Book contents
- Between Fragmentation and Democracy
- Between Fragmentation and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 International Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law
- 3 The Impact of Domestic Politics on Global Fragmentation
- 4 The Brittle Independence of International Tribunals and Its Effects on Fragmentation
- 5 The Emergence of Interjudicial Cooperation among National Courts
- 6 Interjudicial Cooperation and the Potential for Democratization of the Global Regulatory Sphere
- 7 How Global Judicial “Countermajoritarianism” Can Enhance Democracy and Inclusion
- Postscript
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2017
Book contents
- Between Fragmentation and Democracy
- Between Fragmentation and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- 1 Introduction
- 2 International Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law
- 3 The Impact of Domestic Politics on Global Fragmentation
- 4 The Brittle Independence of International Tribunals and Its Effects on Fragmentation
- 5 The Emergence of Interjudicial Cooperation among National Courts
- 6 Interjudicial Cooperation and the Potential for Democratization of the Global Regulatory Sphere
- 7 How Global Judicial “Countermajoritarianism” Can Enhance Democracy and Inclusion
- Postscript
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Between Fragmentation and DemocracyThe Role of National and International Courts, pp. 198 - 217Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adalsteinsson, Ragnar, The Current Situation of Human Right in Iceland, 61/62 Nordic J. Int’l L. 167 (1992–93)Google Scholar
Aleinkoff, T. Alexander, International Law, Sovereignty, and American Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Customary International Law Debate, Am. J. Int’l L. 91 (2004)Google Scholar
Alford, Roger P., Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution, 98 Am. J. Int’l L. 57 (2004)Google Scholar
Alivizatos, Nicos C., Judges as Veto Players, in Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe 566 (Doering, Herbert ed., 1995)Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., Contemporary International Law: An “Empire of Law” or the “Law of Empire”?, 24 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 811 (2009)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C.F., The World Bank Administrative Tribunal, 31 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 748 (1982)Google Scholar
Andersen, Michael J., International Environmental Law in Indian Courts, 7 Rev. Eur. Community & Int’l Envtl. L. 11 (1998).Google Scholar
Arezki, Rabah, Deininger, Klaus, & Selod, Harris, What Drives the Global “Land Rush”?, 29 World Bank Econ. Rev. 207 (2015)Google Scholar
Auer, Matthew R., Geography, Domestic Politics and Environmental Diplomacy: A Case from the Baltic Sea Region, 11 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 77 (1998)Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., Globalization, Tax Competition and the Fiscal Crisis of the State, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 1573 (2000)Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., International Tax as International Law: An Analysis of the International Tax Regime (2007)Google Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie, The European Commission and Its Legislative Activity – Not as Integrationist and Autonomous as Believed, Center for Cooperative and International Studies Working Paper No. 24 (2006).Google Scholar
Barak-Erez, Daphne, The International Law of Human Rights and Constitutional Law: A Case Study of an Expanding Dialogue, 2 Int’l. J. Const. L. 611 (2004)Google Scholar
Barnard, David, In the High Court of South Africa, Case No. 4138/98: The Global Politics of Access to Low-Cost AIDS Drugs in Poor Countries, 12 J. Kennedy Inst. Ethics 159 (2002)Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior ( 2006)Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra, “A Known but an Indifferent Judge”: Situating Ronald Dworkin in Contemporary Indian Jurisprudence, 1 I-CON 557 (2003)Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence, 98 Q. J. Econ. 371 (1983)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., Court Cooperation, Executive Accountability and Global Governance, 41 N.Y.U. J. Int’l. Law & Pol. 931 (2009)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., Prospects for the Increased Independence of International Tribunals in 12 German L.J. 1057 (2011) (rep. in Lawmaking by International Tribunals (von Bogdandy, Armin & Venzke, Ingo eds., 2012))Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., Democratizing Courts: How National and International Courts Promote Democracy in an Era of Global Governance, 46 N.Y.U J. Int’l L. & Pol. 741 (2014)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., Distributive Politics and International Institutions: The Case of Drugs, 36 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 21 (2004)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 595 (2007)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal & Downs, George W., National Courts and Transnational Private Regulation, in Enforcement of Transnational Regulation: Ensuring Compliance in a Global World 131 (Cafaggi, Fabrizio ed., 2012)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, “Coalitions of the Willing” and the Evolution of Informal International Law, in “Coalitions of the Willing”–Avantgarde or Threat? 1 (Calliess, C., Nolte, G., & Stoll, T. eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Coalitions of the Willing, Informal International Lawmaking (Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, & Wouters, Jan eds., 2012)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Democracy Captured: The Mega-Regional Agreements and the Future of Global Public Law, 23 Constellations 58 (2016)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Exit and Voice in the Age of Globalization, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 167 (1999)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Inter-Judicial Cooperation to Secure Independent Review of Counter-Terrorism Measures, in Democracy, Separations of Powers and the Fights against Terrorism 251 (Bianchi, Andrea & Keller, Alexis eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judges and Foreign Affairs: A Comment on the Institut de Droit International’s Resolution on “The Activities of National Courts and the International Relations of Their State,” 5 Eur. J. Int’l L. 423 (1994)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Norms: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts, 4 Eur. J. Int’l L. 159 (1993)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Review and Democratic Failures: Minimizing Asymmetric Information through Adjudication 32 Iyunei Mishpat (Tel-Aviv U. Law Rev.), 277 (2010) (Isr.) (Hebrew)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Party Primaries as Collective Action with Constitutional Ramifications: Israel as a Case Study, 3 Theoretical Inquiries L. 175 (2002)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts, 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 241 (2008)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders, 107 Am. J. Int’l L. 295 (2013)Google Scholar
Berman, Ayelet, The Role of Domestic Administrative Law in the Accountability of IN-LAW: The Case of the ICH, in Informal International Lawmaking 468 (Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., & Wouters, Jan eds., 2012).Google Scholar
Bermann, George A., Constitutional Implications of U.S. Participation in Regional Integration, 46 Am. J. Comp. L., 463 (1998)Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Rudolf, Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights, 42 Germ. Y.B. Int’l L. 11 (1999)Google Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa, Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code’s Search for Immanent Business Norms, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1765 (1996)Google Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa, Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry, 21 J. Legal Stud. 115 (1992)Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy & Burgess, Robin, Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India, 119 Q. J. Econ. 91 (2004)Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, Case Report: Ferrini v. Federal Republic of Germany, 99 Am. J. Int’l L. 242 (2005)Google Scholar
Binder, Christina, The Prohibition of Amnesties by The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 12 German L.J. 1203 (2011)Google Scholar
Bloch, Alice, Galvin, Treasa, & Schuster, Liza (eds.), [Special issue] 13(1) J. Refugee Stud. (2000)Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel & Brunnée, Jutta, The Role of National Courts in the Field of International Environmental Law, 7 Rev. Eur. Community Int’l Envtl. L. 11 (1998)Google Scholar
Bogdan, Michael, Application of Public International Law by Swedish Courts, 63 Nordic J. Int’l L. 3 (1994)Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., International Delegations, the Structural Constitution, and Non-Self-Execution, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 1557 (2003)Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., The Charming Betsy Canon and Separation of Powers: Rethinking the Interpretive Role of International Law, 86 Geo. L.J. 479 (1998)Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., The Treaty Power and American Federalism, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 390 (1998)Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. & Goldsmith, Jack L., Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modern Position, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 815 (1997)Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A. & Goldsmith, Jack L., The Current Illegitimacy of International Human Rights Litigation, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 319 (1997)Google Scholar
Brilmayer, Lea, International Law in American Courts: A Modest Proposal, 100 Yale L.J. 2277 (1991)Google Scholar
Brooks, Kim & Krever, Richard, The Troubling Role of Tax Treaties, 51 Tax Design Issues Worldwide, Series on International Taxation 159 (Michielse, Geerten M.M. & Thuronyi, Victor eds., 2015)Google Scholar
Bruch, Carl et al., Constitutional Environmental Law: Giving Force to Fundamental Principles in Africa, 26 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 131 (2001)Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris, Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century (2012)Google Scholar
Brutsch, Christian & Papa, Mihaela, Deconstructing the BRICS: Bargaining Coalition, Imagined Community, or Geopolitical Fad? 6 Chinese J. Int’l Pol. 299 (2013)Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundation for International Law (2004)Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce & Downs, George W., Development and Democracy, Foreign Aff., Sept.–Oct. (2005)Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W., International Legal Pluralism, 25 Mich. J. Int’l L. 963 (2004)Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Conceptualising the Relationship between Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Rules, 66 Nordic J. Int’l L. 211 (1997)Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Policing the High Seas: The Proliferation Security Initiative, 98 Am. J. Int’l. L. 526 (2004)Google Scholar
Campos, Jose E. & Root, Hilton L., The Key to the Asian Miracle: Making Shared Growth Credible (1996)Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford James, A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems, 71 J. Pol. 55 (2009)Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford James & Gabel, Matthew Joseph, Courts, Compliance, and the Quest for Legitimacy in International Law, 14 Theoretical Inquiries L. 505 (2013)Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino, The Global Polity: Global Dimensions of Democracy and the Rule of Law (2012)Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I., The Implications of Expanding International Dispute Settlement Systems: The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, 90 Am. J. Int’l L. 69 (1996)Google Scholar
Chia-Hui Lee, G., Private Food Standards and Their Impacts on Developing Countries, European Commission – DG Trade Unit G2 Paper (2006)Google Scholar
Clavin, Patricia & Jens, Wilhelm, Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organisation, 14 Contemp. Eur. Hist. 465 (2005)Google Scholar
Cogen, Marc, Human Rights, Prohibition of Political Activities and the Lending Policies of the World Bank and International monetary Fund, in The Right to Development in International Law 387 (Chowdhury, et al. eds., 1992)Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean, Constitutionalism beyond the State: Myth or Necessity? (A Pluralist Approach), 2 Humanity: An Int’l J. Hum. Rts., Humanitarianism, Development 127 (2011)Google Scholar
Compa, Lance A. & Diamond, Stephen F. eds., Human Rights, Labor Rights, and International Trade (1996)Google Scholar
Conforti, Benedetto & Francioni, Francesco, Enforcing International Human Rights in Domestic Courts (1997)Google Scholar
Coquillette, Daniel R., Legal Ideology and Incorporation II: Sir Thomas Ridley, Charles Molloy, and the Literary Battle for the Law Merchant, 1607–1676, 61 B.U. L. Rev. 315 (1981)Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems (1997)Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law, General Course on Public International Law (2014)Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. & Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review and Deference to National Governments, 90 Am. J. Int’l L. 193 (1996)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jean & Brölmann, Catherine, Challenging International Criminal Tribunals before Domestic Courts, in Challenging Acts of International Organizations before National Courts 111 (Reinisch, August ed., 2010)Google Scholar
Dagan, Tsilly, Community Obligations in International Taxation in Community Interests in International Law (Benvenisti, Eyal & Nolte, Georg eds., forthcoming)Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan, Who Defines the Rules of the Game in East Asia? The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Strategic Use of International Institutions, 15 Int’l Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1 (2014)Google Scholar
Danielsen, Dan, How Corporations Govern: Taking Corporate Power Seriously in Transnational Regulation and Governance, 46 Harv. Int’l L.J. 411 (2005)Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F., Whitman, Marina V.N., & Zald, Mayer Nathan, The Responsibility Paradox: Multinational Firms and Global Corporate Social Responsibility (Ross Sch. of Bus. Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 1031, Apr. 2006).Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric, Belgian Courts and the Immunity of International Organizations, 10 Int’l Org. L. Rev. 464 (2014)Google Scholar
De la Rochère, J.D., France, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier, How Not to Think of Land-Grabbing: Three Critiques of Large-Scale Investments in Farmland, 38 J. Peasant Studies 249 (2011)Google Scholar
De Sena, Pasquale & De Vittor, Francesca, State Immunity and Human Rights: The Italian Supreme Court Decision on the Ferrini Case, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 89 (2005)Google Scholar
De Wet, Erika & Nollkaemper, André, Review of Security Council Decisions by National Courts, 45 German Y.B. Int’l L. 166 (2002)Google Scholar
De Witte, Bruno, Direct Effect, Supremacy, and the Nature of Legal Order, in The Evolution of EU Law 177 (Craig, Paul & de Búrca, Gráinne eds., 1999)Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, Giorgio, Grotius and the Foundation of International Law, 37 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 260 (1962)Google Scholar
Deshman, Abigail C., Horizontal Review between International Organizations: Why, How, and Who Cares about Corporate Regulatory Capture, 22 Eur. J. Int’l L. 1089 (2011)Google Scholar
Dothan, Shai, Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts (2015)Google Scholar
Downs, George W. & Jones, Michael A., Reputation, Compliance and International Law, 31 J. Legal Stud. 595 (2002)Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter, Global Law Reform and Rent-Seeking: The Case of Intellectual Property, 7 Australian J. Corp. L. 1 (1996)Google Scholar
Dulitzky, Ariel E., An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 50 Texas Int’l L.J. 46 (2015)Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., The Misguided Debate over NGO Participation at the WTO, 1 J. Int’l Econ. L. 433 (1998)Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew T., & Simmons, Beth, Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000, U. Ill. L. Rev. 265 (2008)Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A., Exit Rights under Federalism, 55 Law & Contemp. Probs. 147 (1992)Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., & Putnam, Robert D. eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics (University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law, 65 Law & Contemp. Probs. 41 (2002)Google Scholar
Feunteun, Tristan, Cartels and the Right to Food: An Analysis of States’ Duties and Options, 18 J. Int’l Econ. L. 341 (2015)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, The Finnish-Swedish Frontier Rivers Commission, 5 Hague Y.B. Int’l L. 33 (1992)Google Scholar
Fletcher, Eric G.M., John Selden (Author of Mare clausum) and His Contribution to International Law, 19 Transaction Grotius Soc’y 1 (1934)Google Scholar
Flynn, Sean M., Baker, Brook, Kaminski, Margot, & Koo, Jimmy, The U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, 28 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 105 (2012)Google Scholar
Fox, Eleanor, Antitrust without Borders: From Roots to Codes to Networks, in Cooperation, Comity and Competition Policy (Guzman, Andrew T. ed., 2010)Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Courts, the State Department and National Policy: A Criterion for Judicial Abdication, 44 Minn. L. Rev. 1101 (1960)Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, Scales of Justice: Reimaging Political Space in a Globalizing World (2009)Google Scholar
French, D., Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules, 55 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 281 (2006)Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five, 112 Yale L.J. 153 (2002)Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen A., Federal Republic of Germany, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Frowein, Jochen A. & Hahn, Michael J., The Participation of Parliament in the Treaty Process in the Federal Republic of Germany, 67 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 361 (1992)Google Scholar
Gadinis, Stavros, Three Pathways to Global Standards: Private, Regulator, and Ministry Networks, 109 Am. J. Int’l L. 1 (2015)Google Scholar
Gagné, Gilbert & Morin, Jean-Frédéric, The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from Recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT, 9 J. Int’l Econ. L. 357 (2006)Google Scholar
Gaja, Giorgio, Italy, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Galambos, Judit, Political Aspects of an Environmental Conflict: The Case of the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Dam System, in Perspectives on Environmental Conflict and International Politics 72 (Kknen, Jyrki ed., 1992)Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno & Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Audiences and Reputation: Perspectives from Comparative Law, 47 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 51 (2008–2009)Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffre, Kelemen, R. Daniel, & Schulz, Heiner, The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union, 52 Int’l Org. 149 (1998)Google Scholar
Gavouneli, Maria & Banteka, Iliass, Case Report: Prefecture of Voiotia v. Federal Republic of Germany, 95 Am. J. Int’l L. 198 (2001)Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Lisa & Scheinin, Martin, Judicial Powers, Due Process and Evidence in the Security Council 1267 Terrorist Sanctions Regime: The Kadi II Conundrum (Eur. U. Inst., EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2011/44, 2011)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, International Judicial Lawmaking (2005) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID693861_code603.pdf?abstractid=693861&mirid=3Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (2003)Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Political Constraints on International Courts, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication 483 (Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J., & Shany, Yuval eds., 2014)Google Scholar
Goetz, Charles J. & Scott, Robert E., Principles of Relational Contracts, 67 Va. L. Rev. 1089 (1981)Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L. et al. eds., Legalization and World Politics (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives, 35 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 40 (2007)Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy S. & McAdam, Jane, The Refugee in International Law (3rd edn., 2007)Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. & Keohane, Robert O., Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics, 99 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 29 (2005)Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Freedom of the Seas (Scott, James Brown ed., van Deman Magoffin, Ralph trans., Oxford University Press, 1916) (1633)Google Scholar
Gulmann, Claus, Denmark, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Halberstam, Daniel, Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Marbury and Van Gend, in The Past and the Future of EU Law: Revisiting the Classics on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Maduro, M.P. & Azoulai, L. eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C., A Forum for the Transnational Development of Refugee Law: The IARLJ’s Advanced Refugee Law Workshop, 15 Int’l J. Refugee L. 418 (2003)Google Scholar
Hathaway, James C., Harmonizing for Whom? The Devaluation of Refugee Protection in the Era of European Economic Integration, 26 Cornell Int’l L.J. 719 (1993)Google Scholar
Hayward, M. Ann, International Law and the Interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Uses and Justifications, 23 U. W. Ont. L. Rev. 9 (1985)Google Scholar
Heffter, August Wilhelm, Das Europaische Volkerrecht der Gegenwart 7 (3rd edn., Berlin, E.H. Schroeder, 1855)Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 Yale J. Int’l L. 1 (2004)Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2005)Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. & Voeten, Erik, International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe, 68 Int’ Org. 77 (2014)Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. & Alter, Karen J., Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice, 64 Int’l Org. 563 (2010)Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, International Law as Law in the United States, 82 Mich. L. Rev. 1555 (1984)Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, United Kingdom, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard, The Role of National Courts in International Trade Relations, 18 Mich. J. Int’l L. 321 (1997)Google Scholar
Hipold, Peter, UN Sanctions before the ECJ: The Kadi Case, in Challenging Acts of International Organizational before National Courts 18 (Reinisch, August ed., 2010)Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (2004)Google Scholar
Ho, Laura et al., (Dis)assembling Rights of Women Workers along the Global Assembly Line: Human Rights and the Garment Industry, 31 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 383 (1996)Google Scholar
Hopewell, Kristen, Different Paths to Power: The Rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization, 22 Rev. Int’l Pol. Econ. 311 (2015)Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law, in the EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? 35 (Weiler, Joseph H.H. ed., 2000)Google Scholar
Huber, Berthold, The Application of Human Rights Standards by German Courts to Asylum-Seekers, Refugees and other Migrants, 3 Eur. J. Migration & L. 171 (2001)Google Scholar
Huber, Katalin Tünde & Rodiles, Alejandro, An Ombudsperson in the United Nations Security Council: A Paradigm Shift? 10 Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional (2012)Google Scholar
Jackson, John H., United States, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki, Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 109 (2005)Google Scholar
Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 1987)Google Scholar
Johnson, Lise & Volkov, Oleksandr, Investor-State Contracts, Home-State “Commitments” and the Myth of Stability in International Law, 24(3) Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 361 (2013)Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian, Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 275 (2008)Google Scholar
Kaminski, Margot E., An Overview and the Evolution of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, PIJIP Research Paper Series, paper no. 17 (2011)Google Scholar
Kaminski, Margot E., The Capture of International Intellectual Property Law through the U.S. Trade Regime, 87 S.Cal. L. Rev. 977 (2014)Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy, Engineered in India – Patent Law 2.0, 369 N. Engl. J. Med. 497 (2013)Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy, The Trans-Pacific Partnership–Is It Bad for Your Health? N. Engl. J. Med. 201 (2015)Google Scholar
Katz Cogan, Jacob, Competition and Control in International Adjudication, 48 Virginia J. Int’l L. 412 (2008)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Macedo, Stephen, & Moravcsik, Andrew, Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism, 63 Int’l Org., 1 (2009).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. et al., Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, 54 Int’l Org., 457 (2000)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict & Davis, Kevin, Obligations Overload: Adjusting the Obligations of Fragile or Failed States (Nov. 22, 2010) (Preliminary Draft)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, & Stewart, Richard B., The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 L. & Contemp. Probs. 15 (2005)Google Scholar
Kirby, Michael, International Law–The Impact on National Constitutions, 99 ASIL Proc. 1, 2 (Seventh Annual Grotius Lecture, 2005)Google Scholar
Knop, Karen, Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts 32 NYU J. Int’l L. & Pol. 501 (2000)Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., The Fast Track and United States Trade Policy, 18 Brook. J. Int’l L. 143 (1992)Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., Commentary: Is International Law Really State Law?, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1824 (1998)Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H., The “Haiti Paradigm” in United States Human Rights Policy, 103 Yale L.J. 2391 (1994)Google Scholar
Kokkot, Juliane, Report on Germany, in The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence 77 (Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Sweet, Alec Stone, & Weiler, J.H.H. eds., 1998)Google Scholar
Kosař, David & Lixinski, Lucas, Domestic Judicial Design by International Human Rights Courts, 109 Am. J. Int’l L. 713 (2016)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (2006)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics, 70 Mod. L. Rev. 1 (2007)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, What Is International Law For?, in Int’l L. 89 (Evans, Malcolm D. ed., 2003)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti & Leino, Päivi, Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties, 15 Leiden J. Int’l L. 553 (2002)Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order, 16 Eur. J. Int’l L. 369 (2005)Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods, 108 Am. J. Int’l L. 1 (2014)Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law, 17 Eur. J. Int’l L. 247 (2006)Google Scholar
Kumm, Matthias, Democratic Constitutionalism Encounters International Law. Terms of Engagement, in The Migration of Constitutional Ideas 256 (Choudhry, Sujit ed., 2007)Google Scholar
L’Heureux-Dubé, Claire, The Importance of Dialogue: Globalization and the International Impact of the Rhenquist Court, 34 Tulsa L.J. 15 (1998)Google Scholar
Lampe, Markus, Explaining Nineteenth-Century Bilateralism: Economic and Political Determinants of the Cobden–Chevalier Network, 64 Econ. Hist. Rev. 644 (2011)Google Scholar
Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective, 18 J. L. & Econ. 875 (1975)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (1958)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Grotian Tradition in International Law, 23 Brit. Y.B. Int’l L. 1 (1946)Google Scholar
Łazowski, Adam, Poland. Constitutional Tribunal on Conformity of the Accession Treaty with the Polish Constitution. Decision of 11 May 2005, 3 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 148 (2007)Google Scholar
Lehavi, Amnon, Land Law in the Age of Globalization and Land Grabbing, in Research Handbook on Comparative Property Law 25 (Graziadei, Michele & Smith, Lionel eds., 2015)Google Scholar
Leitner, Kara & Lester, Simon, WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–2015 – A Statistical Analysis, 19 J. Int’l Econ. L. 289 (2016)Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne, An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests, 92 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 809 (1998)Google Scholar
Steyn, Lord, 2000–2005: Laying the Foundations of Human Rights Law in the United Kingdom, 4 Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 349 (2005)Google Scholar
Templeman, Lord, Treaty-Making and the British Parliament, 67 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 459 (1991)Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Investment Agreements and International Law, 42 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 123 (2003)Google Scholar
Luff, Patrick A., Captured Legislatures and Public-Interested Courts, 2013 Utah L. Rev. 519 (2012)Google Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan & Voeten, Eric, Precedent on International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights (2010)Google Scholar
Lustig, Doreen & Benvenisti, Eyal, The Multinational Corporation as “the Good Despot”: The Democratic Costs of Privatization in Global Settings, 15 Theoretical Inquiries L. 125 (2014)Google Scholar
Lustig, Doreen, International Corporate Regulation in the 20th Century: A History of Failure? (forthcoming, 2017)Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R., Promoting Public-Regarding Legislation through Statutory Interpretation, 86 Colum. L. Rev. 223 (1986)Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Ruth & Sands, Philippe, International Courts and Tribunals and the Independence of the International Judge, 44 Harv. Int’l L.J. 271 (2003)Google Scholar
Maclachlan, C., The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, 54 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 279 (2005)Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian R., Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a “Rich Classificatory Apparatus,” 75 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1018 (1981)Google Scholar
Marks, Axel et al., Private Standards and Global Governance: Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives (2012)Google Scholar
Marston Danner, Allison, When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2006)Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry, Public Law and Public Choice: Critique and Rapprochement, in Research Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law (Farber, Daniel A. & O’Connell, Anne J. eds., 2010)Google Scholar
Maupin, Julie A., Public and Private in International Investment Law: An Integrated Systems Approach, 54(2) Virginia J. Int’l L. 367 (2014)Google Scholar
Mazumder, Soumyajit, Can I Stay a BIT Longer? The Effect of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Political Survival, 10(3) Rev. Int’l Org. 1 (2015)Google Scholar
McNollgast, , Conditions for Judicial Independence, 15 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 105 (2006)Google Scholar
McNollgast, , Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law, 68 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1631 (1995)Google Scholar
McWhinney, Edward, Law, Politics and “Regionalism” in the Nomination and Election of World Court Judges, 13 Syracuse J. Int’l L. Com. 1 (1986)Google Scholar
Melo Araujo, Billy A., Regulating Services through Trade Agreements – A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Disciplines Included in EU and US Free Trade Agreements, 6 Trade L. & Dev. 393 (2014)Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor & Elder, Betty, The New Administrative Tribunal of the World Bank, 14 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 1 (1981)Google Scholar
Mersel, Yigal, Judicial Review of Counter-Terrorism Measures: The Israeli Model for the Role of the Judiciary during the Terror Era, 38 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 67 (2005)Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick, The Much Needed EU Pivoting to East Asia, 10 Asia Pacific J. EU Stud. 9 (2012)Google Scholar
Morettini, Simona, Community Principles Affecting the Exercise of Discretionary Power by National Authorities in the Service Sector, in Global and European Constraints upon National Right to Regulate: The Services Sector 106 (Battini, Stefano & Vesperini, Giulio eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Nair, Gupakumar G., Fernandes, Andreya, & Nair, Karthika, Landmark Pharma Patent Jurisprudence in India, 19 J. Intel. Prop. Rts. 79 (2014)Google Scholar
Naske, Nina & Nolte, Georg, Case Report: “Aerial Security Law,” in 101 Am. J. Int’l L. 466 (2007)Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., Buffer Zones against Refugees: Dublin, Schengen, and the German Asylum Amendment, 33 Va. J. Int’l L. 503 (1993)Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., Sense and Nonsense about Customary International Law: A Response to Professors Bradley and Goldsmith, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 371 (1997)Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation, 98 Am. J. Int’l L. 82 (2004)Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A., US Trade Policy, in 3 Regulation 34 (1988), reprinted in William A. Niskanen, Policy Analysis and Public Choice 183 (1998)Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, Karin & Zimmermann, Andreas, France’s and Germany’s Constitutional Changes and Their Impact on Migration Law: Policy and Practice, 38 German Y.B. Int’l L. 249 (1995)Google Scholar
Onzivu, William, International Environmental Law, the Public’s Health, and Domestic Environmental Governance in Developing Countries, 21 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 597 (2006)Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen, Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty, 56 Int’l Org. 151 (2002)Google Scholar
Paul, Joel R., The Geopolitical Constitution: Executive Expediency and Executive Agreements, 86 Cal. L. Rev. 671 (1998)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, The Rule of Law without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus, 109 Am. J. Int’l L. 761 (2015)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, The UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity, and the WTO Diversity in International Law-Making, Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Insight (Nov. 15, 2005)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., & Wouters, Jan, When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking, 25 Eur. J. Int’l L. 733 (2014)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, & Wouters, Jan eds., Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Petras, James, The Western Welfare State: Its Rise and Demise and the Soviet Bloc, Global Research (Jul. 4, 2012)Google Scholar
Phuong, Catherine, Persecution by Non-state Agents: Comparative Judicial Interpretations of the 1951 Refugee Convention, 4 Eur. J. Migration & L. 521 (2002)Google Scholar
Picciotto, Sol, The WTO’s Appellate Body: Legal Formalism as a Legitimation of Global Governance, 18 Governance 477 (2005)Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2nd edn., 2008)Google Scholar
Polakiewicz, J. & Jacob-Foltzer, V., The European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law, 12 Hum. Rts. L.J. 65 (Part I), 125 (Part II) (1991)Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., The Decline of the International Court of Justice 23 (U. Chicago L. & Econ., Olin Working Paper No. 233, 2004)Google Scholar
Posner, Eric & de Figueiredo, Miguel, Is the International Court of Justice Biased? (U. Chicago L. & Econ., Olin Working Paper No. 234)Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., The Supreme Court 2004 Term – Forward: A Political Court, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 32 (2005)Google Scholar
Prows, Peter, Tough Love: The Dramatic Birth and Looming Demise of UNCLOS Property Law (N.Y.U. L. Sch. Pub. L. & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Paper No. 06–19, 2006)Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, 42 Int’l Org. 427 (1988)Google Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark J., The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach, 23 J. Legal Stud. 721 (1994)Google Scholar
Ranganathan, Surabhi, Strategically Created Treaty Conflicts and the Politics of International Law (2014)Google Scholar
Ranjan, Shikhar, Legal Controls on the Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes into India – An Evaluation, 41 Indian J. Int’l L. 44 (2001)Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law, 43 Va. J. Int’l L. 1 (2002)Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, The Domestic Politics of Global Biodiversity Protection in the United Kingdom and the United States, in The Internationalization of Environmental Protection 42 (Economy, Elizabeth & Schreurs, Miranda A. eds., 1997)Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, The Immunity of International Organizations and the Jurisdiction of Their Administrative Tribunals, 7 Chinese J. Int’l L. 285 (2008)Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, The International Relations of National Courts: A Discourse on International Law Norms on Jurisdictional and Enforcement Immunity, in The Law of International Relations – Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold 289 (Reinisch, August & Kriebaum, Ursula eds., 2007)Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, An International Farce: The Sad Case of the PLO Mission, 14 Yale J. Int’l L. 412 (1989)Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, The Quest for World Order and Human Dignity in the Twenty-First Century Constitutive Process and Individual Commitment (2013)Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith, Law’s Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism’s Multiple Ports of Entry, 115 Yale L.J. 1564 (2006)Google Scholar
Reynolds, Scott, European Council Directive 2001/55/EC: Toward a Common European Asylum System, 8 Colum. J. Eur. L. 359 (2002)Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan A. & Abbott, Frederick M., Foreword: Symposium on Parliamentary Participation in the Making and Operation of Treaties, 67 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 293 (1991)Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan A. & Abbott, Frederick M., The Scope of U.S. Senate Control over the Conclusion and Operation of Treaties, 67 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 571 (1991)Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What We Have Learned?, in Bringing Transnational Relations Back In 280 (Risse-Kappen, Thomas ed., 1995)Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, Must We Trade Rights for Security? The Choice between Smart, Harsh, or Proportionate Security Strategies in Canada and Britain, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 2151 (2006)Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, Sources and Trends in Post 9/11 Anti-Terrorism Laws (U. Toronto Legal Stud. Res. Paper 899291, Apr. 2006)Google Scholar
Roelofsen, C.G., Grotius and International Law: An Introduction to Some Themes in the Field of Grotian Studies, in Grotius Reader 3 (van Holk, L.E. & Roelofsen, C.G. eds., 1983)Google Scholar
Roelofsen, C.G., Grotius and the International Politics of the Seventeenth Century, in Hugo Grotius and International Relations 95 (Bull, Hedley et al. eds., 1990)Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein et al., Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development (1970)Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Michael D., Domestic Bureaucracies and the International Trade Regime: The Law and Economics of Administrative Law and Administratively-Imposed Trade Barriers, 42 Tex. Int’l L.J. 241 (2006)Google Scholar
Sadurska, Romana & Chinkin, C.M., The Collapse of the International Tin Council: A Case of State Responsibility?, 30 Va. J. Int’l L. 845 (1990)Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, “Solange, chapter 3”: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe–Democracy–European Union, 14 Eur. L.J. 1 (2008)Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W. & Sullivan, Nicholas P., Do BITs Really Work?: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain, 46 Harv. Int’l L.J. 67 (2005)Google Scholar
Salve, Harish, Justice between Generations: Environment and Social Justice, in Supreme But Not Infallible: Essays in Honour of the Supreme Court of India 360 (Kirpal, B.N. et al. eds., 2000)Google Scholar
Samson, Klaus, The Standard-Setting and Supervisory System of the International Labour Organisation, in An Introduction to the International Protection of Human Rights 149 (Hanski, Raija & Suksi, Markku eds., 1997)Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G., Netherlands, in The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law (Jacobs, Francis G. & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987)Google Scholar
Schermers, Henry G. & Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law (3rd rev. edn., 1995)Google Scholar
Schmid-Drüner, Marion, Germany’s New Immigration Law: A Paradigm Shift? 8 Eur. J. Migration & L. 191 (2006)Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, Clive M., International Business Law: A New Law Merchant, in Clive M. Schmitthoff’s Select Essays on International Trade Law 20 (Cheng, Chia-Jui ed., 1988)Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David, Investing in Democracy? Political Process and International Investment Law, 60 U. Toronto L.J. 909 (2010)Google Scholar
Schuster, Liza, A Comparative Analysis of the Asylum Policy of Seven European Governments, 13 J. Refugee Stud. 118 (2000)Google Scholar
Schwabach, Aaron, Comment, The Sandoz Spill: The Failure of International Law to Protect the Rhine from Pollution, 16 Ecology L.Q. 443 (1989)Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, Relational Contracts in the Courts: An Analysis of Incomplete Agreements and Judicial Strategies, 21 J. Legal Stud. 271 (1992)Google Scholar
Selden, John & Clausum, Mare, Of the Dominion, Or, Ownership of the Sea (Nedham, Marchamont trans., London, William Du-Gard, 1652) (1635)Google Scholar
Shah, Sheetal B., Illuminating the Possible in the Developing World: Guaranteeing the Human Right to Health in India, 32 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 435 (1999)Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, Regulating Jurisdictional Relations between National and International Courts (2007)Google Scholar
Sheehan, Reginald S., Mishler, William, & Songer, Donald R., Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Parties before the Supreme Court, 86 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 464 (1992)Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner, 20 Eur. J. Int’l L. 265 (2008)Google Scholar
Simpson, A.W. Brian, In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention without Trial in Wartime Britain (1994)Google Scholar
Singer, Michael, Jurisdictional Immunity of International Organizations: Human Rights and Functional Necessity Concerns, 36 Va. J. Int’l L. 53 (1996)Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A Typology of Transjudicial Communication, 29 U. Rich. L. Rev. 99 (1994)Google Scholar
Sripati, Vijayashri, Toward Fifty Years of Constitutionalism and Fundamental Rights in India: Looking Back to See Ahead (1950–2000), 14 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 413 (1998)Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H., In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, 56 Int’l Org. 339 (2002)Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H., Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, 98 Am. J. Int’l L. 247 (2004)Google Scholar
Steinhardt, Ralph, Human Rights Litigation and the “One Voice” Orthodoxy in Foreign Affairs, in World Justice? U.S. Courts and International Human Rights 23 (Gibney, Mark ed., 1991)Google Scholar
Stephenson, Mark C., “When the Devil Turns … ”: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review, 32 J. Legal Stud. 59 (2003)Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew, Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence, 20 J. Law, Econ. & Org. 379 (2004)Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B., Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation, and Responsiveness, 108 Am. J. Int’l L. 211 (2014)Google Scholar
Stigler, George J., The Theory of Economic Regulation, 2 Bell J. Econ. & Mgmt. Sci. 3 (1971)Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Guzman, Martin, The Rule of Law for Sovereign Debt, Project Syndicate (Jun. 15, 2015)Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe, 5 Int’l J. Const. L. 69 (2007)Google Scholar
Storey, Hugo, The Advanced Refugee Law Workshop Experience: An IARLJ Perspective, 15 Int’l J. Refugee L. 422 (2003)Google Scholar
Stumberg, Robert, Sovereignty by Subtraction: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment, 31 Cornell Int’l L.J. 491 (1998)Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty, and Scientific Evidence Requirements: A Pessimistic View, 3 Chi. J. Int’l L. 353 (2002)Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution, 40 Harv. Int’l L.J. 333 (1999)Google Scholar
Trimble, Phillip R., A Revisionist View of Customary International Law, 33 UCLA L. Rev. 665 (1986)Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George & Garrett, Geoffrey, The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union, 55 Int’l Org. 357 (2001)Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (2009)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, Domestic Court Reactions to UN Security Council Sanctions, in Challenging Acts of International Organizations before National Courts 54 (Reinisch, August ed., 2010)Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia & Warren, Mark E., The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory, 11 Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 387 (2008)Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter, From Afterthought to Centerpiece: The WTO Appellate Body and Its Rise to Prominence in the World Trading System (Maastricht Fac. Law, Working Paper No. 2005/1, 2005)Google Scholar
Van der Molen, Gezina H.J., Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law (1937)Google Scholar
Van Dunn, Jan M., Liability in Tort for the Detrimental Use of Fresh Water Resources under Dutch Law in Domestic and International Cases, in The Scarcity of Water 196 (Brans, Edward H.P. et al. eds., 1997)Google Scholar
Von Bernstorff, Jochen, The Global “Land-Grab”, Sovereignty and Human Rights, 2(9) European Soc’y of Int’l L. Reflections (2013)Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin, Law and Politics in the WTO–Strategies to Cope with a Deficient Relationship, in 5 Max Planck Y.B. of U.N. L. 609 (Frowein, J.A. & Wolfrum, R. eds., 2001)Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin & Venzke, Ingo, In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (2014)Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, Armin & Venzke, Ingo, In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and International Tribunals Democratic Justification, 23 Eur. J. Int’l L. 7 (2012)Google Scholar
Vreeland, Hamilton & Grotius, Hugo, The Father of the Modern Science of International Law (1917)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Foreign Laws and the Modern Ius Gentium, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (2005)Google Scholar
Walter, C., Vöneky, S., Röben, V., & Schorkopf, F. eds., Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law: Security versus Liberty? (Springer, 2004)Google Scholar
Waters, Melissa A., Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties, 107 Colum. L. Rev. 628 (2007)Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H., The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement 11 (Harv. Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 9/00, 2000)Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H., A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors, 26 Comp. Pol. Stud. 510 (1994)Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H., The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy, 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 547 (2004)Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., The Constitutional Dilemma of Economic Liberty, J. Econ. Persp. (Summer 2005)Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje & Liste, Philip, Lost without Translation? Cross-Referencing and a New Global Community of Courts, 21 Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 263 (2014)Google Scholar
Young, Ernst A., Foreign Law and the Denominator Problem, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 148 (2005)Google Scholar
Zalewski, Christopher S. & McQuade, Paul F., A Stalemate on Biosafety Pact, The Nat’l L.J., May 24, 1999Google Scholar
Zappalà, Salvatore, Do Heads of State in Office Enjoy Immunity from Jurisdiction for International Crimes? The Ghaddafi Case before the French Cour de Cassation, 12 Eur. J. Int’l L. 595 (2002)Google Scholar
Zurn, Christopher F., Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review (2007)Google Scholar