Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:47:43.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Improving the performance of the European social model: the welfare state over the individual life cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Assar Lindbeck
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University
Jordi Gual
Affiliation:
IESE Business School, Barcelona
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Welfare state arrangements are more comprehensive in Western Europe, or Europe for short, than in other parts of the world. As a result, welfare state spending (including expenditures on education) typically hovers at around 25–35 per cent of GDP among European countries (gross figures, OECD, 2002). The achievements are also impressive. In particular, there is considerable income security over the individual's life cycle, largely as a result of social insurance. Governments have also boosted the consumption of various types of (personal) social services with strong elements of investment in human capital – in particular, education and health care, as well as child care in some countries. Poverty has also been mitigated, not only as a result of social insurance but also via selective income support and social services that are made available for low-income groups. In countries where the children of low-income groups enjoy a relatively large share of aggregate education services, the factor incomes of these groups have also improved.

Some welfare state arrangements also contribute to favourable economic and social dynamics. For example, when aggregate investment in human capital is stimulated, future labour productivity is boosted, which in turn improves the future aggregate tax base. As a result, in a long-term perspective, these types of welfare state spending may even be ‘self-financing’ for the government – an example of virtuous welfare state dynamics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Building a Dynamic Europe
The Key Policy Debates
, pp. 39 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D. (1994), ‘Distributive politics and economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (May): 465–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arai, M. and P. Skogman Thoursie (2001), ‘Incentives and selection in cyclical absenteeism’, FIEF Working Paper Series No. 167, Stockholm: Labour Union Institute for Economic Research
Askildsen, J. E., E. Bratberg and O. A. Nilsen (2002), ‘Unemployment, labor force composition and sickness absence: a panel data study’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 446, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor
Barmby, T. A., Sessions, J. and Treble, J. G. (1994), ‘Absenteeism, efficiency wages and shirking’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96: 561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, F. and F. M. Sandström (2001), ‘Competition and the quality of public schools’ (mimeo), Swedish Research Institute of Trade, Stockholm
Bertola, G., J. F. Jimeno, R. Marimon and C. Pissarides (2001), ‘EU welfare systems and labor markets: diverse in the past, integrated in the future?’, in G. Bertola, T. Boeri and G. Nicoletti, Welfare and unemployment in a united Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 23–122
Björklund, A. and M. Jäntti (1993), ‘Intergenerational income mobility in Sweden compared to the United States’ (mimeo), Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University
Blanchard, O. and Wolfers, J. (2000), ‘The role of shocks and institutions in the rise in European unemployment: the aggregate evidence’, Economic Journal, 110: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L., Forslund, A. and Hemström, M. (2001), ‘Does active labour market policy work? Lessons from the Swedish experiences’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8(2): 61–124Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Fuchs, V. R. (1986), The health economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Henrekson, M., K. Lantto and M. Persson (1994), Bruk och missbruk av sjukförsäkringen [Use and misuse of health insurance], Stockholm: SNS Förlag
Hepburn, C. R. (2001), Can the market save our schools?, Vancouver: Fraser Institute
Hoxby, C. (2002), ‘School choice and school productivity’, NBER Working Paper No. 8873, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
Ichino, A. and R. T. Riphahn (2002), ‘The effects of employment protection on worker effort: a comparison of absenteeism during and after probation’, CESifo Working Paper No. 596, Munich: CESifo
Johansson, P. and Palme, M. (2001), ‘Assessing the effects of public policy on worker absenteeism’, Journal of Human Resources, 37(2): 381–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, O. (1991), ‘Behov eller rättighet? Sjukfrånvarons strukturella och institutionella bestämningsfaktorer i OECD-länderna’ [Need or right? Structural and institutional determinants of sick absenteeism in OECD countries], Sociologisk Forskning, 3: 23–41Google Scholar
Larsson, L. (2002), ‘Sick of being unemployed? Interactions between unemployment and sickness insurance in Sweden’, IFAU Working Paper Series 2002:6, Uppsala: Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation
Layard, R. S., N. Nickel and R. Jackman (1991), Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labor market, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Leibowitz, A. (1996), ‘Child care: private costs or public responsibility?’, in Ⅴ. Fuchs (ed.), Individual and social responsibility, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ch. 2
Lindbeck, A. (1995), ‘Hazardous welfare-state dynamics’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 85: 9–15Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A. (1996), ‘The West European employment problem’, Weltwirtschaft-liches Archiv, 132 (4) (December): 3–31Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S. and Weibull, J. W. (1999), ‘Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, A. and Persson, M. (2003 forthcoming), ‘The gains from pension reform?’, Journal of Economic LiteratureCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D. (2000), ‘Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: from Tayloristic to holistic organizations’, Journal of Labor Economics, 19: 353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, A. and Wikström, S. (2000), ‘The ICT revolution in consumer product markets’, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 4: 77–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, A. and S. Wikström (2002), ‘E-exchange and the boundary between households and organizations’, CESifo Working Paper No. 806, Munich: CESifo
Martin, J. M. and D. Grubb (2001), ‘What works and for whom: a review of OECD countries’ experiences with active labour market policies’ (mimeo), Office of Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), Uppsala
McHale, J. (1999), ‘The risk of social security benefit rule changes: some international evidence’, NBER Working Paper No. 7031, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
Nicoletti, G., R. D. G. Haffner, S. Nickell, S. Scarpetta and G. Zoega (2001), ‘European integration, liberalization, and labor-market performance’, in G. Bertola, T. Boeri and G. Nicoletti, Welfare and unemployment in a united Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 147–236
OECD (2002), Social Expenditures, database
RFV [Riksförsäkringsverket] (2002a), ‘Sjukskrivnas syn på hälsa och arbete’ [Attitudes towards health and work of individuals on sick leave], Analysera 2002:16, Working Paper, Stockholm: RFV
RFV (2002b), ‘Svensk sjukfrånvaro i ett europeiskt perspektiv’ [sick absenteeism in Sweden in a European perspective], Analysera 2002:11, Working Paper, Stockholm: RFV
Rosen, S. (1997), ‘Public employment and the welfare state in Sweden’, in R. Freeman, B. Swedenborg and R. Topel (eds.), Reforming the welfare state: the Swedish model in transition, Chicago: NBER and University of Chicago Press, pp. 79–108
Sinn, H. W. (2000), ‘The threat to the German welfare state’, CESifo Working Paper No. 320, Munich: CESifo
Skogman Thoursie, P. (2002), ‘Reporting sick: are sporting events contagious?’ (mimeo), Department of Economics, Stockholm University

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×