterns in the Polymetra. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Louis, N. (2010). Commentaire historique et traduction du Diuus Augustus de Suétone. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Lowry, M. (1979). The World of Aldus Manutius: Business and Scholarship in Renaissance Venice. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, W. (1990). ‘The origin and development of the Catullan style in Neo-Latin poetry’, in Godman, P. and Murray, O. (eds.), Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition 183–97. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyles, K. (2004). Vietnam ANZACs: Australian & New Zealand Troops in Vietnam 1962–72. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994). ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41.187–204 (= (2007) 167–83)Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998). ‘Love and death: Laodamia and Protesilaus in Catullus, Propertius, and others’, CQ 48.200–12 (= (2007) 211–26)Google Scholar
McKie, D. S. (1977). ‘The Manuscripts of Catullus: recension in a closed tradition’. Diss. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
McKie, D. S. (1986). ‘Salutati, Poggio, and Codex M of Catullus’, in Diggle, J., Hall, J. B., and Jocelyn, H. D. (eds.), Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink (PCPS Suppl. 15) 66–86. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1973). ‘Catullus 116’, CQ 23.304–9 (= (1983) 181–6; = Gaisser (2007a) 35–45)Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1974). ‘A use of myth in ancient poetry’, CQ 24.82–93 (= (1983) 159–70)Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2016). ‘Analytic and synthetic forms of the comparative and superlative from early to late Latin’, in Adams, and Vincent, (2016) 340–66Google Scholar
Manuzio, A. (2017). Humanism and the Latin Classics, ed. and trans. by J. N. Grant. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2008). The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Marchesi, I. (2015). ‘Uncluttered spaces, unlittered texts: Pliny’s villas as editorial places’, in Marchesi, I. (ed.), Pliny the Bookmaker 223–51. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Markley, A. A. (2004). Stateliest Measures: Tennyson and the Literature of Greece and Rome. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1992). ‘Horace, Ovid and others’, in Jenkyns, R. (ed.), The Legacy of Rome: A New Appraisal 177–214. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Maselli, G. (1994). Affari di Catullo: Rapporti di proprietà nell’immaginario dei Carmi. BariGoogle Scholar
Mastandrea, P., Perrelli, R., Biondi, G. G., Zurli, R. and Viparelli, V. (eds.) (2007). Musisque Deoque: A Digital Archive of Latin Poetry. www.mqdq.itGoogle Scholar
Masterson, M., Sorkin, N. and Robson, J. (eds.) (2015). Sex in Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Merli, E. (2017). ‘The festinatio in Flavian poetry: a clarification’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 139–55Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. (2001). ‘Wooden wit: tabellae in Latin poetry’, in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-five years at Yale 201–12. New HavenGoogle Scholar
Meyers, T. L. (ed.) (2004). Uncollected Letters of Algernon Charles Swinburne. Vol. 3. 1890–1909. LondonGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1994). Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: The Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1998). ‘Catullan consciousness, the “care of the self” and the force of the negative in history’, in Larmour, D. H. J., Miller, P. A. and Platter, C. (eds.), Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity 171–203. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004). Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2005). ‘Il Liber Catulli di Terenziano Mauro: l’ Attis e le convenzioni del libro latino’, Segno e Testo 3.71–91Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (ed.) (2008). Epigramma longum. Da Marziale alla tarda antichità / From Martial to late antiquity. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino, 29–31 maggio 2006. CassinoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (ed.) (2012). Lepos e mores. Una giornata su Catullo. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino, 27 maggio 2010. CassinoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2014). ‘La legge di Postumia. Una lettura di Catull. 27’, Rationes Rerum: Rivista di filologia e storia 4.103–26Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (2017). ‘Catullus 23 and Martial. An epigrammatic model and its ‘refraction’ throughout Martial’s libri’, in Bessone, and Fucecchi, (2017) 116–35Google Scholar
Morelli, G. M. (2011–12). Caesii Bassi de metris, Atilii Fortunatiani de metris Horatianis. Collectanea Grammatica Latina. 2 vols. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. D. (2007 [Unpublished]). ‘Who was “Mentula”?’, American Philological Association, 138th Annual Meeting (San Diego, Calif., January 4–7, 2007), Abstracts, p. 221Google Scholar
Morgan, J. D. (2008). ‘The addressee of Catullus’ Poem 68a’, The Classical Outlook 85.141–50Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G. (1977). ‘Nescio quid febriculosi scorti: a note on Catullus 6’, CQ 27.338–41Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1955). ‘Catullus in the Neo-Latin poetry of France before 1550’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 17.365–94Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (1963). ‘Catullus and the poetry of the Renaissance in France’, Bibliothèque d’humanisme et renaissance 25.25–56Google Scholar
Munday, J. (2008). Introducing Translation Studies. Theories and Applications. 2nd edn. London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T. (1998). ‘Cicero’s first readers: epistolary evidence for the dissemination of his works’, CQ 48.492–505Google Scholar
Muse, K. (2009). ‘Fleecing Remus’ magnanimous playboys: wordplay in Catullus 58.5’, Hermes 137.302–13Google Scholar
Muzzioli, G. (1959). ‘Due nuovi codici autografi di Pomponio Leto’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 2.337–51Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (2012). ‘Catullan contexts in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, in Du Quesnay, and Woodman, (2012) 239–254Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. (1966). Catullus. Carmina. Codex Oxoniensis bibliothecae Bodleianae Canonicianus class. lat. 30. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. (1999). ‘The goat, the gout, and the girl: Catullus 69, 71, and 77’, Mnemosyne 52.266–76Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2002). Poetry for Patrons. Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Mnem. Suppl. 206. Leiden/Boston/CologneGoogle Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2004). ‘Catullus 63 in a Roman context’, Mnemosyne 57.596–628 (= Nauta and Harder (2005) 87–119)Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (2005). ‘Hephaestion and Catullus 63 again’, in Nauta and Harder (2005) 143–8Google Scholar
Navarro Anatolín, F. (1996). Lygdamus. Corpus Tibullianum III.1–6: Lygdami Elegiarum Liber. Trans. J. J. Zoltowski. Mnem. Suppl. 154. Leiden/New York/CologneGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2020). ‘How Ennian was Latin epic between the Annals and Lucretius?’, in Damon, C. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History 188–210. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. (2013a). ‘Architectural ecphrasis in Roman poetry’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature 57–80. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Newlands, C. (2013b). ‘Impersonating Hypsipyle: Statius’ Thebaid and Medieval lament’, Dictynna 10.2–18Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (1990). Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, M. C. (2010). ‘Parchment codices in a new text of Galen’, Greece & Rome 57.378–86Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970, 1978). A Commentary on Horace Odes: Book I and Book II. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Noonan, J. D. (1986). ‘Myth, humor and the sequence of thought in Catullus 95’, CJ 81.299–304Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. (1995). Anacreon Redivivus: A Study of Anacreontic Translation in Mid-Sixteenth-Century France. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1994). ‘“They might be giants”: inconsistency and indeterminacy in Vergil’s war in Italy’, Colby Quarterly 30.206–26Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1996). ‘Sostratus Suppl. Hell. 733: a lost, possibly Catullan-era elegy on the six sex changes of Tiresias’, TAPA 126.173–210Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2007). Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Oksala, P. (1964). Vom Gebrauch geographischer Namen bei den römischen Lyrikern der Blütezeit: Catull, Vergil, Horaz. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Oldfather, W. A. (1943). ‘The most extreme case of elision in the Latin language?’, CJ 38.478–9Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1991). ‘Canidia, canicula, and the decorum of Horace’s Epodes’, Arethusa 24.107–38Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1965). Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen. Eine Typologie. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Ormand, K. (2009). Controlling Desires: Sexuality in Ancient Greece and Rome. Westport, Conn.Google Scholar
Pächt, O. and Alexander, J. J. G. (1966–73). Illuminated Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library Oxford. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (2010). ‘The power of the epistolary preface from Statius to Pliny’, CQ 60.194–201Google Scholar
Page, D. (1955). Sappho and Alcaeus. An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. and Ellis, R. (1875). ‘Scaliger’s Liber Cujacianus of Propertius, Catullus, &c.’, Hermathena 2.124–58Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1963). ‘Osservazioni sui rapporti fra Catullo e gli epigrammisti dell’ Antologia’, in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni 562–87. TurinGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2003). ‘Ego maenas: Maenadism, marriage, and the construction of female identity in Catullus 63 and 64’, Helios 30.101–26Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2007). ‘Sexuality and ritual: Catullus’ wedding poems’, in Skinner, (2007a) 276–92Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1968). ‘Arte allusiva’, in Pagine stravaganti di un filologo 2.275–82. Florence (= Stravaganze quarte e supreme (Venice 1951) 111–20 = Terze pagine stravaganti (Florence 1942) 185–7)Google Scholar
Passerat, J. (1608). Commentarii in C. Val. Catullum, Albium Tibullum et Sex. Aur. Propertium. ParisGoogle Scholar
Pavlock, B. R. (1979). ‘“Frater Ave atque Vale”: Tennyson and Catullus’, Victorian Poetry 17.365–76Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (2011). ‘Unlocking Aeneid 6.460: Plautus’ Amphitryon, Euripides’ Protesilaus and the referents of Callimachus’ Coma’, CJ 106 .149–219Google Scholar
Peruzzi, M. (ed.) (2008). Ornatissimo codice. La biblioteca di Federico di Montefeltro. Vatican CityGoogle Scholar
Petoletti, M. (2004). ‘Catullo, Properzio e Tibullo nella biblioteca di Francesco Petrarca’, in Ballarani, M., Frasso, G., Monti, C. M. (eds.), Manoscritti e libri a stampa nella Biblioteca Ambrosiana 102–5. MilanGoogle Scholar
Petrini, M. (1997). The Child and the Hero: Coming of Age in Catullus and Vergil. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginning to the End of the Hellenistic Age. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Platter, C. L. (1995). ‘Officium in Catullus and Propertius: a Foucauldian reading’, CP 90.211–24Google Scholar
Pleitner, K. (1849). Des Q. Valerius Catullus Epigramme an und über C. Jul. Caesar und Mamurra. SpeyerGoogle Scholar
Portuese, O. (2013). Il carme 67 di Catullo: introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento. CesenaGoogle Scholar
Possanza, D. M. (2004). Translating the Heavens. Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1982). ‘Catullus 11: the ironies of integrity’, in id., Essays on Latin Lyric, Elegy, and Epic 13–29. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (2016). ‘The sense of two endings: how Virgil and Statius conclude’, ICS 41.85–149Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. and Ramsey, J. T. (2017). ‘Reconstructing the chronology of Caesar’s Gallic Wars’, Histos 11.1–74Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A. (eds.) (1992). Feminist Theory and the Classics. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Ramírez de Verger, A. (ed.) and Pérez Vega, A. (trans.) (2005). C. Valerii Catulli Carmina – Catulo, Poemas. HuelvaGoogle Scholar
Ramler, K. W. (1793). Kajus Valerius Katullus in einem Auszuge Lateinisch und Deutsch. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. and Raaflaub, K. A. (2017). ‘Chronological tables for Caesar’s wars (58–45 bce)’, Histos 11.162–217Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1978). ‘The identity problems of Q. Cornificius’, CQ 28.188–201 (= (1991) 272–88)Google Scholar
Reitz, B. (2013). Building in Words: Representations of the Process of Construction in Latin Literature. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (1993). ‘Not before homosexuality: the materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman law against love between men’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 3.523–73Google Scholar
Ricottilli, L. (1982). ‘Tra filologia e semiotica: ripristino e interpretazione di una formula allocutiva (quid tu? quid uos?)’, MD 9.107–51Google Scholar
Ridenour, G. M. (1988). ‘Swinburne’s imitations of Catullus’, The Victorian Newsletter 74. 51–7Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989). ‘The use of myth in Latin epithalamia from Statius to Venantius Fortunatus’, TAPA 119.321–48Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2013). ‘Propertius 1.3: sleep, surprise, and Catullus 64’, BICS 56.89–115Google Scholar
Roche, P. (2016). ‘Latin prose literature: author and authority in the prefaces of Pliny and Quintilian’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome 434–49. Chichester/Malden, Mass.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (1998). ‘Pliny’s Catullus: the politics of literary appropriation’, AJP 128.265–304Google Scholar
Roman, L. (2001). ‘The representation of literary materiality in Martial’s Epigrams’, JRS 91.113–45Google Scholar
Roman, L. (2015). ‘Statius and Martial: poetic self-fashioning in Flavian Rome’, in Dominik, , Newlands, and Gervais, (2015) 444–61Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2011). ‘I tria corda di Stazio, poeta Greco, romano e napoletano’, in Bonadeo, A., Canobbio, A. and Gasti, F. (eds.), Filellenismo e identità romana in età flavia 15–34. PaviaGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G. (2015). ‘The Silvae: poetics of impromptu and cultural consumption’, in Dominik, , Newlands, , and Gervais, (2015) 54–72Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (2009). ‘Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification – the contribution of particles’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009) 317–442Google Scholar
Rostand, E. (trans.), Benoist, E. (ed., comm.), Thomas, E. (comm.) (1879–90). Les poésies de Catulle. ParisGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. A. (2003). ‘Beyond satire: Horace, popular invective and the segregation of literature’, JRS 93.35–65Google Scholar
Rühl, M. (2006). Literatur gewordener Augenblick. Die Silven des Statius im Kontext literarischer und sozialer Bedingungen von Dichtung. Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2008). Fasti Sacerdotum. A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BC to AD 499. Trans. D. M. B. Richardson. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Schatzmann, A. (2012). Nikarchos II: Epigrammata. Einleitung, Texte, Kommentar. Hypomnemata 188. GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Scherf, J. (1996). Untersuchungen zur antiken Veröffentlichung der Catullgedichte. Spudasmata 61. Hildesheim/Zürich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. (2018). The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Schoell, F. L. (1915). ‘George Chapman and the Italian Neo-Latinists of the Quattrocento’, Modern Philology 13.215–238Google Scholar
Scholderer, V. (1924). ‘Printing at Venice to the end of 1481’, The Library ser. iv, 5. 129–52 = id. (1966). Fifty Essays in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Bibliography, ed. D. E. Rhodes, 74–89. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Schulze, W. (1904). Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennamen. Reprinted 1991, with additional appendix by O. Salomies. ZurichGoogle Scholar
Schwabe, L. (1886). Catulli Veronensis Liber ad optimos codices denuo collatos. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1994). ‘“Shakehands, Catull”. Catullus-Rezeption in der deutschsprachigen Lyrik der Gegenwart’, AU 2.34–49Google Scholar
Selden, D. (1992). ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity 461–512. New York/London (= Gaisser (2007a) 490–559)Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1970). ‘The prosecution of Roman magistrates-elect’, Phoenix 24.162–5Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980). Cicero: Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. A. (2014). ‘Socration or Philodemus? Catullus 47 and prosopographical excess’, CJ 109.385–405Google Scholar
Sillig, C. I. (1830). Review of Doering, rev. Naudet (1826), Lachmann (1829) and three other works in Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik No. 5, Vol. 2.259–97Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2019). ‘New light and old texts: Galen and his own books’ in Petit, C. (ed.), Galen’s Treatise περὶ ἀλυπιìας (de indolentia) in Context: A Tale of Resilience. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1972). ‘The unity of Catullus 68: the structure of 68a’, TAPA 103.495–512Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1979). ‘Parasites and strange bedfellows: a study in Catullus’ political imagery’, Ramus 8.137–52Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1981). Catullus’ Passer: The Arrangement of the Book of Polymetric Poems. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1989). ‘Vt decuit cinaediorem: power, gender, and urbanity in Catullus 10’, Helios 16.7–23Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1993). ‘Ego mulier: the construction of male sexuality in Catullus’, Helios 20.107–30 (= Hallett and Skinner (1997) 129–50)Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2003). Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2007b). ‘Authorial arrangement of the collection: debate past and present’, in Skinner (2007a) 35–53Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (2015). ‘A review of scholarship on Catullus 1985-2015’, Lustrum 57.91–360Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1969). ‘Metrical variations and some textual problems in Catullus’, BICS 16.38–43 (= Gaisser (2007a) 45–55)Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. (1989). ‘Forms of literary criticism in Catullus: polymetrics vs epigram’, CP 89.312–19Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2013). The Roman Poetry of Love: Elegy and Politics in a Time of Revolution. LondonGoogle Scholar
Spies, A. (1930). Militat omnis amans: Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik. TübingenGoogle Scholar
Starr, R. J. (1987). ‘The circulation of literary texts in the Roman world’, CQ 37.213–23Google Scholar
Stead, H. (2016). A Cockney Catullus: The Reception of Catullus in Romantic Britain 1795–1821. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Stehle(Stigers), E. (1997). ‘Retreat from the male: Catullus 62 and Sappho’s erotic flowers’, Ramus 6.83–102Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1979). ‘Ovids Liebeskunst und die Ehegesetze des Augustus’, Gymnasium 86.323–52Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (2000). ‘Lesbia und Juventius: ein erotisches Liederbuch im Corpus Catullianum’, in id., Apocrypha. Entlegene Schriften 79–99. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. (2005). ‘Writing (on) bodies: lyric discourse and the production of gender in Horace Odes 1.13’, CP 100.52–82Google Scholar
Swann, B. W. (1994). Martial’s Catullus: The Reception of an Epigrammatic Rival. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. (1990/2001). Catull. Eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil. Die grossen Gedichte. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2006). ‘Propertian textual criticism and editing’, in Günther, H.-C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Propertius 45–65. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1993). ‘Catullus 79: personal invective or political discourse?’, PLLS 7.31–45Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (1997). ‘Friendship, politics, and literature in Catullus: Poems 1, 65 and 66, 116’, CQ 47. 482–500 (= Gaisser (2007a) 369–98)Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2007). ‘Social commentary and political invective’, in Skinner, (2007a) 333–54Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. (2011). ‘Invective identities in Pro Caelio’, in Smith, C. J. and Corvino, R. (eds.), Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric 165–79. SwanseaGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (2013). ‘Catullus and Lesbia translated in women’s historical novels’, in Hardwick, L. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Classics in the Modern World: A Democratic Turn 275–86. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982). ‘Catullus and the polemics of poetic reference (Poem 64.1–18)’, AJP 103.144–64 (= Thomas (1999) 12–32)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983). ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman poetry’, CQ 33.92–113 (= Thomas (1999) 68–100)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1984). ‘Menander and Catullus 8’, RhM 127.308–16 (= Thomas (1999) 44–52)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1986). ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSCP 90.171–98 (= Thomas (1999) 114–41)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1993). ‘Sparrows, hares, and doves: a Catullan metaphor and its tradition’, Helios 20.131–42 (= Thomas (1999) 52–67)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999). Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, O. (1992). Ritual and Desire: Catullus 61 and 62 and Other Ancient Documents on Wedding and Marriage. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1970). ‘The codex Romanus of Catullus: a collation of the text’, RhM 113.97–110Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1973). ‘A new look at the manuscript tradition of Catullus’, YCS 23.113–29Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (1997). Catullus Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Phoenix Suppl. 34. TorontoGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1994). Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (2005). The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method, ed. and trans. G. W. Most. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1975). ‘Orazio e Catullo’, in id., Poeti latini (e neolatini): note e saggi filologici 253–75. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1998a). Poeti latini (e neolatini): note e saggi filologici. V serie. BolognaGoogle Scholar
Traina, A. (1998b). ‘Introduzione a Catullo: la poesia degli affetti’, in Traina, (1998a) 19–50 (orig. publ. in Catullo, I canti, trans. E. Mandruzzato, Milan 1982, 5–38)Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1998c). ‘Compresenze strutturali in Catullo’, in Traina, (1998a) 51–68 (orig. publ. in ΜΟΥΣΑ. Scritti in onore di G. Morelli, Bologna 1997, 283–96)Google Scholar
Trimble, G. C. (2012). ‘Catullus and “comment in English”: the tradition of the expurgated commentary before Fordyce’, in Stray, C. and Harrison, S. (eds.), Expurgating the Classics: Editing Out in Greek and Latin 143–62. LondonGoogle Scholar
Trimble, G. C. (2013). ‘Catullus 64 and the prophetic voice in Virgil’s fourth Eclogue’, in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic 263–77. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. (2006). ‘Embracing the young man in love: Catullus 75 and the comic adulescens’, Antichthon 40.19–34Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1908). ‘The Identification of the Manuscripts of Catullus Cited in Statius’ Edition of 1566’. Diss. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1960a). ‘The transmission of the text of Catullus’, in Studi in Onore di Luigi Castiglioni 2.1025–57. FlorenceGoogle Scholar
Vance, N. and Wallace, J. (eds.) (2015). The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature. Vol. 4: 1790–1880. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988). Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, transl. D. Pellauer. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Volpi, G. (1710). C. Valerius Catullus, Albius Tibullus E. R., Sex. Aurelius Propertius. PaduaGoogle Scholar
Volpi, G. (1737). C. Valerius Catullus, et in eum Jo. Antonii Vulpii … novus commentarius locupletissimus. PaduaGoogle Scholar
von Albrecht, M. (2003). Literatur als Brücke. Studien zur Rezeptionsgeschichte und Komparatistik. HildesheimGoogle Scholar
De Vos, M. (2014). ‘From Lesbos she took her honeycomb: Sappho and the “female tradition” in Hellenistic poetry’, in Pieper, C. and Ker, J. (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World: Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values VII, 410–34. Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
Vossius, I. (1684). Cajus Valerius Catullus Et in eum Isaaci Vossii Observationes. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. (1982). ‘A note on the phonostylistics of Latin: (s) in Plautus’, Glotta 60.120–4Google Scholar
Watson, A. G. (1979). Catalogue of Dated and Datable Manuscripts c.700–1600 in the department of Manuscripts, The British Library. LondonGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (1995). ‘Horace’s Epodes: the impotence of iambos?’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration 188–202. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (2007). ‘The Epodes: Horace’s Archilochus?’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace 93–104. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. C. (2012). ‘Catullus, inurbanitas and the Transpadanes’ in Morelli, A. M. (2012) 151–69Google Scholar
West, D. and Woodman, T. [=A. J.] (eds.) (1979). Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wharton, D. (2009). ‘On the distribution of adnominal prepositional phrases in Latin prose’, CP 104.184–207Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. (1934). Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry. BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (1993). Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MassCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. (2010). Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1879). ‘Die Galliamben des Kallimachos und Catullus’, Hermes 14.194–9Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1924). Hellenistische Dichtung in der Zeit des Kallimachos. Vols. 1–2. BerlinGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2015). The Roman Audience. Classical Literature as Social History. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wong, A. (2017). The Poetry of Kissing in Early Modern Europe: From the Catullan Revival to Secundus, Shakespeare and the English Cavaliers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1966). ‘Some implications of otium in Catullus 51.13–16’, Latomus 25.217–26Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2000). Review of J. Godwin, Catullus: The Shorter Poems (Warminster 1999), BMCR 05.14Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2002). ‘Biformis Vates: the Odes, Catullus, and Greek Lyric’, in T. [= A. J.] Woodman and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace 53–64. Cambridge (= (2012) 41–58)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2003). ‘Poems to historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1’, in Braund and Gill (2003) 191–216 (= (2012) 121–44)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2006). ‘Catullus 51: a suitable case for treatment?’, CQ 56.610–11 (= (2012) 24–6)Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2012b). ‘A covering letter: Poem 65’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman (2012) 130–52Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2015a). Lost Histories: Selected Fragments of Roman Historical Writers. Histos Suppl. 2. Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
Woodman, T. [= A. J.] and Powell, J. (eds.) (1992). Author and Audience in Latin Literature. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Woodman, T. [= A. J.] and West, D. (eds.) (1974). Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. (2009). ‘Ovid’s Catullus and the neoteric moment in Roman poetry’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid 252–64. Malden, Mass./OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. (2012). ‘Catullus the Roman love elegist?’, in Gold, B. K. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Love Elegy 25–38. Malden, Mass./OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamponi, S. (2016). ‘Aspetti della tradizione gotica nella littera antiqua’, in Black, et al. (2016) 105–25Google Scholar
Zeiner, N. (2005). Nothing Ordinary Here: Statius as Creator of Distinction in the Silvae. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983/2007). ‘Catullus, Ennius, and the poetics of allusion’, ICS 8.251–66 (= Gaisser, (2007a) 198–216)Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018). Critics, Compilers and Commentators. An Introduction to Roman Philology 200 BCE–800 CE. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1955). ‘Moribunda ab sede Pisauri’, Studia Oliveriana 3.57–69 (= (1978) 187–99)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1957). ‘Calfurnio editore di Catullo’, Atene e Roma 2.157–9 (= (1978) 105–8)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1958). ‘Ricerche sulla tradizione manoscritta di Catullo’, Bollettino per l’edizione nazionale dei classici 6.79–99 (= (1978) 79–104)Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. (1964). ‘Some metrical and prosodical features of Catullus’ poetry’, Phoenix 18.193–205Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. (2004). ‘Between text and music: the reception of Virgilian speeches in early Virgilian manuscripts’, MD 52.107–26Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, T. (2007). ‘Anglo-American Catullus since the mid-twentieth century’, IJCT 13.409–30Google Scholar
Zukofsky, L. and Zukofsky, C. (1969). Catullus (Gai Valeri Catulli Veronensis liber). LondonGoogle Scholar