Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:58:09.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The habitat of soil microbes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Iain M. Young
Affiliation:
University of Abertay Dundee
Karl Ritz
Affiliation:
Cranfield University
Richard Bardgett
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Michael Usher
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
David Hopkins
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access

Summary

SUMMARY

  1. This chapter deals with the impact of the soil's physical habitat on the operation of soil microbes.

  2. The importance of the spatial and temporal nature of soil structural heterogeneity is emphasised.

  3. The moisture characteristic is revealed as having a pre-eminent impact on soil biology.

  4. The sensory ecology of nematodes is described in relation to the chemotaxis process.

Introduction

All terrestrial life lives and moves in the context of a more or less physically structured environment. The antelopes have their veldt, the mountain goats their crevasses, the rabbits their warrens and soil microbes their dark recesses of soil structure. How each individual, population and community operates is defined to a large extent by the physical landscape in which they live, which serves to partition substrate, mates, predators, water, gases and so forth. Geography, even the microgeography of the soil, sorts and drives the species in earth and on Earth.

Much has been published in relation to the so-called aggregate sizes and the presence of microorganisms. For example, Vargas and Hattori (1986) are convinced that there is order in soil, with bacteria living in the centre of aggregates more often than on the surface. Linn and Doran (1984) link the direct influence of soil structure to changes in microbial activity and community structure at the field scale. Work from The Netherlands has produced conclusive proof that the structure of soil, and the attendant moisture, are controlling factors in predator–prey interactions between bacteria and protozoa (e.g. Kuikman et al. 1989; Postma ' van Veen 1990), an area that Young et al. (1994) and Young and Crawford (2001) revisited with respect to the impact of structure on substrate location and accessibility.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. R. A., Sleeman, B. D., Young, I. M. & Griffiths, B. S. (1998b). Nematode movement along a chemical gradient in a structurally heterogeneous environment: 2. Theory. Fundamental and Applied Nematology, 20, 165–172Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R. A., Young, I. M., Sleeman, B. D., Griffiths, B. S. & Roberston, W. M. (1998a). Nematode movement along a chemical gradient in a structurally heterogeneous environment: 1. Experiment. Fundamental and Applied Nematology, 20, 157–163Google Scholar
Arah, J. R. M. & Smith, K. A. (1989). Steady-state denitrification in aggregated soils: mathematical model. Journal of Soil Science, 40, 139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargmann, C. I. (1998). Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Science, 282, 2028–2033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, M. (1998). Caenorhabditis elegans is a nematode. Science, 282, 2041–2046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, D. C., Crossley, D. A. & Hendrix, P. F. (2003). Fundamentals of Soil Ecology. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. W., Verrall, S. & Young, I. M. (1995). The origin and loss of fractal scaling in soil aggregates. European Journal of Soil Science, 48, 643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, E. A. (1993). Soil Microscopy and Micromorphology. Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Heijnen, C. E. & Veen, J. A. (1991). A determination of protective microhabitat for bacteria introduced into soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85, 73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, J. & Donaich, T. (1997). Natural variation and copulatory plug formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 146, 149–164Google ScholarPubMed
Kuikman, P. J., Vuuren, M. M. I. & Veen, J. A. (1989). Effect of soil moisture on predation by protozoa of bacteria biomass and the release of bacterial nitrogen. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 27, 271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, D. M. & Doran, J. W. (1984). Aerobic and anaerobic microbial populations in no-till and plowed soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48, 794–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, N., Ritz, K., Crabb, D., et al. (2001). Quantification of the in situ distribution of soil bacteria by large-scale imaging of thin sections of undisturbed soil, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 37, 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. & Ritz, K. (2002). In situ spatial patterns of soil bacterial populations, mapped at multiple scales, in an arable soil. Microbial Ecology, 44, 296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. & Ritz, K. (2003). Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 44, 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postma, J. & Veen, J. A. (1990). Habitable pore space and survival of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii introduced into soil. Microbial Ecology, 19, 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, S., Griffiths, B. S. & Young, I. M. (1999). Links between substrate additions, native microbes and the structural complexity and stability of soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1541–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rillig, M. C., Wright, S. F., Kimball, B. A., et al. (2001). Elevated carbon dioxide and irrigation effects on water stable aggregates in a sorghum field: a possible role for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Global Change Biology, 7, 333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, R. & Hattori, T. (1986). Protozoan predation of bacterial cells in soil aggregates. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 38, 233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, H. R. (1958). Movement of eelworms: I. The influence of pore size and moisture content of the soil on the migration of larvae of the beet eelworm, Heterodera schachtii Schmidt. Annals of Applied Biology, 46, 74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. A., Killham, K., Glover, L. A. & Prosser, J. I. (1993). The effect of the location in soil on protozoan grazing of a genetically modified inoculum. Geoderma, 56, 633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., Blanchart, E., Chenu, C., et al. (1998). The interaction of soil biota and soil structure under global change. Global Change Biology, 4, 703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. & Crawford, J. W. (2001). Protozoan life in a fractal world. Protist, 152, 123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. & Rappoldt, C. (2001). New methods and models for characterising structural heterogeneity of soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 61, 33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., Griffiths, B. G. & Robertson, W. M. (1996). Continuous foraging by bacterial-feeding nematodes. Nematologica, 43, 378–382Google Scholar
Young, I. M., Griffiths, B. S., Robertson, W. M. & McNicol, J. W. (1998). Nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) movement in sand as affected by particle size, moisture and the presence of bacteria (Escherichia coli). European Journal of Soil Science, 49, 237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. & Ritz, K. (1998). Tillage, habitat space and microbial function. Soil and Tillage Research, 53, 201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., Roberts, A., Griffiths, B. S. & Caul, S. (1994). Growth of a ciliate protozoan in model ballotini systems of different particle sizes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26, 1173–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×