Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T06:00:46.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Auction theory for auction design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Tilman Börgers
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, University College, London
Eric van Damme
Affiliation:
Research Professor in Economics, Tilburg University; Director of the Law and Economics Centre, Tilburg University
Maarten Janssen
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this introductory survey we review research papers on auction theory that may be of relevance to the design of auctions of government assets in general, and of spectrum licence auctions in particular. We focus on the main intuitions emerging from these papers, and refer to the original papers for technical details.

We begin in section 2 with a discussion of why economists typically favour auctions over other methods for allocating licences to operate in a market. In section 3, we have a first discussion on auction design, stressing the fact that a seller will typically face a much more complicated problem than just what auction form to use; he also has to think carefully about what to sell, whom to allow as bidders and when to sell. Of course, the solution to these problems will also depend on what goal is to be achieved. Assuming these problems are solved, we turn, in section 4 to an exposition of auction formats. We start the discussion with the simple case in which the seller has just one indivisible object for sale, for which we describe the four basic auction forms: two open auctions – the English (or ascending) auction and the Dutch (or descending) auction – and two sealed-bid formats, the first-price auction and the second-price (or Vickrey) auction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Auctioning Public Assets
Analysis and Alternatives
, pp. 19 - 63
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashenfelter, O. 1989, ‘How auctions work for wine and art’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, L. 2003, ‘A generalized Vickrey auction’, Econometrica, forthcoming
Ausubel, L. and P. Cramton 1996, ‘Demand reduction and inefficiency in multi-unit auctions’, mimeo, University of Maryland
Ausubel, L. and P. Milgrom 2002, ‘Ascending auctions with package bidding’, Frontiers of Theoretical Economics 11, article 1, Berkeley Electronic Press
Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P. 2002, ‘The biggest auction ever’, The Economic Journal 112: C74–C96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. and Swierzbinski, J. 2000, ‘Treasury auctions: uniform or discriminatory’, Review of Economic Design 5: 387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, S. and Lopomo, G. 2002, ‘Collusion via signalling in simultaneous ascending bid auctions with multiple objects and complementarities’, Review of Economic Studies, 69: 407–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulow, J. and Klemperer, P. 1996, ‘Auctions versus negotiations’, American Economic Review 86: 180–94Google Scholar
Capen, E., Clapp, R. and Campbell, W. 1971, ‘Competitive bidding in high-risk situations’, Journal of Petroleum Technology 23: 641–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cybernomics 2000, ‘An experimental comparison of the simultaneous multiple round auction and the CRA combinatorial auction’, Report to the Federal Communications Commission
Damme, E. van 1999, ‘The Dutch DCS-1800 auction’, in F. Patrone, I. García-Jurado and S. Tijs (eds.), Game Practice: Contributions from Applied Game Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Tilburg
Damme, E. 2002a, ‘The Dutch UMTS-auction’, Ifo Studien, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsforschung 1/2002: 175–200Google Scholar
Damme, E. 2002b, ‘Pompen en verzuipen’ (Pumping and drowning), Economisch Statistische Berichten 87–4354: 271–3Google Scholar
Demange, G., Gale, D. and Sotomayor, M. 1986, ‘Multi-item auctions’, Journal of Political Economy 94: 863–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, E. and Kahn, C. 1998, ‘Multi-unit auctions with uniform prices’, Economic Theory 12: 227–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. 1982, ‘Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly’, American Economic Review, 72: 514–26Google Scholar
Graham, D. and Marshall, R. 1987, ‘Collusive behavior at single-object second-price and English auctions’, Journal of Political Economy 95: 1217–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, V., F. Riedel and E. Wolfstetter 2002, ‘Low price equilibrium in multi-unit auctions: the GSM spectrum auction in Germany’, Discussion Paper SFB 373, Humboldt University, Berlin
Janssen, M., A. Ros and N. van der Windt 2001, ‘De draad kwijt? Onderzoek naar de gang van zaken rond de Nederlandse UMTS-veiling’ (Research into the proceedings of the Dutch UMTS auction), Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jehiel, P. and Moldovanu, B. 1996, ‘Strategic non-participation’, RAND Journal of Economics 27: 84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehiel, P. and Moldovanu, B. 2000a, ‘Auctions with downstream interaction among buyers’, RAND Journal of Economics 31: 768–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehiel, P. and B. Moldovanu 2000b, ‘A critique of the planned rules for the German UMTS/IMT-2000 licence auction’, mimeo, University College London and University of Mannheim
Jehiel, P. and B. Moldovanu 2001, ‘The European UMTS/ IMT-2000 licence auctions’, mimeo, University College London and University of Mannheim
Kagel, J. 1995, ‘Auctions: a survey of experimental research’, in J. Kagel and A. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press
Klemperer, P. 2000, ‘What really matters in auction design’, Working Paper, http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmi/0004008.html
Klemperer, P. 2002, ‘What really matters in auction design’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 169–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, V. 2002, Auction Theory, Academic Press, San Diego
Krishna, V. and Rosenthal, R. 1996, ‘Simultaneous auctions with synergies’, Games and Economic Behavior 17: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, H. 1983, ‘Elicitation of honest preferences for the assignment of individuals to positions’, Journal of Political Economy 91: 461–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. and Smith, J. 1994, ‘Equilibrium in auctions with entry’, American Economic Review 84: 585–99Google Scholar
Maasland, E. and S. Onderstal 2002a, ‘Auctions with financial externalities’, CentER Discussion Paper 22, Tilburg University
Maasland, E. and S. Onderstal 2002b, ‘Optimal auctions with financial externalities’, CentER Discussion Paper 21, Tilburg University
Maskin, E. and Riley, J. 2000, ‘Asymmetric auctions’, Review of Economic Studies 67: 413–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, P. and McMillan, J. 1987, ‘Auctions with entry’, Economics Letters 23: 343–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, P. and McMillan, J. 1992, ‘Bidding rings’, American Economic Review 82: 579–99Google Scholar
McAfee, P., McMillan, J. and Reny, P. 1989, ‘Extracting the surplus in a common value auction’, Econometrica 57: 1451–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J. 1994, ‘Selling spectrum rights’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 145–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. 2000, ‘Putting auction theory to work: the simultaneous ascending auction’, Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. and Weber, R. 1982, ‘A theory of auctions and competitive bidding’, Econometrica 50: 1089–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, R. 1981, ‘Optimal auction design’, Mathematics of Operations Research 6: 58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. and Reny, P. 1999, ‘On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions’, Econometrica 67: 895–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesendorfer, W. and Swinkels, J. 1997, ‘The loser's curse and information aggregation in common value auctions’, Econometrica 65: 1247–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, M., Teisberg, T. and Kahn, E., 1990, ‘Why are Vickrey auctions rare?’, Journal of Political Economy 98: 94–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickrey, W. 1961, ‘Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders’, Journal of Finance 16: 8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickrey, W. 1962, ‘Auctions and bidding games’, in Recent Advances in Game Theory, Princeton University Press. Reprinted in R. Arnott et al., Public Economics: Selected Papers by William Vickrey, Cambridge University Press (1994)
Williamson, O. 1976, ‘Franchise bidding for natural monopolies: in general and with respect to CATV’, Bell Journal of Economics 7: 73–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. 1979, ‘Auctions of shares’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 675–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Auction theory for auction design
    • By Tilman Börgers, Professor of Economics, University College, London, Eric van Damme, Research Professor in Economics, Tilburg University; Director of the Law and Economics Centre, Tilburg University
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Auction theory for auction design
    • By Tilman Börgers, Professor of Economics, University College, London, Eric van Damme, Research Professor in Economics, Tilburg University; Director of the Law and Economics Centre, Tilburg University
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Auction theory for auction design
    • By Tilman Börgers, Professor of Economics, University College, London, Eric van Damme, Research Professor in Economics, Tilburg University; Director of the Law and Economics Centre, Tilburg University
  • Edited by Maarten Janssen, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Book: Auctioning Public Assets
  • Online publication: 03 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610844.003
Available formats
×