Advisory Council on California Indian Policy, 1997. The ACCIP Recognition Report: Equal Justice for California. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Alfred, Taiaiake, 1999. Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alfred, Taiaiake, 1999. “Why Play the White Man's Game?” Wind Speaker, Vol. 17, No. 4, October 1, 4.Google Scholar

Anaya, James S., 1990. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ashley, Jeffrey S. and Hubbard, Secody J., 2004. Negotiated Sovereignty: Working to Improve Tribal-State Relations. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Bacher, Dan, 2010. Fish and Game Commission Refuses to Recognize Tribal Gathering Rights at Meeting in Stockton. June 29. www.klamathjustice.blogspot.com.Google Scholar

Bacher, Dan, 2010. Schwarzenegger's MLPA Initiative: A Question of Bad Public Policy. August 9. California Progress Report. www.californiaprogressreport.com.Google Scholar

Barker, Joanne, 2011. Native Acts: Law Recognition, and Cultural Authenticity. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bays, Brad A. and Fouberg, Erin Hogan, eds., 2002. The Tribes and the States: Geographies of Intergovernmental Interaction. Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bruyneel, Kevin, 2007. The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.-Indigenous Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Burns, Nancy, 1994. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

California Department of Fish and Game, 2012. Notice to Tribes and Tribal Communities: New and Revised Marine Protected Areas in Effect in Northern California. December 19. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=59652&inline=true.Google Scholar

Cattelino, Jessica R., 2008. High Stakes: Florida Seminole Gaming and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Center for Responsive Politics, 2014. Influence and Lobbying. Gaming. www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=N07Google Scholar

Cobb, Daniel and Fowler, Loretta, eds., 2007. Beyond Red Power: American Indian Politics and Activism since 1900. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research.Google Scholar

Cohen, Felix S., 1942. Handbook of Federal Indian Law. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Cordero, Roberta Reyes, 2008. Application to South Coast Regional Stakeholder Group. July 16. www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/scrsg/cordero.pdf.Google Scholar

Cornell, Steven, 1988. The Return of the Native: American Indian Political Resurgence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corntassel, Jeffrey and Witmer, Richard, 2008. Forced Federalism: Contemporary Challenges to Indigenous Nationhood. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

County News, 2011. “Role Reversal: Indian Tribes Help Other Governments,” June 20, Vol. 43, No. 12, 1.Google Scholar

David, Wilkins, 2000. “An Inquiry into Indigenous Political Participation: Implications for Tribal Sovereignty,” Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy (1999–2000), Vol. 9, 732–51.Google Scholar

Deloria, Vine Jr., 1988. Custer Died for Your Sins. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Duffy, Diane, 1997. “An Attitudinal Study of Native American Patriotism,” Unpublished Paper Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychologists, Krakow, Poland, July 22.Google Scholar

Evans, Laura E., 2011. Power from Powerlessness: Tribal Governments, Institutional Niches, and American Federalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Matthew L. M., 2007. “Retiring the Deadliest Enemies model of Tribal-State Relations,” 43 Tulsa L. Rev., Vol. 73, 74–88.Google Scholar

Frickey, Philip P., 1999. “A Common Law for Our Age of Colonialism: The Judicial Divestiture of Indian Tribal Authority over Nonmembers,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 109, No. 1, 1–85.Google Scholar

Friends Committee on National Legislation, 2012. FY2012 Funding for Native American Programs. January 23. http://fcnl.org/issues/nativeam/fy2012_funding/Google Scholar

Galanda, Gabriel S., 2010. “The Federal Indian Consultation Right: A Frontline Defense against Tribal Sovereignty Incursion,” The Federal Indian Lawyer, Fall. www.fedbar.org/Image-Library/Sections-and-Divisions/Indian/Federal-Indian-Consultation-Right.pdf.Google Scholar

Getches, David H. 1993. “Negotiated Sovereignty: Intergovernmental Agreements with American Indian Tribes as Models for Expanding Self-Government,” Review of Constitutional Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 120–70.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Carole and Champagne, Duane, 2006. “Is Public Law 280 Fit for the Twenty-First Century? Some Data at Last,” Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 38, 697.Google Scholar

Graham, Lorie, 2003. “Securing Sovereignty through Agreement,” New England Law Review, Vol. 37, 523.Google Scholar

Gussac, Mervin “Louie.” Application for Nomination to the MLPA BlueRibbon Task Force. Undated. www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/pdfs/scrsg/guassac.pdf.Google Scholar

Handbook State–Tribal Relations, Prepared by the Commission on State-Tribal Relations, 1984. Albuquerque, NM: American Indian Law Center, Inc.Google Scholar

Heizer, Robert F., ed., 1972. The Eighteen Unratified Treaties of 1851–52 between the California Indians and the United States Government, Berkeley, CA: University of California Archaeological Research Facility.Google Scholar

Hicks, Michell, Principal Chief of the Eastern Band of Cherokee, 2004. Testimony regarding H.R. 898, Legislation that Would Congressionally Acknowledge the Lumbees as an Indian Tribe. April 1.Google Scholar

Hoopa Valley Transportation Plan, 1996–2001.Google Scholar

Humboldt Advocate Online, 2006. Hoopa Denied Membership in HCAOG. Elaine Weinreb. January 11.Google Scholar

Indian Country Today, 2016. A Few on the Election and What Donald Trump Means for Indian Country. Gyasi Ross. November 16.Google Scholar

Indian Country Today, 2016. Deborah Parker Named to Democrat's Platform Committee. Mark Trahant, May 27.Google Scholar

Indian Country Today, 2010. House Falls Short of Unqualified UN Declaration Adoption: Tribal Leaders Call for Full, Unconditional Adoption. Gale Corey Toensing, July 30.Google Scholar

Indians.com, 2016. Indian Country Shares Spotlight at Democratic National Convention. July 27.Google Scholar

Indianz.com, 2016. Native American Council Meets at Democratic National Convention. July 25.Google Scholar

Dimitrios, Karmis and Wayne, Norman, eds., 2005. Theories of Federalism: A Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kessler-Mata, Kouslaa, 2011. “Empowerment through Incorporation? The Trouble with Agreement Making and Tribal Sovereignty,” Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 47, 599.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will, 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laurence, Robert, 1988. “Learning to Live with the Plenary Power of Congress over the Indian Nations: An Essay in Reaction to Professor Williams' Algebra,” Arizona Law Review, Vol. 30, 413.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T., 2002. “Indians in Madison's Constitutional Order,” in James Madison and the Future of Limited Government, Samples, John, ed., Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T., 2004. “Indigenous Self-Government,” in NOMOS XLV: Secession and Self-Determination, Macedo, Stephen and Buchanan, Allen, eds., American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T., 2008a. “Three Perversities of Indian Law,” Texas Review of Law and Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 329–68.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T., 2008b. “Self-Determination, Non-Domination, and Federalism,” Hypatia, Vol. 23, No. 3, 60–78.Google Scholar

Levy, Jacob T., n.d. “Indigenous Rights, Modern Political Concepts, and the State,” working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1904671.Google Scholar

Luna, Eileen M., 2000. “Mobilizing the Unrepresented: Indian Voting Patterns and the Implications for Tribal Sovereignty,” WicazoSa Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, Spring, 91–115.Google Scholar

Mason, W. Dale, 1998. “Tribes and States: A New Era in Intergovernmental Affairs,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 28, No. 1, Winter, 111–30.Google Scholar

McCloskey, Robert, 2000. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McCool, Daniel, Olson, Susan M., and Robinson, Jennifer L., 2007. Native Vote: American Indians, the Voting Rights Act, and the Right to Vote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McDonald, Laughlin, 2010. American Indians and the Fight for Equal Voting Rights. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Bruce, 1992. “Women and Politics: Comparative Evidence from the Northwest Coast,” Ethnology, Vol. 31, No. 4, October, 61–73.Google Scholar

Mohawk, John, 1983. Indian Nations, the United States and Citizenship. Olympia, WA: Center for World Indigenous Studies.Google Scholar

Monette, Richard, 2008. “100 Years after Winters: The Immovable Object of Tribes’ Reserved Water Meets the Irresistible Force of State's reserved Rights under the Equal Footing Doctrine,” working paper, May 9. http://law.wisc.edu/m/5yzmx/monette_article_for_9_may_08.rtf.Google Scholar

Natinixwe: The Hoopa People, 2007. Hoopa Continues to Get Scraps from HCAOG Table. Shelly Baldy. Vol. 13, No. 5, January 31.Google Scholar

National Congress of American Indians, 2014. Membership and Dues. www.ncai.org/get-involved/become-a-member.Google Scholar

Notes, 1984. “Rethinking the Trust Doctrine in Federal Indian Law,” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, 422–40.Google Scholar

Notes, 2003. “International Law as an Interpretive Force in Federal Indian Law,” Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 6, 1751–73.Google Scholar

O'Brien, Sharon, 1989. American Indian Tribal Governments, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Peters, Kurt and Straus, Terry, eds., 2009. Visions and Voices: American Indian Activism and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago, IL: Albatross Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 2009. “Law and Liberty,” Working Paper Series, Princeton University, Paper No. 08-010, 2. Paper also appears in Besson, Samantha and Marti, Jose Luis, eds., Law and Republicanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 2010. “Legitimate International Institutions: A Neo-Republican Perspective,” in The Philosophy of International Law, Tasioulas, John and Besson, Samatha, eds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–62.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 2015. “Republican Liberty: Three Axioms, Four Theorems,” Princeton Law and Public Affairs, Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 07-004, dated 17 September 2015. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=985236 (May 27, 2016).Google Scholar

Pevar, Stephen, 2009. “The Federal–Tribal Trust Relationship: Its Origin, Nature, and Scope,” CA Water Plan Update, Vol. 4.Google Scholar

Pommersheim, Frank, 1995. Braid of Feathers: American Indian Law and Contemporary Tribal Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pommersheim, Frank, 2003. “Is There a (Little or Not so Little) Constitutional Crisis Developing in Indian Law?: A Brief Essay,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 5, 271, 285.Google Scholar

Pommersheim, Frank, 2009. Broken Landscape: Indians, Indian Tribes, and the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, Robert O., 1999. “The Demise of the Ongwehoweh and the Rise of the Native Americans: Redressing the Genocidal Act of Forcing American Citizenship upon Indigenous Peoples,” Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal, Vol. 15, 107–83.Google Scholar

Porter, Robert Odawi, 2002. “Two Kinds of Indians, Two Kinds of Indian Nation Sovereignty: A Surreply to Professor LaVelle,” Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 11, Spring, 629.Google Scholar

Porter, Robert Odawi, 2004. “The Inapplicability of American Law to the Indian Nations,” Iowa Law Review, Vol. 89, 1595, 1598–9.Google Scholar

Prucha, Francis Paul, 1994. American Indian Treaties: The History of a Political Anomaly. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Requejo, Ferran, 2005. “Federalism in Plurinational Societies: Rethinking the Ties Between Catalonia, Spain, and the European Union,” in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Karmis, Dimitrios and Norman, Wayne, eds., New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 311–20.Google Scholar

Rosier, Paul C., 2012. Serving Their Country: American Indian Politics and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosser, Ezra, 2006. “Caution, Cooperative Agreements, and the Actual State of Things: A Reply to Professor Fletcher,” Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 42, 57–74.Google Scholar

Rubin, Edward L. and Feeley, Malcolm M., 2008. “Federalism and Interpretation,” In Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 38, No. 2, Spring, 167–91.Google Scholar

Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 2004. Lawmakers Use Public Office to Help Private Interest: State's Rules on Conflicts of Interest Fuzzy at Best. Angela Galloway, January 9.Google Scholar

The Seattle Times, 2007. “More Natives Step into Legislature.” Lynda V. Mapes, January 9.Google Scholar

Simpson, Audra, 2014. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Skibine, Alex Tallchief, 2006. “Redefining the Status of Indian Tribes within ‘Our Federalism’: Beyond the Dependency Paradigm,” Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 38, 667.Google Scholar

Smith, Wesley G. and Taggart, William A., 2010. “Tribal-State Gaming Compacts 20 Years after Passage of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act,” Gaming Law Review and Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 85–90.Google Scholar

Steinman, Erich, 2004. “American Federalism and Intergovernmental Innovation in State-Tribal Relations,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 34, No. 2, Spring, 95–114.Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred, 2005. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model,” in Theories of Federalism: A Reader, Karmis, Dimitrios and Norman, Wayne, eds., New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Stubben, Jerry D., 2006. Native Americans and Political Participation: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sydney, 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

The Huffington Post Online, 2015. Donald Was a Dirtbag to Native Americans. Julian Brave Noisecat. August 12.Google Scholar

The Seattle Times, 2007. More Natives Step into Legislature. Lynda V. Mapes. January 9.Google Scholar

The StoryTeller: When Indians Vote American Wins, 2008. Indians Make History at DNC Convention. Ed. Kalyn Free. December.Google Scholar

The Times-Standard, 2007. Looking for a Level Playing Field. Leo Sears. February 16.Google Scholar

The Times-Standard, 2007. Hoopa Tribe Deciding Next Step in Agency Membership Quest. Dave Rosso. April 04.Google Scholar

Trahant Reports, 2016. Native American Republicans Make Their Case to Voters. Mark Trahant. August 14.Google Scholar

Trahant Reports, 2017. A President Unlike Any since, Well, Andrew Jackson. Mark Trahant. January 01.Google Scholar

Tribal Consultation: Memorandum for the Head of Executive Departments and Agencies, Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 215, Monday, November 9, 2009. www.bia.gov/cs/groups/public/documents/text/idc002694.pdf.Google Scholar

Tully, James, 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, 2007. House Resolution 2824: To sever United States’ government relations with the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma until such time as the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma restores full tribal citizenship to the Cherokee Freedmen disenfranchised in the March 3, 2007, Cherokee Nation vote and fulfills all its treaty obligations with the Government of the United States, and for other purposes.Google Scholar

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 2003. A Quiet Crisis: Federal Funding and Unmet Needs in Indian Country.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Interior. Federal Funding for Native American Programs, Office of Budget, Department of Interior: www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.htmlGoogle Scholar

U.S. Department of State, Undated. Announcement of U.S. Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: www.state.gov/s/tribalconsultation/declaration/Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy and Williams, Melissa, eds., 1998. NOMOS XLVIII: Toleration and Its Limits. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Ward, Mary, 2004. “The Politics of Abundance: Toward a Future of Tribal-State Relations,” Oregon Law Review, Vol. 83, 1331.Google Scholar

Washburn, Kevin K., 2006. “Tribal Self-Determination at the Crossroads,” Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 38, 777.Google Scholar

Wildenthal, Bryan H., 2003. Native American Sovereignty on Trial. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert A. Jr., 1986. “The Algebra of Federal Indian Law: The Hard Trail of Decolonizing and Americanizing the White Man's Indian Jurisprudence,” Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 219–99.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert A. Jr., 1988. “Learning Not to Live with Eurocentric Myopia: A Reply to Professor Laurence's Learning to Live with the Plenary Power of Congress over the Indian Nations,” Arizona Law Review, Vol. 30, 439–57.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E., 1994. “The U.S. Supreme Court's Explication of ‘Federal Plenary Power:’ An Analysis of Case Law Affecting Tribal Sovereignty, 1886–1914.” American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, Summer, 349–68.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E., 1997. American Indian Sovereignty and the U.S. Supreme Court: The Masking of Justice. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E., “An Inquiry into Indigenous Political Participation: Implications for Tribal Sovereignty,” 9 Kan J.L. and Pub. Pol. (1999–2000), 732–51.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E., 2003. “A Constitutional Confession: The Permanent if Malleable Status of Indigenous Nations,” New England Law Review, Vol. 37.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E. and Stark, Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik, 2011. American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Washington, DC: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David E. and Lomawaima, Tsianina K. 2001. Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Charles F., 1987. American Indians, Time, and the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Wortman, Dave, 2001. “Suburban Sprawl Hits Tribal Land,” High Country News, March 12.Google Scholar

Wunder, John R., 1994. “Retained by the People”: A History of American Indians and the Bill of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar