Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:44:22.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

11 - Equitable doctrine of breach of confidence

Mark J. Davison
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Ann L. Monotti
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Leanne Wiseman
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Creation and open transmission of ideas and information have long been regarded as important features of a democratic society. However, there are many occasions where a person will want to communicate information to another in confidence on the understanding that the information is not further disseminated or used without consent. This may arise in the context of business, government or personal relationships. The value of information in each type of context will differ. Businesses and corporations are usually concerned to protect information that has some commercial value. It may be an invention for which a patent is to be sought, details of a business strategy or secret processes or recipes. Governments need to protect their ability to make decisions on sensitive issues. Individuals are usually concerned about protection of reputation and privacy. In the case of indigenous groups, their concern is to protect the secrets of their tribal group.

There is no discrete body of law that protects confidential information because the circumstances differ widely in which obligations are imposed. Duties of confidence may be relevant in many different legal contexts, including that of protection of government secrets, business secrets and personal privacy, and requests for information under the relevant freedom of information legislation. Obligations also arise under the doctrine of legal professional privilege, but this type of confidence must be distinguished from confidential information which is the source of the plaintiff's rights. Specific duties may be owed by people who have statutory powers to obtain information, and issues of confidentiality can arise in connection with arbitration proceedings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×