Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T04:16:51.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Public–private partnerships in the provision of environmental governance: a case of disaster management

from Part II - Adapting and governing public institutions for uncertainty and complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Emily Boyd
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Carl Folke
Affiliation:
Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Disaster planning is an activity most often performed by the state, through which disaster risk reduction is provided as a public good. State institutions manage this role with varying degrees of success. State provision of disaster risk reduction occurs when there is financial and political commitment to risk reduction, effective institutional structures and the alignment of political interests with those of powerful stakeholder groups. This chapter analyses a novel approach to disaster risk reduction – the use of a public–private partnership – and shows how adaptive governance can work in practice. Specifically, the chapter analyses the role of public and private responsibility in the provision of disaster mitigation, early warning systems, disaster response and post-impact recovery. This is achieved through a review of the emergence and transformation of the Cayman Islands’ National Hurricane Committee (NHC). The NHC is a novel hybrid institution that emerged through spontaneous collective action by various members of Cayman Islands society, some of whom were civil servants. The NHC is now an official public–social–private partnership that uses relational contracting transactions, hierarchical management relationships and recurrent contractual transactions to prepare the Cayman Islands for storms and manage the islands’ recovery in a state of emergency. This chapter reveals that public–private partnerships can provide effective governance structures for weather-risk management, if they exhibit the features commonly associated with adaptive governance, that is, they are participatory and deliberative, they build trust, they are multi-layered, they link knowledge, action and hazard context, and they are accountable. However, such public–private partnerships need to be carefully crafted and delivered to ensure that the distribution of costs and benefits from their existence is not captured by a small group of powerful individuals.

The term public–private partnership (PPP) describes a range of initiatives that bring together the public and private sectors for long-term partnerships of mutual benefit. PPPs have been described as ‘an institutionalised form of cooperation of public and private actors who, on the basis of their own indigenous objectives, work together towards a joint target, in which both parties accept investment risks on the basis of a predetermined distribution of revenues and costs’ (Nijkamp et al. 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Adapting Institutions
Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience
, pp. 171 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, W. N.Brown, K.Fairbrass, J. 2003 Governance for sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decisionmakingEnvironment and Planning A 35 1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. 2001 Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resourcesWorld Development 29 1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderies, J. M.Ryan, P.Walker, B. H. 2006 Loss of resilience, crisis and institutional change: lessons from an intensive agricultural system in southeastern AustraliaEcosystems 9 865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J.Iossa, E. 2006 Delegation of contracting in the private provision of public servicesReview of Industrial Organisation 29 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F.Folke, C. 1998 Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building ResilienceCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Berkhout, F.Leach, M.Scoones, I. 2003 Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social ScienceAldershotEdward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T.Ghatak, M. 2001 Government versus private ownership of public goodsQuarterly Journal of Economics 116 1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birner, R.Wittmer, H. 2004 On the ‘efficient boundaries of the state’: the contribution of transaction-costs economics to the analysis of decentralisation and devolution in natural resource managementEnvironment and Planning C. Government and Policy 22 667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birner, R.Wittmer, H. 2006 Better public sector governance through partnership with the private sector and civil society: the case of Guatemala’s forest administrationInternational Review of Administrative Sciences 72 459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, P. 2006 The challenging business of long-term public–private partnerships: reflections on local experiencePublic Administration Review 66 400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H.Mol, A. P. J. 2003 Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debateEnvironmental Values 12 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. 2005 Follow the argument where it leads: some personal reflections on ‘policy-relevant’ researchTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, T.Arkes, H. R.Hammond, K. R. 2000 Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary ReaderCambridgeCambridge University Press
Cooke, B.Kothari, U. 2001 Participation: the New Tyranny?LondonZed Books
Davidson, D. J.Frickel, S. 2004 Understanding environmental governance: a critical reviewOrganization and Environment 17 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ECLAC 2005 The Impact of Hurricane Ivan in the Cayman IslandsMexico CityECLAC and UNDPGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. 2001 Managing surprising ecosystems in southern FloridaEcological Economics 37 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T.Olsson, P.Folke, C.Johansson, K. 2006 Trust-building, knowledge generation and organisational innovations: the role of a bridging organisation for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, SwedenHuman Ecology 34 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Treasury 2000 Public Private Partnerships: The Government’s ApproachLondonHMSOGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. L. 1999 Introduction to the special feature. Adaptive management: scientifically sound, socially challenged?Conservation Ecology 3 10www.consecol.org/vol13/iss11/art10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A.Wurzel, R. K. W.Zito, A. R. 2003 New’ environmental policy instruments: an evolution or a revolution in environmental policy?Environmental Politics 12 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamieniecki, S.Shafie, D.Silvers, J. 1999 Forming partnerships in environmental policy: the business of emissions trading in clean air managementAmerican Behavioral Scientist 43 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kara, J.Quarless, D. 2002
Kasemir, B.Jager, J.Jaeger, C. C.Gardner, M. T. 2003 Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A HandbookCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, R.Treverton, G. F. 2003 IBM Endowment for the Business of GovernmentArlington, VAIBMGoogle Scholar
Kunreuther, H. 2006 Disaster mitigation and insurance: learning from KatrinaAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladson, A. R.Argent, R. M. 2002 Adaptive management of environmental flows: lessons for the Murray–Darling Basin from three large North American riversAustralian Journal of Water Resources 5 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W. D.Pelkey, N. W.Sabatier, P. A. 2002 Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and WashingtonJournal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, L.Anderies, J. M.Campbell, B. 2006 Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systemsEcology and Society 11 www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. N. 1993 Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics in the EnvironmentWashington, DCIsland PressGoogle Scholar
Lemos, M. C.Agrawal, A. 2006 Environmental governanceAnnual Review of Environment and Natural Resources 31 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liverman, D. M. 2004 Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance and the commodification of natureAnnals of the Association of American Geographers 94 734Google Scholar
Lovrich, N. P. 1999 Policy partnering between the public and the not-for-profit private sectors: a key policy lever or a dire warning of difficulty ahead?American Behavioral Scientist 43 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, H. R. 1994 The ’32 Storm: Eyewitness Accounts and Official Reports of the Worst Natural Disaster in the History of the Cayman IslandsGrand CaymanCayman Islands National Archive
Mikalsen, K. H.Hernes, H. K.Jentoft, S. 2007 Leaning on user-groups: the role of civil society in fisheries governanceMarine Policy 31 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Hurricane Committee 2006 George Town:
Nijkamp, P.Burch, M.Vindigni, G. 2002 A comparative institutional evaluation of public–private partnerships in Dutch urban land-use and revitalisation projectsUrban Studies 39 1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 1990 Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformanceCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P.Gunderson, L. H.Carpenter, S. R. 2006 Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systemsEcology and Society 11 18www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Riordan, T.Burgess, J.Szerszynski, B. 1999 Deliberative and Inclusionary Processes: A Report from Two SeminarsNorwichCSERGEGoogle Scholar
Pelling, M.High, C.Dearing, J.Smith, D. 2008 Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisationsEnvironment and Planning A 40 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelliszoni, L. 2004 Responsibility and environmental governanceEnvironmental Politics 13 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, P. R.Stavins, R. N. 2000 Public Policies for Environmental ProtectionWashington, DCResources for the Future
Ramonjavelo, V.Prefontaine, L.Skander, D.Ricard, L. 2006 A course in the development of the PPP: the institutional, interorganisation and interpersonal confidenceCanadian Public Administration–Administration Publique du Canada 49 350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O.Webler, T.Wideman, P. 1995 Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental DiscourseDordrechtKluwerCrossRef
Ring, P. S.Van de Ven, A. H. 1992 Structuring cooperative relationships between organizationsStrategic Management Journal 13 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, G.Frewer, L. J. 2000 Public participation methods: a framework for evaluationScience, Technology and Human Values 25 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. H.Phillipson, M. C. 2003 UK adaptation strategy and technical measures: the impacts of climate change on buildingsBuilding Research and Information 31 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savas, E. S. 2000 Privatisation and Public–Private PartnershipsNew York, NYChatham HouseGoogle Scholar
Stewart, A.Gray, T. 2006 The authenticity of ‘type two’ multi-stakeholder partnerships for water and sanitation in Africa: when is a stakeholder a partner?Environmental Politics 15 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M.Gaviria, I. 2004 Weathering the Storm: Lessons in Risk Reduction from CubaBoston, MAOxfam AmericaGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, E. L. 2005 Planning for climate change in small islands: insights from national hurricane preparedness in the Cayman IslandsGlobal Environmental Change, Human and Policy Dimensions 15 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, E. L.Hurlston, L.-A. 2003 Report to the Cayman Islands Government. Adaptation Lessons Learned from Responding to Tropical Cyclones by the Cayman Islands Government, 1988–2002NorwichTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East AngliaGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, E. L.Hurlston, L.-A. 2005 Natural hazards and climate change: what knowledge is transferable?NorwichTyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East AngliaGoogle Scholar
Walters, C. 1997 Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystemsConservation Ecology 1 www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettenhall, R. 2003 The rhetoric and reality of public–private partnershipsPublic Organisation Review 3 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1999 Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspectiveJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×