Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:39:12.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - An Environmental Competition Statute

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Alyson C. Flournoy
Affiliation:
University of Florida
David M. Driesen
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Get access

Summary

THE PREVIOUS PART OF THIS BOOK HAS BEEN CONCERNED primarily with conserving our environmental legacy. Environmental law, however, must function not only as a force for conservation of the good but also as the generator of a better future. Next-generation environmental law embraces both preservation and dynamic and constructive change. Thus, the next generation of environmental law must figure out how to generate the sorts of changes that will create a better environmental future.

The next generation of environmental law should use economic incentives to creatively stimulate innovation in environmental technology. This chapter proposes an Environmental Competition Statute as a means of stimulating movement toward a more sustainable future. Such a statute would authorize those who achieve low emissions to collect the cost of achieving low emissions plus a premium from competitors with higher emissions.

This chapter briefly explains the value of using this mechanism. It then canvasses the problems with the first and second generation of environmental law that an Environmental Competition Statute can help us overcome. A detailed description of an Environmental Competition Statute follows. The chapter then turns to possible objections to the scheme not addressed in the previous material. It closes with a brief conclusion.

Value of an Environmental Competition Statute

We have achieved a number of advances in material welfare because entrepreneurs seek to get rich by developing and introducing innovations. Examples include the cellular phone, the personal computer, and various uses of the Internet.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Environmental Law
Policy Proposals for a Better Environmental Future
, pp. 173 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McGarity, Thomas O., Some Thoughts on Deossifying the Rulemaking Process, 41 Duke L.J. 1385 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David M., Distributing the Costs of Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation: The Feasibility Principle, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Regulatory Reform, 32 B. C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1, 14–16 (2005)Google Scholar
Pierre, Bruce, Technology-Forcing and Federal Environmental Protection Statutes, 62 Iowa L. Rev. 771, 805–31 (1977)Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B., Shattering the Fragile Case for Judicial Review of Rulemaking, 85 Va. L. Rev. 1243 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, Michael et al., Allowance Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: A Commentary, 5 Climate Pol'Y127, 127 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David M., Is Emissions Trading an Economic Incentive Program? Beyond the Economic Incentive/Command and Control Dichotomy, 55 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 289, 324 (1998)Google Scholar
Driesen, David M., Does Emissions Trading Encourage Innovation? 33 Envt'L L. Rep. 10,094, 10,105 (2003)Google Scholar
Swift, Byron, Command without Control: Why Cap-and-Trade Should Replace Rate Standards for Regional Pollutants, 31 Envt'L L. Rep. 10,330, 10,332 (2001)Google Scholar
Taylor, Margaret R., Rubin, Edward S. & Hounshell, David A., Regulation as the Mother of Invention: The Case of SO2 Control, 27 Law & Pol'Y348, 370 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, David, Pollution Control Innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990, 22 J. Pol'Y Anal. & Mgmt. 641 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. & Stavins, Robert N., Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation: A New Era from an Old Idea, 18 Ecology L.Q. 1, 8–9 & n. 33 (1991)Google Scholar
Thompson, Andrew McFee, Comment, Free Market Environmentalism and the Common Law: Confusion, Nostalgia, and Inconsistency, 45 Emory L.J. 1329, 1359 (1996)Google Scholar
Choi, Inho, Global Climate Change and the Use of Economic Approaches: The Ideal Design Features of Domestic Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and an Analysis of the European Union's CO2 Emissions Trading Directive and the Climate Stewardship Act, 45 Nat. Resources J. 865, 902–03 (2005)Google Scholar
Michaelowa, Axel & Butzengeiger, Sonja, EU Emissions Trading: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis, 5 Climate Pol'Y1, 5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, Tom, Using Economic Incentives to Maintain our Environment, 33 Challenge42, 43 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David M., The Changing Climate for United States Law, 1 Climate Change L. Rev. 33, 38 (2007)Google Scholar
Greene, Nathaniel & Ward, Venessa, Getting the Sticker Price Right: Incentives for Cleaner, More Efficient Vehicles, 12 Pace Envt'L L. Rev. 289, 346 (1998)Google Scholar
Mandel, Gregory N., Promoting Environmental Innovation and Intellectual Property Innovation: A New Basis for Patent Rewards, 24 Temple J. Envtl. L. & Tech. 51, 56 (2006)Google Scholar
Frischman, Brett & Lemley, Mark A., Spillovers, 107 Colum. L. Rev. 257 (2007)Google Scholar
Hansen, James E., A Slippery Slope: How Much Global Warming Constitutes “Dangerous” Anthropogenic Interference, 68 Climate Change269, 277 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinshausen, Malte, What Does a 2°C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates, in Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change269–70 (Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim et al. eds. 2006)Google Scholar
Lindegaard, Klaus, Environmental Law, Environmental Globalization, and Sustainable Techno-Economic Evolution, in Environment, Technology, And Economic Growth141 (Tylecote, Andrew & Straaten, Jan eds. 1998)Google Scholar
Driesen, David M. & Sinden, Amy, The Missing Instrument: Dirty Input Limits, 22 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 65 (2009)Google Scholar
Hellerstein, Walter, Deconstructing the Debate over State Taxation of Electronic Commerce, 13 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 549, 552 (2000)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×