Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T00:15:45.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Effective evolutionary time and the latitudinal diversity gradient

from Part IV - Latitudinal Gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Klaus Rohde
Affiliation:
University of New England, Australia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between climate and biodiversity is perhaps the most widely recognized and extensively studied pattern of nature on earth. Attempts to explain this relationship and the attendant latitudinal gradient in diversity began more than 200 years ago (von Humboldt, 1808; Wallace, 1878) and indeed the number of theories that attempt to address this question appears to be accumulating at an ever increasing rate. However, one theory which has received relatively little attention began with the observation by Rensch (1959) that animals living in warmer tropical climates have shorter generation times than those living at higher latitudes. He suggested that because natural selection accumulates change with each generation, shorter generation times found among tropical fauna might increase the pace of natural selection and thereby the pace at which evolution progresses. A faster evolutionary speed in the tropics would therefore lead to the evolution of more species there than at higher latitudes over an equivalent period of time.

Evidence suggesting that mutations can be induced by high temperatures prompted Rohde (1978, 1992) to predict that not only might rates of selection increase with increasing ambient energy towards the tropics, but that rates of mutation may also be greater in lower-latitude climates. It is predicted that the combined effects of faster rates of mutation and faster rates of selection will lead to greater rates of diversification. Over an equivalent period of time, regions experiencing generally faster rates of genetic evolution will therefore generate and accumulate more species and greater species richness than regions where genetic evolution is slower. Fundamental to this hypothesis is the precept that the incumbent diversity of species within communities is not at an equilibrium number set by contemporary environmental conditions. Instead, it suggests that communities continue to accumulate species at rates that depend on climatic variables. This theory is therefore quite different to those, such as the energy-richness or more individuals hypothesis (Hutchinson, 1959; Brown, 1981; Wright, 1983), that suggest that diversity is limited by energetic capacity of the environment and that species origination and extinction are therefore held in balance with climate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A., Gillooly, J., Savage, V., & Brown, J. (2006). Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 9130–9135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, K. J., & Jetz, W. (2005). The broad-scale ecology of energy expenditure of endotherms. Ecology Letters, 8, 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, K. G., Tracy, M. C., & Dequeiroz, A. (2000). Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals. The American Naturalist, 156, 390–415.Google ScholarPubMed
Bleiweiss, R. (1998). Relative-rate tests and biological causes of molecular evolution in hummingbirds. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromham, L., & Cardillo, M. (2003). Testing the link between the latitudinal gradient in species richness and rates of molecular evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromham, L., Rambaut, A., & Harvey, P. H. (1996). Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43, 610–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S., & Ng, P. K. L. (2003). Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature, 424, 420–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. H. (1981). Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity. American Zoology, 21, 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardillo, M. (1999). Latitude and rates of diversification in birds and butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1221–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A., Rothery, P., & Isaac, N. J. (2010). Scaling of basal metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in mammals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 610–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, N., & Purvis, A. (2009). What factors shape rates of phenotypic evolution? A comparative study of cranial morphology of four mammalian clades. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 1024–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, T., Savolainen, V., Chase, M., Moat, J., & Barraclough, T. (2004). Environmental energy and evolutionary rates in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 2195–2200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillman, L. N., Ross, H. A., Keeling, J. D., & Wright, S. D. (2009). Latitude, elevation and the tempo of molecular evolution in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276, 3353–3359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillman, L. N., Keeling, D. J., Gardner, R. C., & Wright, S. D. (2010). Faster evolution of highly conserved DNA in tropical plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 1327–1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillman, L. N., McCowan, L., & Wright, S. D. (2012). The tempo of genetic evolution in birds: body mass, population size and climate effects. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 1567–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., West, G. B., & Brown, J. H. (2005). The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 140–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldie, X., Gillman, L. N., Crisp, M., & Wright, S. D. (2010). Evolutionary speed limited by water in arid Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 2645–2653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldie, X., Lanfear, R., & Bromham, L. (2011). Diversification and the rate of molecular evolution: no evidence of a link in mammals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 1471–2148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gossmann, T. I., Keightley, P. D., & Eyre-Walker, A. (2012). The effect of variation in the effective population size on the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in eukaryotes. Genome Biology and Evolution, 4, 658–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillebrand, H. (2004). On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. The American Naturalist, 163, 192–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist, 93, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, L. T. (2010). Molecular evolutionary rates predict extinction and speciation in temperate angiosperm lineages. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanfear, R., Ho, S. Y. W., Love, D., & Bromham, L. (2010). Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107, 20423–20428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanfear, R., Thomas, J. A., Welch, J. J., Brey, T., & Bromham, L. (2007). Metabolic rate does not calibrate the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 15388–15393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. P., & Palumbi, S. R. (1993). Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 90, 4087–4091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mckechnie, A. E., & Lovegrove, B. G. (2002). Avian facultative hypothermic responses: a review. Condor, 104, 705–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, D., Thomas, D. W., & Humphries, M. M. (2005). Torpor patterns of hibernating eastern chipmunks Tamias striatus vary in response to the size and fatty acid composition of food hoards. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 692–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabholz, B., Glemin, S., & Galtier, N. (2008). Strong variations of mitochondrial mutation rate across mammals – the longevity hypothesis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaev, S. I., Montoya-Burgos, J. I., Popadin, K., Parand, L., & Margulies, E. H. (2007). Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 20443–20448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunn, G., & Stanley, S. (1998). Body size effects and rates of cytochrome b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1360–1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, T. (1992). The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, M., Venditti, C., & Meade, A. (2006). Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science 314, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, B. D., Meserve, P. L., & Lang, B. K. (1989). Distribution and abundance of small mammals along an elevational transect in temperate rainforests of Chile. Journal of Mammalogy, 70, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rensch, B. (1959). Evolution Above the Species Level. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1978). Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and their causes. I. A review of the hypotheses explaining the gradients. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 97, 393–403.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1992). Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1953). The Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2008). Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science, 322, 86–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, G. C. (1989). The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics.The American Naturalist, 133, 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P., & Kinnison, M. T. (2003). Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. A., Welch, J. J., Lanfear, R., & Bromham, L. (2010). A generation time effect on the rate of molecular evolution in invertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27, 1173–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanValen, L. M. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
Von Humboldt, A. (1808). Ansichten der Natur mit wissenschaftlichen Erlauterungen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1878). Tropical Nature and Other Essays. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J., Payne, R. J. H., & Pagel, M. (2003). Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation. Science, 301, 478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, J. T., & Schluter, D. (2008). Calibrating the avian molecular clock. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2321–2328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, J. J., Bininda-Emonds, O. R., & Bromham, L. (2008). Correlates of substitution rate variation in mammalian protein-coding sequences. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 1471–2148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolfit, M., & Bromham, L. (2005). Population size and molecular evolution on islands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2277–2282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, D. H. (1983). Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory. Oikos, 41, 496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. D., Gray, R. D., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Energy and the rate of evolution: inferences from plant rDNA substitution rates in the western Pacific. Evolution, 57, 2893–2898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S., Keeling, J., & Gillman, L. (2006). The road from Santa Rosalia: a faster tempo of evolution in tropical climates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 7718–7722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. D., Gillman, L. N., Ross, H. A., & Keeling, J. D. (2009). Slower tempo of microevolution in island birds: implications for conservation biology. Evolution, 63, 2276–2287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. D., Gillman, L. N., Ross, H. A., & Keeling, D. J. (2010). Energy and the tempo of evolution in amphibians. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 733–740.Google Scholar
Wright, S. D., Ross, H. A., Keeling, D. J., McBride, P., & Gillman, L. N. (2011). Thermal energy and the rate of genetic evolution in marine fishes. Evolutionary Ecology, 25, 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×