Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: November 2015

10 - The Costs of Party Reform: Two States’ Experiences

from PART III - POLARIZATION IN THE STATES

Summary

Several states have attempted to rein in or eliminate political parties through a series of reforms. This chapter details two such efforts: campaign finance reform in Colorado and cross-filing in California. While these reforms met with mixed success in reining in partisanship, they imposed other costs on the political system that generally worked against reformers’ stated goals.

• Coloradoe's campaign finance reform in 2002, which sharply limited parties’ donations and expenditures, did not curtail partisanship in the state, while it did make campaign contributions much more difficult to trace.

• Cross-filing in California (1913–59) did have the effect of limiting partisanship in the statehouse, but it also created a corrupt environment dominated by lobbyists and business interests.

• Strong party systems, while frustrating, tend to allow for greater accountability in elections.

• Our political system might be better served by seeking to adapt institutions to strong parties, rather than trying to conform parties to existing institutions.

American political discourse is suddenly filled with suggestions for political reform. A vast range of political activists, journalists, and politicians have reacted to increased concerns about party polarization and legislative gridlock in the natione's capital by proposing ideas that would do anything from marginally mitigating partisanship to eliminating parties altogether. Indeed, the very conference that spawned this edited volume began with an address by a university administrator describing polarization as a “tumor” and calling upon scholars to develop the T-cell therapy that would help beat back the disease. More recently, a U.S. Senator called for the national adoption of Californiae's “top-two” primary system to encourage the election of more moderates (Schumer 2014), while the Bipartisan Policy Center released a report calling for, in part, more open primaries and increased participation in those contests (Bipartisan Policy Center 2014). Other reformers call for instant runoff voting, the abolition of the Electoral College, proportional voting, redistricting reform, campaign finance reform, and so forth, all in the name of reducing parties’ influence on our political system.

In an upcoming book (Masket 2016), I examine several reforms enacted during the past century designed to rein in or eliminate parties at the level of an American state. I find that not only do these reforms tend to fail to curb the role of parties in the political system, but they usually inadvertently inflict harm on democracy in the process. This chapter has a similar focus.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Ames, Michele. 2002. “‘Big Money’ Brouhaha No Laughing Matter – Both Sides Grit Teeth over Amendment on Campaign Finance.” Rocky Mountain News (CO), 18A.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 136–159.
Bender, Michael C. 2002. “Campaign-Finance Reform ‘Answer to What Ails Politics.’” Daily Sentinel (Grand Junction, CO), September 22.
Bipartisan Policy Center. 2014. Governing in a Polarized America: A Bipartisan Blueprint to Strengthen Our Democracy. Retrieved from http://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/files/BPC%20CPR%20Governing%20in%20a%20Polarized%20America.pdf.
Boyarsky, Bill. 2008. Big Daddy: Jesse Unruh and the Art of Power Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buchanan, William. 1963. Legislative Partisanship: The Deviant Case of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buckley, V. Valeo. 1976.424 U.S. 1 Buckley v. Valeo.
Cannon, Lou. 1969. Ronnie and Jesse: A Political Odyssey. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Crummy, Karen E. 2012. “Spending by Super Pacs in Colorado Is the Dominion of Democrats.” Denver Post, March 10.
Fish, Sandra. 2002. “Amendment 27 Would Change Funding Landscape – Parties, Candidates Would Have Millions Less If Limits Were in Effect This Year.” Daily Camera (Boulder, CO), A2.
Hicke, Carole. 1987. Oral History Interview with Gordon A. Fleury. Sacramento: California State Archives.
Masket, Seth E. 2016. The Inevitable Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Masket, Seth. 2014. “Mitigating Extreme Partisanship in an Era of Networked Parties: An Examination of Various Reform Strategies.” Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/03/20-masket/masket_mitigating-extreme-partisanship-in-an-era-of-networked-parties.pdf.
Masket, Seth. 2013. “Picking a State? The Stakes Are Getting Higher.” Al Jazeera America, November 27.
Masket, Seth. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Miller, Michael. 2013. Subsidizing Democracy: How Public Funding Changes Elections, and How It Can Work in the Future. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Mowry, George Edwin. 1951. The California Progressives. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
Nagourney, Adam. 2013. “California Sees Gridlock Ease in Governing.” New York Times, October 19, A1.
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reinier, Jacqueline S., ed. 1987. Oral History Interview with Hon. Lloyd W. Lowrey. Sacramento: California State Archives.
Rusco, Elmer Ritter. 1961. “Machine Politics, California Model: Arthur H. Samish and the Alcoholic Beverage Industry.” Ph.D. diss., University of California.
Samish, Arthur H. 1971. The Secret Boss of California: The Life and High Times of Art Samish. New York: Crown Publishers.
Schaffner, Brian F., Streb, Matthew, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2001. “Teams without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 7–30.
Schumer, Charles E. 2014. “End Partisan Primaries, Save America.” New York Times, July 22, A21.
Shaw, Stanford C. 1988. Oral History Interview with Stanford C. Shaw. Sacramento: California State Archives.
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2013. “Individual State Legislator Shor-McCarty Ideology Data.” Retrieved from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/26805.
Transparency International. 2013. Global Corruption Barometer 2013: Report. Retrieved fromhttp://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/report.
Yglesias, Matthew. 2009. “Gerrymandering and Polarization.” Thinkprogress. Retrieved from http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2009/10/01/194566/gerrymandering-and-polarization/.