Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools Comparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- 5 Cyberviolence and Cyberbullying in Europe and India
- 6 Cyberbullying in Higher Education in India and France
- 7 Participant Roles in Bullying
- 8 Bullying, Defending and Victimization in Western Europe and India
- 9 Defining the Relationship between Risk-Taking and Bullying during Adolescence
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
7 - Participant Roles in Bullying
What Data from Indian Classes Can Tell Us about the Phenomenon
from Part II - Comparative Data on Bullying
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2018
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- 5 Cyberviolence and Cyberbullying in Europe and India
- 6 Cyberbullying in Higher Education in India and France
- 7 Participant Roles in Bullying
- 8 Bullying, Defending and Victimization in Western Europe and India
- 9 Defining the Relationship between Risk-Taking and Bullying during Adolescence
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in SchoolsComparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives, pp. 130 - 145Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abenthum, M. (2016). Bullying als kulturabhängiges Phänomen? – Eine Vergleichstudie zwischen Deutschland und Indien [Bullying as a Culture-Dependent Phenomenon? A Comparative Study between Germany and India]. Zulassungsarbeit im Studiengang Schulpsychologie, Department Psychologie der LMU München.Google Scholar
Chhokar, J. S. (2008). India: Diversity and complexity in action. In Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (eds.), Culture and Leadership across the World. The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies (S. 971–1020). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570.Google Scholar
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 56–68.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kochenderfer, B. J. & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development, 67, 1305–1317.Google Scholar
Krueger, J. I. (2009). A componential model of situation effects, person effects, and situation-by-person interaction effects on social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 127–136.Google Scholar
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.” Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In Magnusson, D. & Endler, N. S. (eds.), Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 86–97.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J. T. & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. l., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystanders intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., De Mey, L., & Willemen, A. M. (2013). Children’s intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 669–682.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Östermann, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, M. & Starch, K. (2015). Changing perspective is changing the system – A moral foundation perspective on how to approach the group dynamics behind bullying. Presentation at the VI World Congress on School Violence and Public Policies: From Violence to School Well-being, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Schäfer, M., Starch, K., Stoiber, M., & Letsch, H. (2017). Changing perspective is changing the system – Bullying as “strong situation.” Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 8(1). doi: 10.4172/2155–6105.1000305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, K. S. (1992). People of India: An introduction (National Series Vol. 1). Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1–9.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and theory of mind: A critique of the “social skills deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by