Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:52:55.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Spectrum auctions by the United States Federal Communications Commission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Timothy C. Salmon
Affiliation:
Assistant professor in economics, Florida State University
Maarten Janssen
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In 1985 the then chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Mark Fowler, first asked permission from the US Congress to use auctions in the assignment of spectrum licences. This request was denied. In fact, successive FCC chairmen asked Congress for this authority every year until it was finally granted in 1993. In the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993, Congress finally provided the FCC with the statutory authority to conduct spectrum auctions. This led to the FCC's first spectrum auctions being conducted in 1994. Since then the FCC has conducted over thirty-seven auctions with net high bids summing to over $40 billion.

Over the course of these auctions there have been many successes but also a few failures, with some of these failures being quite serious. In this chapter, we detail the reasons for both the successes and the failures, with the aim of using the FCC's experience in designing and running auctions to show how auctions can be designed to solve highly complex allocation problems.

Section 2 discusses the regulatory background of spectrum allocation methodologies in the United States in order to describe how the auctions programme came to be. Section 3 presents the structure of a simultaneous ascending auction including the specific version used by the FCC as well as some modifications to the design that might be used under different circumstances. Section 4 discusses some of the successes and failures of specific FCC auctions to see what lessons can be learned.

Type
Chapter
Information
Auctioning Public Assets
Analysis and Alternatives
, pp. 147 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoit, J. and Krishna, V. 2001, ‘Multiple object auctions with budget constrained bidders’, Review of Economic Studies 68: 155–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykowsky, M., Cull, R. and Ledyard, J. 2000, ‘Mutually destructive bidding: the FCC auction design problem’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 205–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, Y. and Gale, I. 1998, ‘Standard auctions with financially constrained bidders’, Review of Economic Studies 65: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compte, O. and P. Jehiel 2000, ‘On the virtues of the ascending price auction: new insights in the private value setting’, Working Paper, University College London
Copps, M. 2001, ‘Dissenting statement on 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review spectrum aggregation limits for commercial mobile radio Services’, WT Docket No. 01-14, http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Copps/Statements/2001/stmjc123.html (accessed at 8 November 2001)
Demange, G., Gale, D. and Sotomayor, M. 1986, ‘Multi-item auctions’, Journal of Political Economy 94: 863–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingell, J. 2002, ‘Statement in reference to HR 4560’, http://www.house.gov/commerce_democrats/press/107st110.htm (accessed at 7 February 2003)
FCC 2002, ‘7th annual report and analysis of competitive market conditions with respect to commercial mobile services’, Staff Report, July, http://wireless.fcc.gov/cmrs-crforum.html (accessed at 7 February 2003)
FCC 2003, ‘FCC announces wireless spectrum cap to sunset effective January 1, 2003’, Press Release, WT Docket No. 01-14, http://wireless.fcc.gov/spectrumcap.html (accessed at 7 February 2003)
Harstad, R. 2000, ‘A blueprint for a multi-round auction with package bidding’, Comment submission to the FCC, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
Hazlett, T. 1998, ‘Assigning property rights to radio spectrum users: why did FCC license auctions take 67 years?Journal of Law and Economics 41: 529–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, J., Harstad, R. and Levin, D. 1987, ‘Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: a laboratory study’, Econometrica 55: 1275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwerel, E. and Rosston, G. 2000, ‘An insider's view of FCC spectrum auctions’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 253–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J., Porter, D. and Rangel, A. 1997, ‘Experiments testing multi-object allocation mechanisms’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 63: 639–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J., C. DeMartini, A. Kwasnica and D. Porter 1999, ‘A new and improved design for multi-object iterative auctions’, Social Science Working Paper No. 1054, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Milgrom, P. 2000, ‘Putting auction theory to work: the simultaneous ascending auction’, Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. and Weber, R. 1982, ‘A theory of auctions and competitive bidding’, Econometrica 50: 1089–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. and Reny, P. 1999, ‘On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-object auctions’, Econometrica 67: 885–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. 1997, ‘Laboratory experimental testbeds: application to PCS auctions’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 605–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. 2000, ‘A combinatorial auction designed for the Federal Communications Commission’, Report to the FCC, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Plott, C. 2001, ‘The FCC rules for the 700MHz auction: a potential disaster’, Working Paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Plott, C. and T. Salmon 2000, ‘Comment sought on modifying the simultaneous multiple round auction design to allow combinatorial (package) bidding’, Comment submission to the FCC, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Plott, C. and T. Salmon 2001, ‘The simultaneous ascending auction: dynamics of price adjustment in experiments and in the UK 3G spectrum auction’, Working Paper, Florida State University
Riley, J. and H. Li 1999, ‘Auction choice’, mimeo, University of California Los Angeles
Salmon, T. and R. Isaac 2002, ‘Revenue from the saints, the showoffs, and the predators: comparisons of auctions with price-preference values’, Working Paper, Florida State University
Wilkie, S. 1997, ‘Explaining price anomalies in the PCS license auctions’, Working Paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Zheng, C. 2001, ‘High bids and broke winners’, Journal of Economic Theory 100: 129–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×