Adams, Eric M. ‘Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Matthew D. ‘Rights against Rules: The Moral Structure of American Constitutional Law’. Michigan Law Review 97, no. 1 (1998): 1–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albertyn, Catherine, and Davis, Dennis. ‘Legal Realism, Transformation and the Legacy of Dugard’. South African Journal on Human Rights 26, no. 2 (2010): 188–216.Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’. Yale Law Journal 96, no. 5 (1987): 943–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Translated by Rivers, Julian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Allan, James. ‘Statutory Bills of Rights: You Read Words in, You Read Words out, You Take Parliament's Clear Intentions and You Shake It All About – Doin’ the Sankey Hanky Panky’. In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 108–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Allan, T. R. S.Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Allan, T. R. S. ‘Democracy, Legality, and Proportionality’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 205–33. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Allan, T. R. S.The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Gavin W. ‘The New Borders of the Constitutional’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 3 (2013): 737–62.Google Scholar

Andrews, Penelope, and Ellmann, Stephen, eds. The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa's Basic Law. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Antoine, Rose-Marie Belle. Commonwealth Caribbean Law and Legal Systems. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008.Google Scholar

Arnull, Anthony. The European Union and Its Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Austen-Baker, Richard. Implied Terms in English Contract Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baar, Carl. ‘The Courts in Canada’. In The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by Waltman, Jerold L. and Holland, Kenneth M., 53–82. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Bailey, Michael A., and Maltzman, Forrest. ‘Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court’. American Political Science Review 102, no. 3 (2008): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Dennis. Not Quite Supreme: The Courts and Coordinate Constitutional Interpretation. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Baker, J. H.The Common Law Tradition: Lawyers, Books and the Law. London: Hambledon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bale, Gordon. ‘The New Brunswick Origin of Canadian Judicial Review’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 40 (1991): 100–129.Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon. ‘Proportionality (2)’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András, 738–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Barber, N. W. ‘The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard-Naudé, Jaco. ‘The Post-Apartheid Legal Order’. In Introduction to Law and Legal Skills in South Africa: Jurisprudence, edited by Humby, Tracy, Kotzé, Louis, and du Plessis, Anél, 11–44. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bates, Ed. ‘British Sovereignty and the European Court of Human Rights’. Law Quarterly Review 128, no. 3 (2012): 382–411.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Baxi, Upendra. ‘The Colonialist Heritage’. In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick, 46–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Beatson, Jack, Grosz, Stephen, Hickman, Tom, Singh, Rabinder, and Palmer, Stephanie. Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008.Google Scholar

Beatty, David M.The Ultimate Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Gunnar. The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar

Bell, John, and Engle, George. Cross: Statutory Interpretation. 3rd edn. London: Butterworths, 1995.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Benjamin L. ‘The Abiding Presence of Conscience: Criminal Justice against the Law and the Modern Constitutional Imagination’. University of Toronto Law Journal 61, no. 4 (2011): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Benjamin L. ‘Children of Two Logics: A Way into Canadian Constitutional Culture’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 2 (2013): 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, Jeffrey. The Law of Equitable Remedies. 2nd edn. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2013.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.Reform and Continuity: The Electoral College, the Convention, and the Party System. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bilchitz, David. Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Bilder, Mary Sarah. ‘The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 116, no. 3 (2006): 502–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, Michael. ‘Remedies’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 9-i to 9–199. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco. Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bone, Robert G. ‘Lon Fuller's Theory of Adjudication and the False Dichotomy between Dispute Resolution and Public Law Models of Litigation’. Boston University Law Review 75, no. 5 (1995): 1273–324.Google Scholar

Bonner, David, Fenwick, Helen, and Harris-Short, Sonia. ‘Judicial Approaches to the Human Rights Act’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52, no. 3 (2003): 549–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, A. W., and Ewing, K. D.. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 15th edn. Harlow: Longman, 2010.Google Scholar

Bronstein, Victoria. ‘Conflicts’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stu, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 16-i to 16-28. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar

Brown, Henry S.Supreme Court of Canada Practice 2015. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2014.Google Scholar

Browne-Wilkinson, Lord. ‘A Bill of Rights for the United Kingdom – the Case Against’. Texas International Law Journal 32, no. 3 (1997): 435–40.Google Scholar

Brun, Henri, Tremblay, Guy, and Brouillet, Eugénie. Droit constitutionnel. 6th edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2014.Google Scholar

Butler, Andrew S., and Butler, Petra. The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary. Wellington: LexisNexis NZ, 2005.Google Scholar

Campbell, Tom. ‘Incorporation through Interpretation’. In Sceptical Essays on Human Rights, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cane, Peter. Administrative Law. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Chanock, Martin. ‘A Post-Calvinist Catechism or a Post-Communist Manifesto? Intersecting Narratives in the South African Bill of Rights Debate’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Alston, Philip, 392–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram. ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’. Harvard Law Review 89, no. 7 (1976): 1281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen-Wishart, Mindy. Contract Law. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit. ‘Migration as a New Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit, and Hunter, Claire E.. ‘Measuring Judicial Activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE’. McGill Law Journal 48, no. 3 (2003): 525–64.Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit, and Roach, Kent. ‘Putting the Past behind Us? Prospective Judicial and Legislative Constitutional Remedies’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 21 (2003): 205–66.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Eric. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism in South Africa: Creative Uses of Constitutional Court Authority to Advance Substantive Justice’. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 13, no. 3 (2010): 575–614.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Eric C. ‘Adjudicating Non-Justiciable Rights: Socio-Economic Rights and the South African Constitutional Court’. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 38, no. 2 (2007): 321–86.Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard, and Tomlinson, Hugh, eds. The Law of Human Rights. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Porat, Iddo. Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, Hugh. ‘South Africa's First Bill of Rights: Random Recollections of One of Its Drafters’. International Journal of Legal Information 32, no. 2 (2004): 313–21.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul. Administrative Law. 6th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008.Google Scholar

Currie, Iain, and De Waal, Johan. The Bill of Rights Handbook. 6th edn. Cape Town: Juta, 2013.Google Scholar

de Vos, Pierre. ‘Grootboom, the Right of Access to Housing and Substantive Equality as Contextual Fairness’. South African Journal on Human Rights 17, no. 2 (2001): 258–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Vos, W. le R. ‘The Impact of the New Constitution upon Civil Procedure’. Stellenbosch Law Review 6, no. 1 (1995): 34–53.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th edn. London: Macmillan, 1965.Google Scholar

Dixon, Rosalind. ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 235–86.Google Scholar

Dodek, Adam. ‘A Tale of Two Maps: The Limits of Universalism in Comparative Judicial Review’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 47, no. 2 (2009): 287–316.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C. ‘Dicta and Article III’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142, no. 6 (1994): 1997–2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorf, Michael C. ‘Facial Challenges to State and Federal Statutes’. Stanford Law Review 46, no. 2 (1994): 235–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorsett, Shaunnagh, and McLaren, John. ‘Laws, Engagements and Legacies: The Legal Histories of the British Empire – an Introduction’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 1–11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Dugard, Jackie. ‘Court of First Instance? Towards a Pro-Poor Jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court’. South African Journal on Human Rights 22, no. 2 (2006): 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugard, Jackie. ‘Courts and Structural Poverty in South Africa: To What Extent Has the Constitutional Court Expanded Access and Remedies to the Poor?’ In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, 293–327. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Duplé, Nicole. Droit constitutionnel: Principes fondamentaux. 5th edn. Montreal, QC: Wilson et Lafleur, 2011.Google Scholar

Dussault, René, and Borgeat, Louis. Traité de droit administratif. 2nd edn. 3 vols. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 1984.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Rights as Trumps’. In Theories of Rights, edited by Waldron, Jeremy, 153–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’. Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2012): 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Disobeying Parliament? Privative Clauses and the Rule of Law’. In The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State, edited by Bauman, Richard W. and Kahana, Tsvi, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Unwritten Constitution and the Rule of Law’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Brodie, Ian, 383–412. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, and Taggart, Michael. ‘Reasoned Decisions and Legal Theory’. In Common Law Theory, edited by Edlin, Douglas E., 134–67. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ekins, Richard. ‘A Critique of Radical Approaches to Rights-Consistent Statutory Interpretation’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (2003): 641–50.Google Scholar

Ekins, Richard. ‘Rights, Interpretation and the Rule of Law’. In Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law, edited by Ekins, Richard, 165–87. Wellington: LexisNexis, 2011.Google Scholar

Elliott, Mark. ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 60, no. 2 (2001): 301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Mark, and Thomas, Robert. Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endicott, Timothy. Administrative Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epp, Charles R. ‘External Pressure and the Supreme Court's Agenda’. In Supreme Court Decision-Making, edited by Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard, 255–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Erdos, David. Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewing, K. D. ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’. Modern Law Review 62, no. 1 (1999): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallon, Richard H.. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallon, Richard H. Jr., and Meltzer, Daniel J.. ‘New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies’. Harvard Law Review 104, no. 8 (1991): 1731–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, David. ‘Institutional Roles and Meanings of “Compatibility” under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger, 87–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Feldman, David. ‘The Nature and Significance of “Constitutional” Legislation’. Law Quarterly Review 129, no. 3 (2013): 343–58.Google Scholar

Feldman, David. ‘Public Interest Litigation and Constitutional Theory in Comparative Perspective’. Modern Law Review 55, no. 1 (1992): 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stephen M. ‘The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 30, no. 1 (2005): 89–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger. Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fielding, Nigel G. ‘Judges and Their Work’. Social and Legal Studies 20, no. 1 (2011): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. ‘Foreword: The Forms of Justice’. Harvard Law Review 93, no. 1 (1979): 1–58.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, P. J.Salmond on Jurisprudence. 12th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1966.Google Scholar

Flemming, Roy B.Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fontana, David. ‘Docket Control and the Success of Constitutional Courts’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind, 624–41. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter. ‘Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law, edited by Bussani, Mauro and Mattei, Ugo, 171–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fridman, G. H. L.The Law of Contract in Canada. 6th edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2011.Google Scholar

Friedland, M. L. ‘Prospective and Retrospective Judicial Lawmaking’. University of Toronto Law Journal 24, no. 2 (1974): 170–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Barry. ‘Taking Law Seriously’. Perspectives on Politics 4, no. 2 (2006): 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.Anatomy of the Law. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Problems of Jurisprudence. Brooklyn, NY: Foundation Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Furmston, Michael. Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston's Law of Contract. 16th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galligan, Denis J., and Versteeg, Mila, eds. Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garant, Patrice, Garant, Philippe, and Garant, Jérôme. Droit administratif. 6th edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2010.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘A Comparative Perspective on Reforming the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’. Policy Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2014): 33–38.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘The “Horizontal Effect” of Constitutional Rights’. Michigan Law Review 102, no. 3 (2003): 387–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘How Successful and Distinctive Is the Human Rights Act? An Expatriate Comparatist's Assessment’. Modern Law Review 74, no. 2 (2011): 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’. American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Gibson, Dale. ‘Enforcement of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 4th edn, edited by Beaudoin, Gérald-A. and Mendes, Errol, 1321–98. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2005.Google Scholar

Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. ‘Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court’. Journal of Politics 65, no. 1 (2003): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillman, Howard. ‘What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making’. Law and Social Inquiry 26, no. 2 (2001): 465–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, ed. Comparative Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Girard, Philip. ‘Imperial Legacies: Chartered Enterprises in Northern British America’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 127–40. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Glass, Arthur. ‘The Vice of Judicial Activism’. In Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism, edited by Campbell, Tom and Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, 355–69. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick. The Cosmopolitan State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick. On Common Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘Judicial Review, Legislative Override, and Democracy’. In Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions, edited by Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, and Stone, Adrienne, 263–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘Questioning the Migration of Constitutional Ideas: Rights, Constitutionalism and the Limits of Convergence’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 115–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Guttman, Daniel F. ‘Hislop v. Canada – A Retroactive Look’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 42 (2008): 547–66.Google Scholar

Haigh, Richard, and Sobkin, Michael. ‘Does the Observer Have an Effect? An Analysis of the Use of the Dialogue Metaphor in Canada's Courts’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 67–90.Google Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. ‘Why the Legal Complex Is Integral to Theories of Consequential Courts’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A., 337–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew, and Leyland, Peter. ‘Comparative Law in Constitutional Contexts’. In Comparative Law: A Handbook, edited by Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David, 313–38. Oxford: Hart, 2007.Google Scholar

Harel, Alon. Why Law Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, Carol. ‘Public Law and Popular Justice’. Modern Law Review 65, no. 1 (2002): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, Carol, and Rawlings, Richard. Law and Administration. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. ‘Thinking Institutionally’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., 731–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hedley, Steve. ‘Courts as Public Authorities, Private Law as Instrument of Government’. In Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law, edited by Barker, Kit and Jensen, Darryn, 89–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Heydon, J. D. ‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ Law Quarterly Review 130, no. 3 (2014): 392–412.Google Scholar

Hickman, Tom. ‘Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model’. New Zealand Law Review (forthcoming).

Hickman, Tom. ‘Negotiable Rights, What Rights?’ Modern Law Review 75, no. 3 (2012): 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hickman, Tom. Public Law after the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart, 2010.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet L. ‘Governing Like Judges?’ In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., and Tomkins, Adam, 40–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet L. ‘New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights?’ Texas Law Review 82, no. 7 (2004): 1963–87.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet L. ‘Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 1 (2006): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiebert, Janet L., and Kelly, James B.. Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa. ‘Beyond Manicheanism: Assessing the New Constitutionalism’. Maryland Law Review 65, no. 1 (2006): 15–31.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. ‘From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 1 (2013): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, David, and Rowe, John. Human Rights in the UK: An Introduction to the Human Rights Act 1998. 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman, 2010.Google Scholar

Hofmeyr, Kate. ‘A Central-Case Analysis of Constitutional Remedial Power’. South African Law Journal 125, no. 3 (2008): 521–52.Google Scholar

Hogan, Gerard W., and Whyte, Gerry. J. M. Kelly: The Irish Constitution. 4th edn. Dublin: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003.Google Scholar

Hogg, Peter W.Constitutional Law of Canada. 5th edn. 2 vols. Scarborough, ON: Thomson/Carswell, 2007.Google Scholar

Hunt, Murray. ‘The Human Rights Act and Legal Culture: The Judiciary and the Legal Profession’. Journal of Law and Society 26, no. 1 (1999): 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huscroft, Grant. ‘Proportionality and the Relevance of Interpretation’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 186–202. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huscroft, Grant. ‘Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by Kelly, James B. and Manfredi, Christopher, 50–65. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire. Introduction to Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 1–17. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ibhawoh, Bonny. ‘Asserting Judicial Sovereignty: The Debate over the Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction in British Africa’. In Legal Histories of the British Empire: Laws, Engagements and Legacies, edited by Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McLaren, John, 30–44. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Issalys, Pierre, and Lemieux, Denis. L'action gouvernementale: Précis de droit des institutions administratives. 3rd edn. Cowansville, QC: Yvon Blais, 2009.Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C. ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András, 54–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki C.Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Louis L. ‘The Citizen as Litigant in Public Actions: The Non-Hohfeldian or Ideological Plaintiff’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 116, no. 6 (1968): 1033–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, David Philllip, and de Villars, Anne S.. Principles of Administrative Law. 5th edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2009.Google Scholar

Jones, Peris, and Stokke, Kristian, eds. Democratising Development: The Politics of Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.Google Scholar

Juratowitch, Ben. ‘Questioning Prospective Overruling’. New Zealand Law Review, no. 3 (2007): 393–416.Google Scholar

Juratowitch, Ben. Retroactivity and the Common Law. Oxford: Hart, 2008.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v. Mendoza’. In Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act, edited by Fenwick, Helen, Phillipson, Gavin, and Masterman, Roger, 114–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Judging the Judges under the Human Rights Act: Deference, Disillusionment and the “War on Terror”’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 287–304.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘Special Advocates, Control Orders and the Right to a Fair Trial’. Modern Law Review 73, no. 5 (2010): 836–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. ‘What's So Weak about “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming).

Kellaway, E. A.Principles of Legal Interpretation of Statutes, Contracts and Wills. Durban, South Africa: Butterworths, 1995.Google Scholar

Keyes, John Mark. Executive Legislation. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2010.Google Scholar

King, Jeff A. ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 3 (2008): 409–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Jeff. Judging Social Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Jeff. ‘Parliament's Role Following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act’. In Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit, edited by Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Hayley, and Yowell, Paul, 165–92. Oxford: Hart, 2015.Google Scholar

Klare, Karl E. ‘Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism’. South African Journal on Human Rights 14, no. 1 (1998): 146–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klug, Heinz. The Constitution of South Africa: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart, 2010.Google Scholar

Klug, Heinz. ‘Constitutional Authority and Judicial Pragmatism: Politics and Law in the Evolution of South Africa's Constitutional Court’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordon, and Kagan, Robert A., 93–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. ‘Toward a Theorization of Craft’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronman, Anthony T. ‘Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence’. Yale Law Journal 94, no. 7 (1985): 1567–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumm, Mattias. ‘Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2, no. 3 (2004): 574–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kumm, Mattias. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’. In Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by Pavlakos, George, 131–66. Oxford: Hart, 2007.Google Scholar

Kyritsis, Dimitrios. ‘Principles, Policies and the Power of Courts’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20, no. 2 (2007): 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, David. ‘The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement’. Harvard International Law Journal 53, no. 1 (2012): 402–59.Google Scholar

Lang, Michael. ‘Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ’. Intertax 35, no. 4 (2007): 230–45.Google Scholar

Law, David S. ‘Constitutions’. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert M., 376–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Law, David S. ‘Generic Constitutional Law’. Minnesota Law Review 89, no. 3 (2005): 652–742.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Sonia. ‘A New Subtlety in Judicial Supremacy: Review of the 2003–2004 Constitutional Cases’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 26 (2004): 77–146.Google Scholar

Leckey, Robert. ‘Complexifying Roncarelli's Rule of Law’. McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2010): 721–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leclair, Jean. ‘Réflexions critiques au sujet de la métaphore du dialogue en droit constitutionnel canadien’. Revue du Barreau 63, special issue (2003): 377–420.Google Scholar

Leclair, Jean, and Morissette, Yves-Marie. ‘L'indépendance judiciaire et la Cour suprême: Reconstruction historique douteuse et théorie constitutionnelle de complaisance’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 36, no. 3 (1998): 485–514.Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre. ‘Against a European Civil Code’. Modern Law Review 60, no. 1 (1997): 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legrand, Pierre. ‘Foreign Law: Understanding’. Journal of Comparative Law 6, no. 2 (2011): 67–177.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Karin. ‘In Defense of the Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of the Minimum Core’. American University International Law Review 22, no. 1 (2007): 163–97.Google Scholar

Leigh, Ian, and Lustgarten, Laurence. ‘Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Law Journal 58, no. 3 (1999): 509–45.Google Scholar

Leigh, Ian, and Masterman, Roger. Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in Its First Decade. Oxford: Hart, 2008.Google Scholar

Lemmens, Koen. ‘Comparative Law as an Act of Modesty: A Pragmatic and Realistic Approach to Comparative Legal Scholarship’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco, 302–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lester, Anthony, Pannick, David, and Herberg, Javan. Human Rights Law and Practice. 3rd edn. London: LexisNexis, 2009.Google Scholar

Levinson, Daryl J. ‘Rights Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration’. Columbia Law Review 99, no. 4 (1999): 857–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jonathan. ‘The Constitutional Court of South Africa: An Evaluation’. Law Quarterly Review 125, no. 3 (2009): 440–67.Google Scholar

Leyland, Peter. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis. 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar

Liebenberg, Sandra. Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution. Claremont, South Africa: Juta, 2010.Google Scholar

Lieven, Nathalie, and Kilroy, Charlotte. ‘Access to the Court under the Human Rights Act: Standing, Third Party Intervenors and Legal Assistance’. In Delivering Rights: How the Human Rights Act Is Working, edited by Jowell, Jeffrey and Cooper, Jonathan, 115–46. Oxford: Hart, 2003.Google Scholar

Lindell, Geoffrey. ‘Invalidity, Disapplication and the Construction of Acts of Parliament: Their Relationship with Parliamentary Sovereignty in the Light of the European Communities Act and the Human Rights Act’. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2 (2000): 399–415.Google Scholar

Liston, Mary. Honest Counsel: Institutional Dialogue and the Canadian Rule of Law. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2007.Google Scholar

Lobban, Michael. The Common Law and English Jurisprudence, 1760–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Loots, Cheryl. ‘Standing to Enforce Fundamental Rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 10, no. 1 (1994): 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loots, Cheryl. ‘Standing, Ripeness and Mootness’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 7-i to 7-23. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar

Loveland, Ian. Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovell, John. ‘From Now On: Temporal Issues in Constitutional Adjudication’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2005): 17–43.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Roderick A. ‘Book Review: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review’. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22, no. 1 (2007): 141–43.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, Emmett. ‘Conceptual Precision and Parliamentary Systems of Rights: Disambiguating “Dialogue”’. Review of Constitutional Studies 17, no. 2 (2012): 73–100.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, Emmett. ‘Dialogue or Compliance? Measuring Legislatures’ Policy Responses to Court Rulings on Rights’. International Political Science Review 34, no. 1 (2013): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macfarlane, Emmett. Governing from the Bench: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Role. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Macklem, Timothy. ‘Entrenching Bills of Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maiman, Richard. ‘“We've Had to Raise Our Game”: Liberty's Litigation Strategy under the Human Rights Act 1998’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick, 87–109. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar

Mak, Elaine. Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts. Oxford: Hart, 2013.Google Scholar

Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, ed. Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla. ‘Introduction: Toward a Constitutionalism of the Global South’. In Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia, edited by Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manfredi, Christopher P. ‘The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court, 1998–2003’. In Constitutionalism in the Charter Era, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Brodie, Ian, 105–31. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004.Google Scholar

Manfredi, Christopher P. ‘Strategic Behaviour and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’. In The Myth of the Sacred: The Charter, the Courts, and the Politics of the Constitution in Canada, edited by James, Patrick, Abelson, Donald E., and Lusztig, Michael, 147–67. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Manfredi, Christopher P., and Kelly, James B.. ‘Dialogue, Deference and Restraint: Judicial Independence and Trial Procedures’. Saskatchewan Law Review 64, no. 2 (2001): 323–46.Google Scholar

Mbazira, Christopher. Litigating Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: A Choice between Corrective and Distributive Justice. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.Google Scholar

McCamus, John D.The Law of Contracts. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2012.Google Scholar

McCann, Michael. ‘Litigation and Legal Mobilization’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A., 522–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

McCormick, Peter J. ‘“Was It Something I Said?” Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984–2011’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50, no. 1 (2012): 93–128.Google Scholar

McCrudden, Christopher. ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20, no. 4 (2000): 499–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKendrick, Ewan. Contract Law. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar

McLaren, John. Dewigged, Bothered, and Bewildered: British Colonial Judges on Trial, 1800–1900. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, Kirsty. Constitutional Deference, Courts and Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2009.Google Scholar

McNamara, Luke. Human Rights Controversies: The Impact of Legal Form. Abingdon, UK: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.Google Scholar

Mendes, Errol, and Beaulac, Stéphane, eds. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 5th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.Google Scholar

Meuwese, Anne, and Versteeg, Mila. ‘Quantitative Methods for Comparative Constitutional Law’. In Practice and Theory in Comparative Law, edited by Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco, 230–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. ‘The Rule of Law, Legality and the Supremacy of the Constitution’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 11-i to 11-44. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.

Miles, Joanna. ‘Standing under the Human Rights Act 1998: Theories of Rights Enforcement and the Nature of Public Law Adjudication’. Cambridge Law Journal 59, no. 1 (2000): 133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohr, Thomas. ‘A British Empire Court – a Brief Appraisal of the History of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’. In Power in History: From Medieval to the Post-Modern World, edited by McElligott, Anthony, Chambers, Liam, Breathnach, Ciara, and Lawless, Catherine, 125–42. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Mohr, Thomas. ‘British Imperial Statutes and Irish Law: Imperial Statutes Passed before the Creation of the Irish Free State’. Journal of Legal History 31, no. 3 (2010): 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möller, Kai. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monahan, Patrick, and Shaw, Byron. Constitutional Law. 4th edn. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2013.Google Scholar

Mubangizi, John C.The Protection of Human Rights in South Africa: A Legal and Practical Guide. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2004.Google Scholar

Mullan, David J.Administrative Law. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2001.Google Scholar

Muttart, Daved M. ‘Dodging the Issue: Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada’. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 54, no. 1 (2005): 101–13.Google Scholar

Nardell, Gordon. ‘The Human Rights Act: Procedure, Standing and Remedies’. In Human Rights for the New Millennium, edited by Butler, Frances, 65–84. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar

National Council of Welfare. Justice and the Poor. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.

Newman, Donald J. ‘Pleading Guilty for Considerations: A Study of Bargain Justice’. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 46, no. 6 (1956): 780–90.Google Scholar

Ngcobo, Sandile. ‘South Africa's Transformative Constitution: Towards an Appropriate Doctrine of Separation of Powers’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 1 (2011): 37–49.Google Scholar

Ngcukaitobi, Tembeka. ‘The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and Their Significance in Promoting Social Justice’. South African Journal on Human Rights 18, no. 4 (2002): 590–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicol, Danny. ‘Law and Politics after the Human Rights Act’. Public Law, no. 4 (2006): 722–51.Google Scholar

Nicol, Danny, and Marriott, Jane. ‘The Human Rights Act, Representative Standing and the Victim Culture’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (1998): 730–41.Google Scholar

O'Connell, Paul. Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

O'Regan, Kate. ‘Text Matters: Some Reflections on the Forging of a New Constitutional Jurisprudence in South Africa’. Modern Law Review 75, no. 1 (2012): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, Charles. Bills of Rights and Decolonization: The Emergence of Domestic Human Rights Instruments in Britain's Overseas Territories. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Petter, Andrew. ‘Legalize This: The Chartering of Canadian Politics’. In Contested Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, edited by Kelly, James B. and Manfredi, Christopher P., 211–31. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Phillips, Sir Fred. Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutional Law. London: Cavendish, 2002.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Gavin. ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’. Current Legal Problems 60, no. 1 (2007): 40–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. ‘Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science’. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 693–721. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002.Google Scholar

Pinard, Danielle. ‘A Plea for Conceptual Consistency in Constitutional Remedies’. National Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 2 (2006): 105–68.Google Scholar

Plucknett, Theodore F. T.A Concise History of the Common Law. 5th edn. London: Butterworth, 1956.Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas. ‘Constitutional Exceptionalism and the Common Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 2 (2009): 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Thomas. ‘Dogmatic Liberalism? T. R. S. Allan and the Common Law Constitution’. Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Thomas. ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’. Legal Studies 25, no. 1 (2005): 142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rautenbach, Christa. ‘South African Common and Customary Law on Intestate Succession: A Question of Harmonisation, Integration or Abolition’. Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (2008): 119–32.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. ‘Rights and Politics’. Indiana Law Journal 71, no. 1 (1995): 27–44.Google Scholar

Riles, Annelise. ‘A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities’. Buffalo Law Review 53, no. 3 (2005): 973–1033.Google Scholar

Ripinsky, Sergey, and Williams, Kevin. Damages in International Investment Law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘The Challenges of Crafting Remedies for Violations of Socio-Economic Rights’. In Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, edited by Langford, Malcolm, 46–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Common Law Bills of Rights as Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 733–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Constitutional and Common Law Dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian Legislatures’. Canadian Bar Review 80, nos 1–2 (2001): 481–533.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. Constitutional Remedies in Canada. 1st edn. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book, 1994.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. Constitutional Remedies in Canada. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Canada Law Book, 2013.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 23 (2004): 49–104.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Enforcement of the Charter – Subsections 24(1) and 52(1)’. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 5th edn, edited by Mendes, Errol and Beaulac, Stéphane, 1123–87. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2013.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Principled Remedial Discretion under the Charter’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 25 (2004): 101–50.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Remedial Consensus and Dialogue under the Charter: General Declarations and Delayed Declarations of Invalidity’. University of British Columbia Law Review 35, no. 2 (2002): 211–70.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. ‘Sharpening the Dialogue Debate: The Next Decade of Scholarship’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45, no. 1 (2007): 169–92.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent. The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, 2001.Google Scholar

Roach, Kent, and Budlender, Geoff. ‘Mandatory Relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When Is It Appropriate, Just and Equitable?’ South African Law Journal 122, no. 2 (2005): 325–51.Google Scholar

Robinson, Tracy. ‘Gender, Nation and the Common Law Constitution’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28, no. 4 (2008): 735–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, James R. ‘Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction’. American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 1 (2001): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roux, Theunis. The Politics of Principle: The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995–2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rundle, Kristen. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller. Oxford: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar

Russell, Peter H.The Judiciary in Canada: The Third Branch of Government. Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1987.Google Scholar

Ryder, Bruce. ‘Suspending the Charter’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 21 (2003): 267–95.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech. ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 2 (2002): 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sales, Sir Philip, and Ekins, Richard. ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review 127, no. 2 (2011): 217–38.Google Scholar

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. ‘Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’. Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 3 (1987): 279–302.Google Scholar

Sathanapally, Aruna. Beyond Disagreement: Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. ‘Refining the Lawmaking Function of the Supreme Court’. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 17, no. 1 (1983): 1–24.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Patrick, and Halliday, Simon. ‘Introduction: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context’. In Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context, edited by Halliday, Simon and Schmidt, Patrick, 1–21. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David. ‘Banging Constitutional Bibles: Observing Constitutional Culture in Transition’. University of Toronto Law Journal 55, no. 3 (2005): 833–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, David. ‘Judging in Secular Times: Max Weber and the Rise of Proportionality’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 63 (2013): 557–77.Google Scholar

Seedorf, Sebastian, and Sibanda, Sanele. ‘Separation of Powers’. In Constitutional Law of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 12-i to 12-98. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey Allan, and Spaeth, Harold J.. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seidman, Louis Michael. ‘Acontextual Judicial Review’. Cardozo Law Review 32, no. 4 (2011): 1143–81.Google Scholar

Seron, Carroll, and Silbey, Susan S.. ‘Profession, Science, and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research’. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Sarat, Austin, 30–59. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Sgayias, David. ‘Charter Remedies in 2001: Proceeding Cautiously’. Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 16 (2002): 405–19.Google Scholar

Shah, Sangeeta, and Poole, Thomas. ‘The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords’. Public Law, no. 2 (2009): 347–71.Google Scholar

Shah, Sangeeta, Poole, Thomas, and Blackwell, Michael. ‘Rights, Interveners and the Law Lords’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. ‘Law and Politics: The Problem of Boundaries’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Daniel Kelemen, R., and Caldeira, Gregory A., 767–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Sharpe, Robert. ‘The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective’. In Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Alston, Philip, 431–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sharpe, Robert J. ‘Mootness, Abstract Questions and Alternative Grounds: Deciding Whether to Decide’. In Charter Litigation, edited by Sharpe, Robert J., 327–56. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1987.Google Scholar

Siegel, Reva B. ‘Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the De Facto Era’. California Law Review 94, no. 5 (2006): 1323–419.Google Scholar

Slattery, Brian. ‘The Pluralism of the Charter: Revisiting the Oakes Test’. In The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. v. Oakes, edited by Tremblay, Luc B. and Webber, Grégoire C. N., 13–35. Montreal, QC: Thémis, 2009.Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M. ‘Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Law’. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Whittington, Keith E., Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Caldeira, Gregory A., 46–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Smith, Stephen A. ‘Duties, Liabilities, and Damages’. Harvard Law Review 125, no. 7 (2012): 1727–48.Google Scholar

Sossin, Lorne. Boundaries of Judicial Review: The Law of Justiciability in Canada. 2nd edn. Toronto, ON: Carswell, 2012.Google Scholar

Strayer, Barry L.The Canadian Constitution and the Courts: The Function and Scope of Judicial Review. 3rd edn. Toronto, ON: Butterworths, 1988.Google Scholar

Strayer, Barry L.Judicial Review of Legislation in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Ruth. Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes. 6th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2014.Google Scholar

Sumner, L. W. ‘Politicians, Judges, and the Charter’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21, no. 1 (2008): 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunkin, Maurice. ‘Judicial Review’. In The New Oxford Companion to Law, edited by Cane, Peter and Conaghan, Joanne, 653–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Swan, Angela, and Adamski, Jakub. Canadian Contract Law. 3rd edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2012.Google Scholar

Swart, Mia. ‘Left out in the Cold? Crafting Constitutional Remedies for the Poorest of the Poor’. South African Journal on Human Rights 21, no. 2 (2005): 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinfen, David B.Imperial Appeal: The Debate on the Appeal to the Privy Council, 1833–1986. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Swinfen, D. B.Imperial Control of Colonial Legislation, 1813–1865: A Study of British Policy towards Colonial Legislative Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z.Beyond the Formalist–Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. ‘The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a “Practice” in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies’. Law and Society Review 30, no. 1 (1996): 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tata, Cyrus. ‘Sentencing as Craftwork and the Binary Epistemologies of the Discretionary Decision Process’. Social and Legal Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Kendall. ‘Beyond the Privacy Principle’. Columbia Law Review 92, no. 6 (1992): 1431–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomkins, Adam. Our Republican Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 2005.Google Scholar

Tomkins, Adam. ‘The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution’. University of Toronto Law Journal 60, no. 1 (2010): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tremblay, Luc B. ‘Marbury v. Madison and Canadian Constitutionalism: Rhetoric and Practice’. George Washington International Law Review 36, no. 3 (2004): 515–41.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H.American Constitutional Law. Vol. 1. 3rd edn. New York: Foundation Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H.The Invisible Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Tsakyrakis, Stavros. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 7, no. 3 (2009): 468–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. ‘The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review’. In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind, 321–33. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. ‘Some Reflections on Method in Comparative Constitutional Law’. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by Choudhry, Sujit, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Twomey, Anne. ‘Fundamental Common Law Principles as Limitations upon Legislative Power’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2009): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Caenegem, R. C.The Birth of the English Common Law. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van der Merwe, C. G., du Plessis, Jacques, de Wall, Marius, Zimmermann, Reinhard, and Farlam, Paul. ‘The Republic of South Africa’. In Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, edited by Palmer, Vernon Valentine, 95–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Van der Merwe, Schalk, Van Huyssteen, L. F., Reinecke, M. F. B., and Lubbe, G. F.. Contract: General Principles. 3rd edn. Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta, 2007.Google Scholar

Vermeule, Adrian. ‘The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32, no. 3 (2012): 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vick, Douglas W. ‘The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution’. Texas International Law Journal 37, no. 2 (2002): 329–72.Google Scholar

Vining, Joseph. Legal Identity: The Coming of Age of Public Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Waddams, S. M.The Law of Contracts. 6th edn. Toronto, ON: Canada Law Book, 2010.Google Scholar

Wade, Sir William, and Forsyth, Christopher. Administrative Law. 10th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wadham, John, Mountfield, Helen, Prochaska, Elizabeth, and Brown, Christopher. Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. ‘Compared to What? Judicial Activism and New Zealand's Parliament’. New Zealand Law Journal, no. 11 (2005): 441–45.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 115, no. 6 (2006): 1346–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walters, Mark D. ‘The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex non scripta as Fundamental Law’. University of Toronto Law Journal 51, no. 2 (2001): 91–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walters, Mark D. ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’. In The Unity of Public Law, edited by Dyzenhaus, David, 431–54. Oxford: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar

Waltman, Jerold L. Introduction to The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, edited by Waltman, Jerold L. and Holland, Kenneth M., 1–5. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waluchow, W. J.A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Watt, Gary. ‘Comparison as Deep Appreciation’. In Methods of Comparative Law, edited by Monateri, Pier Giuseppe, 82–103. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Webber, Grégoire. ‘On the Loss of Rights’. In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 123–54. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Webber, Grégoire C. N. ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23, no. 1 (2010): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webber, Grégoire C. N. ‘The Unfulfilled Potential of the Court and Legislature Dialogue’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (2009): 443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, James Boyd. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith E. ‘Once More unto the Breach: Postbehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics’. Law and Social Inquiry 25, no. 2 (2000): 601–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Stuart, and Dugard, Jackie. ‘Taking Poverty Seriously: The South African Constitutional Court and Socio-Economic Rights’. Stellenbosch Law Review 22, no. 3 (2011): 664–82.Google Scholar

Woolf, Lord, and Jowell, Jeffrey L. De Smith, Woolf and Jowell: Judicial Review of Administrative Action. 5th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Woolman, Stu. ‘The Amazing, Vanishing Bill of Rights’. South African Law Journal 124, no. 4 (2007): 762–94.Google Scholar

Woolman, Stuart, Bishop, Michael, and Brickhill, Jason, eds. Constitutional Law of South Africa. 2nd edn. 4 vols. Cape Town: Juta, 2012.Google Scholar

Young, Alison L. ‘Judicial Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Cambridge Law Journal 61, no. 1 (2002): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Alison L.Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart, 2009.Google Scholar

Young, Alison L. ‘Proportionality Is Dead: Long Live Proportionality!’ In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, 43–66. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Young, Alison L. ‘Will You, Won't You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 (2014): 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar