Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:04:10.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Female Voices in Virtual Reality: Drawing Young Girls into an Online World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2009

Ann Locke Davidson
Affiliation:
Educational Connections, LLC 1012 S.W. King Avenue, Suite 301 Portland, OR 97205 davidson@educationalconnections.com
Janet Ward Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh 517 LRDC 3939 O'Hara Street Pittsburgh, PA 15260-5159 schof@pitt.edu
K. Ann Renninger
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Wesley Shumar
Affiliation:
Drexel University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Popular media, prominent politicians, and technology enthusiasts convey rich imagery about the transformative educational potential of the Internet. Compelling visions are epitomized in a speech given by U.S. President Clinton:

children in urban, suburban and rural districts, rich, poor, middle class – for the first time in the history of America, because of these [Internet] connections, we can make available the same learning from all over the world at the same level of quality and the same time to all our children. It will revolutionize education.

(Sioux Falls, SD: 1996)

Indeed, there is little argument about the fact that universal Internet connections would provide many students with access to a vast array of information as well as to potentially enriching opportunities to interact with distant others who would not otherwise be available.

However, it is less certain that Internet access in and of itself will end up making available the same learning for all school age children; strong evidence indicates that existing attitudes toward, interest in, and use of technology are clearly related to variables such as gender and race. For example, gender and race have been shown to predict Internet use even when financial barriers to access are removed, with young, European American males dominating (Kraut et al., 1996). Boys are more likely than girls to use computers during discretionary time (Durndell & Lightbody, 1993; Hess & Miura, 1985; Hoyles, 1988; Schofield, 1995) to enroll in computer science courses, particularly as the required level of expertise increases, and to earn computer science degrees (Hoyles, 1988; National Center for Education Statistics, 1997; Schofield, 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Building Virtual Communities
Learning and Change in Cyberspace
, pp. 34 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of University Women (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. New York: Marlowe & Company
Bronner, E. (1998, June 25). Voracious computers are siphoning talent from academia. The New York Times, A1Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, R. (1998, January 12). U.S. to train workers for tech jobs. The Washington Post, A1Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press
Davidson, A. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools: Student narratives on race, gender and academic engagement. Albany: State University of New York Press
Durndell, A., & Lightbody, P. (1993). Gender and computing: Change over time?Computers in Education, 21, 331–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman
Epstein, C. F. (1997). The multiple realities of sameness and difference: Ideology and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 259–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity and success at Capital High. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Fullerton, H. N. Jr. (1997). Labor force 2006: Slowing down and changing composition. Monthly Labor Review, 120, 23–38Google Scholar
Gender Wars in Cyberspace (1995, March 8). The Boston Globe, pp. 29, 32
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Gilligan, C. (1993). Joining the resistance: Psychology, politics, girls, and women. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race and gender in United States schools (pp. 143–68). Albany: State University of New York Press
Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill
Hall, J., & Cooper, J. (1991). Gender, experience and attributions to the computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, 51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, A. (1998, January 13). Software jobs go begging and threaten high technology boom. The New York Times, p. A1Google Scholar
Hess, R. D., & Miura, I. T. (1985). Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes. Sex Roles, 13, 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyles, C. (1988). Review of the literature. In C. Hoyles (Ed.), Girls and computers (pp. 5–12). London: Institute of Education
Huber, B. R., & Schofield, J. W. (1998). Gender and the sociocultural context of computing in Costa Rica. In H. Bromley & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Education/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp. 103–131). Albany: State University of New York Press
Hunter, B. (1993). Internetworking: Coordinating technology for systemic reform. Communications, 36, 42–6Google Scholar
Hurtado, A. (1997). Understanding multiple group identities: Inserting women into cultural transformations. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 299–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J. B. (1997). What are the social issues involved in focusing on difference in gender?Journal of Social Issues, 53, 213–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 668–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krapp, A., & Fink, B. (1992). The development and function of interests during the critical transition from home to preschool. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 397–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). HomeNet: A field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepper, M. R., & Cordova, D. I. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 187-208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 255–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Light, P., & Littleton, K. (1997). Situational effects in computer-based problem solving. In L. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse' tools' and reasoning: Situated cognition and technologically supported environments. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 224–39CrossRef
Lott, B. (1997). The personal and social correlates of a gender difference ideology. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 279–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, N. (1990). Listening to voices we have not heard. In C. Gilligan, N. P. Lyons & T. J. Hanmer (Eds.), Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School (pp. 30–72). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press
Murphy, K., Naples, L., Schofield, J., Davidson, A. L., & Stocks, J. (1997). Difference blindness/blindness difference: Student explorations of “disability” over the Internet. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago
National Center for Education Statistics (1997). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement
Nolan, P. C., McKinnon, D. H., & Soler, J. (1992). Computers in education: Achieving equitable access and use. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 24, 299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelgrum, W. J. (1992). International research on computers in education. Prospects, 22(3), 341–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Raissiguier, C. (1994). Becoming women, becoming workers: Identity formation in a French vocational school. Albany: State University of New York Press
Renninger, K. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Sanders, J. S. (1985). Making the computer neuter. The Computing Teacher, 12, 23–7Google Scholar
Schofield, J. W. (1989). Black and white in school. New York London: Teachers College Press
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University Press
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, J. (1997). Jobs associated with the Internet. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 41, 2–9Google Scholar
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Sutherland, R., & Hoyles, C. (1988). Gender perspectives on Logo programming in the mathematics curriculum. In C. Hoyles (Ed.), Girls and computers (pp. 40–63). London: Institute of Education
Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools. Review of Educational Research, 61, 475–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: William Morrow
Treichler, P. A., & Kramarae, C. (1983). Women's talk in the ivory tower. Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 118–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster
Veneri, C. (1988). Here today, jobs of tomorrow: Opportunities in information technology. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 42, 44Google Scholar
Whitley, B. Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×