Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:35:55.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Regulations and Public Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Christian Seigneur
Christian Seigneur
Affiliation:
École des Ponts Paris Tech
Get access

Summary

Improving air quality by decreasing air pollutant concentration levels requires promulgating regulations that protect public health, ecosystems, the agriculture, buildings, and atmospheric visibility. Then, public policies must be implemented to design, apply, and evaluate emission control strategies to meet the regulatory standards. In this chapter, the general approach for the development of regulations to protect public health via ambient air quality standards is described first. These regulations and the implementation of the associated public policies differ among countries. Those used in the United States and in France are presented here comparatively to illustrate slightly different approaches. Finally, approaches used at the national and international levels to regulate atmospheric deposition and global atmospheric issues (i.e., destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer and climate change) are presented.

Type
Chapter
Information
Air Pollution
Concepts, Theory, and Applications
 , pp. 327 - 345
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airparif, 2016. “Rapports sur la qualité de l’air en Île-de-France,” 2011 to 2015, available at: www.airparif.asso.fr/telechargement/telechargement-statistique.Google Scholar
Appel, K.W., Napelenok, S.L., Foley, K.M. et al., 2017. Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1703–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federal Register, Vol. 75, N° 26, Section II, 9 February 2010, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 75, N° 119, Section II, 22 June 2010, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 76, N° 169, Section II, 31 August 2011, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 78, N° 10, Section III, 15 January 2013, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 78, N° 10, Section IV, 15 January 2013, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 79, N° 242, Section II, 17 December 2014, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Federal Register, Vol. 80, N° 2, Section II, 5 January 2015, www.federalregister.gov.Google Scholar
Godowitch, J.M., Gilliland, A.B., Draxler, R.R., and Rao, S.T., 2008. Modeling assessment of point source NOx emission reductions on ozone air quality in the eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 42, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menut, L., Bessagnet, B., Khvorostyanov, D. et al., 2014. CHIMERE 2013: A model for regional atmospheric composition modeling, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 981–1028.Google Scholar
NADP, 2017. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NRSP-3), NADP Program Office, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Ohshita, S.B. and Seigneur, C., 1993. Risk and technology in air toxics control: California and the Clean Air Act amendments, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 43, 723–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartelet, K., Couvidat, F., Roustan, Y., and Seigneur, C., 2012. Impact of biogenic emissions on air quality over Europe and North America, Atmos. Environ., 53, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCAMQD, 2017. “Historical data by year,” www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California.Google Scholar
Vijayaraghavan, K., Lindhjem, C., DenBleyker, A., Nopmongcol, U., Grant, J., Tai, E., and Yarwood, G., 2012. Effects of light duty gasoline vehicle emission standards in the United States on ozone and particulate matter, Atmos. Environ., 60, 109–120.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×