Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T17:44:48.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Applications of Scanning Electron Microscopy in Geomicrobiology

from Part III - Imaging Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2019

Janice P. L. Kenney
Affiliation:
MacEwan University, Edmonton
Harish Veeramani
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa
Daniel S. Alessi
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access

Summary

From mineralized biofilms of ancient or “extreme” environments to the nth replicate of laboratory-based biofilm experiments, geomicrobiological samples containing microbes associated with primary minerals or secondary (biogenic) mineral precipitates are highly diverse. The foremost advantage of scanning electron microscopy for geomicrobiology is that it provides high-resolution micrographs of cells and biofilms in association with minerals. These micrographs provide visual evidence of biogeochemical processes, which helps to explain phenomena that occur in the natural environment or in the laboratory. In addition to high-resolution secondary electron or backscatter electron modes of imaging, scanning electron microscopes can be equipped with a range of microanalytical tools, thereby extending the breadth of analytical capacities. Analytical techniques such as energy dispersive spectroscopy and electron backscatter diffraction analysis characterize the chemical composition and crystallography of biofilms and (bio)minerals, respectively, down to the micrometer scale. In addition, a focused ion beam can be used for nanomachining samples to provide a view beneath the outer surface of a sample or can be used as a technique for preparing samples for transmission electron microscopy. To provide the reader with an overview of tools and techniques, this chapter will explain a number of widely used preparation techniques, including whole-mounts, petrographic thin sections, polished blocks, and focused ion beam milling. By using these techniques, various types of geomicrobiological materials will be examined and used to guide and develop the necessary skills for interpreting biogeochemical processes from structural and chemical information obtained through secondary electron and backscatter electron micrographs and associated microanalyses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Analytical Geomicrobiology
A Handbook of Instrumental Techniques
, pp. 148 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6.8 References

Australian Microscopy & Microanalysis Research Facility (AMMRF), MyScopeTM http://ammrf.org.au/myscope/Google Scholar
Beveridge, T.J., 1981. Ultrastructure, chemistry, and function of the bacterial wall. International Review of Cytology. 72, 229317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, D.F., Bagu, J. and Koegler, P., 1994, Comparison of hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), Peldri II, and critical point drying methods for scanning electron microscopy of biological specimens. Microscopy Research and Technique. 26, 489495.Google Scholar
Burne, R.V., Moore, L.S., Christy, A.G., et al., 2014, Stevensite in the modern thrombolites of Lake Clifton, Western Australia: A missing link in microbialite mineralisation? Geology. 42, 575587.Google Scholar
Campbell, S.G., Reith, F., Etschmann, B., et al., 2015, Surface transformation of platinum grains from Fifield, New South Wales, Australia. American Mineralogist. 100, 12361243.Google Scholar
Dohnalkova, A.C., Marshall, M.J., Arey, B.W., et al., 2011, Imaging hydrated microbial extracellular polymers: Comparative analysis by electron microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 77, 12541262.Google Scholar
Giammara, B.L. 1993. Microwave embedment for light and electron microscopy using epoxy resins, LR White and other polymers. Scanning. 15, 8387.Google Scholar
Hayat, M.A. 1959. Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological Applications. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
Karnovsky, M.J., 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology. 27, 137A138A.Google Scholar
Krember, A., Lippens, S., Bartunkova, S., et al., 2015, Developing 3D SEM in a broad biological context. Journal of Microscopy. 259, 8096.Google Scholar
Levett, A., Gagen, E., Shuster, J., et al., 2016, Evidence of biogeochemical processes in iron duricrust formation. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 71, 131142.Google Scholar
Migneault, I., Dartiguenave, C., Bertrand, M.J. and Waldron, K.C., 2004, Glutaraldehyde: Behaviour in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking. BioTechniques. 37, 790802.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K.E. and Albrechtsen, J., 1974, Glutaraldehyde: The influence of pH, temperature and buffering on the polymerisation rate. Histochemistry. 38, 1926.Google Scholar
Reith, F., Fairbrother, L., Nolze, G., et al., 2010, Nanoparticle factories: Biofilms hold the key to gold dispersion and nugget formation. Geology. 38, 843846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, D.D., Bensch, K. and Barrnett, R.J., 1962, Cytochemistry and electron microscopy: The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. Journal of Cell Biology. 17, 1958.Google Scholar
Shuster, J., Lengke, M., Márquez-Zavalía, M.F. and Southam, G., 2016, Floating gold grains and nanophase particles produced from the biogeochemical weathering of a gold-bearing ore. Economic Geology. 111, 14851494.Google Scholar
Walther, P. and Müller, M., 1999, Biological ultrastructure as revealed by high resolution cryo-SEM of block faces after cryo-sectioning. Journal of Microscopy. 196, 279287.Google Scholar
Westall, F., 1999, The nature of fossil bacteria: A guide to the search for extra-terrestrial life. Journal of Geophysical Research. 104, 1643716451.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×