The Bank's main policy goal in the 1960s was to maintain the exchange-rate parity. Apart from this, a prime function was to ensure the smooth financing of the exchequer, and of lesser importance was the control of bank advances. To these ends, the Bank pursued order (nowhere defined) in the money and gilts markets. As Radcliffe saw it, debt management and funding were central in monetary policy. The containment of inflation was seldom explicit, but concern was frequently expressed over the expansion of credit or the growth of bank advances. However, it should be stressed that monetary policy at the time was neither remotely like that of previous periods nor of later ones, nor did it bear much resemblance to what was found in textbooks. The monetary authorities, especially the Treasury, had for some time been uncertain as to the effectiveness of conventional monetary policy for controlling the domestic economy. The views found in the Radcliffe Report were not far from those of the Treasury, and it was these kinds of ideas that gave rise to the enquiry in the first instance. That is, it was the reading of the experience of the years 1955–57 in particular that suggested that monetary policy did not deliver or certainly not quickly. Thus monetary policy became instead a collection of devices intended to work on both the domestic and external variables: ‘It was neither aimed at controlling the stock of money nor was it much relied upon to combat inflation.