Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-05T21:37:16.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Balancing Environmental and Operational Objectives in Nuclear Refueling Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Phillip C. Beccue
Affiliation:
Strategy, Baxter BioScience
Jeffrey S. Stonebraker
Affiliation:
Decision Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline
Ralph F. Miles Jr.
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

The New York Power Authority (NYPA) wanted to develop a ten-year schedule for refueling its Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant (IP3) that balanced fish protection, which occurs when IP3 is shut down for nuclear refueling, with the costs of buying and loading fuel. We developed a decision analysis model to compare alternative strategies for refueling. In the model, we explicitly considered key uncertainties associated with future operation: how well IP3 operates, how long it takes to refuel, and when New York State is likely to deregulate the electric utility industry. The NYPA decision makers used the model to reinforce their choice of a refueling strategy. They were not surprised that more fish protection occurred with strategies that restricted the starting date for refueling to the last full week in May, rather than allowing the starting date to float throughout the period from May through August. However, the NYPA decision makers were surprised that the more restrictive strategies also resulted in lower costs.

The NYPA is the nation's largest nonfederal public power organization, providing about one-fourth of the electricity used in New York State. The NYPA owns twelve power projects. The Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant (IP3), located on the Hudson River, generates approximately one-fifth of its electrical power. Since 1975, IP3 has saved electric power users in Westchester County and New York City more than $1 billion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Decision Analysis
From Foundations to Applications
, pp. 564 - 581
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnthouse, L. W., Boreman, J., Englert, T. L., Kirk, W. L., and Horn, E. G. (1988). Hudson River settlement agreement: Technical rationale and cost considerations. American Fisheries Society Monograph, 4, 267–273.Google Scholar
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Coastal Environmental Services, Inc. (1996). Evaluation of alternative outage schedules based on a multispecies approach. Bowie, MD: Post, Buckley, Schuh, and Jernigan.
Fourcade, F., Johnson, E., Bara, M., and Cortey-Dumont, P. (1997). Optimizing nuclear power plant refueling with mixed-integer programming. European Journal of Operations Research, 97, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., SlovicTversky, P., , R. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Manzella, A., and Dalton, C. (2004). DPL 6.0 Professional User Guide. Concord, MA: Syncopation Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Matheson, D., and Matheson, J. E. (1998). The Smart Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Merkhofer, M. W. (1987). Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights. IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17(5), 741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. E., and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990). Decision Traps: The Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision-Making and How to Overcome Them. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Spetzler, C. S., and Staël von Holstein, C.-A. S. (1975). Probability encoding in decision analysis. Management Science, 22(3), 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×