Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T07:29:27.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2018

Laura Jansen
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Borges' Classics
Global Encounters with the Graeco-Roman Past
, pp. 159 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aizenberg, E. (ed.) (1990), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Aizenberg, E. (ed.) (1990), ‘Introduction’, in Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 116.Google Scholar
Alazraki, J. (1990), ‘Borges’s Modernism and the New Critical Idiom’, in Aizenberg, E (ed.), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 99108.Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, M. (2009), The Theme of Returning Home in Ancient Greek Literature: The Nostos of the Epic Heroes. Lewiston, NY and Lampeter, Wales.Google Scholar
Almeida, I. and Parodi, C. (2005), ‘Borges en diálogo sobre el Budismo’, Variaciones Borges, 20, 101–24.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (2005), The Art of the Aeneid. Mundelein, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Apter, E. (2013), Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Assman, J. (1995), ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, in Assman, J. and Czaplicka, J. (eds.), New German Critique, 65, 125–33.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S., Brodersen, K., Champion, C. B., Erskine, A. and Huebner, S. R. (eds.) (2013), The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947), Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balderstone, D. (2008), ‘Borges, las sucesivas rupturas’, in Olea Franco, R. (ed.), ‘In memoriam’ Jorge Luis Borges. Mexico: Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Lingüísticos y Literarios, 1936.Google Scholar
Bär, N. (2010), ‘Borges se anticipó medio siglo a las neurociencias’, La Nación, February 4.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1988), ‘Ovid the Censor’, AJAH 13: 96105.Google Scholar
Barrenechea, A. M. (1965), Borges the Labyrinth Maker, translated by Lima, R.. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1991), Essais critiques. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bartoloni, P. (1997), ‘Spatialised Time and Circular Time: A Note on Time in the Work of Gerald Murnane and Jorge Luis Borges’, Australian Literary Studies, 185–90.Google Scholar
Bartoloni, P.(2004), ‘The Problem of Time in the Critical Writings of Jorge Luis Borges’, Modern Greek Studies: Australia and New Zealand, 11(12), 317–33.Google Scholar
Baugh, E. (2009), Derek Walcott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. (2008), ‘World Literature without a Hyphen: Towards a Typology of Literary Systems’, New Left Review 54, 87100.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. (2013), ‘Greek, Latin, and the Origins of “World Literature”’, Comparative Literature and Culture 15.5 https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2334Google Scholar
Beecroft, A.(2015), An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day. London and New York, NY: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Begley, A. (1993), ‘Don De Lillo, The Art of Fiction No. 135’, The Paris Review, 128.Google Scholar
Benario, H. W. (2012), ‘The Annals’, in Pagán, V. E. (ed.), A Companion to Tacitus. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 101–22.Google Scholar
Billings, J. (2016), ‘The Sighs of Hellenism’, in Butler, S. (ed.), Deep Classics. Rethinking Classical Reception. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1975), A Map of Misreading. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bondanella, P. (2006), ‘Italo Calvino and Umberto Eco: Postmodern Masters’, in Bondanella, P. and Ciccarelli, A. (eds.), Cambridge Companion to the Italian Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–81.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. (1923–49), Obras Completas I, Edición crítica anotada por Rolando Costa Picazo e Irma Zangara, Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1952–72), Obras Completas II, Edición crítica anotada por Rolando Costa Picazo e Irma Zangara. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1975–85), Obras Completas III, Edición crítica anotada por Rolando Costa Picazo e Irma Zangara. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1975–88), Obras Completas IV, Edición crítica anotada por Rolando Costa Picazo e Irma Zangara. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(2010), Oeuvres completes I, Préface de L’Auteur et edition établie, présentée et annotée par J. P. B. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(2010), Oeuvres completes II, Préface de L’Auteur et edition établie, présentée et annotée par J. P. B. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1984), Seven Nights, translated by Weinberger, E.. New York: New Directions Publishing.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1998), Collected Fictions, translated by Hurley, A.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1999), Selected Non-Fictions, edited by Weinberger, E.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(1999), Selected Poems, edited by Coleman, A.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L.(2002), This Craft of Verse, The Charles Eliot Norton Lectures 1967–1968. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. and Carrizo, A. (1983), Jorge Luis Borges, Borges el memorioso, Conversaciones Jorge Luis Borges con Antonio Carrizo. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. and Ferrari, O. (2014), Jorge Luis Borges, Osvaldo Ferrari Conversations I, translated by Wilson, J.. London and New York, NY: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. and Ferrari, O. (2015), Jorge Luis Borges, Osvaldo Ferrari Conversations II, translated by Boll, T.. London and New York, NY: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. and Ferrari, O. (2012), Jorge Luis Borges, Osvaldo Ferrari Dialogues I: Borges en dialogues. Nouveaux dialogues, translated by Pons, René. Paris: Pocket Publishing.Google Scholar
Bossart, W. H. (2003), Borges and Philosophy: Self, Time, and Metaphysics. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bough, E. (2006), Derek Walcott. Cambridge Studies in African and Caribbean Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breslin, P. (2001), Nobody’s Nation: Reading Derek Walcott. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. and Talbert, T. (eds.) (2004), Space in the Roman World: Its Perception and Presentation. Münster: Lit ag.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (2011), The Matter of the Page: Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (ed.) (2016), Deep Classics: Rethinking Classical Reception. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. (2016), ‘Some Problems in the Text and Transmission of Lucretius’, in Hunter, R. and Oakley, S. (eds.), Latin Literature and Its Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2253.Google Scholar
Cajero, A. (2006), ‘“A quien leyere”: La poética de Fervor de Buenos Aires’, Variaciones Borges 22, 101–28.Google Scholar
Caldwell, T. M. (2008), Virgil Made English: The Decline of Classical Authority. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvino, I. (1996), Six Memos for the Next Millennium. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Calvino, I.(1997), Invisible Cities. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Calvino, I.(2009), Why Read the Classics? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1968), ‘The First Edition of the Amores’, CQ 62, 320–33.Google Scholar
Capozzi, R. (2002), ‘Knowledge and Cognitive Practices in Eco’s Labyrinths of Intertextuality’, in Gracia, J. J. E., Korsmeyer, C. and Gasché, R. (eds.), Literary Philosophers: Borges, Calvino, Eco. New York, NY and London: Routledge, 164–84.Google Scholar
Carricaburo, N. (2011), ‘Los enciclopedistas y el enciclopedismo de Jorge Luis Borges’, in Cámpora, M. and González, J. R. (eds.), Borges – Francia, Buenos Aires: Universidad Católica Argentina, 461–73.Google Scholar
Casanova, P. (2004), The World Republic of Letters, translated by Debevoise, M. B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cassin, B. (ed.) (2004), Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles, Vol. 26, No. 2, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Cédola, E. (1994), ‘Borges et la ferveur de Buenos Aires’, in Melançon, B. et Popovic, P. (eds.), Montréal 1642–1992. Le grand passage, Montréal: XYZ, 169–89.Google Scholar
Charbonnier, G. (1967), Entretiens avec Jorge Luis Borges. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Cheah, P. (2008), ‘What Is a world? On World Literature as World-Making Activity’, Daedalus, 167, 26-38.Google Scholar
Cheah, P. (2016), What Is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.della Corte, F. (1986), ‘Gli Amores di Ovidio ripidiati’, in Stache, U. J., Maaz, W. and Wagner, F. (eds.), Kontinuität und Wandel. Lateinische Poesie von Naevius bis Baudelaire. Franco Munarizum 65. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: Weidmann, 70–8.Google Scholar
Damrosch, D. (2013), What Is World Literature? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981), Dissemination, translated by Johnson, B.. London and New York, NY: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2016), ‘Overlooked Manuscript Evidence for Interpolations in Lucretius’, in Hunter, R. and Oakley, S. (eds.), Latin Literature and Its Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6887.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (2013), L’Antiquité, territoire des écarts. Entretiens avec Pauline Colonna d’Istria et Sylvie Taussig. Paris: Broché.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1950), Aeschylus: Agamemnon, edited with commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Earle, P. G. (2003), ‘In and Out of Time (Cervantes, Dostoevsky, Borges)’, Hispanic Review71, 113.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1989), The Open Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1994), Reflections on The Name of the Rose. London: Minerva.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (2004), On Beauty: A History of a Western Idea. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Eco, U.(2006), On Literature. London: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eco, U.(2007), On Ugliness. New York, NY: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Eco, U.(2009), The Infinity of Lists: From Homer to Joyce. London: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Eco, U.(2014), The Name of the Rose. Translated by Weaver, W.. Boston and New York: Houghon Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1944), What Is a Classic? An Address Delivered Before the Virgil Society on the 16th of October 1944. London: The Virgil Society.Google Scholar
Enguídanos, M. (1986), ‘Seventeen Notes towards Deciphering Borges (Glosses)’, in Cortínez, C. (ed.), Borges the Poet. Fayetteville, 315–21.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991), Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farronato, C. (2003), Eco’s Chaosmos: From the Middle Ages to Postmodernity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fiddian, R. (2013), ‘Post-Colonial Borges’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, R. (2003), ‘Borges y Cervantes: Perspectivas estéticas’, in Solotorevsky, M. and Fine, R. (eds.), Borges en Jerusalén. Veruvert: Iberoamericana, 117–25.Google Scholar
Fishburn, E. (2013), ‘Jewish, Christian, and Gnostic themes’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5667.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (2016), Variety: The Life of a Roman Concept. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forero, M. T. and Garabieta, L. (2013), Borges y oriente, Buenos Aires: Diseño.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.London: Tavistock Publications. Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984), ‘Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias’, Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité: 46–9.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (2004), ‘The Homeric Question’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 220–32.Google Scholar
Fry, P. (2000), ‘Classical Standards in Romantic Period’, in Brown, M. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. 5: Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 728.Google Scholar
García Jurado, F. and Salazar Morales, R. (2014), La traducción y sus palimpsestos: Borges, Homero y Virgilio. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.Google Scholar
García Jurado, F. (2016), Teoría de la tradicíon clásica: Conceptos, historia y métodos. México: Universidad Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
García Martin, E. (2005), ‘The Dangers of Abstraction in Borges’s “The Immortal”’, Variaciones Borges, 20, 87100.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1997), Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, translated by Lewin, J. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giskin, H. (2005), ‘Borges’ Revisioning of Reading in “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote”’, Variaciones Borges 19, 103–23.Google Scholar
Glissant, E. (1997), The Poetics of Relation, translated by Wing, B.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goff, B. and Simpson, M. (2007), Crossroads in the Black Aegean: Oedipus, Antigone and Dramas of the African Diaspora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. (forthcoming 2018), ‘Orts, scraps, and fragments’, in Harding, J. and Nash, J., Modernism and Non-Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González Echevarría, R. (2013), ‘The Aleph’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–36.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (eds.) (1965), The Greek Anthology 1: Hellenistic Epigrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gracia, J. J. E., Korsmeyer, C. and Gasché, R. (eds.) (2002), Literary Philosophers: Borges, Calvino, Eco. New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002), Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Greenwood, E. (eds.) (2007), Homer in the Twentieth Century: Between World Literature and the Western Canon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (2011), The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. New York, NY and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. (2009), ‘Shades of Rome in the Poetry of Derek Walcott’, in Harrison, S. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 255–74.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E.(2010), Afro-Greeks: Dialogues between Anglophone Caribbean Literature and Classics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E.(2016), ‘Reception Studies: The Cultural Mobility of Classics’, Daedalus Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 145(2), 41–9.Google Scholar
Griffin, C. (2013), ‘Philosophy and Fiction’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 515.Google Scholar
Güthenke, C. (2008), BMCR Review of Homer in the Twentieth Century: Between World Literature and the Western Canon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2009), Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardwick, L. (2007), ‘Introduction’, in Hardwick, L. and Gillespie, C. (eds.), Classics in Post-Colonial Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2007). ‘Homer after Parry: Tradition, Reception and the Timeless Text’, in Graziosi, B. and Greenwood, E. (eds.), Homer in the Twentieth Century: BetweenWorld Literature and the Western CanonOxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B.(1989), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2006), ‘Playing with his Life: Ovid’s “Autobiographical” References’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5168.Google Scholar
Huggan, G. (2011), ‘The Trouble with World Literature’, in Behdad, A. and Thomas, D. (eds.), A Companion to Comparative Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 490506.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1992), ‘Callimachus and Heraclitus’, MD 28, 113–23.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1985), Aeschylus, Septem Contra Thebas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O.(2006), Propertius: Elegies Book IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O.(2008), Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ioannidou, E. (2017), Greek Fragments in Postmodern Frames: Rewriting Tragedy 1970–2005. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, H. (1974), Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, L. (2012), ‘On the Edge of the Text: Preface and Reader in Ovid’s Amores’, Helios 39(1), 119.Google Scholar
Jansen, L.(2014), The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.Google Scholar
Jansen, L.(2016), ‘Borges and the Disclosure of Antiquity’, in Butler, S. (ed.), Deep Classics: Rethinking Classical Reception. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 291309.Google Scholar
Jansen, L.(2018), ‘Extreme Classicisms: Jorge Luis Borges’, in Richardson, E. (ed.), Classics in Extremis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009), ‘Time. For Borges’, CR: The New Centennial Review 9(1), 209–26.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (2001), A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Lailhacar, C. (1990), ‘The Mirror and the Encyclopaedia: Borgesian Codes in U. Eco’s The Name of the Rose’, in Aizenberg, E. (ed.), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 155–79.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1979), The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition with Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kefala, E. (2007), Peripheral (post) Modernity: The Syncretist Aesthetics of Borges, Piglia, Kalokyris and Kyriakidis. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2002), Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F.(2007), ‘Making a Text of the Universe: Perspectives on Discursive Order in De rerum natura’, in Gale, M. R. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Lucretius. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 276–96.Google Scholar
King, B. (2000), Derek Walcott: A Caribbean Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klaeber, F. (2008), Klaeber’s Beowulf and The Fight at Finnsburg, edited by Fulk, R. D., Bork, R. E. and Niles, J. D.. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Kristal, E. (2002), Invisible Work: Borges and Translation. Vanderbilt and Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Google Scholar
Krysinski, W. (2002), ‘Borges, Calvino, Eco: The Philosophies of Metafiction’, in Gracia, J. E., Korsmeyer, C. and Gasché, R. (eds.), Literary Philosophers: Borges, Calvino, Eco. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laín Corona, G. (2009), ‘Borges and Cervantes: Truth and Falsehood in the Narration’, Neophilologus 93(3), 421–37.Google Scholar
Lapidot, E. (1991), ‘Borges y Escher: artistas contemporáneos’, Revista Iberoamericana, Vol. LVII, No. 155–56, 607–15.Google Scholar
Lazarus, N. (2004), ‘Introducing Postcolonial Studies’, in Lazarus, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 116.Google Scholar
Levine, S. J. (2013), ‘Borges on Translation’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4355.Google Scholar
Loeb, P. S. (2013), ‘Eternal Recurrence’, in Gemes, K. and Richardson, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López-Baralt, L. (2013), ‘Islamic Themes’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6880.Google Scholar
Macadam, A. (2013), ‘The Maker’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–45.Google Scholar
Madrid, L. (1987), Cervantes y Borges: La inversión de los signos. Madrid: Pliegos.Google Scholar
Manguel, A. (1997), A History of Reading. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Manguel, A.(2006), With Borges. London: Telegram.Google Scholar
Manguel, A.(2007) Homer’s the Iliad and the Odyssey: A Bibliography. New York, NY: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Manguel, A.(2010), A Reading on Reading. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Manguel, A.(2012), ‘Translating Borges’, Biblioasis International Translations Blog, http://biblioasistranslation.blogspot.com/2012/04/alberto-manguel-translating-borges.html.Google Scholar
Martin, R. H. (2010), ‘From Manuscript to Print’, in Woodman, A. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241–52.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993), Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C.(1997), ‘Introduction: The Classic of Europe’, in Martindale, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118.Google Scholar
Martindale, C.(2010), ‘Leaving Athens: Classics for a New Century?’, Review of Page duBois, Out of Athens: The New Ancient Greeks, Arion 18(1), 135–48.Google Scholar
Martindale, C.(2013), ‘Response to Forum Debate’, Classical Receptions Journal 5(2), 246–51.Google Scholar
Martínez Pérsico, M. (2010), ‘Analogías de la invención: M. C. Escher y Jorge Luis Borges’, Cartaphilus 7(8), 112–8.Google Scholar
Marx, J. (2004), ‘Postcolonial Literature and the Western Literary Canon’, in Lazarus, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8396.Google Scholar
Master, J. (2012), ‘The Histories’, in Pagán, V. E. (ed.), A Companion to Tacitus. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 84100.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. (2013), Black Odysseys: The Homeric Odyssey in the African Dispora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, H. (2013), ‘The Mulatto of Criticism: Walcott and Literary Criticism’, in Antoine-Dunne, J. (ed.), Interlocking Basins of a Globe: Essays on Derek Walcott. Leeds: Peepal Tree Press, 5170.Google Scholar
McKeown, J. C. (1987), Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary. Volume I (Arca 20). Liverpool: ARCA 20.Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2004), ‘Conjectures on World Literature’, in Prendergast, C. (ed.), Debating World Literature. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999), Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosher, M. (1994), ‘Atemporal Labyrinths in Time: J. L. Borges and the New Physicists’, Symposium 48(1), 5161.Google Scholar
Mualem, S. (2012), Borges and Plato: A Game with Shifting Mirrors. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert Verlag.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E. (1986a), ‘The date of Ovid’s Ars Amatoria 3’, AJPh, 107, 7494.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E.(1986b), ‘Influence of Ovid’s Remedia Amoris on Ars Amatoria 3 and Amores 3’, CPh 81, 203–20.Google Scholar
Murgia, C. E.(2012), ‘The Textual Transmission’, in Pagán, V. E. (ed.), A Companion to Tacitus. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1522.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2010), Homer The Preclassic. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Neer, R. (2012), Greek Archaeology: A New History, c. 2500 – c. 150 BCE. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Obrist, H. U. and Raza, A. (2017), Mondialité or the Archipelagos of Édouard Glissant. Villa Empain, Brussels: Boghossian Foundation.Google Scholar
Olea Franco, R. (1993), El otro Borges, el primer Borges. Mexico: El Colegio de México – Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Olea Franco, R.(2013), ‘The early poetry (1923–1929)’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 172–85.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, G. (1990), ‘The Library Is on Fire: Intertextuality in Borges and Foucault’, in Aizenberg, E. (ed.), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 109–21.Google Scholar
Palmer, (2014), Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, D. (1990), ‘The Literature of Appropriation: Eco’s Use of Borges in Il Nome della Rosa’, Modern Language Review 85, 842–9.Google Scholar
Perella, S. (1999), Calvino. Roma.Google Scholar
Petrovic, I. (2014), ‘Posidippus and Achaemenid Royal Propaganda’, in Hunter, R., Rengakos, A. and Sistakou, E. (eds.), Hellenistic Studies at a Crossroads: Exploring Texts, Contexts and Metatexts. Berlin: De Gruyter, 273300.Google Scholar
Pettersson, A. (2008), ‘Transcultural Literary History: Beyond Constricting Notions of World Literature’, New Literary History 39, 463479.Google Scholar
Piglia, R. (2001), Crítica y fición. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
Piglia, R.(2005), El último lector. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
Piglia, R.(2013), Clase 3: ‘La biblioteca y el lector en Borges’, Borges por Piglia, www.tvpublica.com.ar/programa/borges-por-piglia.Google Scholar
Pollard, C. W. (2004), New Worlds of Modernisms: T. S Eliot, Derek Walcott and Kamau Brathwaite. Charlottesville, VA and London: The University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2004), ‘Homer: The History of an Idea’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 324–43.Google Scholar
Porter, J.(2008), ‘Reception Studies: Future Prospects’, in Hardwick, L. and Gillespie, C. (eds.), Classics in Post-Colonial Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 469–81.Google Scholar
Prosperi, V. (2010), ‘Lucretius in the Italian Renaissance’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 214–26.Google Scholar
Purves, A. (2017), Touch and the Ancient Senses. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rabau, S. (2012), Quinze (brèves) rencontres avec Homère, L’Antiquité au present. Paris and Berlin: Fabula.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. (2010), ‘Lucretius in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Transmission and Scholarship’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205–13.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G. (eds.) (1983), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. (2012), Borges and Space. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. (1987), Heraclitus: Fragments. A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Monegal, E. (1983), Jorge Luis Borges: Biographie Littéraire. Paris: Gallimard. Google Scholar
Roman, L. (2015), ‘Statius and Martial: Post-Vatic Self-Fashioning in Flavian Rome’, in Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E. and Gervais, K. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Statius. Leiden: Brill, 444–61.Google Scholar
Rosato, L. and Álvarez, G. (2010), Borges, libros y lecturas: catálogo de la colección Jorge Luis Borges. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Biblioteca Nacional.Google Scholar
Ross, R. (1990), ‘It Cannot Not Be There: Borges and Australia’s Peter Carey’, in Aizenberg, E. (ed.), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 4458.Google Scholar
Sagastume, J. R. and Martínez-Sáenz, M. (2005), ‘Desmantelamiento y reconstrucción textual: Borges, «Pierre Menard, autor del Quijote y la traducción»’. Bulletin of Spanish Studies 82(6), 815–29.Google Scholar
Salazar Morales, R. (2011), Homerus redivivus: Borges et ses ‘Vies imaginaires’ d’Homère. Paris: Université de Paris IV.Google Scholar
Salazar Morales, R.(2015), ‘Homère dans la Cité des Immortels: de la “vie imaginaire” à l’imaginaire philosophique dans “El inmortal” de Jorge Luis Borges’, Comparatismes en Sorbonne (Les Classiques aux Amériques) 6, 115, www.crlc.paris-sorbonne.fr/FR/Page_revue_num.php?P1=6.Google Scholar
Sarlo, B. (1988), Una modernidad peripherica: Buenos Aires, 1920 y 1930. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
Sarlo, B.(1993), A Writer on the Edge. London and New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Saunders, T., Martindale, C., Pite, R. and Skoie, M. (eds.) (2012), Romans and Romantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwob, M. (2004), Vies imaginaires. Présentation par Jean-Pierre Bertrand et Gérald Purnelle. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Scianna, F. (1999), Portraits of Jorge Luis Borges. Italy: Franco Sciardelli. Google Scholar
Skempis, M. and Ziogas, I. (eds.) (2014), Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stead, E. (ed.) (2009), Seconde Odyssée: Ulysse de Tennyson à Borges, textes réunis, commentés et en partie traduits par Evanghélia Stead. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon. Nomina, essais et documents.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1978), History in Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tcherepashenets, N. (2008), Place and Displacement in the Narrative Worlds of Jorge Luis Borges and Julio Cortázar. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
de Toro, A. (1995), ‘Post-Coloniality and Post-Modernity: Jorge Luis Borges: The Periphery in the Centre, the Periphery as the Centre, the Centre of the Periphery’, in de Toro, F. and de Toro, A. (eds.), Borders and Margins: Postcolonialism and Post-Modernism. Frankfurt and Madrid: Vervuert Verlag, 1143.Google Scholar
Varsava, J. (1990), ‘The Last Fictions: Calvino’s Borgesian Odysseys’, in Aizenberg, E. (ed.), Borges and His Successors: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and the Arts. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 183–99.Google Scholar
Walcott, D. (1981), The Fortunate Traveller, New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Walcott, D.(1984), Midsummer. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Walcott, D.(1998), What the Twilight Says. Essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Webb, T. (1982), English Romantic Hellenism: 1700–1824. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, B. (1993), Understanding Italo Calvino. Columbia, SC: University of South California.Google Scholar
Widzisz, M. A. (2012), Chronos on the Threshold: Time, Ritual, and Agency in the Oresteia. Lanham, MD and Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Williamson, E. (1994), ‘The Question of Influence’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), Cervantes and the Modernists: The Question of Influence. London: Tamesis, 18.Google Scholar
Williamson, E.(2004), Borges: A Life. New York, NY and London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williamson, E.(2013), ‘Borges in Context: The Autobiographical Dimension’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–25.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2013), ‘The Late Poetry’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186200.Google Scholar
Wood, M. (1994), ‘Cervantes reads Borges and Nabokov’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), Cervantes and the Modernists: The Question of Influence. London: Tamesis, 2941.Google Scholar
Wood, M.(2013), ‘Borges and theory’, in Williamson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2942.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. M. and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2008), The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zonana, V. G. (2006), ‘Memoria del mundo clásico en “Funes el memorioso”’, Revista de Literaturas Modernas 36, 207–33.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Jansen, University of Bristol
  • Book: Borges' Classics
  • Online publication: 30 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289979.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Jansen, University of Bristol
  • Book: Borges' Classics
  • Online publication: 30 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289979.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Jansen, University of Bristol
  • Book: Borges' Classics
  • Online publication: 30 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289979.010
Available formats
×