Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- PREFACE
- LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
- INVITED PAPERS
- MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMY: HIGHLIGHTS AND PROBLEMS
- ARCHAEOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL VIEW
- THE STATISTICAL APPROACH
- STATISTICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE ASTRONOMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF STANDING STONES WITH A SECTION ON THE SOLAR CALENDAR
- MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMICAL SIGHTLINES: CURRENT REASSESSMENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- ASPECTS OF THE ARCHAEOASTRONOMY OF STONEHENGE
- IMPLICATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGY
- PI IN THE SKY
- CONTRIBUTED PAPERS
- INVITED PAPER
- INDEX
MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMICAL SIGHTLINES: CURRENT REASSESSMENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- PREFACE
- LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
- INVITED PAPERS
- MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMY: HIGHLIGHTS AND PROBLEMS
- ARCHAEOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL VIEW
- THE STATISTICAL APPROACH
- STATISTICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE ASTRONOMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF STANDING STONES WITH A SECTION ON THE SOLAR CALENDAR
- MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMICAL SIGHTLINES: CURRENT REASSESSMENT AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- ASPECTS OF THE ARCHAEOASTRONOMY OF STONEHENGE
- IMPLICATIONS FOR ARCHAEOLOGY
- PI IN THE SKY
- CONTRIBUTED PAPERS
- INVITED PAPER
- INDEX
Summary
Abstract. A general account and progress report is presented concerning the aims of, and conclusions drawn from, two extensive seasons of fieldwork on Scottish megalithic sites. Topics discussed fall into three main categories: reassessments of existing work by A. Thom & A.S. Thom; suggestions for methodological improvements; and fresh site investigations carried out according to a more explicit methodology. It is concluded that the case in favour of high precision astronomical sightlines, as a primary function of many sites, is unproven on the basis of the evidence currently available. The suggestion is made that future work in British archaeoastronomy should concentrate on rougher astronomical alignments and indications, regarding them as merely one of any number of factors that might have given rise to any particular structure orientation. It is also recommended that more attention should be focussed upon groups of sites which are demonstrably similar archaeologically, where marked orientation trends are evident at the outset, rather than upon archaeologically somewhat diverse collections of sites, which has often been the case up to the present.
INTRODUCTION
This paper consists of a general progress report rather than a presentation of results: various detailed accounts have been and are being published elsewhere (Ruggles 1981, 1982, 1983). It is written upon the completion of a 31/2;-month continuous period of surveying work in Scotland during May – August 1981, before any processing of the raw field data has even begun.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Archaeoastronomy in the Old World , pp. 83 - 106Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1982
- 4
- Cited by