Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T07:59:12.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Predation and noise in communication networks of neotropical katydids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2010

Alexander B. Lang
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzen University, Graz, Austria
Ingeborg Teppner
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzen University, Graz, Austria
Manfred Hartbauer
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzen University, Graz, Austria
Heiner Römer
Affiliation:
Karl-Franzen University, Graz, Austria
P. K. McGregor
Affiliation:
Cornwall College, Newquay
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Intraspecific acoustic communication in grasshoppers or katydids appears to be a very simple and straight forward behaviour: one sex – usually the male – produces an acoustic signal, and the female, once perceiving and recognizing the signal as species specific, shows some kind of response, either an acoustic reply or a phonotactic movement to the male. However, the system is far from being that simple and involves more than just a sender and receiver. First, communication usually takes place in a physically complex environment, where sound signals are subject to attenuation and degradation, depending on the carrier frequencies, which are often in the high-sonic or ultrasonic range because of the small size of the sound radiating structures (Wiley & Richards, 1978; Michelsen, 1992). In addition, the physical conditions of the transmission channel for the sound may vary strongly during day or night and with weather conditions; consequently, the ability to detect and localize a signal undergoes strong variations. Second, insects often aggregate and communicate in areas rich in resources or at periods of the day or night favouring mate attraction. As a result of many signallers calling in close proximity, masking interference will take place at the site of receivers, depending on the spacing, as well as the kind and extent of signal timing. Since such favourable areas and times for signalling are similar for different species, heterospecific choruses may be formed with impressive sound pressure levels of biological background noise, which further complicates the detection of a signal (reviewed for katydids by Schatral (1990)).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×