Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-09T12:36:52.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The Return of the Regular Republicans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Paul D. Moreno
Affiliation:
Hillsdale College, Michigan
Get access

Summary

HARDING AND COOLIDGE

The return of the “regular” Republicans to full control of the federal government in 1921 slowed progressive reform, and many wartime programs were scaled back. The Republicans finally declared the war over in 1921, thus ending the basis for such legislation as the Lever Act. The Republicans enacted no peacetime Sedition Act, and President Harding pardoned most of those convicted under the wartime Act. Postal censorship had continued into 1921, but the new Postmaster General ended it and reaffirmed the principle of liberty. Congress reduced taxes and spending dramatically, though rates and revenues did not return to pre-war levels, and nobody seriously considered doing away with the income tax altogether. Similarly, the Federal Reserve Board remained in place. The Federal Trade Commission survived the decade, maintaining a progressive-Democratic majority until 1925. In reaction to its hostile report on the meatpackers, Congress gave power to regulate that industry to the Department of Agriculture in the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1922. The Supreme Court also reined in the commission, holding that it could not impose its own definition of “unfair methods of competition,” and allowing courts to review its factual findings. In 1925, with the appointment of the outspoken William E. Humphrey, Republicans won a majority on the five-man commission. It now began to restrain itself, particularly by ending the practice of “fishing expeditions” – sweeping investigations without a particular allegation of wrongdoing. Senate progressives were so dissatisfied that the commission had failed to expose a nefarious electric “power trust” in 1927 that they began an investigation of their own. Several progressives called for the repeal of the FTC Act.

Type
Chapter
Information
The American State from the Civil War to the New Deal
The Twilight of Constitutionalism and the Triumph of Progressivism
, pp. 177 - 188
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Scheiber, Harry N., The Wilson Administration and Civil Liberties, 1917–21 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1960), 32Google Scholar
McFarland, Carl, Judicial Control of the Federal Trade Commission and the Interstate Commerce Commission, 1920–30 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933Google Scholar
Jaenicke, Walter, “Herbert Croly, Progressive Ideology, and the FTC Act,” Political Science Quarterly 93 (1978), 490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. Cullom, “The Transformation of the Federal Trade Commission, 1914–29,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 49 (1962), 437–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Official Report of the Proceedings of the Seventeenth Republican National Convention (New York: Tenny, 1920), 258, 263
Trani, Eugene P. and Wilson, David L., The Presidency of Warren G. Harding (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1977), 190Google Scholar
Sobel, Robert, Coolidge: An American Enigma (Washington: Regnery, 1998), 62–79;Google Scholar
McCoy, Donald R., Calvin Coolidge: The Quiet President (New York: Macmillan, 1967), 49, 92–96Google Scholar
O’Neill, Johnathan, “Constitutional Maintenance and Religious Sensibility in the 1920s: Rethinking the Constitutionalist Response to Progressivism,” Journal of Church and State 51 (2009), 24–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Press Under a Free Government,” 17 Jan. 1925, in Foundations of the Republic: Speeches and Essays (New York: Scribner’s, 1926), 188, 190
Keller, Morton, In Defense of Yesterday: James M. Beck and the Politics of Conservatism, 1861–1936 (New York: Coward-McCann, 1958), 159Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael, A Machine that Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture (New York: St. Martin’s, 1994), 224–32, 249Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Maxwell, Peaceful Revolution: Constitutional Change and American Culture from Progressivism to the New Deal (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 76Google Scholar
Powell, , “Constitutional Metaphors,” New Republic, 11 Feb. 1925, pp. 314–15
Bagley, William C., “Federal Aid for Public Schools,” National Education Association Proceedings 59 (1921), 618–23Google Scholar
Sterling, Thomas, “Constitutional and Political Significance of Federal Legislation on Education,” University of Illinois Bulletin 19 (1921), 89–97Google Scholar
Dumenil, Lynn, “‘The Insatiable Maw of Bureaucracy’: Antistatism and Education Reform in the 1920s,” Journal of American History 77 (1990), 499–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Jane Perry, The Rise of a New Federalism: Federal-State Cooperation in the United States (New York: Russell & Russell, 1965 [1938]), 142, 154, 203Google Scholar
Oakes, Eugene, “The Federal Offset and the American Death Tax System,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 54 (1940), 566–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chepaitis, Joseph B., “Federal Social Welfare Progressivism in the 1920s,” Social Service Review 46 (1972), 219;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J. Stanley, “The Sheppard-Towner Act: Progressivism in the 1920s,” Journal of American History 55 (1969), 778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paschal, Joel Francis, Mr. Justice Sutherland: A Man Against the State (New York: Greenwood, 1969 [1951]), 149;Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry, “The Hughes Court and Constitutional Consultation,” Journal of Supreme Court History 1 (1998), 91Google Scholar
Warren, Charles, Congress as Santa Claus, or, National Donations and the General Welfare Clause (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1932), 140Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S., Twilight of the Supreme Court (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1934), 176Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965);Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., “The Original Constitution and Its Decline: A Public Choice Perspective,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 21 (1997), 201;Google Scholar
Greve, Michael, The Upside-Down Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2012), 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shideler, James H., “‘Flappers and Philosophers,’ and Farmers: Rural-Urban Tensions of the Twenties,” Agricultural History 47 (1973), 296Google Scholar
Keller, Morton, Regulating a New Economy: Public Policy and Economic Change in America, 1900–33 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 154;Google Scholar
Hicks, John D., Republican Ascendancy, 1921–33 (New York: Harper, 1960), 198–200;Google Scholar
Fite, Gilbert C., “The McNary-Haugen Episode and the Triple-A,” Journal of Farm Economics 42 (1960), 1084–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, John D., “The McNary-Haugen Movement,” American Economic Review 18 (1928), 418Google Scholar
Fite, , “The Agricultural Issue and the Presidential Campaign of 1928,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 37 (1951), 653–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wengert, Norman, “Antecedents of TVA: The Legislative History of Muscle Shoals,” Agricultural History 26 (1952), 141–47Google Scholar
Hubbard, Preston J., Origins of the T.V.A.: The Muscle Shoals Controversy, 1920–32 (New York: Norton, 1968), 234, 266Google Scholar
Cushman, Robert E., “The National Police Power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution,” Minnesota Law Review 3 (1919), 289Google Scholar
Cushman, Robert E., “The Social and Economic Interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Michigan Law Review 20 (1922), 757, 762–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Charles M., “Due Process of Law – To-Day,” Harvard Law Review 32 (1919), 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Joan G., “The Jurisprudence of Equality: The Women’s Minimum Wage, the First Equal Rights Amendment, and Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 1905–1923,” Journal of American History 78 (1991), 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, Edwin E., “‘Yellow Dog’ Contracts,” Wisconsin Law Review 6 (1930), 26Google Scholar
Bernstein, David E., “Philip Sober Controlling Philip Drunk: Buchanan v. Warley in Historical Perspective,” Vanderbilt Law Review 51 (1998), 865Google Scholar
Carey, Homer F. and Oliphant, Herman, “The Present Status of the Hitchman Case,” Columbia Law Review 29 (1929), 444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Walter, Federal Centralization: A Study and Criticism of the Expanding Scope of Congressional Legislation (New York: Harcourt, 1923), 136
Wood, Stephen B., Constitutional Politics in the Progressive Era: Child Labor and the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), 159Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., “Congress Before the Lochner Court,” Boston University Law Review 85 (2005), 849Google Scholar
Fite, Katherine B. and Rubinstein, Louis Baruch, “Curbing the Supreme Court: State Experiences and Federal Proposals,” Michigan Law Review 35 (1937), 764–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Children and Youth in America: A Documentary History, ed. Bremner, Robert H., 3 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971), III: 608
Kauffman, Bill, “The Child Labor Amendment of the 1920s,” Journal of Libertarian Studies 10 (1992), 139–69Google Scholar
Sherman, Richard B., “The Rejection of the Child Labor Amendment,” Mid-America 45 (1963), 3–17;Google Scholar
Kyvig, Donald E., Explicit and Authentic Acts: Amending the U.S. Constitution, 1776–1995 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996), 253–61Google Scholar
McBain, Howard Lee, The Living Constitution: A Consideration of the Realities and Legends of Our Fundamental Law (New York: Macmillan, 1927), 161Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×