Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:20:54.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Astrometric satellites

from Part I - Astrometry in the twenty-first century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Lennart Lindegren
Affiliation:
Lund University
William F. van Altena
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The launch of the Hipparcos satellite in 1989 and the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990 revolutionized astrometry. By no means does this imply that not much progress was made in the ground-based techniques used exclusively until then. On the contrary, the 1960s to 1980s saw an intense development of new or highly improved instruments, including photoelectric meridian circles, automated plate measuring machines, and the use of chargecoupled device (CCD) detectors for small-field differential astrometry (for a review of optical astrometry at the time, see Monet 1988). In the radio domain, very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) astrometry already provided an extragalactic reference frame accurate to about 1 milliarcsecond (mas) (Ma et al. 1990). Spectacular improvements were made in terms of accuracy, the faintness of the observed objects, and their numbers. However, there was a widening gulf between small-angle astrometry, where differential techniques could overcome atmospheric effects down to below 1 mas, and large-angle astrometry, where conventional instruments such as meridian circles seemed to have hit a barrier in the underlying systematic errors at about 100 mas. Though very precise, the small-angle measurements were of limited use for the determination of positions and proper motions, due to the lack of suitable reference objects in the small fields, and even for parallaxes the necessary correction for the mean parallax of background stars was highly non-trivial. Linking the optical observations to the accurate VLBI frame also proved extremely difficult.

Type
Chapter
Information
Astrometry for Astrophysics
Methods, Models, and Applications
, pp. 14 - 28
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. and King, I. R. (2003). An improved distortion solution for the Hubble Space Telescope's WFPC2. PASP, 115, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. and King, I. R. (2006). PSFs, Photometry, and Astrometry for the ACS/WFC. Space Telescope Science Institute, ISR-ACS 2006–01.Google Scholar
Bacchus, P. and Lacroute, P. (1974). Prospects of space astrometry. Proc. IAU. Symp., 61, 277.Google Scholar
Bastian, U. and Röser, S. (2001). DIVA, the next global astrometry and photometry mission. ASP Conf. Ser., 228, 321.Google Scholar
Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Bean, J. L. (2008). HST FGS astrometry – the value of fractional millisecond of arc precision. Proc. IAU Symp., 248, 23.Google Scholar
Chubey, M. S., Kopylov, I. M., Gorshanov, D. L., Kanayev, , et al. (1997). The Aist-Struve space project sky survey. In New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys, ed. B. J., McLean et al. Proc. IAU Symp., 179, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,ESA (1997). The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues. ESA SP-1200.Google Scholar
Gaume, R. (2010). Looking towards the future: testing new concepts. EAS Publ Ser, 45, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouda, N. (2010). Series of JASMINE missions. EAS Publ Ser, 45, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, G. S. and Gaume, R. (2010). Space astrometry with the Joint Milliarcsecond Astrometry Pathfinder. Proc. IAU Symp., 261, 350.Google Scholar
Høg, E. (1993). Astrometry and photometry of 400 million stars brighter than 18 mag. In Developments in Astrometry and Their Impact on Astrophysics and Geodynamics, ed. I. I., Mueller and B., Kotaczek. Proc. IAU Symp., 156, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høg, E. (1995). A new era of global astrometry. II. A 10 microarcsecond mission. In Astronomical and Astrophysical Objectives of Sub-Milliarcsecond Optical Astrometry, ed. E., Høg and P. K., Seidelmann. Proc. IAU Symp., 166, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., Urban, S., Corbin, T., Wycoff, G., Bastian, U., Schwekendiek, P., and Wicenec, A. (2000). The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars. A&A, 355, L27.Google Scholar
Johnston, K. J. (2003). The FAME mission. Proc. SPIE, 4854, 303.Google Scholar
Johnston, K. J., Dorland, B., Gaume, R., et al. (2006). The Origins Billions Star Survey: Galactic explorer. PASP, 118, 1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalirai, J. S., Anderson, J., Richer, H. B., et al. (2007). The space motion of the globular cluster NGC 6397. ApJ, 657, L93.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Y., Gouda, N., Yano, T., et al. (2008). The current status of the Nano-JASMINE project. Proc. IAU Symp., 248, 270.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J. (2005). The Hipparcos project at Strasbourg Observatory. In The Multinational History of Strasbourg Astronomical Observatory, ed. A., Heck. New York; NY: Springer Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 330, p. 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroute, P. (1967). In Transactions of the IAU, XIIIB, 63.Google Scholar
Lindegren, L. (2010a). Gaia: Astrometric performance and current status of the project. In Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy, ed. S., Klioner, P. K., Seidelmann and M., Soffel. Proc. IAU Symp., 261, 296.Google Scholar
Lindegren, L. (2010b). High-accuracy positioning: astrometry. ISSI Sci. Rep. Ser., 9, 279.Google Scholar
Lindegren, L. and Perryman, M. A. C. (1996). GAIA: Global astrometric interferometer for astrophysics, A&A Suppl. Ser., 116, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindegren, L., Babusiaux, C., Bailer-Jones, C., et al. (2008). The Gaia mission: science, organization and present status. Proc. IAU Symp., 248, 217.Google Scholar
Ma, C., Shaffer, D. B., de Vegt, C., Johnston, K. J., and Russell, J. L. (1990). A radio optical reference frame. I. Precise radio source positions determined by Mark III VLBI: observations from 1979 to 1988 and a tie to the FK5. AJ, 99, 1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignard, F., Bailer-Jones, C., Bastian, U., et al. (2008). Gaia: organisation and challenges for the data processing, Proc. IAU Symp., 248, 224.Google Scholar
Monet, D. G. (1988). Recent advances in optical astrometry. ARAA, 26, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelan, E. P., Lupie, O. L., McArthur, B., et al. (1998). Fine guidance sensors aboard the Hubble Space Telescope: the scientific capabilities of these interferometers. Proc. SPIE, 3350, 237.Google Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C. (2009). Astronomical Applications of Astrometry. Ten Years of Exploitation of The Hipparcos Satellite Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C., Lindegren, L., Kovalevsky, J., et al. (1997). The Hipparcos Catalogue. A&A, 323, L49.Google Scholar
Shao, M. (2006). Search for terrestrial planets with SIM Planet Quest. In Advances in Stellar Interferometry, ed. J. D., MonnierM., Schöller and W. C., Danchi. Proc. SPIE, 6268, 1Z.Google Scholar
Turon, C., Gomez, A., Crifo, F., Creze, M., et al. (1992). The Hipparcos Input Catalogue. I – Star selection. A&A, 258, 74.Google Scholar
Turon, C., O'Flaherty, K. S., and Perryman, M. A. C., eds. (2005). The Three-Dimensional Universe with Gaia. ESA SP-576.
Unwin, S. C., Shao, M., Tanner, A. M., et al. (2008). Taking the measure of the universe: precision astrometry with SIM PlanetQuest. PASP, 120, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. (2007). Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 350, New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yano, T., Gouda, N., Kobayashi, Y., et al. (2008). Space astrometry JASMINE. Proc. IAU Symp., 248, 296.Google Scholar
Zacharias, N. and Dorland, B. (2006). The concept of a stare-mode astrometric space mission. PASP, 118, 1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×