Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T06:16:59.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Luminescence Dating

from Part VI - Absolute Dating Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

By
Richard M. Bailey
Edited by
Michael P. Richards  and
Kate Britton
Michael P. Richards
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Kate Britton
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

The range of chronological methods described by the term “luminescence dating” provides a rich set of tools for dating many types of events relevant to archaeological research. These include assessing the depositional age of sediments (the time elapsed since those sediment were deposited by, for example, water, wind, or human activity), and estimating the time since pottery, casting cores, or stones were last fired/heated. Following an initial suggestion by Daniels et al. (1953), luminescence dating methods were introduced into the archaeological context by Aitken et al. (1964) with the thermoluminescence (TL) dating of pottery. Since then, considerable improvements in understanding the basic underlying physical mechanisms have been translated into significant methodological breakthroughs. Notable among these was the development of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) methods (Huntley et al. 1985) and the improved confidence in dating sedimentary material that this brought. A more recent technologically driven advance was the dating of individual sand grains (so-called single-grain dating), allowing more in-depth assessments of dating reliability and widening the applicability of OSL dating (also referred to as “optical dating”).

Type
Chapter
Information
Archaeological Science
An Introduction
 , pp. 424 - 438
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamiec, G. and Aitken, M. J. 1998. Dose rate conversion factors: Update Ancient TL 16:37–49.Google Scholar
Aitken, M. J. 1985. Thermoluminescence Dating. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Aitken, M. J. 1989. Luminescence dating: A guide for non-specialists. Archaeometry 31:147–159.Google Scholar
Aitken, M. J. 1997. Luminescence dating. In: `Taylor, R. E. and `Aitken, M. J. (eds.) Chronometric Dating in Archaeology, pp. 183–216. Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitken, M. J. 1998. An Introduction to Optical Dating. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aitken, M. J., Tite, M. S., and Reid, J. 1964. Thermoluminescent dating of ancient ceramics. Nature 202:1032–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anikovich, M. V., Anikovich, M. V., Sinitsyn, A. A., Hoffecker, J. F., Holliday, V. T., Popov, V. V., Lisitsyn, S. N., Forman, S. L., Levkovskaya, G. M., Pospelova, G. A., Kuz’Mina, I., and Burova, N. D. 2007. Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and implications for the dispersal of modern humans. Science 315(5809):223–226.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. M. 2000. The slow component of quartz optically stimulated luminescence. Radiation Measurements 32(3):233–246.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. and Arnold, L. 2006. Statistical modelling of single grain quartz De distributions and an assessment of procedures for estimating burial dose. Quaternary Science Reviews 25(19–20):2475–2502.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. M. and McKeever, S. W. S. 2009. The physical basis of luminescence dating. In: `Krbetschek, M. (ed.) Luminescence Dating: An Introduction and Handbook. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. M., Singarayer, J. S., Ward, S., and Stokes, S. 2003. Identification of partial resetting using De as a function of illumination time. Radiation Measurements 37(4–5):511–518.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. M., Smith, B. W., and Rhodes, E. J. 1997. Partial bleaching and the decay form characteristics of quartz OSL. Radiation Measurements 27(2):123–136.Google Scholar
Bateman, M. 2003. Investigations into the potential effects of pedoturbation on luminescence dating. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(10–13):1169–1176.Google Scholar
Bateman, M. D., Boulter, C. H., Carr, A. S., Frederick, C. D., Peter, D., and Wilder, M. 2007. Detecting post-depositional sediment disturbance in sandy deposits using optical luminescence. Quaternary Geochronology 2(1–4):57–64.Google Scholar
Bowler, J. M., Johnston, H., Olley, J. M., Prescott, J. R., Roberts, R. G., Shawcross, W., and Spooner, N. A. 2003. New ages for human occupation and climatic change at Lake Mungo, Australia. Nature 421(6925):837–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrough, S. L, Thomas, D. S. G., and Bailey, R. M. 2009. Mega-Lake in the Kalahari: A Late Pleistocene record of the Palaeolake Makgadikgadi system. Quaternary Science Reviews 28:1392–1411.Google Scholar
David, B., Roberts, R. G., Magee, J., Mialanes, J., Turney, C., Bird, M., White, C., Fifield, L. K., and Tibby, J. 2007. Sediment mixing at Nonda Rock: Investigations of stratigraphic integrity at an early archaeological site in northern Australia and implications for the human colonisation of the continent. Journal of Quaternary Science 22:449–479.Google Scholar
Duller, G. A. T. 2008. Single-grain optical dating of Quaternary sediments: Why aliquot size matters in luminescence dating. Boreas 37(4):589–612.Google Scholar
Daniels, F., Boyd, C. A., and Saunders, D. F. 1953. Thermoluminescence as a research tool. Science 117:343–349.Google Scholar
Feathers, J. K., Rhodes, E. J., Huot, S., and Mcavoy, J. M. 2006. Luminescence dating of sand deposits related to late Pleistocene human occupation at the Cactus Hill Site, Virginia, USA. Quaternary Geochronology 1(3):167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, R. F. and Green, P. F. 1990. Estimating the component ages in a finite mixture. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17:97–206.Google Scholar
Galbraith, R. F., Roberts, R. G., Laslett, G. M., Yoshida, H., and Olley, J. M. 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, Northern Australia: Part I, experimetal design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41(2):339–364.Google Scholar
Grine, F. E., Bailey, R. M., Harvati, K., Nathan, R. P., Morris, A. G., Henderson, G. M., Ribot, I., and Pike, A. W. 2007. Late Pleistocene human skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and modern human origins. Science 315(5809):226–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshilwood, C. S. 2002. Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa. Science 295(5558):1278–1280.Google Scholar
Huntley, D. J., Godfrey-Smith, D. I., and Thewalt, M. L. W. 1985. Optical dating of sediments. Nature, 313(5998):105–107.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, Y. V., Hall, S., Tite, M. S., Bailey, R., O’Malley, J. M., and Medvedev, V. E. 2001. Radiocarbon and thermoluminescence dating of the pottery from the early Neolithic site of Gasya (Russian Far East): Initial results. Quaternary Science Reviews 20:945–948.Google Scholar
Lauer, T., Krbetschek, M., Frechen, M., Tsukamoto, S., Hoselmann, C., and Weidenfeller, M. 2011. Infrared radiofluorescence (Ir-Rf) dating of middle pleistocene fluvial archives of the Heidelberg Basin (Southwest Germany). Geochronometria 38(1):23–33.Google Scholar
Madsen, A. T., Murray, A. S., Andersen, T. J., Pejrup, M., and Breuning-Madsen, H. 2005. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young estuarine sediments: a comparison with 210Pb and 137Cs dating. Marine Geology 214(1–3): 251–268.Google Scholar
McKeever, S. W. S. 1988. Thermoluminescence of Solids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKeever, S. W. S. and Chen, R. 1997. Luminescence models. Radiation Measurements 27(5):625–661.Google Scholar
Mercier, N. and Valladas, H. 2003. Reassessment of TL age estimates of burnt flints from the Paleolithic site of Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 45:401–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Roberts, R. G., Sutikna, T., Turney, C. S., Westaway, K. E., Rink, W. J., Zhao, J. X., van den Bergh, G. D., Due, R. A., and Hobbs, D. R. 2004. Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431(7012):1087–1091.Google Scholar
Murray, A. and Olley, J. M. 2002. Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz: A status review. Geochronometria 21:1–16.Google Scholar
Nathan, R. P., Thomas, P. J., Jain, M., Murray, A. S., and Rhodes, E. J. 2003. Environmental dose rate heterogeneity of beta radiation and its implications for luminescence dating: Monte Carlo modelling and experimental validation. Radiation Measurements 37:305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olley, J., Caitcheon, G., and Murray, A. 1998. The distribution of apparent dose as determined by Optically Stimulated Luminescence in small aliquots of fluvial quartz: implications for dating young sediments. Quaternary Science Reviews 17(11):1033–1040.Google Scholar
Olley, J. M., Murray, A., and Roberts, R. 1996. The effects of disequilibria in the uranium and thorium decay chains on burial dose rates in fluvial sediments. Quaternary Science Reviews 15(7):751–760.Google Scholar
Olley, J. M. and Pietsch, T. 2004. Optical dating of Holocene sediments from a variety of geomorphic settings using single grains of quartz. Geomorphology 60:337–358.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. G., Flannery, T. F., Ayliffe, L. K., Yoshida, H., Olley, J. M., Prideaux, G. J., Laslett, G. M., Baynes, A., Smith, M. A., Jones, R., and Smith, B. L. 2001. New ages for the last Australian megafauna: Continent-wide extinction about 46,000 years ago. Science 292(5523):1888–1892.Google Scholar
Roberts, R., Galbraith, R., and Olley, J. 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part II, results and implications. Archaeometry 41(2):365–395.Google Scholar
Singarayer, J. S., Bailey, R. M., Ward, S., and Stokes, S. 2005. Assessing the completeness of optical resetting of quartz OSL in the natural environment. Radiation Measurements 40(1):13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivia, D. S., Burbidge, C., Roberts, R. G., and Bailey, R. M. 2004. A Bayesian approach to the evaluation of equivalent doses in sediment mixtures for luminescence dating. AIP Conference Proceedings 735:305–311.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. 2004. Optical dating of aeolian dynamism on the West African Sahelian margin. Geomorphology 59(1–4):281–291.Google Scholar
Stokes, S., Bailey, R. M., Fedoroff, N., and O’Marah, K. E. 2004. Optical dating of aeolian dynamism on the West African Sahelian margin. Geomorphology 59(1–4):281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, K. J., Murray, A. S., and Jain, M. 2011. Stability of IRSL signals from sedimentary K-feldspar samples. Geochronometria 38(1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribolo, C., Mercier, N., Selo, M., Valladas, H., Joron, J. L., Reyss, J. L., Henshilwood, C., Sealy, J., and Yates, R., 2006. Tl dating of burnt lithics from Blombos Cave (South Africa): Further evidence for the antiquity of modern human behaviour. Archaeometry 48(2):341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Lu, Y., and Wintle, A. 2006. Recuperated OSL dating of fine-grained quartz in Chinese loess. Quaternary Geochronology 1(2):89–100.Google Scholar
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., and Hallmark, C. T. 2011. The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331(6024):1599–1603.Google Scholar
Wintle, A. 2008. Luminescence dating: Where it has been and where it is going. Boreas 37:471–482.Google Scholar
Wintle, A. and Murray, A. 2006. A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiation Measurements 41(4):369–391.Google Scholar
Yoshida, H., Roberts, R. G., Olley, J. M., Laslett, G. M., and Galbraith, R. F. 2000. Extending the age range of optical dating using single “supergrains” of quartz. Radiation Measurements 32:439–446.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×