Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:05:00.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Creating and Implementing a Curriculum for Reproductive and Sexual Health Training Programs

from Section III - Family Planning Curricular Design & Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2021

Uta Landy
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Philip D Darney
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Jody Steinauer
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

A curriculum in reproductive and sexual health (SRH) serves as the foundation on which the learner builds and integrates knowledge in the family planning field.In the United States, accreditation organizations at all levels of medical education require written curricula with clearly defined educational objectives, methods, and evaluations to address core competencies in health care delivery. In this chapter, the authors describe a rigorous framework for developing a curriculum in sexual and reproductive health, beginning with conducing a general and targeted needs assessment, defining goals and objectives, outlining educational strategies, implementing the curriculum and collecting evaluation and feedback. Readers will have the tools they need to create a SRH curriculum in their own institution.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advancing Women's Health Through Medical Education
A Systems Approach in Family Planning and Abortion
, pp. 183 - 189
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hauer, KE, Boscardin, C, Brenner, JM, van Schaik, SM, Papp, KK. Twelve tips for assessing medical knowledge with open-ended questions: designing constructed response examinations in medical education. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):880885. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1629404.Google Scholar
Kern, D. Overview: a six-step approach to curriculum development. In Thomas, P, Kern, DE, Hughes, MT, Chen, BY (Eds.), Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016:59.Google Scholar
Interstate Renewable Energy Council. Basic guidelines for training curriculum: key components of a curriculum. https://irecusa.org/workforce-education/training-resources/best-practices-the-series/best-practices-2-curriculum-program-development/key-components-of-a-curriculum/. Accessed July 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Taylor David, CM, Hamdy, Hossan. Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):e1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153Google Scholar
Thomas, P, Abras, C. Step 4: educational strategies. In Thomas, P, Kern, DE, Hughes, MT, Chen, BY (Eds.), Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016:5783.Google Scholar
Council of Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology – American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CREOG-ACOG). Educational Objectives: Core Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11th ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2016.Google Scholar
Sweet, LR, Palazzi, DL. Application of Kern’s six-step approach to curriculum development by global health residents. Educ Health (Abingdon)2015 May–Aug;28(2):138141. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.170124Google Scholar
Hermsen, JL, Mokadam, NA, Verrier, ED. Flipping the classroom: how to optimize learning in the didactic setting. Thorac Surg Clin. 2019;29(3):279284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.04.002Google Scholar
Yang, SC. The alternative surgical curriculum. Thorac Surg Clin. 29(3):291301. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.04.003Google Scholar
Kurtz, JB, Lourie, MA, Holman, EE, Grob, KL, Monrad, SU. MCQs: creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students’ perceptions? A mixed methods study. Med Educ Online. 2019;24:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×