Abad Nebot, F. ‘Juan de Valdés y la conciencia lingüística de los Erasmistas españoles’ [Juan de Valdés and the linguistic consciousness of the Spanish Erasmians], in Revuelta Sañudo, M and Morón Arroyo, C (eds.), El Erasmismo en España. Ponencias del coloquio celebrado en la Biblioteca de Menéndez Pelayo del 10 al 14 de junio de 1985 [Erasmism in Spain. Presentations from the colloquium held at the Biblioteca de Menéndez Pelayo, 10–14 June 1985] (Santander: Sociedad Menéndez Pelayo, 1986), pp. 479–89.Google Scholar

Ackroyd, P. Shakespeare: The Biography (London: Random House, 2005).Google Scholar

Agata, M. ‘Improvements, corrections, and changes in the Gutenberg Bible’, in Thaisen, and Rutkowska, (eds.), Scribes, pp. 135–55.Google Scholar

Almeida Cabrejas, B. ‘Escuchar los textos. El análisis de los textos en el estudio de la fonética y fonología de épocas pasadas’ [Listening to texts. Text analysis in the study of the phonetics and phonology of bygone ages], Lingüística en la Red, 11 (2013), https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4714106 [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Alphabetum Boëmicum in quo singularum litterarum proprietates novâ & facili methodo proponuntur [Czech alphabet, in which the singular properties of the letters are presented in a new and easy way …] (Prague: Karel František Rosenmüller senior, 1718), KPS no. K00129.Google Scholar

Amirova, T. I. K istorii i teorii grafemiki [Towards a history and theory of graphemics] (Moscow: Nauka, 1977).Google Scholar

Andrieux-Reix, N. and Monsonégo, S (eds.), Segments graphiques du français. Pratiques et normalisations dans l’histoire [Graphical segments of French. Practices and standardisation in history], Langue Française, 119 (1998).Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, J. K. ‘Non-standard spellings in media texts: the case of German fanzines’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4 (4, 2000), pp. 514–33.Google Scholar

Andry de Boisregard, N. Réflexions, ou Remarques Critiques sur L’usage Present de la Langue Françoise [Critical reflections and notes on the current use of the French language], 2nd ed. (Paris: Laurent d’Houry, 1692), in Colombat et al. (compilers), Grand Corpus.Google Scholar

Anis, J. ‘Les Linguistes français et la ponctuation’ [French linguists and punctuation], L’Information Grammaticale, 102 (2004), pp. 5–10.Google Scholar

Anis, J. ‘Pour une graphématique autonome’ [Towards autonomous graphematics], Langue française: Le Signifiant graphique, 53 (1983), pp. 31–44.Google Scholar

Anis, J., Chiss, J.-L. and Ch. Puech, L’Écriture: théories et descriptions [Writing: theories and descriptions] (Brussels: De Boeck University, 1988).Google Scholar

Anónimo de Lovaina, , Gramatica de la lengua vulgar de España [Grammar of the Common Language of Spain] (Louvain: Bartolomé Gravio, 1559), facsimile edition in Gómez Asencio, (ed.), Antiguas gramáticas.Google Scholar

Anthony, L. AntConc (version 3.5.6), www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc [last accessed 5 May 2020].Google Scholar

Aquino-Weber, D., Cotelli, S and Kristol, A, Sociolinguistique historique du domaine gallo-roman: Enjeux et méthodologies [Historical sociolinguistics of the Gallo-Roman domain: Issues and methodologies] (Bern: Peter Lang, 2009).Google Scholar

Arabyan, M. ‘Histoire et emplois de l’alinéa ouvrant en diachronie (XIIIe–XVIIe siècles)’ [History and diachronic uses of the opening paragraph (C13–C17)], Signata. Annales des Sémiotiques, 9 (2018), pp. 427–58.Google Scholar

Arabyan, M. ‘La Notion de paragraphe en rédaction: Narration vs dissertation’ [The notion of the paragraph in writing: story-telling versus commentary], Le Français Aujourd’hui, 187 (4, 2014), pp. 19–29.Google Scholar

Arabyan, M. Le Paragraphe narratif. Étude typographique et linguistique de la ponctuation textuelle dans les récits classiques et modernes [The narrative paragraph. Typographical and linguistic study of textual punctuation in classical and modern narratives] (Paris: L’Harmattan, 1994).Google Scholar

Archer, D., Kytö, M, Baron, A and Rayson, P, ‘Guidelines for normalising Early Modern English corpora: Decisions and justifications’, ICAME Journal, 39 (2015), pp. 7–42.Google Scholar

Arellano, I. ‘La puntuación en los textos del Siglo de Oro y en el Quijote’ [Punctuation in Golden Age Spanish texts and in the Quijote], Anales Cervantinos, 42 (2010), pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

Arias Álvarez, B. ‘Problemas en el análisis gráfico de documentos novohispanos’ [Problems in the graphical analysis of American-Spanish documents], in Alconchel, Girón and Tovar, de Bustos (eds.), Actas del VI Congreso, pp. 261–70.Google Scholar

Aristotle’s Metaphysics, transl. J. Sachs, 2nd ed. (Santa Fe: Green Lion Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Aronoff, M. ‘The orthographic system of an early English printer: Wynkyn de Worde’, Folia Linguistica Historica, 8 (1–2, 1989), pp. 65–97.Google Scholar

Audisio, G. and Bonnot-Rambaud, I, Lire le français d’hier. Manuel de paléographie moderne [Reading yesterday’s French. A manual of modern paleography] (Paris: Armand Colin, 2003).Google Scholar

Auer, A. and Fairman, T, ‘Letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835)’, in Bennett, P, Durrell, M, Scheible, S and Whitt, R. J. (eds.), New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics (Tübingen: Narr, 2013), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar

Auer, A. and Voeste, A, ‘Grammatical variables’, in Hernández-Campoy, and Conde-Silvestre, (eds.), Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar

Auer, P. ‘Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect-standard constellations’, in Delbecque, N, van der Auwera, J and Geeraerts, D (eds.), Perspectives on Variation (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005), pp. 7–42.Google Scholar

Augst, G. (ed.), Graphematik und Orthographie [Graphematics and orthography] (Frankfurt am Main; Bern; New York: Peter Lang, 1985).Google Scholar

Ayres-Bennett, W. A History of the French Language through Texts (London; New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Azorín Fernández, D. and Provencio Garrigós, H, ‘La puntuación en las obras editadas en los siglos XVI y XVII’ [Punctuation in texts published during C16 and C17], in Méndez, Sánchez et al. (eds.), Temas, problemas y métodos, pp. 437–68.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H. Analysing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. ‘Accents, signes auxiliaires et signes de ponctuation: Leurs appellations chez les imprimeurs (XVIe–XVIIe siècles)’ [Accents, special symbols and punctuation marks: The names given to them by printers in C16 and C17], Le Français Préclassique 1550‒1650, 17 (2015), pp. 21–60.Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. ‘French orthography in the 16th century’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 97–125.Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. L’Orthographe française au temps de la réforme [French orthography at the time of the Reformation] (Geneva: Droz, 1993).Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. ‘Sources pour l’étude de la ponctuation française du XVIe siècle’ [Sources for the study of C16 French punctuation], in Dubois, N and Dürrenmatt, J (eds.), La Ponctuation à la Renaissance [Punctuation in the Renaissance], (Paris: Garnier, 2011), pp. 191–227.Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. and Voeste, A, ‘Introduction: Orthographies in early modern Europe: A comparative view’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Baddeley, S. and Voeste, A (eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe (Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter, 2012).Google Scholar

Badiou-Monferran, C. ‘“Ponctuation noire”, “ponctuation blanche” et “contes bleus”: L’Évolution du codage des discours directs dans La Barbe bleue de Perrault (1695–1905)’ [‘Black punctuation’, ‘white punctuation’ and ‘contes bleus’: The evolution of the coding of direct speech in Perrault’s La Barbe bleue (1695–1905)], in Parussa, et al. (eds.), Enregistrer la parole, pp. 143–77.Google Scholar

Badiou-Monferran, C. (ed.), La ‘Rémanence’: un concept opératoire pour la linguistique diachronique? Le cas du français [‘Persistence’: a useful concept for diachronic linguistics? The case of French], special issue of Le Français Moderne, no. 2 (2020).Google Scholar

Bajerowa, I. Kształtowanie się systemu polskiego języka literackiego w XVIII wieku [The emergence of the Polish literary language system in C18] (Wrocław: ZNIO, 1964).Google Scholar

Bajerowa, I. ‘Zanik samogłosek pochylonych w języku polskim jako wynik działania ogólniejszych tendencji językowych’ [The disappearance of narrow vowels in the Polish language as the result of general linguistic tendencies], Sprawozdania z Posiedzeń Komisji Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Oddział w Krakowie, 7 (1963), pp. 103–21.Google Scholar

Baranda, N. ‘Mujeres y escritura en el Siglo de Oro: Una relación inestable’ [Women and writing in the Spanish Golden Age: An unstable relationship], Litterae, Cuadernos de Cultura Escrita (3–4, 2003–4), pp. 61–83.Google Scholar

Bargieł, M. Cechy dialektalne polskich zabytków rękopiśmiennych pierwszej połowy XVI wieku [Dialectal features of Polish manuscripts from the first half of C16] (Wrocław: ZNIO, 1969).Google Scholar

Baron, A. and Rayson, P, ‘Automatic standardization of texts containing spelling variation: How much training data do you need?’, in Mahlberg, M, González-Díaz, V and Smith, C (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, CL2009, 20–23 July 2009 (Liverpool: University of Liverpool, 2009), http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/cl2009/314_FullPaper.pdf [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Baron, A., Rayson, P and Archer, D, ‘Automatic standardization of spelling for historical text mining’, Digital Humanities 2009 (University of Maryland, 22–25 June 2009).Google Scholar

Baron, A., Rayson, P and Archer, D, ‘Innovators of Early Modern English Spelling Change: Using DICER to Investigate Spelling Variation Trends’, Helsinki Corpus Festival (Helsinki, 28 September–2 October 2011), https://www.slideshare.net/VARIENG/innovators-of-the-early-modern-english-spelling-change-using-dicer-to-investigate-spelling-variation-trends [last accessed 9 May 2020].Google Scholar

Baron, A., Rayson, P and Archer, D, ‘Quantifying Early Modern English spelling variation: change over time and genre’, Conference on New Methods in Historical Corpora (University of Manchester 29–30 April 2011).Google Scholar

Baron, A., Rayson, P and Archer, D, ‘Word frequency and key word statistics in historical corpus linguistics’, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20 (1, 2009), pp. 41–67.Google Scholar

Barootes, B. S. W. ‘“In fourme of speche is chaunge”: Final -e in Troilus and Criseyde, book II, lines 22–28’. The Chaucer Review, 53 (1, 2018), pp. 102–11.Google Scholar

Barteld, F., Szczepaniak, R and Zinsmeister, H, ‘The definition of tokens in relation to words and annotation tasks’, in Henrich, V, Hinrichs, E, de Kok, D, Osenova, P and Przepiórkowski, A (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, TLT13 (Tübingen: University of Tübingen, 2014), pp. 250–7, http://tlt13.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/tlt13-proceedings.pdf [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Barteld, F., Hartmann, S and Szczepaniak, R, ‘The usage and spread of sentence-internal capitalisation in Early New High German: A multifactorial approach’, Folia Linguistica, 50 (2, 2016), pp. 385–412.Google Scholar

Bartoš, F. M. Soupis rukopisů Národního musea v Praze I, II [Catalogue of manuscripts of the National Museum of Prague I, II] (Prague: Melantrich, 1926‒7).Google Scholar

Bartoszewicz, A. Piśmienność mieszczańska w późnośredniowiecznej Polsce (Warsaw: WUW, 2012). [English edition: A. Bartoszewicz, Urban Literacy in Late Medieval Poland (Turnhout: Brepols, 2017).]Google Scholar

Barzizza, G. Gasparini Pergamensis orthographia liber [Gasparino Pergamensis’s book of orthography] (Paris: U. Gering, M. Crantz, M. Friburger, 1470), https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k131477g/f474.image [last accessed 11 June 2020].Google Scholar

Barzizza, G. Liber de arte punctandi [The book on the art of punctuation], MS, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS lat. 8731, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10035384j/ [last accessed 18 April 2020], fols. 35–40.Google Scholar

Basu, A. ‘“Ill shapen sounds, and false orthography”: A computational approach to Early English orthographic variation’, in Estill, L, Jackaki, D and Ullyot, M (eds.), Early Modern Studies after the Digital Turn (Tempe: Iter and Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2016), pp. 167–200.Google Scholar

Basu, A. and Pentecost, S, ‘EEBO N-Gram Browser’ (Saint Louis: Humanities Digital Workshop at Washington University in Saint Louis, 2014), https://earlyprint.wustl.edu [last accessed 5 May 2020].Google Scholar

Bataillon, M. ‘Diego de Enzinas en Amberes: Ortografía castellana de un libro prohibido’ [Diego de Enzinas in Antwerp: Castilian spelling of a forbidden book], in Bataillon, M, Devoto, D and Amiel, C (eds.), Erasme et l’Espagne [Erasmus and Spain], vol. 3 (Geneva: Droz, 1991), pp. 249–75.Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S, ‘Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4’, Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1, 2015), pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Baugh, A. C. and Cable, T. H., A History of the English Language, 6th ed. (London: Routledge, 2012 [1951]).Google Scholar

Bédmar Sancristóbal, M. E. ‘Problemas de edición de textos manuscritos modernos: la puntuación’ [Problems on editing modern manuscript texts: punctuation], in Pons, L (ed.), Historia de la lengua y crítica textual [Language history and textual criticism] (Madrid, Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana-Vervuert, 2006), pp. 127–80.Google Scholar

Behr, M. Buchdruck und Sprachwandel. Schreibsprachliche und textstrukturelle Varianz in der ‘Melusine’ des Thüring von Ringoltingen (1473/74–1692/93) [Book printing and language change. Graphic and textual variance in Thüring von Ringoltingen’s ‘Melusina’ (1473/74–1692/93)] (Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar

Bellosta von Colbe, V. ‘Is role and reference grammar an adequate grammatical theory for punctuation?’, in Van Valin, R. D. Jr (ed.), Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008), pp. 245–62.Google Scholar

Beltrán, E. ‘Un traité inconnu de Guillaume Fichet sur la ponctuation’ [An unknown treatise on punctuation, by Guillaume Fichet], Scriptorium, 39 (1985), pp. 284–91.Google Scholar

Benskin, M., Laing, M, Karaiskos, V and Williamson, K, An Electronic Version of a Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.html [last accessed 4 May 2020].Google Scholar

Berg, K. and Aronoff, M, ‘Self-organization in the spelling of English suffixes: the emergence of culture out of anarchy’, Language, 93 (1, 2017), pp. 37–64.Google Scholar

Berger, T. ‘Religion and diacritics: The case of Czech orthography’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 255‒68.Google Scholar

Berger, T. ‘Užívání češtiny jako úředního jazyka v druhé polovině 18. století na příkladě města Chrudimě’ [Using Czech as a language of administration in the second half of C18: the example of the town of Chrudim], in Petrbok, V, Lunga, R and Tydlitát, J (eds.), Východočeská duchovní a slovesná kultura v 18. století. Sborník příspěvků ze sympozia konaného 27.–29. 5. 1999 v Rychnově nad Kněžnou [East Bohemian spiritual and literary culture in C18. Collection of papers from the symposium held at 27 to 29 May 1999 in Rychnov nad Kněžnou] (Boskovice: Albert, 1999), pp. 43–78.Google Scholar

Bergmann, R. ‘Zur Herausbildung der deutschen Substantivgroßschreibung. Ergebnisse des Bamberg-Rostocker Projekt’ [On the evolution of German noun capitalisation. Results of the Bamberg–Rostock project], in Hoffmann, et al. (eds.), Das Frühneuhochdeutsche, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar

Bergmann, R. and Nerius, D, Die Entwicklung der Großschreibung im Deutschen von 1500–1700 [The evolution of capitalisation in German from 1500 to 1700], 2 vols. (Heidelberg: Winter, 1998).Google Scholar

Bergs, A. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503) (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005).Google Scholar

Besch, W. ‘Entstehung und Ausformung der neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache/Standardsprache’ [Origin and formation of the New High German written/standard language], in Besch, et al. (eds.), Sprachgeschichte, vol. 3, pp. 2252–96.Google Scholar

Besch, W. ‘Sprachliche Änderungen in Lutherbibel-Drucken des 16.–18. Jahrhunderts’ [Linguistic changes in printed edition of the Luther Bible C16–C18], in Schildt, J (ed.), Luthers Sprachschaffen. Gesellschaftliche Grundlagen, geschichtliche Wirkungen [Luther’s (influence on German) language formation. Societal foundations, historical effects] (Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1984), pp. 108–33.Google Scholar

Besch, W., Betten, A, Reichmann, O and Sonderegger, St (eds.), Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung [History of language. A handbook on the history of the German language and research on it], 2nd ed., vols. 1 and 3 (Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar

Biblioteca Digital Hispánica [Spanish digital library]. Biblioteca Nacional de España, http://www.bne.es/es/Catalogos/BibliotecaDigitalHispanica/Inicio/index.html [last accessed 16 April 2020].Google Scholar

Bičan, A. ‘Fonématika’ [Phonemics], in Karlík et al. (eds.), CzechEncy, https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/FONÉMATIKA [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Biedermann-Pasques, L. Les Grands Courants orthographiques au XVIe siècle et la formation de l’orthographe moderne [Major orthographical trends in the C16 and the formation of modern spelling] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1992).Google Scholar

Bikialo, S. and Rault, J (eds.), Imaginaires de la ponctuation. Ordre et inquiétude du discours [Imaginary punctuation. Order and chaos in discourse], Linx, 75 (2017).Google Scholar

Blahoslav, J. Grammatica čeſká, od Kněza Beneſſe Optáta, a od Kněze Wáclawa Filomáteſa predeſſlých let wydaná … [Czech grammar published several years ago by priests Beneš Optát and Václav Filomátes], manuscript, 1571 (copy c. 1670), Moravian Provincial Library, Brno, Rkp 114 (RKP2-0047.982).Google Scholar

Blake, N. F. ‘Manuscript to print’, in Griffiths, J and Pearsall, D (eds.), Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 403–33.Google Scholar

Blake, N. F. ‘Early Modern English’, in Nocera Avila, C, Pantaleo, N and Pezzini, D (eds.), Early Modern English: Trends, Forms and Texts (Fasano: Schena editore, 1992), pp. 13–37.Google Scholar

Blake, N. F. ‘English versions of “Reynard the Fox” in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Studies in Philology, 62 (1965), pp. 63–77.Google Scholar

Blas Arroyo, J. L. ‘Tras las huellas de la variación y el cambio lingüístico a través de textos de inmediatez comunicativa: Fundamentos de un proyecto de sociolingüística histórica’ [Following the traces of variation and linguistic change through texts of communicative immediacy: Foundations of a historical sociolinguistics project], in Martín, García (ed.), Actas, vol. 2, pp. 1737–56.Google Scholar

Blažević Krezić, V. Književnimi radnjami za crkvu i domovinu. O novocrkvenoslavenskome jeziku Parčićeva misala iz 1893. [Literary works for church and homeland. On the New Church Slavonic language of Parčić’s Missal of 1893] (Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 2020).Google Scholar

Blecua, J. M. ‘Notas sobre la puntuación española hasta el Renacimiento’ [Notes on Spanish punctuation up to the Renaissance], in Alonso, M. R. and del Agua, J (eds.), Homenaje a Julián Marías [Studies in honour of Julián Marías] (Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1984), pp. 121–30.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. Supervernaculars and their Dialects, King’s College London Working Papers in Urban Languages and Literacies, 81 (2011), https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ecs/research/research-centres/ldc/publications/workingpapers/the-papers/wp81.pdf [last accessed 4 June 2020].Google Scholar

Bock, M. ‘Lesen in Abhängigkeit von der Groß- und Kleinschreibung’ [Reading as a function of upper- and lowercase spelling], Sprache und Kognition, 8 (3, 1989), pp. 191–209.Google Scholar

Bock, M., Hagenschneider, K and Schweer, A, ‘Zur Funktion der Groß- und Kleinschreibung beim Lesen deutscher, englischer und niederländischer Texte’ [On the function of upper- and lowercase spelling in the reading of German, English and Dutch texts], in Eisenberg, and Günther, (eds.), Schriftsystem und Orthographie, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar

Bončkutė, R. ‘Alberto Vijūko‑Kojalavičiaus veikalo Historia Lituana recepcija Simono Daukanto darbe “Istorija Žemaitiška”’ [Reception of Albertas Vijūkas Kojelavičius’s opus Historia Lituana in Simonas Daukantas’s work ‘History of the Lithuanian Lowlands’], Senoji Lietuvos literatūra 27 (2009), pp. 353–76.Google Scholar

Borecki, M. Kształtowanie się normy językowej w drukach polskich xvi wieku (na przykładzie oboczności typu pirwszy || pierwszy) [The formation of a linguistic norm in C16 Polish printed texts (with special reference to pirwszy || pierwszy type alternations)] (Warsaw; Cracow: ZNIO and Polish Academy of Sciences, 1974).Google Scholar

Boscán, J. Las obras de Boscán y algunas de Garcilasso de la Vega: Repartidas en quatro libros [The works of Boscán and some of Garcilasso de la Vega, distributed in four books] (Barcelona, Carles Amorós, 1543).Google Scholar

Bosquet, J. Elemens ou Institutions de la langue françoise [Elements or institutions of the French language] (Mons: Charles Michel, 1586), in Colombat et al. (compilers), Grand Corpus.Google Scholar

Boucheron-Pétillon, S. Les Détours de la langue. Étude sur la parenthèse et le tiret double [Detours of language. A study of brackets and the double hyphen] (Louvain; Paris: Peeters, 2003).Google Scholar

Brajerski, T. O języku polskim dawnym i dzisiejszym [On the historical and modern Polish language] (Lublin: KUL, 1995).Google Scholar

Branca-Rosoff, S. ‘Deux points, ouvrez les guillemets: notes sur la ponctuation du discours rapporté au XVIIIe siècle’ [Colon, begin quotation: notes on the punctuation of C18 discourse], Le Gré des Langues, 5 (1993), pp. 178–202.Google Scholar

Branca-Rosoff, S. ‘Sociolinguistique historique et analyse du discours du côté de l’histoire: Un chantier commun?’ [Historical sociolinguistics and discourse analysis on a historical period: A common project?], Langage et Société, 121–2 (2007), pp. 163–76, https://www.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2007-3-page-163.htm [last accessed 4 June 2020].Google Scholar

Branca-Rosoff, S. and Schneider, N, L’Écriture des citoyens: Une analyse linguistique de l’écriture des peu-lettrés pendant la période révolutionnaire [The writing of citizens: A linguistic analysis of the writing of the semi-literate during the revolutionary period] (Paris: Klincksieck, 1994).Google Scholar

Bravo García, E. M. ‘Indicadores sociolingüísticos en la documentación indiana (Cartas e informes de particulares)’ [Sociolinguistic indicators in Indian documentation (Letters and reports by individuals)], in Oesterreicher, W, Stoll, E and Wesch, A (eds.), Competencia escrita, tradición discursiva y variedades lingüísticas. El español en los siglos XVI y XVII [Written competence, discursive tradition and linguistic varieties. Spanish in C16 and C17] (Tübingen: Narr, 1998), pp. 125–42.Google Scholar

Brengelman, F. H. ‘Orthoepists, printers, and the rationalization of English spelling’, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 79 (3, 1980), pp. 332–54.Google Scholar

Bruthiaux, P. ‘Knowing when to stop: Investigating the nature of punctuation’, Language and Communication, 13 (1, 1993), pp. 27–43.Google Scholar

Bučar, F. and Fancev, F, ‘Bibliografija hrvatske protestantske književnosti za reformacije’ [Bibliography of Croatian Protestant literature during the Reformation], Starine JAZU, 39 (1938), pp. 49–125.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. ‘In-group spelling in Novgorod birch-bark letters’, in Juffermans, K and Weth, C (eds.), The Tyranny of Writing: Ideologies of the Written Word (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. ‘Introduction’, in Bunčić et al. (eds.), Biscriptality, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. ‘The standardization of Polish orthography in the 16th century’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 219‒54.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D., Lippert, S. L. and Rabus, A (eds.), Biscriptality: A Sociolinguistic Typology (Heidelberg: Winter, 2016).Google Scholar

Bünting, K. D. Einführung in die Linguistik [Introduction to linguistics] (Königstein: Athenäum, 1981).Google Scholar

Buridant, C. Grammaire du français médiéval [Grammar of medieval French] [1st ed., 2000] (Strasbourg: Société de Linguistique Romane, 2019).Google Scholar

Buridant, C. ‘Varietas delectat. Prolégomènes à une grammaire de l’ancien français’ [Varietas delectat. Prolegomena to a grammar of Old French], Vox Romanica, 55 (1996), pp. 87–125.Google Scholar

Burke, W. E. ‘Let’s get physical: Bibliography, codicology, and seventeenth-century women’s manuscripts’, Literature Compass, 4/6 (2007), pp. 1667–82.Google Scholar

Burkhard, C. ‘Zur Ungleichzeitigkeit in der Weltgesellschaft. Erkenntnistheoretische Kommentare zur Kriegsursachenforschung, Arbeitspapier 1/2002’ [Non-simultaneity in global society. Comments on the study of the causes of wars from the perspective of theory of knowledge] (Working Paper, University of Hamburg) https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71735506.pdf [last accessed 4 June 2020].Google Scholar

Bustos Tovar, J. J. ‘Las propuestas ortográficas de Gonzalo Correas’ [Spelling proposals by Gonzalo Correas], DICENDA, Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica, 16 (1998), pp. 41–62.Google Scholar

Capdevilla, L., Cassagnes, S, Cocaud, M, Godineau, D, Rouquet, F and Sainclivier, J, Le Genre face aux mutations: masculin et féminin, du moyen âge à nos jours [Gender in the face of change: male and female, from the Middle Ages to the present] (Rennes: PUR, 2003).Google Scholar

Carrasco Santos, I. and Carrasco Santos, P, ‘Las ordenanzas sevillanas de 1492: grafemática y fonética de sus versiones manuscritas’ [The Sevillian ordinances of 1492: graphematics and phonetics of their handwritten versions], in Cartelle, E. M. and Rovira, C. M. (eds.), Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española (Santiago de Compostela 14–18 de Septiembre 2009) [Proceedings of the VIII International Congress of History of the Spanish Language (Santiago de Compostela, 14–18 September 2009)] (Madrid: Meubook/AHLE, 2011), pp. 641–52.Google Scholar

Carrasco Santos, P. ‘Análisis fonético fonológico y gráfico de los documentos malagueños (s. XVI)’ [Phonetic, phonological and graphical analysis of documents from Malaga (C16)], in Carrasco, I (ed.), Textos para la historia del español [Texts for the history of Spanish], vol. 7 (Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, 2012).Google Scholar

Castillo Gómez, A. ‘Del tratado a la práctica. La escritura epistolar en los siglos XVI y XVII’ [From treatise to practice. Epistolary writing in C16 and C17], in Sáez Sánchez, C and Castillo Gómez, A (eds.), Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Cultura Escrita [International Congress on the History of Literacy], vol. 1 (Alcalá de Henares: Calambur, 2002), pp. 79–107.Google Scholar

Catach, N. ‘La Ponctuation’ [Punctuation], Langue Française, 45 (1980), pp. 16–27.Google Scholar

Catach, N. La Ponctuation: histoire et système [Punctuation: history and system] (Paris: PUF, 1994).Google Scholar

Catach, N. L’Orthographe française à l’époque de la renaissance [French orthography in the Renaissance] (Geneva: Droz, 1968).Google Scholar

Cattan, M. ‘Cuestiones de género y autoría: La retórica clásica en la Instrucción de Titu Cusi Yupanqui’ [Gender and authorship: classical rhetoric in Titu Cusi Yupanqui’s Instrucción], Revue Romane, 49 (1, 2014), pp. 120–46.Google Scholar

Cazal, Y. and Parussa, G, Introduction à l’histoire de l’orthographe [Introduction to the history of orthography] (Paris: Armand Colin, 2015).Google Scholar

Čejka, M. ‘Srovnání Devotyho opisu Loutny české Adama Michny z Otradovic s původním tiskem’ [A comparison of Devoty’s transcription of ‘Czech Lute’ by Adam Michna z Otradovic with the original printed version], in Zand, G and Holý, J (eds.), Tschechisches Barock: Sprache, Literatur, Kultur = České baroko: Jazyk, literatura, kultura [Czech Baroque: language, literature, culture] (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999), pp. 34–42.Google Scholar

Ceković, B. ‘Grafematičke osobitosti glagoljičnog izdanja Artikula (1562)’, in Kuštović, and Žagar, (eds.), Meandrima hrvatskoga glagoljaštva, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar

Ceković, B., Eterović, I, Kuštović, T and Žagar, M, Misal hruacki Šimuna Kožičića Benje: Latinička transliteracija glagoljskog izvornika … [The Croatian Missal of Šimun Kožičić Benja: transliteration into Latin script of the Glagolitic edition …] (Zagreb: NSK, 2016).Google Scholar

Ceković, B., Eterović, I, Kuštović, T and Žagar, M (eds.), Artikuli ili deli stare krstjanske vere, Urach 1562: Glagoljski izvornik prepisali latinicom i usporedili s ćiriličkim izdanjem [Articles or parts of the old Christian faith: Glagolitic edition transliterated into Latin script and compared with the Cyrillic edition] (Zagreb: NSK, 2017).Google Scholar

Černá, A. M. ‘Specifika pravopisného úzu rukopisných textů 16. století’ [Specifics of the orthography of the manuscript texts from C16], in Čornejová, et al. (eds.), Dějiny českého pravopisu, pp. 224–34.Google Scholar

Cerquiglini, B. L’Accent du souvenir [The accent of remembrance] (Paris: Minuit, 1995).Google Scholar

Cerquiglini, B. Le Roman de l’orthographe. Au paradis des mots, avant la faute (1150–1694) [The story of spelling. In the paradise of words, before the fall (1150–1694)] (Paris: Hatier, 1996).Google Scholar

Cerquiglini, B. ‘L’Orthographe des Précieuses’ [The orthography of the Précieuses], in La Genèse de l’orthographe française (XIIe–XVIIe siècles) [The genesis of French orthography (C12–C17)] (Paris: Champion, 2004), pp. 133–9.Google Scholar

Cervantes, M. de, El ingenioso hidalgo don Quixote de la Mancha [The ingenious Gentleman Don Quixote of La Mancha] (Madrid: Juan de la Cuesta, 1605), http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/el-ingenioso-hidalgo-don-quixote-de-la-mancha--9/ [last accessed 23 May 2020].Google Scholar

Chanson de Roland [The song of Roland], MS, University of Oxford, Bodleian Libraries, MS Digby 23.Google Scholar

Chanson de Saint Alexis [The song of Saint Alexis], MS, Hildesheim, Dombibliothek, Saint Godehard, No. 1, fols. 57–68.Google Scholar

CHARTA: Corpus hispánico y americano en la red [Spanish and American corpus on the web], www.redcharta.es/ [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

Chartier, R. La Main de l’auteur et l’esprit de l’imprimeur [The author’s hand and the printer’s mind] (Paris: Gallimard, 2015).Google Scholar

Chrisomalis, S. Numerical Notation: A Comparative History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

CICA: Corpus Informatizat del Català Antic [Computerised corpus of Old Catalan], www.cica.cat [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

CODEA+ 2015: Corpus de documentos españoles anteriores a 1800 [Corpus of Spanish documents from before 1800], Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, http://corpuscodea.es/ [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

Codex Aemilianensis 60, Sermones et Homiliae [Codex from the monastery of San Millán de la Cogolla 60: Sermons and Homilies], MS, Real Academia de la Historia, Madrid.Google Scholar

Colombat, B., Fournier, J.-M. and Ayres-Bennett, W (compilers), Grand corpus des grammaires françaises, des remarques et des traités sur la langue (XIVe–XVIIe s.) [Great corpus of French language grammars, commentaries and treatises on language (C14–C17)] (Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2011), classiques-garnier.com/numerique/ [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Colombo Timelli, M. ‘Les Dialogues dans les Cent nouvelles nouvelles. Marques linguistiques et (typo)graphiques, entre manuscrit et imprimé’ [Dialogues in Les Cent nouvelles nouvelles. Linguistic and typographical marks, between manuscript and printed texts], in Parussa, et al. (eds.), Enregistrer la parole, pp. 123–41.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Conde-Silvestre, J. C. and Hernández-Campoy, J. M., ‘A sociolinguistic approach to the diffusion of Chancery written practices in late fifteenth century private correspondence’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 105 (2004), pp. 133–52.Google Scholar

Conde-Silvestre, J. C. and Hernández-Campoy, J. M., ‘Tracing the generational progress of language change in fifteenth-century English: the digraph in the “Paston letters”’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 114 (3, 2013), pp. 279–99.Google Scholar

Coote, E. The English Schoole-Maister Teaching all his Scholers, the Order of Distinct Reading, and True Writing our English Tongue (London: Printed by the widow Orwin, for Ralph Iackson, and Robert Dextar, 1596), https://search.proquest.com/eebo [last accessed 28 Dec. 2018].Google Scholar

CORDE – Corpus diacrónico del español [Diachronic corpus of Spanish], https://www.rae.es/recursos/banco-de-datos/corde [last accessed 11 May 2020].Google Scholar

Čornejová, M., Rychnovská, L and Zemanová, J (eds.), Dějiny českého pravopisu (do r. 1902). Sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní konference Dějiny českého pravopisu (do r. 1902). 23.–25. září 2010, Brno, Česká Republika [History of Czech orthography (up to 1902). Proceedings of the International Conference History of Czech Orthography (up to 1902). 23–25 September 2010, Brno] (Brno: Masaryk University, 2010).Google Scholar

Corpus del español [Spanish language corpus], www.corpusdelespanol.org [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

Corpus of Early English Correspondence, http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/pceec.html [last accessed 5 May 2020].Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. Principios de semántica estructural [Principles of structural semantics], 2nd ed. (Madrid: Gredos, 1981).Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. ‘Structure lexicale et enseignement du vocabulaire’ [Lexical structure and vocabulary teaching], in Lamb, S. M., Pottier, B. L. and Bourquin, G (eds.), Actes du Premier Colloque International de Linguistique Appliquée. Organisé par la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de l’Université de Nancy (26‒31 octobre 1964) [Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on Applied Linguistics. Organised by the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Nancy (26‒31 October 1964)] (Nancy: Mémoires des Annales de l’Est, 1966), pp. 175–252.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. The Writing Systems of the World (Oxford; Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. Writing Systems: An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Craig, H. and Whipp, R, ‘Old spellings, new methods: automated procedures for indeterminate linguistic data’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25 (1, 2010), pp. 37–52.Google Scholar

Crick, J. C. and Walsham, A, The Uses of Script and Print, 1300–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Crystal, D. Making a Point: The Pernickety Story of English Punctuation (London: Profile Books, 2015).Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. and Kytö, M (compilers), A Corpus of English Dialogues: 1560–1760, CD-ROM (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2006).Google Scholar

Cybulski, M. Język piętnastowiecznej części Psałterza floriańskiego. Ortografia, fonetyka, fleksja [The language of C15 part of the Saint Florian Psalter. Orthography, phonetics, inflection] (Łódź: Łódź University, 1988).Google Scholar

Cybulski, M. ‘Na obrzeżach głównego nurtu. O grafii urzędowych rękopisów średniopolskich’ [On the fringes of the main tendencies. On the spelling of Middle-Polish official manuscripts], in Kuźmicki, and Osiewicz, (eds.), Dokument pisany, pp. 167–88.Google Scholar

Cyran, W. ‘Ślady iloczasu w głównych zabytkach języka polskiego XIV i XV wieku’ [Traces of vowel length in the most prominent historical texts in Polish form of C14 and C15], Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego, 11 (1952), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Dahlet, V. Ponctuation et énonciation [Punctuation and enunciation] (Guadeloupe: Ibis Rouge Éditions, 2003).Google Scholar

Dalmatin, A. and Konzul [Istrianin], S, Parvi del posztile evanyeliov, koi sze vszaku nedillu po obitsayu otsito u czrikvi tstu … [The first part of the homilies that are read every Sunday in church …] (Regensburg, 1568).Google Scholar

Damjanović, S. ‘Kakav je jezik za knjige prikladan (Neke napomene uz jezikoslovne dvojbe hrvatskih protestanata)’ [What kind of language is suitable for books (Remarks on the linguistic dilemma of the Croatian Protestants)], in Damjanović, , Novi filološki prinosi, pp. 130–9.Google Scholar

Damjanović, S. Novi filološki prinosi [New philological contributions] (Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 2014).Google Scholar

Daukantas, S. Budą Senowęs-Lëtuwiû Kalnienû ĩr Ƶámajtiû [The character of the ancient Lithuanians, Highlanders and Samogitians] (Saint Petersburg: C. Hintze, 1845).Google Scholar

Daukantas, S. ‘Didysis lenkų–lietuvių kalbų žodynas’ [Great Polish–Lithuanian dictionary], manuscript, 1852–6 and 1858, Library of the Institute of Literature and Folklore in Vilnius, Lithuania, call no. f. 1 – SD 12; ed. by Giedrius Subačius and published as Didysis lenkų–lietuvių kalbų žodynas, 3 vols. (Vilnius: MELC, 1993–6).Google Scholar

Daukantas, S. ‘Istoryje Ƶemaytyszka’ [History of the Lithuanian Lowlands], manuscript, 1831–4, Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore in Vilnius, call no. f. 1 – SD 2.Google Scholar

Daukantas, S. Prasmą Łotinû Kałbôs, Paraszę K. W. Myle (pseudonym of Daukantas) [Understanding of the Latin language, written by K. W. Myle] (Saint Petersburg: K. Hintze, 1837).Google Scholar

Daukantas, S. (ed.), Ch. F. Lhomond, Epitome historiae sacrae [Lhomond, an abridgement of the holy history] (Saint Petersburg: Hintze, 1838).Google Scholar

Dauvois, N. and Dürrenmatt, J (eds.), La Ponctuation à la renaissance [Punctuation in the Renaissance] (Paris: Garnier, 2011).Google Scholar

Davis, N. ‘The language of the Pastons’, in Burrow, J (ed.), Middle English Literature: British Academy Gollancz Lectures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954), pp. 45–70.Google Scholar

Daybell, J. Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Decyk-Zięba, W. ‘Ortografia Stanisława Zaborowskiego’ [The orthography of Stanisław Zaborowski], Poradnik Językowy, 5 (2014), pp. 101–9.Google Scholar

Demaizière, C. L’Écriture des femmes à la renaissance française [The writing of women in the French Renaissance] (Montreal: McGill University, 1998).Google Scholar

Demonet, M.-L. ‘Ponctuation et narration chez Rabelais et ses contemporains’ [Punctuation and narration in Rabelais and his contemporaries], in Dürrenmatt, J (ed.), La ponctuation [Punctuation] (Poitiers: Université de Poitiers, 2000), pp. 37–62.Google Scholar

Demonet, M.-L. ‘Rhétorique de l’écrit imprimé à la Renaissance’ [Rhetoric of printed texts from the Renaissance], Dossiers d’HEL, SHESL, Écriture(s) et Représentations du Langage et des Langues, 9 (2016), pp. 146–61.Google Scholar

Demonet, M.-L. ‘Tentatives de modernisation de la langue et des graphies à la Renaissance’ [Attempts to modernise language and writing in the Renaissance], Revue de l’Académie de l’Orléanais (2016), pp. 77–98.Google Scholar

Denison, D. and Yáñez-Bouza, N (compilers), ARCHER: A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers, https://www.projects.alc.manchester.ac.uk/archer/ [last accessed 10 May 2020].Google Scholar

Deumert, A. Sociolinguistics and Mobile Communication (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Diccionario de abreviaturas novohispanas [Dictionary of American-Spanish abbreviations], Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (2013), http://www.iifilologicas.unam.mx/dicabenovo/ [last accessed 2 April 2020].Google Scholar

Díez del Corral Areta, E. ‘Encrucijada de ediciones: La accesibilidad a los textos documentales’ [A melting pot of textual editions: accessibility to documentary texts], Versants, 59 (3, 2012), pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Díez del Corral Areta, E. ‘La problemática de las tradiciones textuales en el estudio lingüístico del documento indiano’ [The problem of textual traditions in the linguistic study of the Indian documentation], in Álvarez, Torrens and Borja, Sánchez Prieto (eds.), Nuevas perspectivas, pp. 323–34.Google Scholar

Díez del Corral Areta, E. ‘Utilidad y límites de la diplomática en el estudio lingüístico del documento indiano’ [Usefulness and limits of diplomacy in the linguistic study of the ‘Indian document’], in Salamanca, M (ed.), La materialidad escrita: nuevos enfoques para su interpretación [Written materiality: new approaches to its interpretation] (Oviedo: IEPC, 2011), pp. 11–48.Google Scholar

Díez del Corral Areta, E. and Martín Aizpuru, L, ‘Sin corpus no hay historia: La Red CHARTA como un proyecto de edición común’ [Without a corpus there is no history: The CHARTA Network as a co-editing project], Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, 2 (2014), pp. 287–314.Google Scholar

Dik, S. C. The Theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The Structure of the Clause (Dordrecht; Providence: Foris, 1989).Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. ‘Ergativity’, Language, 55 (1, 1979), pp. 59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobson, E. J. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, vols. 1–2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Dolet, E. ‘De la pvnctuation de la langue francoyse’ [French language punctuation], in La Maniere de bien traduire d’vne langve en avtre … [How to translate well from one language to another] (Lyon: E. Dolet, 1540), pp. 21–9, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k106073c.image [last accessed 4 June 2020].Google Scholar

Dollinger, S. ‘What the capitalisation of early nouns in Canadian English may tell us about “colonial lag” theory: methods and problems’, Views, 12 (1, 2003), pp. 24–44.Google Scholar

Domahs, U. and Primus, B (eds.), Handbuch Laut, Gebärde, Buchstabe [Handbook of sounds, signs and letters] (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2016).Google Scholar

Đorđić, P. Istorija srpske ćirilice [History of Serbian Cyrillic] (Belgrade: Institute for Textbook Publishing of the Socialist Republic of Serbia, 1971).Google Scholar

Dowty, D. ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection’, Language, 67 (3, 1991), pp. 547–619.Google Scholar

Dücker, L. ‘Die Getrennt- und Zusammenschreibung von Komposita in frnhd. Hexenverhörprotokollen’ [Separate and compound spelling of compounds in Early New High German protocols of witch trials], Zeitschrift für Wortbildung, 2 (1, 2018), pp. 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumville, D. English Caroline Script and Monastic History: Studies in Benedictinism A.D. 950–1030 (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Dürscheid, Ch. Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik [Introduction to grapholinguistics] (Wiesbaden: Springer, 2002).Google Scholar

Early English Books Online: Text Creation Partnership (EEBO-TCP), https://textcreationpartnership.org/tcp-texts/eebo-tcp-early-english-books-online/ [last accessed 4 May 2020].Google Scholar

Early European Books, https://www.proquest.com/products-services/databases/eeb.html [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

Eckhardt, T. Azbuka. Versuch einer Einführung in das Studium der slavischen Paläographie [Azbuka. A primer on the study of Slavic palaeography] (Vienna; Cologne: Böhlau, 1989).Google Scholar

Eden, K. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Intimacy (Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Egido, A. ‘Los manuales de escribientes desde el Siglo de Oro. Apuntes para la teoría de la escritura’ [The scribes’ manuals since the ‘Spanish Golden Century’. Notes on the theory of writing], Bulletin Hispanique, 97 (1995), pp. 67–94.Google Scholar

Ehmer, H. ‘Hans Ungnad von Sonnegg und die Uracher Druckerei 1560–1564’ [Hans Ungnad von Sonnegg and the Urach printing house, 1560–1564], in Lorenz, S, Schindling, A and Setzler, W (eds.), Primus Truber 1508–1586: Der slowenische Reformator und Württemberg [Primus Truber 1508–1586: the Slovenian reformer and Württemberg] (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2011), pp. 201–16.Google Scholar

Ein gebet aus heiliger Göttlicher geschrifft gezogen [A prayer drawn from the sacred divine scriptures] (Regensburg: Hans Kohl, 1555) (VD 16 G 574).Google Scholar

Eisenberg, P. and Günther, H (eds.), Schriftsystem und Orthographie [Writing system and orthography] (Tübingen: Niemeyer/Berlin: de Gruyter, 1989).Google Scholar

Eisenstein, E. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Eisenstein, J. ‘Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19 (2, 2015), pp. 161–88.Google Scholar

Elmentaler, M. ‘Der Erkenntniswert der schreibsprachlichen Variation für die Sprachgeschichte. Überlegungen zu den Ergebnissen eines Duisburger Graphematikprojektes’ [The epistemological value of written language variation for language history. Considerations of the results of a Duisburg graphics project], Rheinische Vierteljahrsblätter, 65 (2001), pp. 290–314.Google Scholar

Elmentaler, M. Struktur und Wandel vormoderner Schreibsprachen [Structure and changes of premodern regional written languages] (Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar

Encyclopédie d’Yverdon = Felice, F. B. L’Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire universal raisonné des connaissances humaines [The encyclopaedia or universal dictionary of human knowledge] (Yverdon, 1770‒1780), digital edition by C. Blum (ed.) in Dictionnaires, grammaires, encyclopédies [Dictionaries, grammars, encyclopedias] (Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2011), https://classiques-garnier.com/encyclopedie-d-yverdon.html [last accessed 11 June 2020].Google Scholar

Esteve Serrano, A. Estudios de teoría ortográfica del español [Studies on Spanish orthographical theory] (Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 1982).Google Scholar

Estienne, R. Traicté de la Grãmaire Francoise [A treatise on French Grammar] (Paris: Iaques du Puis, 1559), in Colombat et al. (compilers), Grand Corpus.Google Scholar

Evans, M. ‘A sociolinguistics of early modern spelling? An account of Queen Elizabeth I’s correspondence’, Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, vol. 10: Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources (University of Helsinki, 2012), http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/10/evans/#daybell_2001 [last accessed 9 May 2020].Google Scholar

Evans, M. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar

Evans, V. and Green, M, Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Evertz, M. Visual Prosody. The Graphematic Foot in English and German (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018).Google Scholar

Ewald, P. and Nerius, D, ‘Die Alternative: gemäßigte Kleinschreibung’ [The alternative: minimum capitalisation], in Augst, G, Blüml, K, Nerius, D and Sitta, H (eds.), Zur Neuregelung der deutschen Orthographie. Begründung und Kritik [On the revision of German orthography. Rationale and critique] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1997), pp. 419–34.Google Scholar

Ezell, M. J. Social Authorship and the Advent of Print (Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Fancev, F. ‘Jezik hrvatskih protestantskih pisaca XVI. vijeka [1]’ [The language of the Croatian Protestant writers of C16], Rad JAZU, 212/92 (1916), pp. 147–225.Google Scholar

Fancev, F. ‘Jezik hrvatskih protestantskih pisaca XVI. vijeka [2]’ [The language of the Croatian Protestant writers of C16], Rad JAZU, 214/93 (1916), pp. 1–112.Google Scholar

Farnaby, T. Florilegium epigrammatum græcorum, eorumque latino versu à varijs redditorum [Anthology of Greek epigrams, translated into Latin by various hands] (London: Christopher Meredith, 1650), EEBO-TCP Phase 1 file A40902.Google Scholar

Favriaud, M. ‘Ponctuation(s) et architecturation du discours à l’écrit’ [Punctuation(s) and architecturing of written discourse], Langue Française, 172 (Paris: Colin, 2011).Google Scholar

Ferdinand, , … Obnowené Práwo a Zřjzenj Zemſké Dědjčného Králowſtwj Cžeſkého … [… Reformed law and constitution of the hereditary Kingdom of Bohemia …] (Prague: Jan Schumann, 1627), KPS no. K02447.Google Scholar

Ferdinand II, … Obnowene Prawo a Zržizenj Zemſke Dědiczneho Kraloſtwj Czeſkeho … [… Reformed law and constitution of the hereditary Kingdom of Bohemia …] (second half of C17). East Bohemian Museum, Pardubice, Rkp 393, Repertorium 5046.Google Scholar

Ferdinand, , … Obnowene Prawo a Zřizeni Zemſke. Diedicžneho Kralowſtwj Cžeſkeho… [… Reformed law and constitution of the hereditary Kingdom of Bohemia …] (Solnice, 1672). Library of the National Museum, Prague, IV C 2, Bartoš Soupis 981.Google Scholar

Fernández, M. Olla podrida a la española [Spanish miscellany] (Antwerp; Amsterdam: Felipe van Eyck, 1655).Google Scholar

Fidlerová, A. A. ‘Ke vztahům mezi písařským a tiskařským pravopisným územ v raněnovověkých rukopisech’ [On the relations between scribal and printers’ orthographies in early modern manuscripts], Bohemica Olomucensia 3 – Linguistica Juvenilia (2009), pp. 40–7.Google Scholar

Fidlerová, A. A. ‘Rukopisná kultura Čech 17. a 18. století v zrcadle muzejních sbírek’ [Manuscript culture of Bohemia in C17 and C18 in the mirror of museum collections], Folia Historica Bohemica, 28 (2013), pp. 181–224.Google Scholar

Fidlerová, A. A., Andrle, J, Bernhardt, T, Těšínská Lomičková, R, Timofeev, D et al. (eds.), Repertorium rukopisů 17. a 18. století z muzejních sbírek v Čechách III/1‒2, P–Š [Inventory of C17 and C18 manuscripts from the museum collections in Bohemia, part 3, vols. 1 and 2 (P‒Š)] (Prague: Karolinum, in press).Google Scholar

Fidlerová, A. A., Bekešová, M et al. (eds.), Repertorium rukopisů 17. a 18. století z muzejních sbírek v Čechách II/1‒2, K–O [Inventory of C17 and C18 manuscripts from the museum collections in Bohemia, part 2, vols. 1 and 2 (K‒O)] (Prague: Karolinum, 2007).Google Scholar

Fidlerová, A. A., Dittmann, R and Vladimírová, V. S., ‘Uživání velkých písmen v českých tištěných Biblích raného novověku’ [Capitalisation in Early Modern Czech printed Bibles], in Čornejová, et al. (eds.), Dějiny českého pravopisu, pp. 285–308.Google Scholar

Fournier, J.-M. ‘La Généralité dans la théorie des sons à l’âge classique’ [Generality in the theory of sounds in the classical age], in J.-M. Fournier and S. Verleyen (eds.), Histoire des théories du son [History of sound theories], Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage, 29 (1, 2007), pp. 85–105.Google Scholar

Fournier, J.-M. ‘La Notion d’unité sonore dans les grammaires françaises des 17e et 18e siècles’ [The notion of sound unity in C17 and C18 French grammars], in Kibbee, D. A. (ed.), History of Linguistics 2005 (Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007), pp. 120–30.Google Scholar

Frantext, ATILF-CNRS, Université de Nancy 2, www.frantext.fr/ [last accessed 30 March 2020].Google Scholar

Fuhrhop, N. and Buchmann, F, ‘Die Längenhierarchie: Zum Bau der graphematischen Silbe’ [The length hierarchy: on the structure of the graphematic syllable], Linguistische Berichte, 218 (2009), pp. 127–55.Google Scholar

Fujii, A. ‘Zur Methode der Exzerption älterer Drucke. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Setzerwechsels in Frühdrucken’ [Excerpting from early printed texts. A contribution to the problem of multiple typesetters in early printing], Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie, 115 (1996), pp. 393–432.Google Scholar

Gadet, F. La Variation sociale en français [Social variation in French] (Paris: Ophrys, 2007).Google Scholar

Gadžieva, S., A. Kovačević, M. Mihaljević, S. Požar, J. Reinhart, M. Šimić, and Vince, J, Hrvatski crkvenoslavenski jezik [The Croatian redaction of the Church Slavonic language] (Zagreb: Croatian University Press, Old Church Slavonic Institute, 2014).Google Scholar

Gallica, the digital library of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, gallica.bnf.fr [last accessed 16 April 2020].Google Scholar

Gallmann, P. Graphische Elemente der geschriebenen Sprache [Graphic elements of the written language] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1985).Google Scholar

García Macho, M. L. and Pascual, J. A., ‘Sobre la lengua de Santa Teresa y el valor de sus elecciones gráficas evitadas por Fray Luis’ [The language of Saint Teresa and the graphical choices she made that were avoided by Fray Luis], Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 26–2 (1990), pp. 129–40.Google Scholar

García Martín, J. M. (ed.), Actas del IX Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, Cádiz, Setiembre 2012 [Proceedings of the IX International Congress of the History of the Spanish Language] (Madrid; Frankfurt: Iberoamericana Vervuert, 2015), 2 vols.Google Scholar

García Santos, J. F. ‘La ortografía nebrisense’ [Nebrija’s orthography], in Asencio, Gómez (ed.), El castellano y su codificación gramatical, vol. 1, pp. 335–64.Google Scholar

Gautier, A., Pétillon, S and Rinck, F (eds.), La Ponctuation à l’aube du XXIe siècle. Perspectives historiques et usages contemporains [Punctuation at the beginning of C21. Historical perspectives and contemporary uses] (Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, 2016).Google Scholar

Geitler, L. Die Albanesischen und Slavischen Schriften (Vienna: A. Hölder, 1883).Google Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. Narrative Performances: A Study of Modern Greek Storytelling (Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997).Google Scholar

Gfroerer, S., Günther, H and Bock, M, ‘Augenbewegungen und Substantivgroßschrei-bung – Eine Pilotstudie’ [Eye movements and noun capitalisation: a pilot study], in Eisenberg, and Günther, (eds.), Schriftsystem und Orthographie, pp. 111–35.Google Scholar

Giesecke, M. ‘Orthotypographia. Der Anteil des Buchdrucks an der Normierung der Standardsprache’ [Orthotypography. The contribution of printing to the standardisation of the standard language], in Stetter, C (ed.), Zur Theorie der Orthographie. Interdisziplinäre Aspekte gegenwärtiger Schrift- und Orthographieforschung [On the theory of spelling. Interdisciplinary aspects of recent research on writing and spelling] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990), pp. 65–89.Google Scholar

Girón Alconchel, J. L. ‘Las gramáticas del español y el español de las gramáticas en el Siglo de oro’ [Spanish grammars and the Spanish language in grammars from the Golden Age], Boletín de la Real Academia Española, 76 (269, 1996), pp. 285–308.Google Scholar

Girón Alconchel, J. L. and de Bustos Tovar, J. J. (eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española: Madrid, 29 de septiembre–3 octubre 2003 [Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of the History of the Spanish Language, Madrid, 29 September–3 October 2003] (Madrid: Arco Libros, 2006), vol. 1.Google Scholar

Glaser, E. ‘Zu Entstehung und Charakter der neuhochdeutschen Schriftsprache: Theorie und Empirie’ [On the origin and character of the New High German written language: Theory and practice], in Berthele, R, Christen, H, Germann, S and Hove, I (eds.), Die deutsche Schriftsprache und die Regionen [German written language and the regions] (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003), pp. 57–78.Google Scholar

Golubović, B. ‘Nauka o pismu u srpskoj lingvistici – o dosadašnjim istraživanjima i mogućnostima razvoja’ [The science of writing in Serbian linguistics – the latest research and perspectives], in Voß, C and Golubović, B (eds.), Srpska lingvistika / Serbische Linguistik: Eine Bestandsaufnahme [Serbian linguistics: A survey] (Munich; Berlin: Sagner, 2010), pp. 33–54.Google Scholar

Gómez Asencio, J. J. (ed.), Antiguas gramáticas del castellano [Old grammars of Castilian language] [CD-ROM] (Madrid: Fundación Histórica Tavera, 2001).Google Scholar

Gómez Asencio, J. J. (ed.), El castellano y su codificación gramatical, vol. 1: De 1492 (A. de Nebrija) a 1611 (John Sanford); vol. 2: De 1614 (B. Jiménez Patón) a 1697 (F. Sobrino) [The Castilian language and its grammatical rules: vol. 1: From 1492 (A. de Nebrija) to 1611 (John Sanford); vol. 2: from 1614 (B. Jiménez Patón to 1697 (F. Sobrino)] (Salamanca: Instituto Castellano y Leonés de la Lengua, 2006).Google Scholar

Görlach, M. Eighteenth-Century English (Heidelberg: Winter, 2001).Google Scholar

Görlach, M. Introduction to Early Modern English, revised ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graband, G. Die Entwicklung der frühneuenglischen Nominalflexion [The development of Early Modern English nominal inflection] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1965).Google Scholar

Grace, A., Kemp, N, Martin, F. H. and Parrila, R, ‘Undergraduates’ attitudes to text messaging language use and intrusions of textisms into formal writing’, New Media & Society, 17 (5, 2015), pp. 792–809.Google Scholar

Gries, S. Th. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction (Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2009).Google Scholar

Grimalauskaitė, D. and Remecas, E, Pinigai Lietuvoje [Money in Lithuania] (Vilnius: National Museum of Lithuania, 2016).Google Scholar

Grund, P. J. ‘Scribes and scribal practices’, in Kytö, M, Grund, P. J. and Walker, T (eds.), Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England (Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011), pp. 147–80.Google Scholar

Veronese, Guarino, In presenti libro continentur, item ars dipthongandi Guarini Veronensis. Item compendiosus dialogus de arte punctandi. Item tractatus utilis de accentu [This book contains the art of diphthongisation by Guarino Veronese, the instructional dialogue about the art of punctuation, and a useful treatise on accents] (Lyon: P. Ungarum/P. Hongre, 1482), gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k535510/f5.item [last accessed 4 June 2020].Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. Discourse Strategies (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Günther, H. ‘Eine Etüde zur Entwicklung der deutschen Interpunktion 1522–1961’ [A study on the development of German punctuation 1522–1961], in Thieroff, R, Tamrat, M, Fuhrhop, N and Teuber, O (eds.), Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis [German grammar in theory and practice] (Tubingen: Niemeyer, 2000), pp. 275–86.Google Scholar

Günther, H. (ed.), Geschriebene Sprache – Funktion und Gebrauch, Struktur und Geschichte [Written language – function and use, structure and history] (Munich: FIPKM, 1981).Google Scholar

Güthert, K. Herausbildung von Norm und Usus Scribendi im Bereich der Worttrennung am Zeilenende (1500–1800) [Formation of norm and usus scribendi in the field of word separation (1500–1800)] (Heidelberg: Winter, 2005).Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Cabero, A. M. ‘La enseñanza de la caligrafía en España a través de los Artes de Escribir de los siglos XVI al XX: La construcción de un estilo de escritura’ [The teaching of calligraphy in Spain through Arts of Writing from C16 to C20: The construction of a style of writing], unpublished PhD thesis (Universidad Complutense, Madrid, 2014), http://eprints.ucm.es/29371/1/T35921.pdf [last accessed 14 May 2020].Google Scholar

Hall, D. D. Ways of Writing. The Practice and Politics of Text-Making in Seventeenth-Century New England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hamesse, J. ‘Reportations, graphies et ponctuation’ [Note taking, spelling and punctuation], in Maierù, (ed.), Grafia e interpunzione del latino, pp. 135–51.Google Scholar

Han (Gallus), N. Catechismvs, Predigsweise gestelt, für die kirche zu Regenspurg [Catechism as preached for the church in Regensburg] (Regensburg: Hans Kohl, 1554) (VD 16 G 277).Google Scholar

Harley, J. ‘“My ladye Nevell” revealed’, Music and Letters, 86 (1, 2005), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Hart, J. An Orthographie Conteyning the due Order and Reason, Howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, Most Like to the Life or Nature (London: Henry Denham for William Seres, 1569), https://search.proquest.com/eebo [last accessed 28 Dec. 2018].Google Scholar

Hartweg, F. and Wegera, K.-P., Frühneuhochdeutsch. Eine Einführung in die deutsche Sprache des Spätmittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, 2nd ed. [Early New High German. An introduction to the German language of the late Middle Ages and the early modern period] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2005).Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. ‘Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change’, in Good, J (ed.), Language Universals and Language Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 185–214.Google Scholar

Hatz, E. R. R. ‘Die Durchführung des “etymologischen Prinzips” bei der Graphie der Umlaute von “a” und “au” untersucht an Drucken der Lutherbibel des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts’ [The implementation of the ‘Etymological Principle’ in the graphemes of the umlauts of ‘a’ and ‘au’, investigated in printed editions of the Luther Bible of C16–C18], unpublished PhD thesis (Heidelberg University, 1986).Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Hellinga, L. Texts in Transit: Manuscript to Proof and Print in the Fifteenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2014).Google Scholar

Hellinga-Querido, L. ‘Methode en praktijk bij het Zetten van Boeken in den vijftiende eeuw’ [Method and practice of setting books in C15], unpublished PhD thesis (University of Amsterdam, 1974).Google Scholar

Hendrickx, I. and Marquilhas, R, ‘From old texts to modern spellings: an experiment in automatic normalisation’, Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 26 (2, 2011), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar

Hercigonja, E. Tropismena i trojezična kultura hrvatskoga srednjovjekovlja [The tri-alphabetic and tri-lingual culture of the Croatian Middle Ages] (Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, 2014).Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, J. M. ‘Authorship and gender in English historical sociolinguistic research: samples from the Paston Letters’, in Russi, (ed.), Current Trends, pp. 108–42.Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, J. M. and Conde-Silvestre, J. C., ‘Sociolinguistic and geolinguistic approaches to the historical diffusion of linguistic innovations: incipient standardisation in Late Middle English’, International Journal of English Studies, 5 (1, 2005), pp. 101–34.Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, J. M. and Conde-Silvestre, J. C., ‘The social diffusion of linguistic innovations in fifteenth century England: Chancery spellings in private correspondence’, Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 8 (1999), pp. 251–74.Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, J. M. and Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2014).Google Scholar

Hie kompt ein Beüerlein zu einem reichen Burger [Here is a peasant coming to a rich burgher] (Speyer: Johann Eckhart, 1522) (VD 16 H 3466).Google Scholar

HIe yn diesem büchlin vindet man die grossen wunder werck der heyligen stat Rome [Here in this booklet you will find the great marvels of the holy city of Rome] (Strasbourg: Matthias Hupfuff, 1500) (ISTC im00613100).Google Scholar

Hill, P. and Lehmann, V (eds.), Standard Language in the Slavic World. Papers on Sociolinguistics by Hamburg Slavists (Munich: Otto Sagner, 1988).Google Scholar

Hilpert, M. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Hinrichs, L. and White-Sustaíta, J, ‘Global Englishes and the sociolinguistics of spelling: a study of Jamaican blog and email writing’, English World-Wide, 32 (1, 2011), pp. 46–73.Google Scholar

Hintze, C. ‘Signed receipt for the print of two books by Simonas Daukantas’, a manuscript with no title in Russian at the Institute of the Lithuanian Literature and Folklore (Vilnius, call no. f. 1 – SD 32, 1838).Google Scholar

‘Historia und Geschicht von Melusina/ der Edlen und Hochgebornen Königin auß Franckreich’ [Historia and tale of Melusina, the noble and high-born queen from France], in Das Buch der Liebe [The book of love] (Frankfurt am Main: Feyerabend, 1587) (VD 16 B 8959), fols. 262v–284v.Google Scholar

Hockett, Ch. A Course in Modern Linguistics (New York: Macmillan, 1967).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T. Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-Based Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, W., Macha, J, Mattheier, K. J., Solms, H.-J. and Wegera, K.-P. (eds.), Das Frühneuhochdeutsche als sprachgeschichtliche Epoche [Early New High German as a period of language history] (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999).Google Scholar

Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M and Schmitt, C (eds.), Lexicon der Romanistischen Linguistik: les différentes langues romanes et leurs régions d’implantation du Moyen Âge à la Renaissance [Lexicon of Romance linguistics: The various Romance languages and their areas of establishment from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance], vol. 2, part 2 (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1996).Google Scholar

Honeybone, P. and Salmons, J (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Hope, J. ‘Rats, bats, sparrows, and dogs: biology, linguistics, and the nature of standard English’, in Wright, (ed.), Development of Standard English, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar

Horobin, S. ‘The language of the fifteenth-century printed editions of The Canterbury Tales’, Anglia, 119 (2, 2001), pp. 249–58.Google Scholar

Horobin, S. and Smith, J. J., An Introduction to Middle English (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S, Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 2000).Google Scholar

Houston, K. Shady Characters: Ampersands, Interrobangs and other Typographical Curiosities (London: Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. ‘Early modern printers and the standardization of English spelling’, The Modern Language Review, 101 (2006), pp. 16–29.Google Scholar

Hubert, Ph.-M. ‘Corpvs stigmatologicvm minvs’ [Compendium of texts on punctuation], Archivvm Latinitatis Medii Aevi, 37 (1970), pp. 5–171.Google Scholar

Hubert, Ph.-M. ‘Notes de lexicographie thomiste. V. Présentation, ponctuation et mots-outils’ [Notes on Thomist lexicography. V. Presentation, punctuation and terminology] Archivvm Latinitatis Medii Aevi, 36 (1969), pp. 59–108.Google Scholar

Huchon, M. ‘Pour une histoire de la ponctuation 1532–1553: les variations des éditions des premiers livres de Rabelais’ [A history of punctuation 1532–1553: variations in the editions of Rabelais’s early books], Nouvelle Revue du XVIe Siècle, 6 (1988), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar

Hus, J. Magistri Iohannis Hus Opera omnia, vols. 1–4 (Prague: Academia, 1975–95).Google Scholar

I͡Agich, I. V. ‘Glagolicheskoe pis’mo’ [The Glagolitic script], Enciklopedii͡a slavi͡anskoĭ filologii, 3 (1911), pp. 51–262.Google Scholar

In dem buechlein steet geschriben wie Rom gepauet wart [In this guide it is told how Rome was built] (Rome: Stephan Plannck) (ISTC im00612000).Google Scholar

Isasi, C. ‘Peculiaridades lingüísticas geográficas: interpretación filológica y marcación’ [Peculiarities in geographical linguistics: philological interpretation and marking], in Méndez, Sánchez et al. (eds.), Temas, problemas y métodos, pp. 197–212.Google Scholar

Item in dem püchlein stet geschriben wie Rome gepauet wart [In this guide it is told how Rome was built] (Nuremberg: Peter Wagner, 1491) (ISTC im00608500).Google Scholar

Item in dem püchlin stet geschriben wie Rom gepauet ward [In this guide it is told how Rome was built] (Munich: Johann Schaur, 1482) (ISTC im00607300).Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. M. ‘Introduction: Non-standard orthography and non-standard speech’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4 (2000), pp. 497–513.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. M., Androutsopoulos, J, Sebba, M and Johnson, S (eds.), Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power (Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter, 2012).Google Scholar

Janečková, M. K jazyku českého baroka. Hláskosloví, pravopis a tisk, označování kvantity [Towards the language of the Czech baroque. Phonology, orthography and letter printing, quantity distinction] (Prague: Arsci, 2009).Google Scholar

Janów, J. Jan Sandecki (Malecki), Ewangeliarz z początku XVI wieku i dwa późniejsze druki polskie tegoż autora [Jan Sandecki (Malecki), Gospel from the beginning of C16 and two later Polish printed texts by the same author] (Cracow: PAU, 1949).Google Scholar

Janów, J. ‘O stosunku dwu wydań Żywota Pana Jezu Krysta z r. 1522 i wynikających stąd wnioskach o redaktorze druku Ossolińskiego nr 60862 oraz o zaginionem wydaniu Historii o św. Annie ok. 1522 r.’ [On the relationship between the two 1522 editions of Żywot Pana Jezu Krysta and the resulting conclusions on the editor of the Ossoliński print no. 60862 and the lost edition of the History of Saint Anna around the year 1522], Sprawozdania Towarzystwa Naukowego we Lwowie, 8 (1928), pp. 43–51.Google Scholar

Jembrih, A. ‘Pogovor uz pretisak ćiriličkoga Novoga testamenta [1563]’ [Afterword to the facsimile reprint of the Cyrillic New Testament (1563)] (Zagreb: MVI, 2008).Google Scholar

Jembrih, A. ‘Pogovor uz pretisak glagoljičkoga Novoga testamenta [1562/3]’ [Afterword to the facsimile reprint of the Glagolitic New Testament (1562/3)], 2nd ed. (Zagreb: MVI, 2016).Google Scholar

Jembrih, A. (ed.), Antun Dalmatin, Stipan Konzul. Postilla, Ratisbona 1568, facsimile (Pazin: Juraj Dobrila, 1993).Google Scholar

Jembrih, A. (ed.), Novi testament (1562/3), facsimile edition of the Glagolitic original printed in Urach/Tübingen (Zagreb, 2007).Google Scholar

Jembrih, A. (ed.), Novi testament (1563), facsimile edition of the Cyrillic original printed in Urach/Tübingen (Zagreb, 2008).Google Scholar

Jiménez Patón, B. Epitome de la ortografia latina, y castellana [The handbook of Latin and Castilian orthography] (Baeza: P. de la Cuesta, 1614).Google Scholar

Jodłowski, S. Losy polskiej ortografii [Vicissitudes of Polish spelling] (Warsaw: National Scientific Publishing House, 1979).Google Scholar

Johnston, M. D. ‘Mateo Alemán’s problem with spelling’, PMLA, 103/5 (1988), pp. 759–69.Google Scholar

Joshi, R. M. and Aaron, P. G. (eds.), Handbook of Orthography and Literacy (London; New York: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Juda, M. Pismo drukowane w Polsce XV–XVIII wieku [Printed fonts in C15–C18 Poland] (Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 2001).Google Scholar

Kaempfert, M. ‘Motive der Substantivgroßschreibung. Beobachtungen an Drucken des 16. Jahrhunderts’ [Reasons for noun capitalisation. Observations on the basis of C16 printed texts], Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie, 99 (1980), pp. 72–98.Google Scholar

Kaislaniemi, S., Evans, M, Juvonen, T and Sairio, A, ‘“A graphic system which leads its own linguistic life?” Epistolary spelling in English, 1400–1800’, in Säily, T, Nurmi, A, Palander-Collin, M and Auer, A (eds.), Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017), pp. 187–213.Google Scholar

Kamińska, K. ‘Pisownia druków polskich XVI wieku’ [Spelling in C16 Polish printed texts], Prace Polonistyczne, 11 (1953), pp. 5–28.Google Scholar

Kamińska, M. Psałterz floriański. Monografia językowa, vol. 1: Ortografia, fonetyka, fleksja imion [Saint Florian Psalter. A linguistic monograph, vol. 1: Spelling, phonetics, inflection] (Wrocław: ZNIO, 1981).Google Scholar

Kapatsinski, V. ‘What is it I am writing? Lexical frequency effects in spelling Russian prefixes: Uncertainty and competition in an apparently regular system’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6 (2, 2010), pp. 157–215.Google Scholar

Karaś, M. and Perzanowski, Z, Statuty kapituły norbertańskiej z r. 1541 [Statutes of the Premonstratensian Order chapter from the year 1541] (Cracow: Jagiellonian University, 1970).Google Scholar

Karlík, P., Nekula, M and Pleskalová, J (eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny [CzechEncy ‒ New encyclopaedic dictionary of Czech] (2017), https://www.czechency.org/ [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Karskiĭ, E. F. Slavi͡anskai͡a kirillovskai͡a paleografii͡a [Slavic Cyrillic palaeography] (Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1928 [reprint: Moscow: Nauka, 1979]).Google Scholar

Kaverina, V. V. Stanovlenie russkoĭ orfografii XVII–XIX vv.: Pravopisnyĭ uzus i kodifikacii͡a [The establishment of Russian orthography in C17–C19: orthographical use and codification], Dissertation summary (Moscow State University, 2010).Google Scholar

Kaverina, V. V. ‘Ustranenie omofonii v istorii russkogo pis’ma’ [Homophony neutralisation in the history of Russian writing], Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 9 (5, 2008), pp. 40–65.Google Scholar

Kawecka-Gryczowa, A. Drukarze dawnej Polski od XV do XVIII wieku, vol. 1: Małopolska, part 1: Wiek XV–XVI [Printers of old Poland from C15 to C18, vol. 1: Lesser Poland, part 1: C15–C16] (Wrocław: ZNIO, 1983).Google Scholar

Kawecka-Gryczowa, A. ‘Miejsce książki w kulturze polskiej XVI wieku’ [The role of the book in the Polish culture in C16], in Wyczański, A (ed.), Polska w epoce Odrodzenia. Państwo, społeczeństwo, kultura [Poland in the age of the Renaissance. State, society, culture] (Warsaw: PWN, 1986), pp. 411–54.Google Scholar

Keller, R. E. Die deutsche Sprache [The German language] (Hamburg: Buske, 1995).Google Scholar

Keszler, B. ‘A magyar írásjelhasználat és Európa’ [Hungarian punctuation and Europe], Magyar Nyelvőr, 127 (2003), pp. 24–36.Google Scholar

Keszler, B. Írásjeltan. Az írásjelhasználat szabályai, problémái és történet [The study of punctuation. The use of punctuation, its rules, problems and history] (Budapest: National Textbook Publisher, 2004).Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, F. and Primus, B, ‘The architecture of punctuation systems: a historical case study of the comma in German’, Written Language and Literacy, 17 (2, 2014), pp. 195–224.Google Scholar

Klemensiewicz, Z. Historia języka polskiego [The history of the Polish language], 2nd ed. (Warsaw: PWN, 1985).Google Scholar

Klemensiewicz, Z., Lehr-Spławiński, T and Urbańczyk, S, Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego [Historical grammar of the Polish language] (Warsaw: PWN, 1965).Google Scholar

Klimaŭ, I. P. Rėfarmatsyi͡a ŭ historyi litaraturnykh moŭ slavi͡an: Ŭklad pol’ska-belaruskaha i slavenska-kharvatskaha pratėstantyzmu 16 st. [Reformation in the history of the Slavic standard languages: Contribution of Polish–Belorussian and Slovene–Croatian Protestantism in C16] (Minsk: Belarusian State University of Culture, 2004).Google Scholar

Klimek, Z. Język polski w rozmówkach polsko-niemieckich Książeczek polskich z r. 1539 [The Polish language in Polish–German phrasebooks in Polish publications from the year 1539] (Wrocław: ZNIO, 1978).Google Scholar

Koch, P. and Oesterreicher, W, ‘Gesprochene Sprache und geschriebene Sprache’ / ‘Langage parlé et langage écrit’ [‘Spoken language and written language’], in Holtus, et al. (eds.), Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, pp. 584–627.Google Scholar

Koch, P. and Oesterreicher, W, ‘Language of immediacy ‒ language of distance: orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history’, in Lange, C, Weber, B and Wolf, G (eds.), Communicative Spaces. Variation, Contact, and Change. Papers in Honour of Ursula Schaefer (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2012), pp. 441‒73.Google Scholar

Kohrt, M. Problemgeschichte des Graphembegriffs und des frühen Phonembegriffs [A problematic history of the concepts of the grapheme and of the early phoneme] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1985).Google Scholar

Koialowicz, A. W. Historiae Litvanae pars prior [History of Lithuania, part 1]) (Danzig: Svmptibus Georgii Försteri, 1650).Google Scholar

Konstanc, J. Lima lingvae Bohemicae. To geſt: BRUS Gazyka Cžeſkého … [Whetstone of the Czech language …] (Prague: Impressí akademická, 1667), KPS no. K04307.Google Scholar

Konzul, S. Katehismus, edna malahna kniga v koi yeszu vele potribni i korisni nauci [The catechism, one small book with very useful lessons] (Tübingen, 1564) in Jembrih, A (ed.), Katekizam, jedna malahna knjiga v hrvatski jazik istumačena [Catechism, a small book translated into the Croatian language] (Pazin: Juraj Dobrila, 1991), pp. 1–141.Google Scholar

Kopaczyk, J. The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Kopaczyk, J. and Jucker, A. H. (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English (Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2013).Google Scholar

Korompay, K. ‘16th-century Hungarian orthography’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 321–49.Google Scholar

Kosek, P. ‘Bratrský pravopis’ [Brethren’s orthography], in Karlík et al. (eds.), CzechEncy, https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/BRATRSKÝ PRAVOPIS [last accessed 3 June 2020].Google Scholar

Kosek, P. ‘Interpunkce českých tištěných kancionálů 17. a 18. století a její transkripce’ [Punctuation of the Czech printed hymn-books of C17 and C18 and the methods of its transcription], in Čornejová, et al. (eds.), Dějiny českého pravopisu, pp. 250–84.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten [Future past. On the semantics of historical times] (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979).Google Scholar

Koupil, O. ‘Alphabetum Boëmicum (1718): slabikář pro učené’ [Alphabetum Boëmicum (1718): a primer for scholars], Listy filologické, 136 (2013), pp. 365‒82.Google Scholar

Koupil, O. ‘Druhé vydání náměšťské mluvnice (1543) znovu nalezeno’ [The second edition of the grammar of Náměšť (1543) lost and found], Česká literatura, 64 (2016), pp. 243‒66.Google Scholar

Koupil, O. ‘Psáti neb tisknouti? (Nám4, ŠtVýb1 a písaři)’ [To write or to print? (Nám4, ŠtVýb1 and the scribes)], in Čornejová, et al. (eds.), Dějiny českého pravopisu, pp. 235–49.Google Scholar

Kovačević, A. ‘Neki novi glagololjupci [Some new Glagolitic-lovers], Bašćina: Glasilo Društva Prijatelja Glagoljice, 18 (2017), pp. 37–9.Google Scholar

Kowalska, A. ‘Końcówka -ej w odmianie rzeczowników rodzaju żeńskiego w języku polskim’ [The -ej ending in the feminine gender noun inflectional paradigm], Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Prace Językoznawcze, 1 (1976), pp. 58–81.Google Scholar

Kozhinova, A. ‘Rannie vostochnoslavi͡anskie kriptograficheskie sistemy v kontekste i͡azykovykh kontaktov’ [Early Eastern Slavic cryptographic systems in the context of language contacts], in Tomelleri, and Kempgen, (eds.), Slavic Alphabets in Contact, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar

KPS ‒ Knihopis Database of Czech and Slovak printed texts, http://www.knihopis.cz/knihopis-eng.html [last accessed 25 April 2020].Google Scholar

Kraus, K. Ausgewählte Schriften, vol. 4: Pro Domo et Mundo [Selected writings, vol. 4: To use at home and elsewhere] (Munich: Langen, 1912).Google Scholar

Kresa, M. ‘Gramatyka dla szkół narodowych Onufrego Kopczyńskiego’ [Onufry Kopczyński’s Grammar for the national schools], Poradnik Językowy (1, 2016), pp. 86–93.Google Scholar

Kress, G. Early Spelling. Between Convention and Creativity (London; New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Artykulowe Praw Meſtſkých (1619). [Articles of the municipal law], National Library of the Czech Republic, Prague, XVII G 18, Truhlář, Katalog 307.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Práwa Měſtſká Králowſtwij Czieſkého … [Municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (Prague: Daniel Adam z Veleslavína, Jiří Melantrich z Aventýna senior, 1579), KPS no. K04564.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Prawa Měſtſka Kralowſtwj Czieſkého [Municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia] (Hřešihlavy, 1661). Library of the National Museum, Prague, V C 45, Prozatímní katalog.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Práwa Měſtſká Králowſtwij Czieſkého. Práwa a Zřijzenij zemſká Králowſtwj Cžeſkého [Municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia. Law and constitution of the Kingdom of Bohemia] (Nový Bydžov, 1624). Library of the National Museum, Prague, IV C 15, Bartoš Soupis 994.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Práwa Měſtſká Králowſtwij Cžeſkého / w krátkau Summu vwedená … [Short summary of the municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (Prague: Jiří Černý z Černého Mostu, 1582), KPS no. K04567.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Práwa a Zřijzenij Zemſká Králowſtwij Cžeſkého w krátkau Summu vwedená … [Short summary of the law and constitution of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (Prague: Jiří Černý z Černého Mostu, 1583), KPS no. K04574.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Prawa Mieſtſka Kralowſtwi Cžeſkeho, wkratkau Summu Vwedena … [Short summary of the Municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (before 1685). National Library of the Czech Republic, Prague, XVII C 39, Truhlář, Katalog 117.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Prawa Mieſtſka Kralowſtwj Cžeſkeho w Kratkau Summu Vwedena … [Short summary of the municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (early C18). Museum and Gallery of the Orlické Mountains, Rychnov nad Kněžnou, 562/74, Repertorium 3477.Google Scholar

Kristián z Koldína, P. Prawa Mieſtſka Kralowſtwy Cžeſkeho. Wnowie Přzepſana Letha Panie 1682, Dne 28. Magij [Municipal law of the Kingdom of Bohemia …] (1682). Library of the National Museum, Prague, IV C 22, Bartoš Soupis 1001.Google Scholar

Kristol, A. ‘Sociolinguistique historique et analyse de la conversation: Une nouvelle approche du Journal d’Hygiène de Jean Héroard’ [Historical sociolinguistics and conversational analysis: A new approach to the Journal d’Hygiène by Jean Héroard], Vox Romanica, 68 (2009), pp. 169–86.Google Scholar

Kruming, A. A. Svodnyĭ katalog staropechatnyx izdanij glagolicheskogo shrifta 1483–1812 gg. [Union catalogue of early Glagolitic printed books, 1483–1812] (Moscow: Russian State Library, 1995).Google Scholar

Książek-Bryłowa, W. ‘Uwarunkowania społeczne normy językowej w XVI wieku’ [Social aspects of linguistic norms in C16], Rozprawy Komisji Językowej Łódzkiego Towarzystwa Naukowego, 32 (1986), pp. 139–46.Google Scholar

Kucała, M. Jakuba Parkosza Traktat o ortografii polskiej [Jakub Parkosz’s treatise on Polish orthography] (Warsaw: PWN, 1985).Google Scholar

Kučera, K. ‘Dodatek ke kvantitativním charakteristikám vývoje českého pravopisu od 13. do 20. století’ [An addition to the quantitative characterisation of the development of Czech orthography from C13 to C20], Slovo a Slovesnost, 60 (1999), pp. 301‒3.Google Scholar

Kučera, K. ‘Vývoj účinnosti a složitosti českého pravopisu od konce 13. do konce 20. Století’ [Development of orthographical efficiency and complexity in Czech texts from the end of C13 to the end of C20], Slovo a Slovesnost, 59 (1998), pp. 178‒99.Google Scholar

Kudirka, V. ‘Statrašos ramsčiai’ [Buttresses of orthography], MS (Vilnius University Library, call no. f. 1 – E 333, 1890).Google Scholar

Kul’bakin, S. M. Slavi͡anskai͡a paleografii͡a [Slavic palaeography] (Belgrade: SANU, 2008).Google Scholar

Künast, H.-J. ‘Getruckt zu Augspurg’. Buchdruck und Buchhandel in Augsburg zwischen 1468 und 1555 [‘Printed in Augspurg’. Book printing and the book trade in Augsburg between 1468 and 1555] (Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1997).Google Scholar

Kuraszkiewicz, W. Polski język literacki. Studia nad historią i strukturą [Polish literary language. Studies on history and structure] (Warsaw: PWN, 1986).Google Scholar

Kuštović, T. ‘Jezik hrvatskog protestantskog ćiriličkog Novog Zavjeta (1563.) prema hrvatskoglagoljskoj tradiciji’ [The language of the Croatian Protestant Cyrillic New Testament (1563) in the Croatian Glagolitic tradition], Filologija, 62 (2014), pp. 115–29.Google Scholar

Kuštović, T. and Žagar, M (eds.), Meandrima hrvatskoga glagoljaštva. Zbornik posvećen akademiku Stjepanu Damjanović o 70. rođendanu [Through the meanders of the Croatian Glagolitic tradition. An anthology dedicated to Stjepan Damjanović] (Zagreb: Croatian University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kuźmicki, M. and Osiewicz, M (eds.), Dokument pisany w badaniach historyka języka polskiego. Z badań nad grafią i fonetyką historycznej polszczyzny [A written document as a source of diachronic investigations of Polish. Remarks on the spelling system and on the phonetics of historical Polish] (Zielona Góra; Poznań: University of Zielona Góra, 2010).Google Scholar

Labov, W. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 1: Internal Factors (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Labov, W. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 2: Social Factors (Malden: Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Labs-Ehlert, B. Versalschreibung in althochdeutschen Sprachdenkmälern. Ein Beitrag über die Anfänge der Großschreibung im Deutschen unter Berücksichtigung der Schriftgeschichte [Uppercase spelling in Old High German texts. A contribution on the beginnings of capitalisation in German in the context of the history of writing] (Göppingen: Kümmerle, 1993).Google Scholar

Lamprecht, A. Vývoj fonologického systému českého jazyka [Development of the Czech language phonological system] (Brno: J. E. Purkyně University, 1966).Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: 1476–1776 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Lavrentiev, A. ‘Linguistique de corpus: Idéologie, méthodologies, technologies’ [Corpus linguistics: ideology, methodologies, technologies], Sibirskiĭ Filologicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 3–4 (2004), pp. 121–34.Google Scholar

Lavrentiev, A. ‘Ponctuation française du Moyen Âge au XVIe siècle: théories et pratiques’ [French punctuation from the Middle Ages to C16: theory and practice], in Pétillon, S, Rinck, F and Gautier, A (eds.), La Ponctuation à l’Aube du XXIe Siècle. Perspectives Historiques et Usages Contemporains [Punctuation at the dawn of C21: historical perspectives and contemporary practices], (Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, 2016), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Lavrentiev, A. ‘Tendances de la ponctuation dans les manuscrits et incunables français en prose, du XIIIe au XVe siècle’ [Trends in punctuation in French manuscripts and incunabula in prose, from C13 to C15], unpublished PhD thesis, 2 vols. (ENS Lyon, 2009), tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00494914 [last accessed 5 June 2020].Google Scholar

Lazar, M. ‘Transfer des Rechts und Transfer der Rechtssprache. Sächsisch-magdeburgisches Recht und seine Verbreitung im Ostmitteleuropa nach den Hussitenkriegen’ [Transfer of the law and transfer of the legal language. Saxon-Magdeburg law and its spread in East-Central Europe after the Hussite Wars], in Kuße, H and Kosourová, H (eds.), Persönlichkeiten in der tschechischen Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte. [Personalities in Czech language and cultural history] (Bern: Peter Lang, 2016), pp. 177–202.Google Scholar

Lehmann, V. ‘An essay on crosslinguistic phenomena in the development of Slavic standard languages’, in Hill, and Lehmann, (eds.), Standard Language in the Slavic World, pp. 129–46.Google Scholar

Leith, D. A Social History of English (London: Routledge, 1983).Google Scholar

Levshina, N. How to do Linguistics with R. Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis (Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015).Google Scholar

Lewaszkiewicz, T. ‘O potrzebie nowego spojrzenia na genezę polskiego języka literackiego (z uwzględnieniem tła ogólnoeuropejskiego)’ [The need for a new look at the origin of the Polish literary language (including the European background)], in Kucała, M and Krążyńska, Z (eds.), Studia historycznojęzykowe [Studies in historical linguistics] (Cracow: IJP PAN, 1994), pp. 213–20.Google Scholar

Lewaszkiewicz, T. ‘Rola kontaktów językowych we wstępnym okresie formowania się słowiańskich języków literackich (na tle ogólniejszym)’ [Role of language contacts in the preliminary period of the formation of the Slavic literary languages (on the more general background)], in Galster, B (ed.), Z polskich studiów slawistycznych [From Polish Slavonic studies] (Warsaw: Energeia, 1992), pp. 133–8.Google Scholar

Lewaszkiewicz, T. ‘Rola przekładów Biblii w formowaniu języków literackich europejskiego kręgu kulturowego’ [The role of Bible translations in forming the literary languages of the European Kulturkreis], in Kamińska, M and Małek, E (eds.), Biblia a kultura Europy [The Bible and European culture] (Łódź: Łódź University, 1992), pp. 232–48.Google Scholar

Lillis, T. M. The Sociolinguistics of Writing (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Linda, J., Stich, A, Fidlerová, A, Šulcková, M et al. (eds.), Repertorium rukopisů 17. a 18. století z muzejních sbírek v Čechách I/1‒2, A–J [Inventory of C17 and C18 manuscripts from the museum collections in Bohemia, Part 1, vols. 1 and 2 (A‒J)] (Prague: Karolinum, 2003).Google Scholar

Ling, R., Baron, N. S., Lenhart, A and Campbell, S. W., ‘“Girls text really weird”: gender, texting and identity among teens’, Journal of Children and Media, 8 (4, 2014), pp. 423–39.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘Economic calculation and Polish alphabetic writing’, in Sekiguchi, T (ed.), Spotkania polonistyk trzech krajów – Chiny, Korea, Japonia [Meetings of Polish studies scholars from three countries – China, Korea, Japan] (Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 2009), pp. 195–204.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘Geneza imiesłowu reca w Kazaniach świętokrzyskich. Trzy modele interpretacji historycznojęzykowej’ [Origin of the participle reca in the Holy Cross Sermons. Three models of historical–linguistic interpretation], in Laskowski, R and Mazurkiewicz, R (eds.), Amoenitates vel lepores philologiae [Pleasance and charm of philology] (Cracow: Lexis, 2007), pp. 175–84.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. Grafia druków polskich z 1521 i 1522 roku. Problemy wariantywności i normalizacji [Spelling of Polish printed books from 1521 and 1522. Problems with variation and standardisation] (Poznań: UAM, 2001).Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘Ideographization of the Polish writing system and the historical linguistic interpretation, i.e. what we know about the old Polish spelling system’, Journal of Central & East European Studies, 5 (2, 2003), pp. 89–112.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘Jan Sandecki, redaktor Żywota Pana Jezu Krysta wobec ortografii druków czeskich’ [Jan Sandecki, the editor of Żywot Pana Jezu Krysta from 1522, and his approach to the spelling of Bohemian printed texts], Slavia Occidentalis, 50 (1993), pp. 93–104.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. Polszczyzna początku XVI wieku. Problemy wariantywności i normalizacji fonetyki i fleksji [The Polish language at the beginning of C16. Problems with the variation and standardisation of phonetics and inflection] (Poznań: WiS, 1999).Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘Ślady graficznej tradycji rękopisów w dwu edycjach Żywota Pana Jezu Krysta Baltazara Opeca z 1522 roku’ [Traces of manuscript spelling traditions in the two 1522 editions of Żywot Pana Jezu Krysta by Baltazar Opec], Slavia Occidentalis, 51 (1994), pp. 66–73.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘The beginning of the typographical era in Poland’, Journal of Central & East European Studies, 6 (2, 2004), pp. 139–65.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. ‘The Polish printed book and development of the Polish spelling system’, East European Studies, 12 (1, 2003), pp. 111–35.Google Scholar

Lisowski, T. and Osiewicz, M, ‘Leksykalizacja pisowni polskiej w dobie staroi średniopolskiej jako problem badawczy. Uwagi na marginesie prac Władysława Kuraszkiewicza’ [Lexicalization of Polish spelling in the Old Polish and Middle Polish periods as a research problem. Notes in the margins of Władysław Kuraszkiewicz’s studies], in Kuźmicki, and Osiewicz, (eds.), Dokument pisany, pp. 149–66.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Administración, cultura escrita y puntuación. Documentación castellana y anglonormanda (siglos XII–XIII)’ [Administration, literacy and punctuation. Castilian and Anglo-Norman documents (C12 and C13)], in Arizaleta, A and Bautista, F (eds.), Los modelos anglo-normandos en la cultura letrada en Castilla (siglos XII–XIV) [Anglo-Norman models in Castilian literacy (C12 and C13)] (Toulouse: PUM, 2019), pp. 119–34.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Graphie et ponctuation du français médiéval. Système et variation’ [Spelling and punctuation in mediaeval French. System and variation], in Parussa, et al. (eds.), Enregistrer la parole, pp. 39–87.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Gratiam varietatis. Paramètres de variation stylistique de la lettre au Moyen Âge’ [The pleasure of variation. Parameters of the stylistic variation of the letter in the Middle Ages], Scrinium Friburgense, 44 (2019), pp. 193–214.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Marques graphiques du discours rapporté. Manuscrits du Roman de la Rose, XVe siècle’ [Quotation marks in reported speech. The manuscripts of the Roman de la Rose, C15], in Combettes, B, Guillot, C, Oppermann-Marsaux, É, Prévost, S and Rodríguez Somolinos, A (eds.), Le Changement en français. Études de linguistique diachronique [Linguistic change in French. Studies on diachronic linguistics] (Bern: Peter Lang, 2010), pp. 249–69.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Metro, ritmo y puntuación en los repertorios hispánicos de refranes (siglos XVI–XVII)’ [Meter, rhythm and punctuation in Hispanic collections of proverbs (C16 and C17)], Rilce, 34 (2, 2018), pp. 456–82.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Ponctuation médiévale, pragmatique et énonciation. Lire l’Ovide moralisé au XIVe siècle’ [Mediaeval punctuation, pragmatics and enunciation. Reading the Ovide moralisé in C14], Linx, 73 (2016), pp. 113–45.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Ponctuer, éditer, dire. Notes sur la ponctuation du discours dans l’écriture médiévale’ [Punctuating, editing and speaking. Notes on punctuation of speech in mediaeval writing], in López Muñoz, J. M. (ed.), Aux marges du discours (personnes, temps, lieux, objets) [On the margins of discourse. People, times, places, objects] (Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, 2015), pp. 212–23.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Ponctuer, éditer, lire. État des études sur la ponctuation dans le livre manuscrit’ [Punctuating, editing and reading. The state of the art of punctuation in mediaeval manuscript books], Syntagma, 2 (2008), pp. 131–73.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Pour une étude de la ponctuation du Halotti beszéd és könyörgés dans un contexte européen’ [Towards a study of the punctuation of the Halotti beszéd és könyörgés in a European context], in Bartók, Z. S. and Horváth, B (eds.), Írások a Pray-Kódexről [Writings on the Pray Codex] (Budapest: Argumentum Kiadó, 2019), pp. 111–28.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Réflexions méthodologiques pour l’étude de la ponctuation médiévale’ [Methodological reflections for the study of mediaeval punctuation], in Lavrentiev, A (ed.), Systèmes graphiques de manuscrits médiévaux et incunables français. Ponctuation, segmentation, graphies [The graphic systems of mediaeval manuscripts and French incunables. Punctuation, segmentation, spelling] (Chambéry: Université de Savoie, 2007), pp. 11–48.Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Variación gráfica y secuenciación de la palabra en manuscritos medievales hispánicos’ [Graphic variation and word sequencing in mediaeval Spanish manuscripts], in Cátedra, P. M. (ed.), Los códices literarios de la Edad Media. Interpretación, historia, técnicas y catalogación [Literary codices from the Middle Ages. Interpretation, history, techniques and cataloging] (San Millán de la Cogolla: Cilengua, 2009), pp. 225–57, gredos.usal.es/jspui/handle/10366/122006 [last accessed 5 June 2020].Google Scholar

Llamas-Pombo, E. ‘Variation and standardization in the history of Spanish spelling’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 15–62.Google Scholar

López de Velasco, J. Orthographia y pronunciacion castellana [Castilian pronunciation and orthography] (Burgos: n.p., 1582), http://www.proyectos.cchs.csic.es/humanismoyhumanistas/juan-lopez-de-velasco/ortograf%C3%ADa-y-pronunciaci%C3%B3n-castellana [last accessed 23 May 2020].Google Scholar

Love, H. Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Lunt, H. ‘Ligatures in Old Church Slavonic Glagolitic manuscripts’, Slavistična Revija, 10 (1957), pp. 253–67.Google Scholar

Maas, U. ‘Einige Grundannahmen zur Analyse der Groß- und Kleinschreibung im Deutschen, insbesondere zu ihrer Grammatikalisierung in der Frühen Neuzeit’ [Some basic assumptions regarding the analysis of upper- and lowercase spelling in German, especially its grammaticalisation in the early modern age], in Lerchner, G, Schröder, M and Fix, U (eds.), Chronologische, areale und situative Varietäten des Deutschen in der Sprachhistoriographie [Chronological, areal and situative varieties of German in language historiography] (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1995), pp. 85–100.Google Scholar

Maas, U. ‘Geschriebene Sprache’ [Written language], in Ammon, U, Dittmar, N, Mattheier, K. J., and Trudgill, P (eds.), Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, vol. 1, 2nd ed. (Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2004), pp. 633‒45.Google Scholar

Macha, J. Der konfessionelle Faktor in der deutschen Sprachgeschichte der Frühen Neuzeit [The denominational factor in the German language history of the early modern period] (Würzburg: Ergon, 2014).Google Scholar

Macha, J., Topalović, E, Hille, I, Nolting, U and Wilke, A (eds.), Deutsche Kanzleisprache in Hexenverhören der Frühen Neuzeit, vol. 1: Auswahledition [German chancellery language in witch trials of the early modern age, vol. 1: Anthology] (Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter, 2005).Google Scholar

Maierù, A. (ed.), Grafia e interpunzione del latino nel medioevo (Seminario Internazionale, Roma, 27–29 Septembre 1984) [Spelling and punctuation of the Latin language in the Middle Ages. International seminar, Rome, 27–29 September 1984] (Rome: Ateneo, 1987).Google Scholar

Maître, M. Les Précieuses. Naissance des femmes de lettres en France au XVIIe siècle [The Précieuses. The birth of letter-writing women in C17 France] (Paris: Honoré Champion, 1999).Google Scholar

Malicki, J. ‘Język czeski na Śląsku w kontekście śląskich dziejów języka polskiego i niemieckiego. Pytanie o granice historii języka’ [The Czech language in Silesia in the context of the history of Polish and German languages in Silesia. A question about border in historical linguistics], in Lipowski, J and Żygadło-Czopnik, D (eds.), Podzwonne dla granic: Polsko-czeskie linie podziałów i miejsca kontaktów w języku, literaturze i kulturze [A knell for borders: Polish–Bohemian lines of division and points of contact in language, literature and culture] (Wrocław: University of Wrocław, 2009), pp. 375–87.Google Scholar

Malicki, J. ‘Slezské jazykové spektrum a kategorie okraje a středu ve vývoji komunikace společnosti zemí Koruny české ve 14. až 18. století’ [The Silesian language spectrum and the periphery and centre categories in the development of Czech Crown communications from C14 to C18], in Hałub, M and Mańko-Matysiak, A (eds.), Śląska republika uczonych – Schlesische Gelehrtenrepublik – Slezská vědecká obec [Silesian Republic of scholars], vol. 2 (Wrocław: ATUT, 2006), pp. 15–27.Google Scholar

Mancho Duque, M. J. Teresa de Jesús. La Oralidad de una Santa Escritora [Saint Teresa of Jesus. The spoken language of a writer saint] (Salamanca: CES, 2015).Google Scholar

Maquieira, M. ‘Teoría y práctica ortográficas en las gramáticas del español del siglo XVI’; ‘Teoría … siglo XVII’ [Theory and practice of spelling in C16/C17 Spanish grammars], in Asencio, Gómez (ed.), El castellano y su codificación gramatical, vol. 1: pp. 365–95 and vol. 2, pp. 491–545.Google Scholar

Marchello-Nizia, C. ‘Écrire une nouvelle grammaire historique du français à la lumière de l’histoire des descriptions de la langue’ [Writing a new historical grammar of French in light of the history of language descriptions], in Colombat, B, Fournier, J.-M. and Raby, V (eds.), Vers une histoire générale de la grammaire française. Matériaux et perspectives [Towards a general history of French grammar. Materials and perspectives] (Paris: Champion, 2012), www.unice.fr/bcl/rubrique137?lang=es [last accessed 5 June 2020].Google Scholar

Marchello-Nizia, C. ‘L’Oral représenté en français médiéval: un accès construit à une face cachée des “langues mortes”’ [Representing oral discourse in mediaeval French: building an approach to a hidden facet of dead languages], in Guillot, C, Combettes, B, Lavrentiev, A and Oppermann-Marsaux, E (eds.), Le Changement en français. Études de linguistique diachronique [Language change in French. Studies on diachronic linguistics] (Bern: Peter Lang, 2012), pp. 247–64.Google Scholar

Marchello-Nizia, C. ‘Ponctuation et “unités de lecture” dans les manuscrits médiévaux ou: je ponctue, tu lis, il théorise’ [Punctuation and reading features in mediaeval manuscripts: I punctuate, you read, he theorises], Langue Française, 40 (1978), pp. 32–44.Google Scholar

Marcos Marín, F. Reforma y modernización del español. Ensayo de sociolingüística histórica [Reform and modernisation of Spanish. An essay in historical sociolinguistics] (Madrid: Cátedra, 1979).Google Scholar

Mareš, F. V. ‘Die kyrillo-methodianischen Wurzeln der tschechischen diakritischen Orthographie’ [The Cyrillo-Methodian roots of Czech diacritic orthography], Anzeiger der phil.-hist. Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 110 (3, 1973), pp. 81–99.Google Scholar

Maretić, T. Istorija hrvatskoga pravopisa latinskijem slovima [The history of Croatian orthography in the Roman alphabet] (Zagreb: Yugoslav Academy of Arts, 1889).Google Scholar

Markov, I., Nastase, V and Strapparava, C, ‘Punctuation as native language interference’, in E. M. Bender, L. Derczynski and P. Isabelle (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Santa Fe: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018), pp. 3456–66.Google Scholar

Markus, M. ‘Abbreviations in Early Modern English correspondence’, in Dossena, M and Fitzmaurice, S. M. (eds.), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations (Bern: Peter Lang, 2006), pp. 107–29.Google Scholar

Markus, M. (compiler), Innsbruck Computer Archive of Machine-Readable English Texts (ICAMET) (Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck, 1999).Google Scholar

Marti, R. ‘Ein “Kulturkampf” in der Slavia romana: “Deutsch” vs. “Slavisch” in Schrift und Schreibung’ [The ‘cultural struggle’ in the Slavia romana: ‘German’ versus ‘Slavic’ in script and orthography], in Tomelleri, and Kempgen, (eds.), Slavic Alphabets in Contact, pp. 159–88.Google Scholar

Marti, R. ‘On the creation of Croatian: The development of Croatian Latin orthography in the 16th century’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 269–319.Google Scholar

Martineau, F. ‘Pratiques d’écriture des peu-lettrés en Québéquois ancien: Morphologie verbale’ [Writing practices of the semi-literate in ancient Quebec French: Verbal morphology], in Larrivée, P (ed.), Variation et stabilité du français. Des notions aux opérations. Mélanges de linguistique française offerts à J.-M. Léard [Variation and stability in French. From notions to operations. French linguistic studies in honour of J.-M. Léard] (Louvain; Paris; Dudley: Peeters, 2007), pp. 201–20.Google Scholar

Martinez, C. (ed.), La Variation graphique: Champs, facteurs [Graphic variation: Fields, factors] (Paris: Klincksieck, 2010).Google Scholar

Martínez Alcalde, M. J. (ed.), Textos clásicos sobre historia de la ortografía castellana [Classical texts on the history of Spanish spelling] [CD-ROM] (Madrid: Digibis-Fundación Histórica Tavera, 1999).Google Scholar

Martínez de Sousa, J. Reforma de la ortografía española. Estudio y pautas [Reform of the Spanish spelling. Analysis and guidelines] (Madrid: Visor, 1991).Google Scholar

Martínez Marín, J. ‘La estandarización de la puntuación en español: Siglos XV–XVII’ [The standardisation of punctuation in Spanish from C15 to C17], in Escavy, R, Hernández, M and Roldán, A (eds.), Actas del Congreso Internacional de Historiografía Lingüística. Nebrija V Centenario [Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguistic Historiography. Nebrija’s fifth centenary] (Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 1994), pp. 437–50.Google Scholar

Martínez Marín, J. ‘La ortografía española: perspectiva historiográfica’ [Spanish spelling: a historiographical perspective], Cauce, 14–15 (1991–2), pp. 125–34.Google Scholar

Matak, D. (ed.), Drugi del Novoga testamenta 1563, latinički prijepis glagoljskog izdanja [Second part of the New Testament 1563, Latin transcription of the Glagolitic edition] (Zagreb: University of Zagreb, 2015).Google Scholar

Matak, D. (ed.), Prvi del Novoga testamenta 1562, latinički prijepis glagoljskog izdanja [First part of the New Testament 1562, Latin transcription of the Glagolitic edition] (Zagreb: University of Zagreb, 2013).Google Scholar

Mathesius, V. Jazyk, kultura a slovesnost [Language, culture and literacy], ed. J. Vachek (Prague: Odeon, 1982).Google Scholar

Mazziotta, N. Ponctuation et syntaxe dans la langue française médiévale. Étude d’un corpus de chartes originales écrites à Liège entre 1236 et 1291 [Punctuation and syntax in mediaeval French. Study of a corpus of original charters written in Liège between 1236 and 1291] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2009).Google Scholar

McConchie, R. ‘Compounds and code-switching: Compositorial practice in William Turner’s Libellus de re Herbaria Novvs, 1538’, in Thaisen, and Rutkowska, (eds.), Scribes, pp. 177–90.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Hardie, A (compilers), The Lancaster Newsbooks Corpus (Lancaster: University of Lancaster, 2007).Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Wilson, A, Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

McLeod, R. ‘Spellbound: typography and the concept of old-spelling editions’, Renaissance and Reformation, n.s. (3, 1979), pp. 50–65.Google Scholar

McLuhan, H. M. ‘Address at Vision 65’, The American Scholar, 35 (2, 1966), pp. 196–205.Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographical Man (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Meckhart, J. Catechismus. Ain kurtze Christliche Leer vnd vnderweysung für die Jugent [Catechism. A brief Christian lesson and instruction for young people] (Augsburg: Hans Zimmerman) (VD 16 M 1803).Google Scholar

Mediavilla, C. Histoire de la calligraphie française [History of French calligraphy] (Paris: Albin Michel, 2006).Google Scholar

Medina Morales, F. ‘Problemas metodológicos de la sociolingüística histórica’ [Methodological problems in historical sociolinguistics], Forma y Función, 18 (2005), pp. 115–37.Google Scholar

Medina-Sánchez, B. ‘Punctuation in eighteenth-century English grammars’, unpublished PhD thesis (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 2015), https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/17011 [last accessed 5 June 2020].Google Scholar

Medina-Sánchez, B. and A. Rodríguez-Álvarez, , ‘Estudio comparativo de los primeros tratados de puntuación en lengua inglesa (1672–1704): terminología y función de la puntuación’ [A comparative study of the first treatises on punctuation written in English (1672–1704): terminology and function of punctuation], Onomázein, 31 (2015), pp. 99–112.Google Scholar

Meigret, L. Le Traité de la grammaire française [The treatise of French grammar], ed. Hausmann, F.-J. (Tübingen: Narr, 1980), in Colombat et al. (compilers), Grand Corpus.Google Scholar

L., Meigret Le Trętté de la grammęre françoęse [The treatise of French grammar] (Paris: Chrétien Wechel, 1550), https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8624665r/ [last accessed 23 May 2020].Google Scholar

Melusina. Von Lieb und Leyd/ Ein schöne und lustige Histori. Ausz Frantzösischer Spraach in Teutsch verwandelt [Melusina. Of love and sorrow. A beautiful and merry history. Translated from French into German] (Frankfurt am Main: Egenolff heirs, c. 1580) (VD 16 ZV 28676).Google Scholar

Mentrup, W. Die Groß- und Kleinschreibung im Deutschen und ihre Regeln. Historische Entwicklung und Vorschlag zur Neuregelung [Upper- and lowercase spelling in German and its rules. Historical development and a proposal for revision] (Tübingen: Narr, 1979).Google Scholar

Merkys, V. Simonas Daukantas (Vilnius: Vyturys, 1991).Google Scholar

Messerli, A. ‘Das Lesen von Gedrucktem und das Lesen von Handschriften ‒ zwei verschiedene Kulturtechniken?’ [Reading printed texts and reading hand-written texts – two different cultural techniques?], in Messerli, A and Chartier, R (eds.), Lesen und Schreiben in Europa 1500‒1900 [Reading and writing in Europe 1500‒1900] (Basel: Schwabe, 2000), pp. 235‒46.Google Scholar

Mey, F. De ortografía libelus [Handbook of orthography], in Bravo, B, Thesaurus verborum, ac frasivm, ad orationem latine efficiendam, et locvpletandam (Palma de Mallorca: Gabriel Guasp, 1607).Google Scholar

Michel, A. ‘Italian orthography in early modern times’, in Baddeley, and Voeste, (eds.), Orthographies, pp. 63–96.Google Scholar

Miguel Franco, R. and Sánchez-Prieto Borja, P, ‘CODEA: A primary corpus of Spanish documents’, Variants. The Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship, 12–13 (2016), pp. 211–28.Google Scholar

Mihm, A. ‘Druckersprachen und gesprochene Varietäten. Der Zeugniswert von Bämlers Melusinendruck (1474) für eine bedeutende Frage der Sprachgeschichte’ [The language of print and spoken varieties. Evidence from Bämler’s printed Melusine (1474) for an important question in language history] , in Rautenberg, et al. (eds.), Zeichensprachen, pp. 163–203.Google Scholar

Mihm, A. ‘Graphematische Systemanalyse als Grundlage der historischen Prosodieforschung’, in Auer, P, Gilles, P and Spiekermann, H (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente [Syllable cut and tonal accents] (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2002), pp. 235–64.Google Scholar

Mihm, A. ‘Regionalsprachen in vorreformatorischer Zeit. Die Überlieferung des Buschmann-Mirakels als Zeugnis polyzentrischer Sprachorganisation’ [Regional languages in the pre-Reformation period. The tradition of the Buschmann miracle as a testimony of polycentric language organization], in Horstkötter, L (ed.), Arnt Buschmanns Mirakel. Eine Jenseitsvision des 15. Jahrhunderts. Untersuchungen zu Textentstehung und Verbreitung mit einer Edition der Hamborner Handschrift [Arnt Buschmann’s miracle. A C15 vision of the afterworld. Studies on formation and spread, with an edition of the Hamborn manuscript] (Münster: MV Wissenschaft), pp. 209–49.Google Scholar

Mihm, A. ‘Zur Deutung der graphematischen Variation in historischen Texten’, in Häcki Buhofer, A (ed.), Vom Umgang mit sprachlicher Variation: Soziolinguistik, Dialektologie, Methoden und Wissenschaftsgeschichte [How to deal with linguistic variation: sociolinguistics, dialectology, methods and history of science] (Tübingen; Basel: Francke, 2000), pp. 367–90.Google Scholar

Miklas, H. ‘Zur Struktur des kyrillisch-altkirchenslavischen (altbulgarischen) Schriftsystems’ [On the structure of the Cyrillic Old Church Slavonic (Old Bulgarian) script], Palaeobulgarica, 12 (3, 1988), pp. 52–65.Google Scholar

Miller, D. ‘Why it’s safer to build on concrete than epistemology. A comment on “On Materiality” by Gosewijn van Beek’, Etnofoor, 9 (1, 1996), pp. 25–7.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. ‘Historical description and the ideology of the standard language’, in Wright, (ed.), Development of Standard English, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. ‘Language ideologies and the consequences of standardisation’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5 (4, 2001), pp. 530–55.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Misal po zakonu rimskoga dvora [Missale Romanum Glagolitice], 1st ed. (Venice 1483), in Frangeš, I (ed.), Misal po zakonu rimskoga dvora (Zagreb: Liber, 1971).Google Scholar

Morales, J. B. de, Pronvnciaciones generales de lengvas, ortografia, escvela de leer, escriuir, y contar, sinificación de letras en la mano [The pronunciation of languages, orthography, learning of reading, writing and counting, the meaning of the letters in the hand] (Montilla: Juan Batista de Morales, 1623).Google Scholar

Morin, Y.-C. ‘The phonological status of nasal vowels in XVI century French’, in Sampson, R and Ayres-Bennet, W (eds.), Interpreting the History of French. Festschrift for Peter Rickard (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002), pp. 95–129.Google Scholar

Mortara Garavelli, B. Storia della punteggiatura in Europa [History of punctuation in Europe] (Rome: Laterza, 2008).Google Scholar

Moulin, C. Der Majuskelgebrauch in Luthers Deutschen Briefen (1517–1546) [The use of capital letters in Luther’s German letters (1517–1546)] (Heidelberg: Winter, 1990).Google Scholar

Moyna, M. I. Compound Words in Spanish: Theory and History (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012).Google Scholar

Mueller, M. ‘NUPOS: A part of speech tag set for written English from Chaucer to the present’, WordHoard (2009), http://wordhoard.northwestern.edu/userman/nupos.pdf [last accessed 9 May 2020].Google Scholar

Mulcaster, R. The First Part of the Elementarie VVhich Entreateth Chefelie of the Right Writing of our English Tung, Set Furth by Richard Mulcaster (London: Tomas Vautroullier, 1582), https://search.proquest.com/eebo [last accessed 28 Dec. 2018].Google Scholar

Nebrija, E. A. de, Grammatica de la lengua castellana [Grammar of the Castilian language] (Salamanca, 1492), facsimile (Valencia: Librerías París-Valencia, 1992).Google Scholar

Nebrija, E. A. de, Introductiones in latinam grammaticem [Introduction to Latin grammar], 3rd ed. (Seville: Johannes Pegnitzer and Magnus Herbst, 1502) [1st ed. 1481].Google Scholar