Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:26:05.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - An analysis of the European 3G licensing process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Emiel Maasland
Affiliation:
Researcher, SEOR
Benny Moldovanu
Affiliation:
Holds the Chair of Economic Theory, University of Bonn
Maarten Janssen
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the years 2000 and 2001, several European countries issued licences for third-generation (3G) mobile telecommunications, usually referred to as UMTS. In the context of the present book, where auction methods are analysed and compared to their alternatives, the UMTS case is of particular interest since it is one of the few cases in which countries have chosen different allocation mechanisms to allocate similar goods. Several papers have already been written on the European 3G licensing process. This chapter is structured around the two main research questions of the present book, namely:

  1. What mechanisms can be used to allocate rights to operate in a market, and under what set of circumstances should one allocation mechanism be preferred over others?

  2. What are the important design issues once a particular mechanism is chosen?

Section 2 addresses the first question. It categorises the different allocation mechanisms used by European countries and offers a comparative analysis. It is important to note at the outset that the usual distinction between auctions and Beauty Contests is too simplistic. Section 3 addresses the second main research question. It offers a general survey of the main issues pertaining to efficiency and revenue maximisation in licence auctions. In section 4, we look in more detail at the most flexible design – the German (and Austrian) one. Section 5 concludes.

Licensing methods

In the recent allocations of spectrum for UMTS mobile telephone services, European governments had to make decisions on two main issues:

  1. How many licences should be awarded, and with what spectrum capacity?

  2. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Auctioning Public Assets
Analysis and Alternatives
, pp. 177 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbink, K., B. Irlenbusch, P. Pezanis-Christou, B. Rockenbach, A. Sadrieh and R. Selten 2001, ‘An experimental test of design alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS auction’, mimeo, University of Bonn
Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P. 2002, ‘The biggest auction ever’, Economic Journal 112: 74–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjuggren, P.-O. 2002, ‘The Swedish 3G Beauty Contest: a beauty or a beast?’, mimeo, Jönköping International Business School
Börgers, T. and Dustmann, C. 2003, ‘Awarding telecom licenses: the recent European experience’, Economic Policy, 36: 216–68Google Scholar
Cramton, P. 1997, ‘The FCC spectrum auctions: an early assessment’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 431–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damme, E. 2002, ‘The European UMTS auctions’, European Economic Review 46: 846–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsche Bank 2000, ‘UMTS: the third generation game’, Deutsche Bank Equity Research, London
Ewerhart, C. and B. Moldovanu 2002, ‘A stylized model of the German UMTS auction’, Discussion Paper, Mannheim University
Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. 1982, ‘Pre-emptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly’, American Economic Review 72: 514–26Google Scholar
Grimm, V., Riedel, F. and Wolfstetter, E. 2002, ‘The third generation (UMTS) spectrum auction in Germany’, Ifo Studien, 48: 123–43Google Scholar
Hultén, S., P. Andersson and P. Valiente 2002, ‘Beauty Contest licensing – lessons from the 3G process in Sweden’, mimeo, Stockholm School of Economics
Janssen, M., A. Ros and N. van der Windt 2001, ‘De draad kwijt? Onderzoek naar de gang van zaken rond de Nederlandse UMTS-ve iling’ (Research into the proceedings of the Dutch UMTS auction), Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jehiel, P. and B. Moldovanu 2000, ‘License auctions and market structure’, Discussion Paper, Mannheim University and CEPR
Jehiel, P. 2001, ‘A note on efficiency and revenue maximization in multi-object auctions’, Economic Bulletin 3: 2–5Google Scholar
Jehiel, P. 2003, ‘An economic perspective on auctions’, Economic Policy, 36: 270–308Google Scholar
Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. 1986, ‘How to license intangible property’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 567–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. 1998, ‘Auctions with almost common values: the “Wallet Game” and its applications’, European Economic Review 42: 757–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. 2000, ‘Spectrum on the block’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 5 October 2000Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. 2002a, ‘What really matters in auction design’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 169–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemperer, P. 2002b, ‘How (not) to run auctions: the European 3G telecom auctions’, European Economic Review 46: 829–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002c, ‘Using and abusing economic theory: lessons from auction design’, Alfred Marshall Lecture, 2002 Meeting of the European Economic Association
Maasland, E. 2000, ‘Veilingmiljarden zijn een fictie’ (‘Billions from Auctions: Wishful Thinking’), ESB June 9: 479 and translation available at http://www.paulklemperer.org (accessed at 26 February 2003)
Maskin, E. 1992, ‘Auctions and privatization’, in H. Siebert (ed.), Privatization, Institut für Weltwirtschaft der Universität Kiel
McAfee, R. and McMillan, J. 1996, ‘Analyzing the airwaves auction’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 159–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J. 1995, ‘Why auction the spectrum’, Telecommunications Policy 19: 191–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, A. and Valletti, T. 2001, ‘Spectrum auctions versus Beauty Contests: costs and benefits’, Rivista di Politica Economica 91: 59–109Google Scholar
REG-TP 2000, ‘Entscheidung der Präsidentenkammer vom 18.02.2000 über die Regeln für die Durchführung des Versteigerungsverfahrens zur Vergabe von Lizenzen für UMTS/IMT-200 0; Mobilkommunikation der dritten Generation’ (‘Ruling of 18 February 2000 by the President's Chamber on the rules for conduct of the auction for the award of licences for UMTS/IMT–2000; third-generation mobile communications’), Aktenzeichen BK-1b-98/005-2, official declaratory document, Bonn
UBS Warburg 2000, ‘3G Hysteria! Not everyone's idea of fun and games’, mimeo, UBS Global Equity Research, London
WestLB Panmure 2000, ‘UMTS: the countdown has begun’, mimeo, WestLB Panmure, Pan European Equity, London

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×