Accattino, P. and Donini, P. 1996. Alessandro di Afrodisia. L’anima (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. 1972–1973. “Aristotle’s Definitions of Psuchê,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–133.Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. 1981. Aristotle the Philosopher (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Althoff, J. 1999. “Aristoteles als Medizindoxograph,” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, K. 2016. “Animal Cognition,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal.Google Scholar

Angioni, L. 2016. “Aristotle’s Definition of Scientific Knowledge,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19: 140–166.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Inefficient Causes,” Philosophical Quarterly 32(129): 311–326.Google Scholar

Aubert, H. and Wimmer, Fr. 1860. Aristoteles. Peri Zôiôn Geneseôs (Leipzig: Engelmann).Google Scholar

Aubert, H. and Wimmer, Fr. 1868. Aristoteles. Historiai Peri Zôôn (Leipzig: Engelmann).Google Scholar

Austin, C. 2017. “Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in the Age of Evolution,” Synthese 194: 2539–2556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, C. and Marmodoro, A. 2018. “Structural Powers and the Homeodynamic Unity of Organisms,” in Simpson, W. M. R. R. C. Koons and N. J. Teh (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science (Abingdon: Routledge), 169–184.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. 1970. “Teleological Explanations in Biology,” Philosophy of Science 37: 1–15.Google Scholar

Baghdassarian, F. 2016. La question du divin chez Aristote (Louvain-la-neuve: Peeters).Google Scholar

Baldry, H. C. 1932. “Embryological Analogies in Pre-Socratic Cosmology,” The Classical Quarterly 26(1): 27–34.Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1962. “GENOS and EIDOS in Aristotle’s Biology,” The Classical Quarterly 12(1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. 1972/1992. Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from 2.1–3). Translated with Notes. With a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1987a. “The Place of Biology in Aristotle’s Philosophy,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. 1987b. “Aristotle’s Use of Division and Differentiae,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. 1987c. “Teleology and Necessity,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 275–286.Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1987d. “Aristotle’s Biology was not Essentialist,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 291–312.Google Scholar

Balme, D. 1991. Aristotle. Historia Animalium, Vol. 3: Books 7–10. LCL 439 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Balme, D. 2002. Aristotle: Historia Animalium, Vol. 1, Books I–9: Text. Prepared for publication by Allan Gotthelf (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1975/1993. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Translation with commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1984. Aristotle: Complete Works (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2008. “Aristotle’s Argument for the Human Function,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 293–322.Google Scholar

Barsanti, G. 1994. “Lamarck and the Birth of Biology 1740–1810,” in Poggi, S. and Bossi, M. (eds.), Romanticism in Science: Science in Europe, 1790–1840 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 47–74.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2010. “Aristotle and his Hippocratic Precursors on Health and Natural Teleology,” Rhizai 7: 7–27.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2014. “Aristotle and the Hippocratic De Victu on Innate Heat and the Kindled Soul,” Ancient Philosophy 34: 1–27.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2015. Philosophy and Dietetics in the Hippocratic On Regimen: A Delicate Balance of Health (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2020. “Heat, Pneuma and Soul in the Medical Tradition,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2021. “Aristotle and his Medical Precursors on Digestion and Nutrition,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 127–152.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.) 2020. Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Beatty, J. 1985. “Speaking of Species: Darwin’s Strategy,” in Kohn, D. (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage (Cambridge University Press), 265–280.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. 1993. “Emergent Phenomena and Complex Systems,” in Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J. (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter), 257–288.Google Scholar

Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being. An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bemer, K. 2014. “A Philosophical Examination of Aristotle’s History of Animals.” Dissertation (University of Pittsburgh: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/22674).Google Scholar

Beran, M., Brandl, J., Perner, J., and Proust, J. 2012. The Foundations of Metacognition (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Berryman, S. 2003. “Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation,” Phronesis 48: 344–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betegh, G. 2010. “What Makes a Myth ΕΙΚΩΣ? Remarks Inspired by Myles Burnyeat’s ‘ΕΙΚΩΣ ΜΥΘΟΣ’,” in Mohr, R. D. and Sattler, B. M. (eds.), One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing), 213–226.Google Scholar

Betegh, G. 2020. “Fire, Heat and Motive Cause in Early Greek Philosophy and Medicine,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 35–60.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. 1990. “Themistius: The Last Peripatetic Commentator on Aristotle?,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 113–123.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. 1996. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of the De Anima (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. 1995. “L’influence historique du Stoïcisme sur l’interpretation de l’oeuvre philosophique d’Aristote,” Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Theologiques 79: 553–586.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Bodnár, I. 2005. “Teleology Across Natures,” Rhizai 2: 9–29.Google Scholar

Bodson, L. 1983. “Aristotle’s Statement on the Reproduction of Sharks,” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 391–407.Google Scholar

Bolhuis, J. J., Okanoya, K., and Scharff, C. 2010. “Twitter Evolution: Converging Mechanisms in Birdsong and Human Speech,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(11): 747–759.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1978. “Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3,” Phronesis 23(3): 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, R. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 120–166.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2015. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Natural Teleology in Physics II,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 121–143.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2018. “The Search for Principles in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2 and Generation of Animals 1,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 227–248.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.) 2010. Being, Nature, and Life. Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (ed.) 2007. Galien Tome I: Introduction générale, sur l’ordre de ses propres livre; Sur ses propres livres; Que l’excellent médicin est aussi philosophe (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Brandon, R. 1981. “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 12: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brill, S. 2019. “Aristotle’s Meta-Zoology: Shared Life and Human Animality in the Politics,” in Bianchi, E., Brill, S., and Holmes, B. (eds.), Antiquities Beyond Humanism (Oxford University Press), 97–121.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 1992/1995. “Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? (A Draft),” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 15–26.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 1995. “How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2.7–8,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 421–434.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications).Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2004. “Introduction: Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics,” in De Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds), Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 7–24.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2005. “ΕΙΚΩΣ ΜΥΘΟΣ,” Rhizai 2: 143–165. Reprinted in C. Partenie (ed.) 2009. Plato’s Myths (Cambridge University Press), 167–186.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History (London: G. Bell).Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. 1949. The Origins of Modern Science (London: G. Bell).Google Scholar

Byl, S. 1980. Recherches sur les grands traités biologiques d’Aristote (Brussels: Palais des Académies).Google Scholar

Cagnoli Fiecconi, E. 2018. “Enmattered Virtues,” Metaphysics 1(1): 63–74.Google Scholar

Cameron, R. 2010. “Aristotle’s Teleology,” Philosophical Compass 5: 1096–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, G. L. 2006. Strange Creatures: Anthropology in Antiquity (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Carbone, A. L. 2011. Aristote illustré. représentations du corps et schématisation dans la biologie aristotélicienne (Paris: Garnier).Google Scholar

Carpenter, A. D. 2008. “Embodying Intelligence: Animals and Us in Plato’s Timaeus,” in Zovko, J. and Dillon, J. (eds.), Platonism and Forms of Intelligence (Sankt Augustin: Akademie Verlag), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, A. D. 2010. “Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus,” Phronesis 55: 281–303.Google Scholar

Caston, V. 2005. “The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception,” in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji (Oxford University Press), 245–320.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2018. “Function and Instrument: Towards a New Criterion of the Scale of Being in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 130–150.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. and Falcon, A. 2014. “Continuity and Discontinuity in the Greek and Arabic Reception of Aristotle’s Study of Animals,” Philosophia Antiquorum 8: 35–56.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 1995. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1988. “Aristotle on Hypothetical Necessity and Irreducibility,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 69: 1–53. Reprinted in T. Irwin (ed.), Classical Philosophy. Collected Papers (Abingdon: Routledge), 27–80.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1990. “Aristotle on Meaning, Natural Kinds and Natural History,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 145–167.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1999. “Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73(1): 205–223.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2012. “Teleological Causation,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 227–266.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2014. Definition in Greek Philosophy (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1992/1970. Aristotle’s Physics 1 and 2. Translated with Introduction, Commentary, Note on Recent Work, and Revised Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Chirimuuta, M. 2015. Outside Color: Perceptual Science and the Puzzle of Color in Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Clark, W. R. 1996. Sex and the Origin of Death (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Clayton, E. 2008. “Aesop, Aristotle, and Animals: The Role of Fables in Human Life,” Humanitas: Interdisciplinary Journal (National Humanities Institute) 21(2): 179–200.Google Scholar

Code, A. 1987. “Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Philosophical Topics 15: 51–59.Google Scholar

Code, A. 1997. “The Priority of Final Causes Over Efficient Causes in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 127–143.Google Scholar

Code, A. 2004. “On Generation and Corruption I.5,” in de Haas, F. A. J. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione I. Proceedings of the Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Coleman, W. 1977. Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function, and Transformation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Coles, A. 1995. “Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century BC and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 40: 48–88.Google Scholar

Coles, A. 1997. “Animal and Childhood Cognition in Aristotle’s Biology and the Scala Naturae,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 287–324.Google Scholar

Coles, E. 1992. “Theophrastus and Aristotle on Animal Intelligence,” in Fortenbaugh, W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus, His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar

Collobert, C. 2002. “Aristotle’s Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 281–295.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2001. “An Integrated Approach to Aristotle as a Biological Philosopher,” Review of Metaphysics 55: 297–322.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connell, S. 2018a. “Aristotle’s Explanations of Monstrous Births and Deformities in Generation of Animals 4.4,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 207–223.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2018b. “From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle, by Mariska Leunissen,” Mind 127(507): 938–946.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2019. “Mothering and Intelligence in Aristotle’s Biology and Ethics,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Proceedings of Aristotle World Congress (Thessaloniki, Greece: University of Thessaloniki), 122–127.Google Scholar

Connell, S. 2020. “Nutritive and Sentient Soul in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals II.5,” Phronesis 65(4): 324–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connell, S. 2021. “The Female Contribution to Generation and the Nutritive Soul in Aristotle’s Embryology,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 63–84.Google Scholar

Cook, K. 1996. “Sexual Inequality in Aristotle’s Theories of Reproduction and Inheritance,” in Ward, J. K. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy (Abingdon: Routledge), 51–67.Google Scholar

Coope, U. 2009. “Change and its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality,” in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), Companion to Aristotle (Chichester, UK: Wiley), 277–291.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1982. “Aristotle on Natural Teleology,” in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge University Press), 197–222.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1987. “Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, J. 1988a. “Metaphysics in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 34: 14–31.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1988b. “Political Animals and Civic Friendship,” in Cooper, J., Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (Princeton University Press), 356–378.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. 1997. Plato: Complete Works (Bloomington, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2008a. Streben und Bewegen. Aristoteles. Theorie der Animalischen Ortsbewegung. Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2008b. “Two Jobs for Aristotle’s Practical Syllogism?,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11: 163–184.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2008c. “Aristoteles’ Praktische Syllogismen in der Zweiten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11: 101–132.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2011. “Aristotle’s Notion of Non-Rational Desire,” in Miller, J. (ed.) Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2014. “Activity, Passivity, and Perceptual Discrimination in Aristotle,” in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.) Active Perception in the History of Philosophy (New York: Springer), 31–53.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. Forthcoming. “GA V as a Coda,” in Föllinger, S. and Busch, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, O. 2010. “Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, O. 2013. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion,” Phronesis 58(1): 52–97.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Primavesi, O. 2018. Aristoteles. De Motu Animalium. Über die Bewegung der Lebewesen, Historisch-kritische Edition des Griechischen Textes mit Philologischem Kommentar von O. Primavesi. Deutsche Übersetzung, Philosophische Einleitung und Erklärende Anmerkungen von K. Corcilius (Hamburg: Meiner, Philosophische Bibliothek).Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Rapp, C. 2008. Beiträge zur Aristotelischen Handlungstheorie (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Cosans, C. 1998. “Aristotle’s Anatomical Philosophy of Nature,” Biology and Philosophy 13: 311–339.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2001. “Plato and Medical Texts: Symposium 185c–193d,” The Classical Quarterly 51: 109–114.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2006. “Tragedy as Treatment: Medical Analogies in Aristotle’s Poetics,” in Cairns, D. L. and Liapis, V. J. (eds.), Dionysalexandros: Essays on Aeschylus and His Fellow Tragedians, in Honour of Alexander F. Garvie (Swansea, UK: The Classical Press of Wales), 283–299.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2015. The “Hippocratic” Corpus: Content and Context (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2017. “Teleology in Hippocratic Texts: Clues to the Future?” in J. Rocca (ed.) Teleology in the Ancient World. Philosophical and Medical Approaches (Cambridge University Press), 203–216.Google Scholar

Cunningham, A. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar

Cunningham, A. 1999. “Aristotle’s Animal Book: Ethology, Biology, Anatomy, or Philosophy?” Philosophical Topics 27(1): 17–41.Google Scholar

Danchin, É., Pocheville, A., and Humeman, P. 2019. “Early in Life Effects and Heredity: Reconciling Neo-Darwinism with Neo-Lamarckism Under the Banner of the Inclusive Evolutionary Synthesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 374(1770): 20180113.Google Scholar

Dancy, R. 2016. “Speusippus,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/speusippus.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859/1968. The Origin of Species (London: John Murray).Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1862. On the Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilised (London: John Murray), http://darwinonline.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F800&viewtype=text.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (London: John Murray), http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1868_Variation_F877.1.pdf, Darwin Correspondence Project (DCP) www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters.Google Scholar

1961. Darwin to Gray, May 22. Darwin Correspondence Project, DCP 2814, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 2005. “Aristotle’s Action,” in D. Davidson, Truth, Language and History: Philosophical Essays (Oxford University Press), 277–294.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 1989. The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. A. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Ancient Greek Science (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. A. 2012. “Clinical Gynecology and Aristotle’s Biology: The Composition of HA X,” Apeiron 45: 180–200.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. A. 2021. Aristotle’s Historia Animalium Book X, Text, Translations and Commentary (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. 2004. Aristotle, De Generatione et Corruptione I. Proceedings of the Symposium Aristotelicum (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (ed.) 1996. Galen, On the Elements According to Hippocrates. Edition, Translation and Commentary. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 1, 2 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Delbrück, M. 1971. “Aristotle-totle-totle,” in Monod, J. and Borek, E. (eds.), Microbes and Life (New York: Columbia University Press), 50–55.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Depew, D. J. 1995. “Humans and Other Political Animals in Aristotle’s History of Animals,” Phronesis 40(2): 156–181.Google Scholar

Depew, D. J. 2008. “Consequence Etiology and Biological Teleology in Aristotle and Darwin,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38: 379–390.Google Scholar

Depew, D. J. 2010. “Incidental Causation, Spontaneous Generation, and Homonymous Predication in Aristotle’s Physics II and Other Texts,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Was Ist ‘Leben’? (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag), 285–287.Google Scholar

Depew, D. J. 2016. “Contingency, Chance, and Randomness in Ancient and Modern Biology,” in Ramsey, G. and Pence, C. (eds.), Chance in Evolution (University of Chicago Press), 115–140.Google Scholar

Deslauriers, M. 1990. “Plato and Aristotle on Division and Definition,” Ancient Philosophy, 10(2): 203–219.Google Scholar

Deslauriers, M. 2007. Aristotle on Definition (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Deslauriers, M. 2009. “Sexual Difference in Aristotle’s Politics and His Biology,” Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 102(3): 215–231.Google Scholar

Deslauriers, M. 2015. “Political Rule over Women in Politics I,” in Lockwood, T. and Samaras, T. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 46–63.Google Scholar

Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) 1990. Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: l’Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique).Google Scholar

Devitt, M. 2008. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science 75(3): 344–382.Google Scholar

Devitt, M. 2018. “Individual Essentialism in Biology,” Biology and Philosophy 33(5–6): 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Vries, H. 1901–1903. Die Mutationstheorie, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Veit).Google Scholar

Diehl, E. (ed.) 1903–1906. Proclus, In Platonis Timaeum Commentaria, 3 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Dirlmeier, F. 1937. Die Oikeiosis-Lehre Theophrastus, Philologus Supplement 30 (Leipzig: Dieterich).Google Scholar

Dittmeyer, L. 1907. Aristotelis de animalibus historia (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. 1974. “Nothing in Evolution Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution,” American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. 1999. Antigone de Caryste. Fragments (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. 2012. “Les Témoins et l’histoire du texte,” in Brisson, L., Aubry, G., Congourdeau, M.-H., and Hudry, F. (eds.), Porphyre: sur la manière dont l’embryon reçoit l’ âme (Paris: Vrin), 121–136.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. 2017. “La Ricezione del Sapere Zoologico di Aristotele nella Tradizione Paradossografica,” in Sassi, M. M., Coda, E., and Feola, G. (eds.), La Zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali (Pisa University Press), 60–80.Google Scholar

Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1965a. De Generatione Animalium (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1965b. Nicolaus Damascenus on the Philosophy of Aristotle (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. 1985. “Aristotle, Bar Hebraeus and Nicolaus Damascenus on Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical Studies Presented to David M. Balme (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 345–357.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 2001. Humans and Other Animals (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dupré, J. and Nicholson, D. 2018. “Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology,” in Nicholson, D. and Dupré, J. (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Düring, I. 1961. Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction (Göteborg: Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar

Edelstein, I. 1967. Ancient Medicine (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Eden, J. 2015. “Are Women Passive? What History Says About Gender, Sexuality and Christian Ministry,” Priscilla Papers 29(3): 15–20.Google Scholar

Edwards, G. F. 2018. “Reincarnation, Rationality, and Temperance: Platonists on Not Eating Animals,” in Adamson, P. and Edwards, G. F. (eds.), Animals: A History (Oxford University Press), 27–56.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, M. 2010. “What’s Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism,” Philosophy of Science, 7: 674–689.Google Scholar

Everson, S. 1995. “Proper Sensibles and Καθ ̓ Αὑτά Causes,” Phronesis 40(3): 265–292.Google Scholar

Everson, S. 1997. Aristotle on Perception (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Eycott, A., Daleszczyk, K., Drese, J., Cantero, A. S., Pèbre, J., and Gladys, S. 2013. “Defecation Rate in Captive European Bison, Bion Bonasus,” Acta Theriologica 58: 387–390.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity Without Uniformity (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2014. “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Nature,” in Warren, J. and Sheffield, F. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Abingdon: Routledge), 319–331.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2015. “Aristotle and the Study of Animals and Plants,” in Holmes, K. B. and Fisher, K. D. (eds.), Frontiers of Ancient Science. Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin: De Gruyter), 75–91.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. 2017. “The Place of De Motu Animalium in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy,” in Wians, W. and Polansky, R. (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition (Leiden: Brill), 215–235.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.) 2018. Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M. 2015. “Eulogos in Natural Science,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practices in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 217–240.Google Scholar

Festa, N. 1891. Iamblichi de Communi Mathematica Scientia Liber ad Fidem Codicis Florentini (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. 1956. “Un fragment nouveau de ‘Protreptique’ d’Aristote,” Revue philosophique de la France et L’étranger 146: 117–127.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. 1930/2000. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Föllinger, S. 1996. Differenz und Gleichheit: Das Geschlechterverhältnis in der Sicht griechischer Philosophen des 4. bis 1. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Hermes Einzelschriften 74 (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Föllinger, S. (ed.) Forthcoming. Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1971. “Aristotle: Animals, Emotion and Moral Virtue,” Arethusa 4(2): 137–165.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2013. “The Political Character of Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Deslauriers, M. and Destree, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics (Cambridge University Press), 14–37.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2008. “Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy,” in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 501–529.Google Scholar

Fredrich, C. 1899. Hippokratische Untersuchungen (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung).Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1987. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality,” in Lennox, J. G. and Gotthelf, A. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 392–407.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1992. “Aristotle on the Sense of Touch,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press), 227–248.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1994a. “Aristotle on Perception, Appetition, and Self-Motion,” in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion. From Aristotle to Newton (Princeton University Press), 35–63.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1994b. “Nourishing Speculation: A Freeland Reading of Aristotelian Science,” in Bar-On, B. (ed.), Engendering Origins: Critical Feminist Readings in Plato and Aristotle (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Freudenthal, G. 1999. Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Frey, C. 2012. “Book Review of Leunissen, M. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Natural Science,” Classical Philology 107(2): 169–173.Google Scholar

Frey, C. 2015. “From Blood to Flesh: Homonomy, Unity and Ways of Being in Aristotle,” Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–394.Google Scholar

Frixione, E. 2013. “Pneuma–Fire Interactions in Hippocratic Physiology,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 68: 505–528.Google Scholar

Fu, X. L. and Ares, M. 2014. “Context-Dependent Control of Alternative Splicing by RNA-Binding Proteins,” Nature Review Genetics 15: 689–701.Google Scholar

Furley, D. 1989. “The Mechanics of Meteorologica IV: A Prolegomenon to Biology,” in Furley, D., Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature (Cambridge University Press), chapter 12.Google Scholar

Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Nature and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2010. “Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2015a. “Aristotle on Essence and Habitat,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58: 267–293.Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2015b. “Are Facts About Matter Primitive?” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 46–60.Google Scholar

Gelber, J. 2018. “Females in Aristotle’s Embryology,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 171–187.Google Scholar

Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2005. “Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology,” in Pierris, A. L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Cosmos: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity (Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research), 373–404.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. 1974. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem,” Systematic Zoology 23: 536–544.Google Scholar

Gigon, O. 1987. Aristotelis Opera, Vol. 3: Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 1997. “Material Necessity in Meteorology IV.12,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie, Intentionen, Methode, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner), 145–161.Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 2014. “The Limits of Teleology in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV.12,” History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 335–350.Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. 1994. Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2019. “Aristotle on the Anthropological Difference and Animals Minds,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 140–160.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. 2001. “Organism, Environment, and Dialectics,” in Singh, R., Krimbas, C., Paul, D., and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives (Cambridge University Press), 253–266.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Golitsis, P. 2016. “John Philoponus. Commentary on the Third Book of Aristotle’s De Anima,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators (London: Bloomsbury), 393–412.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1976–1977. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality,” Review of Metaphysics 30: 226–254. Reprinted 1987, with additional notes and a postscript, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 204–242 and in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 3–44.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. (ed.) 1985a. Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications).Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1985b. “Notes Towards a Study of Substance and Essence in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals II–IV,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications) 27–54. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 217–240.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1987. “First Principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 167–198 and in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 153–185.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1988. “The Place of the Good in Aristotle’s Teleology,” in J. J. Cleary and D. C. Shartin (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 4: 113–139. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 45–66.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1989. “Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion,” in Penner, T. and Kraut, R. (eds.), Nature, Knowledge and Virtue. Apeiron: Special Issue 22.4 (Kelowna: Academic Publishing and Printing), 181–193. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 142–150.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1997a. “The Elephant’s Nose: Further Reflections on the Axiomatic Structure of Biological Explanations in Aristotle,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 215–230. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 186–196.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1997b. “Understanding Aristotle’s Teleology,” in Hassing, R. (ed.), Final Causality in Nature and Human Affairs (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press), 71–82. Revised and reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 67–89.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 1999. “Darwin on Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 3–30. Reprinted in Gotthelf 2012a, 345–370.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012a. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012b. “Teleology and Embryogenesis in Aristotle’s GA II 6,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 261–292.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012c. “Division and Explanation in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 197–216.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012d. “Data-Organisation, Classification, and Kinds: The Place of the History of Animals in Aristotle’s Biological Enterprise,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 261–288.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012e. “History of Animals I.6 490b7–491a6: Aristotle’s Megista Gênê,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 293–306.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012f. “Historiae I: Plantarum et Animalium,” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles and Scientific Method (Oxford University Press), 307–342. [Reprinted from Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.) 1988. Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Rhetoric (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books), 100–135.]Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012g. “CODA: Aristotle as Scientist: A Proper Verdict (with Emphasis on his Biological Works),” in Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology (Oxford University Press), 371–398.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. and Falcon, A. 2018. “‘One Long Argument’? The Unity of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 15–34.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. (eds.) 1987. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. and Leunissen, M. 2010. “What’s Teleology Got to Do with It? A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 55: 325–356. Reprinted in A. Gotthelf, 2012a, 117–141.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, P. and Sober, E. 2017. “Aristotle on ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain’,” Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7(2): 246–271.Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Granger, H. 1985. “The Scala Naturae and the Continuity of Kinds,” Phronesis 30: 181–200.Google Scholar

Granger, H. 1987. “Aristotle and the Finitude of Natural Kinds,” Philosophy 62: 523–526.Google Scholar

Gray, A. 1860. “Darwin and his Reviewers,” Atlantic Monthly, October 6, 406–425, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/searchresults?freetext=gray%20atlantic%20monthly.Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. 2007. Aristotle on the Common Sense (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. and Filip, G. 2006. “Aristotle’s Notion of Experience,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Gregory, A. 2016. Anaximander: A Re-Assessment (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Grene, M. 1963. Portrait of Aristotle (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar

Grene, M. 1974. The Understanding of Nature (Boston, MA: Kluwer).Google Scholar

Grene, M. 1989. “Defense of David Kitts,” Biology and Philosophy 4: 69–72.Google Scholar

Grene, M. and Depew, D. 2004. Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. E. 1993. “Functional Analysis and Proper Functions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. 1991. “The Role of the Commentaries on Aristotle in the Teaching of Philosophy According to the Prefaces to the Neoplatonic Commentaries on Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Supplementary Volume: Aristotle and the Later Tradition: 175–189.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. 2002. “Simplicius or Priscianus? On the Author of the Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima: A Methodological Study,” Mnemosyne 55: 159–199.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. 2015. The Harmonization of Aristotle and Plato at Alexandria and Athens (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Hall, T. S. 1965. “The Biology of the Timaeus in Historical Perspective,” Arion 4: 109–122.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 2001. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 2016. “Galen on Aristotle,” in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), 238–257.Google Scholar

Harriman, B. 2018. Melissus and Eleatic Monism (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hasper, P.-S. 2006. “Sources of Delusion,” Phronesis 51(3): 252–284.Google Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. 2013. “Encyclopaedism in the Alexandrian Library,” in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Cambridge University Press), 64–83.Google Scholar

Heath, M. 2008. “Aristotle on Natural Slavery,” Phronesis 53(3): 243–270.Google Scholar

Hellmann, O. 2006. “Peripatetic Biology and the Epitome of Aristophanes of Byzantium,” in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S. A. (eds.), Aristo of Ceos. Text, Translation and Discussion (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books), 329–359.Google Scholar

Hellmann, O. 2015. “On the Interface of Philology and Science: The Case of Zoology,” in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship (Leiden: Brill), 1236–1266.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. (ed.) 1907–1909. Galeni De Usu Partium, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2005. “Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy,” Phronesis 50: 1–42.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2006a. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism,” Apeiron 39: 257–288.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2006b. “Aristotle on the Mechanisms of Inheritance,” Journal of the History of Biology 39: 425–455.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2007. “How Sexist is Aristotle’s Developmental Biology?” Phronesis 52: 251–269.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2009. “Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Agnostonopolous, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (Oxford: Blackwell), 368–383.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2011a. “A Sharp Eye for Kinds: Collection and Division in Plato’s Late Dialogues,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 229–255.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2011b. “Aristotle’s Pluralistic Realism,” The Monist 94: 197–220.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2013. “Optimality Reasoning in Aristotle’s Natural Teleology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55: 225–263.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2015. “Aristotle on the Cosmological Significance of Animal Generation,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science (Cambridge University Press), 100–118.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2018a. “Aristotle on Animals,” in Adamson, P. and Edwards, F. (eds.), Animals. A History (Oxford University Press), 9–25.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2018b. “Aristotle on Epigenesis: Two Senses of Epigenesis,” in A. Falcon and D. Lefebvre (eds.) Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 89–107.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2019. Matter, Form and Moving Causes: Aristotle’s Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.) 2015. Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Herman, J. J., Sultan, S., Horgan-Kybelski, T., and Riggs, C. 2016. “Adaptive Transgenerational Plasticity in an Annual Plant: Grandparental and Parental Drought Stress Enhance Performance of Seedlings in Dry Soil,” Integrative and Comparative Biology 52: 77–88.Google Scholar

Hladký, V. 2017. “Empedocles’ Sphairos,” Rhizomata 5: 1–24.Google Scholar

Hodge, M. J. S. 1982. “Darwin and the Laws of the Animate Part of the Terrestrial System: On the Lyellian Origin of his Zoonomical Explanatory Program,” Studies in the History of Biology 6: 1–106.Google Scholar

Huby, P. M. 1985. “Theophrastus in the Aristotelian Corpus,” in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical Studies Presented to David M. Balme (Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications), 313–325.Google Scholar

Hull, D. 1965. “The Effects of Essentialism on Taxonomy: Two Thousand Years of Stasis,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 314–326.Google Scholar

Hull, D. 1969. “What the Philosophy of Biology Is Not,” Synthese 20: 157–184.Google Scholar

Hull, D. 1976. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.Google Scholar

Hulskamp, M. A. A. 2008. “Sleep and Dreams in Ancient Medical Diagnosis and Prognosis.” PhD Thesis, Newcastle University, https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.489328.Google Scholar

Humphrey, N. 1976. “The Social Function of the Intellect,” in Bateson, P. P. G. and Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology (Cambridge University Press), 303–317.Google Scholar

Huneman, P. and Walsh, D. M. (eds.) 2017. Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, Inheritance (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. 1988. “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate Concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric and Ethics,” Apeiron 21: 17–52.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. 2017. Protrepticus or Exhortation to Philosophy (citations, fragments, paraphrases, and other evidence), www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf.Google Scholar

Huxley, T. H. 1887. “On the Reception of the ‘Origin of Species’,” in Darwin, F. (ed.), Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 1 (New York: Appleton), 533–558.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1980. “The Metaphysical and Psychological Basis of Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), 35–53.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1985/1999. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1995. Irwin, T. (ed.), Classical Philosophy. Collected Papers (Abingdon: Routledge), 27–80.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 2012. “Conceptions of Happiness in the Nicomachean Ethics,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 495–523.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. 1957. “Aristotle’s Use of Medicine as Model of Method in His Ethics,” Journal for Hellenic Studies 77: 54–61.Google Scholar

Janko, R. 1992. “From Catharsis to the Aristotelian Mean,” in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics (Princeton University Press), 341–358.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 1996. “Aristotle on the Sense of Smell,” Phronesis, 41(1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus–Critias (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2005. Aristotle on Teleology (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2012. “The Medical Background of Aristotle’s Theory of Nature and Spontaneity,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 27: 105–152.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2013. “Spontaneity, Nature, and Voluntary Action in Lucretius,” in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. C., and Sharrock, A. (eds.), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, and Science (Oxford University Press), 99–130.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2015. “Aristotle’s Architectonic Science,” in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 163–186.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2018. “Aristotle on the Meaning of Life,” in Leach, S. and Tartagalia, J. (eds.), The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers (Abingdon: Routledge), 56–64.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. 2019. “Aristotle on Cosmos and Cosmoi,” in Horky, P (ed.), Cosmos in the Ancient World (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Joly, R. 1978. Hippocrate: Des Lieux dans l’Homme. Du Systeme des Glandes. Des Fistules. Des Hemorroides. De la Vision. Des Chairs. De la Dentition (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Joly, R. and Byl, S. 2003. Hippocrate: Du Régime, CMG 1.2.4. (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. 1966. “La theorie de l’intelligence et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique Du régime; ses rapports ave Empèdocle et le Timée de Platon,” Revue Des Etudes Grecques 79: 15–18.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. 1980. “Médecine et politique dans la Politique d’Aristote (ii 1268b25–1269a28),” Ktèma 5: 257–266.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. 1996. “Hippocrate et les Problemata d’Aristote: Essai de comparaison entre Airs, Eaux, Lieux,” in Wittern, R. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und Antike Philosophie (Hildesheim: Olms), 273–293.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. 1999. Hippocrates. Translated by M. B. Debevoise (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Joubaud, C. 1991. Le corps humain dans la philosophie platonicienne. Étude à partir du Timée (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar

Journée, G. 2012. “Lumière et Nuit, Féminin et Masculin chez Parménide d’Elée: Quelques Remarques,” Phronesis 57: 289–318.Google Scholar

Judson, L. 2005. “Aristotelian Teleology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 341–365.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Kalderon, M. E. 2015. Form Without Matter: Aristotle and Empedocles on Colour Perception (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Karbowski, J. 2019. “Political Animals and Human Nature in Aristotle’s Politics,” in Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology (Cambridge University Press), 221–237.Google Scholar

Katayama, E. G. 1999. Aristotle on Artifacts (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar

Kay, L. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. 2000. The Century of the Gene (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. 2014. “From Gene Action to Reactive Genomes,” Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2423–2429.Google Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2011. “Physics 199a8–12,” Apeiron 44: 1–12.Google Scholar

Kember, O. 1971. “Right and Left in the Sexual Theories of Parmenides,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 91: 70–79.Google Scholar

Kember, O. 1973. “Anaxagoras’ Theory of Sexual Difference and Heredity,” Phronesis 18: 1–14.Google Scholar

Kevles, D. and Hood, L. (eds.) 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Kim, J. 1999. “Making Sense of Emergence,” Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.Google Scholar

Kim, J. 2006. “Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues,” Synthese 151: 547–559.Google Scholar

King, R. A. H. 2001. Aristotle on Life and Death (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

King, R. A. H 2010. “The Concept of Life and the Life-Cycle in De Iuventute,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Was ist ‘Leben’? Aristoteles’ Anschauungen zur Entstehung und Funktionsweise von Leben (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

King, R. A. H 2016. “Aristotle and the Six-Pack: All Flesh and No Muscle?” in Buchheim, T. and Meissner, D. (eds.), Soma. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der Antiken Philosophie und Literatur (Hamburg: Felix Meiner).Google Scholar

King, R. A. H 2021. “Trophê and Hylomorphism. Reading De Anima II 1,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 43–62.Google Scholar

Kitts, D. B. 1987. “Plato on Kinds of Animals,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 315–328.Google Scholar

Klosin, A., Casas, E., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., Vavouri, T., and Lehner, B. 2017. “Transgenerational Transmission of Environmental Information in C. elegans,” Science 356(6335): 320–323.Google Scholar

Kočandrle, R. and Couprie, D. L. 2017. Apeiron: Anaximander on Generation and Destruction (Cham: Springer).Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. 1997. “Die Anatomischen Untersuchungen des Aristoteles und ihr Stellenwert als Forschungsmethode in der Aristotelischen Biologie,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 367–373.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 1986. “Aristotle on Function and Virtue,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3(3): 259–279.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 1987. “Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 360–391.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 2010. “Male and Female in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle (Cambridge University Press), 147–167.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 2013. The Activity of Being. An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Kraut, R. 1997. Aristotle Politics Books 7 and 8. Translation and commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Kraut, R. 2018. “Aristotle’s Ethics,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/aristotle-ethics.Google Scholar

Kucharski, P. 1964. “Anaxagoras et les Idées Biologiques de son Siècle,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 154: 137–166.Google Scholar

Kudlien, F. 1962. “Poseidonius und die Ärzteschule der Pneumatiker,” Hermes 90: 419–429.Google Scholar

Kühlewein, H. 1884. “Beiträge zur Geschichte und Beurteilung der Hippokratischen Schriften,” Philologus 42: 119–133.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1974. Wissenschaft und Methode: Interpretationen zur Aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1991. “Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle,” in Keyt, D. and Miller, F. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics (Oxford University Press), 94–117.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1998a. Aristoteles und die Moderne Wissenschaft (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1998b. “Zoologische Sammelwerke in der Antike,” in Kullmann, W., Althoff, J. and Asper, M. (eds.), Gattungen Wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike (Tübingen: Narr), 121–140.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 1999. “Zoologische Sammelwerke in der Antike,” in Wöhrle, G. (ed.), Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften i. (Stuttgart: Steiner), 181–198.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. 2007. Aristoteles: Zoologische Schriften II. Über die Teile der Lebewesen (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.) 1997. Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionem, Methoden, Ergebnisse (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Kupreeva, I. 2005. “Aristotle on Growth: A Study of the Argument of On Generation and Corruption 1.5,” Apeiron 38(3): 103–159.Google Scholar

Labarrière, J. L. 1990. “De la Phronesis Animale,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Metaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: l’Editions de Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 405–428.Google Scholar

Laks, A. 2018. The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, trans. G. W. Most (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Laks, A. and Most, G. (eds.) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2011. “Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful?” Science 334(6062): 1512–1516.Google Scholar

Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Yes. Urgently,” Nature 514: 161–164.Google Scholar

Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, L., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., and Odling-Smee, J. 2015. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1813): 20151019.Google Scholar

Lambros, S. 1885. Excerptorum Constantini de natura animalium libri duo. Aristophanis Historiae animalium epitome subiunctis Aeliani Timothei aliorumque eclogis (Berlin: Reimer).Google Scholar

Lange, L. 1983. “Woman Is Not a Rational Animal: On Aristotle’s Biology of Reproduction,” in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Reidel), 1–16.Google Scholar

Laqueur, T. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Le Blay, F. 2005. “Microcosm and Macrocosm: The Dual Direction of Analogy in Hippocratic Thought and the Meteorological Tradition,” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Hippocrates in Context: Papers Read at the Sixth International Hippocrates Colloquium (Leiden: Brill), 251–269.Google Scholar

Lee, H. D. P. 1952. Aristote Meteorologica (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2014. Aristote, La Génération des Animaux, in Pellegrin, P. (ed.), Aristote, Œuvres Complètes (Paris: Flammarion), 1576–1730.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2016. “Le sperma: Forme, matière ou les deux? Aristote critique de la double semence,” Philosophie Antique 16: 31–62.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2018. “Parts and Generation. The Prologue to the Generation of Animals and the Structure of the Treatise,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 35–55.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. Forthcoming. “Reproductive Residues as Quantities and Powers: Aristotle on the Nature of the Seed,” in Föllinger, S. (ed), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach.Google Scholar

Leitao, D. 2012. The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1982. “Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20: 219–232. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 229–249.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1985. “Plato’s Unnatural Teleology,” in O’Meara, D. (ed.), Platonic Investigations (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press), 195–218.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1987a. “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice,” in Gotthelf, A and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 90–119. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 7–38.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1987b. “Kinds, Forms of Kinds, and the More and the Less in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 339–359. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 160–181.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1990. “Notes on David Charles on HA,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 169–183.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1991. “Between Data and Demonstration: The Analytics and the Historia Animalium,” in Bowen, A. (ed.), Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece (New York: Garland Publishing), 261–295.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1994a. “Darwin Was a Teleologist,” Biology and Philosophy 8: 409–421.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1994b. “Teleology by Another Name: A Reply to Ghiselin,” Biology and Philosophy 9: 493–495.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1995. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Cleary, John J. and Wians, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Volume XI (Lanham MD: University Press of America), 217–240. Reprinted in W. Kullmann and S. Föllinger (eds.) 1997, 163–181 and in Lennox, 2001b, 182–204.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1997a. “Nature Does Nothing in Vain …, ” in Kullman, W., Günther, H.-C., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur Antiken Philosophie. Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann, herausgegeben von Hans-Christian Günther und Antonios Rengakos (mit einer Einleitung von Ernst Vogt) (Stuttgart: Steiner), 199–214. Reprinted in J. G. Lennox, 2001b, 205–223.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1997b. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart: Steiner), 161–181.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1999a. “Aristotle on the Biological Roots of Virtue: The Natural History of Natural Virtue,” in Maienschein, J. and Ruse, M. (eds.), Biology and the Foundation of Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 10–31. Reprinted in D. Henry and K. M. Nielsen (eds.) 2015, 193–213.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1999b. “The Place of Mankind in Aristotle’s Zoology,” Philosophical Topics 27: 1–16.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001a. Aristotle. On the Parts of Animals 1–4. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001b. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology) (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001c. “Material and Formal Natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 182–204.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001d. “Matter, Form and Kind,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 127–130.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001e. “Are Aristotelian Kinds Eternal?” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 160–181.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2001f. “The Disappearance of Aristotle’s Biology: A Hellenistic Mystery,” in Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (Cambridge University Press), 110–125.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2004. “Getting a Science Going: Aristotle on Entry Level Kinds,” in Wolters, G. (ed.), Homo Sapiens und Homo Faber (Festschrift Mittelstrass) (Berlin: De Gruyter), 87–100.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2005. “The Place of Zoology in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy,” in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2006. “Aristotle’s Biology and Aristotle’s Philosophy,” in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), 292–315.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2009a. “Form, Essence, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle (London: Blackwell), 348–367.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2009b. “De Caelo 2.2 and its Debt to the de Incessu Animalium,” in Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2009c. “Aristotle on Mind and the Science of Nature,” in Rossetto, M., Tsianikas, M., Couvalis, G., and Palaktsoglou, M. (eds.), Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, June 2009 (Adelaide: Flinders University Department of Languages), 1–18.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2010a. “Bios and Explanatory Unity in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 329–355.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2010b. “Βιος, Πραχεις, and the Unity of Life,” in Föllinger, S. (ed.), Aristoteles: Was ist ‘Leben’? Aristoteles’ Anschauungen zur Entstehungsweise und Funktion von Leben. Akten der Tagung vom 23.-26. August 2006 in Bamberg (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 239–259.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2011. “Aristotle on Norms of Inquiry,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1: 23–46.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2012. “The Complexity of Aristotle’s Study of Animals,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 287–305.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2014. “Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4: 272–305.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2017a. “Aristotle’s Biology,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/aristotle-biology.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2017b. “An Aristotelian Philosophy of Biology: Form, Function and Development,” Acta Philosophica 26: 33–52.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2018a. “‘For a Human Being Reproduces a Human Being’: A Mundane, Profound, Aristotelian Truth,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Aristotle – Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought: On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2018b. “Aristotle, Dissection, and Generation: Experience, Expertise, and the Practices of Knowing,” in Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 249–272.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2021. “‘Most Natural Among the Functions of Living Things’: Puzzles about Reproduction as a Nutritive Function,” in Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter), 3–19.Google Scholar

Leroi, A. M. 2014. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar

Lesky, E. 1951. Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken (Mainz: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur).Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2012. “Aristotle on Natural Character and Its Implications for Moral Development,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4): 507–530.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. (ed.) 2015a. Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2015b. “Aristotle on Knowing Natural Science for the Sake of Living Well,” in Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics (Cambridge University Press), 214–231.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2015c. “Perfection and the Physiology of Habituation According to Physics Vii.3,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press), 225–245.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2017. From Natural Character to Moral Virtue in Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lewens, T. 2015. Cultural Evolution (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. 1978. “Adaptation,” Scientific American 239: 212–230.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. 2003. The Triple Helix: Genes, Organism and Environments (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Li Causi, P. 2017. “Un Aristotele romano? Ricezione e metamorfosi del corpus zoologico in Plinio il Vecchio,” in Sassi, M. M., Coda, E., and Feola, G. (eds.), La zoologia di Aristotele e la sua ricezione dall’età ellenistica e romana alle culture medievali (Pisa University Press), 81–106.Google Scholar

Littré, E. 1839. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, Vol. 1 (Paris: J. B. Baillière).Google Scholar

Littré, E. 1853. Oeuvres Complètes d’Hippocrate, Vol. 8 (Paris: J. B. Baillière).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1963. “Who Is Attacked in ‘On Ancient Medicine’?” Phronesis 8: 108–126.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argument in Early Greek Thought (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1968. “The Role of Medical and Biological Analogies in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Phronesis 13: 68–83.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1970. Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle (New York: W. W. Norton and Company).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1975. “Alcmaeon and the Early History of Dissection,” Sudhoffs Archiv 59(2): 113–147.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983a. Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983b. “Aristotle on the Difference Between the Sexes,” in Lloyd, G. E. R., Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge University Press), 94–105.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. “Empirical Research in Aristotle’s Biology,” in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge University Press), 53–64.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. “Aristotle’s Zoology and His Metaphysics. The Status Quaestionis. A Critical Review of Some Recent Theories,” in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote (Paris: Éditions du CNRS), 7–36.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996a. Aristotelian Explorations (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996b. “The Master Cook,” in Lloyd, G. E. R., Aristotelian Explorations (Cambridge University Press), 83–103.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 2013. “Aristotle on Natural Sociability, Skills and Intelligence in Animals,” in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge University Press), 277–293.Google Scholar

Loenen, J. H. 1954. “Was Anaximander an Evolutionist?” Mnemosyne, 4th series 7: 215–232.Google Scholar

Lones, T. E. 1912. Aristotle’s Researches in Natural Science (London: West, Newman & Co.).Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. 1995. “Medicine in the Lyceum,” in van der Eijk, P., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context (Amsterdam: Rodopi Press), 431–445.Google Scholar

Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. 2021. Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Louguet, C. 2015. “Aristote et les théories pangénétiques du Ve siècle: Enjeux métaphysiques d’un débat biologique,” in Gysembergh, V. and Schwab, A. (eds.), Le travail du savoir. Wissensbewältigung: Philosophie, sciences exactes et sciences appliquées dans l’antiquité (Trier: Wvt Wissenschaftlicher Verlag), 119–161.Google Scholar

Louguet, C. Forthcoming. “Aristotle and the Hippocratic Corpus on Generation,” in Lefebvre, D. (ed.), The Science of Life in Aristotle and the Early Peripatos (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Macfarlane, P. 2020. “The Pathological Role of Pneuma in Aristotle,” in Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine (Cambridge University Press), 310–330.Google Scholar

Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle: Metaphysics Theta. Translated with a commentary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Manetti, D. 2011a. “Aristotle and the Role of Doxography in the Anonymus Londiniensis (PBrLibr Inv. 137),” in van der Eijk, P. (ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine (Leiden: Brill), 95–142.Google Scholar

Manetti, D. 2011b. Anonymus Londiniensis, De medicina (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 2016. Melissus Between Miletus and Elea (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 2018. “Parmenides From Right to Left,” in Mansfeld, J., Studies in Early Greek Philosophy: A Collection of Papers and One Review (Leiden: Brill), 185–202.Google Scholar

Marc Cohen, S. 1973. “Plato’s Method of Division,” in Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.), Patterns in Plato’s Thought (Dordrecht: Reidel), 181–191.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2013. “Aristotle’s Hylomorphism Without Reconditioning,” Philosophical Inquiry 37(1/2): 5–22.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2014a. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2014b. “Causation Without Glue: Aristotle on Causal Powers,” in Natali, C., Viano, C., and Zingano, M. (eds.), Les quatre causes d’Aristotle. Origins et interprétations (Louvain: Peeters), 221–246.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2017. Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’ Metaphysics (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. 2004. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology: Reason and Rationalization (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1961. “Cause and Effect in Biology,” Science 134: 1501–1506.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1988a. Toward a Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Mayr, E. 1988b. “A Response to David Kitts,” Biology and Philosophy 3: 97–98.Google Scholar

McGowan Tress, D. 1992. “The Metaphysical Science of Aristotle’s GA and His Feminist Critics,” Review of Metaphysics 46: 307–341.Google Scholar

McGowan Tress, D. 1999. “Aristotle Against the Hippocratics on Sexual Generation: A reply to Coles,” Phronesis 44: 228–241.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. 1992. Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Medawar, P. B. and Medawar, J. S. 1983. From Aristotle to Zoos: A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Meikle, S. 1994. “Aristotle on Money,” Phronesis 39(1): 26–44.Google Scholar

Meincke, A. S. 2018. “Autopoiesis, Biological Autonomy and the Process View of Life,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9(5): 5–27.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1992. “Aristotle and Plato on God as Nous and as the Good,” Review of Metaphysics 45: 543–573.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of De Anima,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 83–139.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2010. “On Socrates’ First Objections to the Physicists (Phaedo 95e8–97b7),” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 37–68.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2012. “Aristotle’s Theology,” in Shields, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle (Oxford University Press), 422–464.Google Scholar