Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T07:47:41.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Biogeography of prokaryotes

from Part II - Prokaryotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
Donnabella C. Lacap ,
Maggie C.Y. Lau  and
Stephen B. Pointing
Edited by
Diego Fontaneto
Donnabella C. Lacap
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Maggie C.Y. Lau
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Stephen B. Pointing
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Diego Fontaneto
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Prokaryotic microorganisms are critical to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem function due to their involvement in key biogeochemical processes and interaction with macroorganisms (Bell et al., 2005a). The Bacteria are assumed to occur ubiquitously as a result of their large population sizes, rapid generation times and high dispersal rates. Increasingly the Archaea are also being recognised as key components of many biomes (Auguet et al., 2010). The long-held tenet in microbiology that ‘everything is everywhere, the environment selects’ (Baas Becking, 1934) has been employed as a de facto null hypothesis against which to test the existence of spatio-temporal patterns in prokaryotic distribution. Demonstrating the existence of such patterns and their underlying drivers is key to understanding microbial biogeography. This has wide-reaching implications for understanding ecosystem function, conservation value for microorganisms and bioprospecting for strains with biotechnology potential (Prosser et al., 2007).

The prokaryotic species concept

A major limitation to the elucidation of prokaryotic biogeography lies with the species concept as applied to prokaryotes. It is necessary to be able to recognise the diversity of species in community-level studies, and also the abundance of a given species in population studies. The traditional view of a species as a group of individuals that interbreed and are isolated from other species by barriers to recombination (Mayr, 1957) is generally assumed not to be applicable to the asexual lifestyle of prokaryotes, although it is emerging that recombinant events may be more widespread than earlier assumed for some microorganisms (Fraser et al., 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms
Is Everything Small Everywhere?
 , pp. 35 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auguet, J-C., Barberan, A., Casamayor, E.O. (2010). Global ecological patterns in uncultured archaea. ISME Journal 4, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baas Becking, L.G.M. (1934). Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. The Hague: Van Stockum and Zoon.Google Scholar
Bahl, J., Lau, M.C.Y., Smith, G.J.D. et al. (2011). Ancient orgins determine global biogeography of hot and cold desert cyanobacteria. Nature Communications2, 163.Google Scholar
Bell, T., Newman, J.A., Silverman, B.W., Turner, S.L., Lilley, A.K. (2005a).The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature 436, 1157–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, T., Ager, D., Song, J.-I.et al. (2005b). Larger islands house more bacterial taxa. Science 308, 1884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, J.-C., Tiedje, J.M. (2000). Biogeography and degree of endemicity of fluorescent Pseudomonas strains. Applied Environmental Microbiology 66, 5448–5456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohan, F.M. (2002). What are bacterial species?Annual Review of Microbiology 56, 457–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, R.A., Rodriguez-Brito, B., Wegley, L. et al. (2006). Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology. BMC Genomics 7, 57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fierer, N., Jackson, R.B. (2006). The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103, 626–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fierer, N., Morse, J.L., Berthrong, S.T., Bernhardt, E.S. (2007). Environmental controls on the landscape-scale biogeography of stream bacterial communities. Ecology 88, 2162–2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, R.B., Mills, A.L. (2003). Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 44, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., Hanage, W.P., Spratt, B.G. (2007). Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science 315, 476–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., Dunbar, J. (2005). Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high toxicity in soil. Science 309, 1387–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, J., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006). Spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 501–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner Devine, C., Lange, M., Hughes, J.B., Bohannan, B.J.M. (2004). A taxa–area relationship for bacteria. Nature 152, 750–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes Martiny, J.B., Bohannan, B.J.M., Brown, J.H. et al. (2006). Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koeppel, A., Perry, E.B., Sikorski, J. et al. (2008). Identifying the fundamental units of bacterial diversity: A paradigm shift to incorporate ecology into bacterial systematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 2504–2509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacap, D.C., Barraquio, W., Pointing, S.B. (2007). Thermophilic microbial mats in a tropical geothermal location display pronounced seasonal changes but appear resilient to stochastic disturbance. Environmental Microbiology 9, 3065–3076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozupone, C.A., Knight, R. (2007). Global patterns in bacterial diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104, 11436–11440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (ed.) (1957). The Species Problem. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Papke, R.T., Ramsing, N.B., Bateson, M.M., Ward, D.M. (2003). Geographical isolation in hot spring cyanobacteria. Environmental Microbiology 5, 650–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pointing, S.B., Chan, Y., Lacap, D.C. et al. (2009). Highly specialized microbial diversity in hyper-arid polar desert. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106, 19964–19969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosser, J.I., Bohannan, B.J.M., Curtis, T.P. et al. (2007). The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nature Reviews Microbiology 5, 384–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reche, I., Pulido-Villena, E., Morales-Bacquero, R., Casamayor, E.O. (2005). Does ecosystem size determine aquatic bacterial richness?Ecology 86, 1715–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, T., Fakowlski, P.G. (2008). Genome evolution in cyanobacteria: The stable core and the variable shell. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 2510–2515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sogin, M.L., Morrison, H.G., Huber, J.A. et al. (2006). Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the unexplored ‘rare’ biosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103, 12115–12120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takacs-Vesbach, C., Mitchell, K., Jackson-Weaver, O., Reysenbach, A.-L. (2008). Volcanic calderas delineate biogeographic provinces among Yellowstone thermophiles. Environmental Microbiology 10, 1681–1689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gast, C.J., Ager, D.A., Lilley, A.K. (2008). Temporal scaling of bacterial taxa is influenced by both stochastic and deterministic ecological factors. Environmental Microbiology 10, 1411–1418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren-Rhodes, K.A., Rhodes, K.L., Pointing, S.B. et al. (2006). Hypolithic cyanobacteria, dry limit of photosynthesis and microbial ecology in the hyperarid Atacama Desert, Chile. Microbial Ecology 52, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, R.J., Grogan, D.W., Taylor, J.W. (2003). Geographic barriers isolate endemic populations of hyperthermophilic archaea. Science 301, 976–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×