Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-ntdpv Total loading time: 0.588 Render date: 2022-01-29T02:36:02.851Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

8 - Dialogic Democracy, Feminist Theory and Women’s Participation in Constitution-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Ruth Rubio-Marín
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla
Helen Irving
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

Explores the history of women’s participation in constitution-making in Liberia, and outlines the strategies women have adopted to have their aspirations for constitutional equality heard. Written from the author’s experience as an advisor on constitutional amendment and constitutional reform processes in Liberia, the chapter reflects upon the lessons drawn from this experience for women’s engagement in constitution-making. It explains the importance of a ‘dialogic’ approach, in which all voices contribute to the ultimate outcome. This goal, Williams explains, not only requires the participation of women, it also requires explicit attention to designing the types of processes that will encourage openness in participation. These processes are contextualised in the history of Liberia, its complex ethnic, religious and social demographics, and its experience of conflict. The dialogic approach, it concludes, offers a hope of real participation for women in one of the most fundamental of social decisions: the adoption or amendment of a constitution.
Type
Chapter
Information
Women as Constitution-Makers
Case Studies from the New Democratic Era
, pp. 351 - 377
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, M., 2008, ‘Expanding Participation in Constitution Making: Challenges and Opportunities’, William & Mary Law Review 49, p. 1043.Google Scholar
Bauer, J., 2009, ‘Women and the 2005 Election in Liberia’, Journal of Modern African Studies 47, p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. and Tarule, J. M., 1987, Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Psychology Press).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., 1996, ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton University Press), p. 67.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. J., 1978, The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, F. V., 2009, ‘Gender equality and the rule of law in Liberia: Statutory law, customary law, and the status of women’, in Williams, S. H. (ed.), Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press), p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, J., 2014, ‘The Peril of Imposing the Rule of Law: Lessons from Liberia’, Minnesota Journal of International Law 23, p. 47.Google Scholar
Constitution of the Republic of Liberia Jan. 6, 1986, Chapter XII, Article 91, www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Liberia_1986.pdf?lang=en.
Fraser, N., 1992, ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 109.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sirleaf, H. E. President Ellen Johnson, 2014, Annual Message to the Third Session of the 53rd National Legislature of the Republic of Liberia: Consolidating the Processes of Transformation 28 (27 January), www.emansion.gov.lr/doc/FINAL_ANNUAL_MESSAGE_2014.pdf.
Heaner, G., 2008, ‘Religion, Law and Human Rights in Post-Conflict Liberia’, African Human Rights Law Journal 8, p. 458.Google Scholar
Held, V., 1990, ‘Mothering versus contract’, in Mansbridge, J. J. (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest (University of Chicago Press), p. 287.Google Scholar
Isser, D. H., Lubkemann, S. C. and N’Tow, S., 2009, ‘Looking for Justice: Liberian Experiences with and Perceptions of Local Justice Options’, a report by the United States Institute for Peace, (5 November), p. 4, www.usip.org/sites/default/files/PW63-Looking%20for%20Justice-Liberian%20Experiences%20with%20and%20Perceptions%20of%20Local%20Justice%20Options.pdf.
Letter from President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to Hon. Armah Jallah, President Pro Tempore of the Liberian Senate, p. 7, Item 18 (describing the proposed amendment), https://governancecommissionlr.org/pg_img/President%20Sirleaf%20writes%20the%20Senate%20Commenting%20on%20the%20CRC%20Report.pdf.
MacDougall, C. and Cooper, H., 2017, ‘George Weah Wins Liberia Election’, New York Times (28 December), www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/world/africa/george-weah-liberia-election.html.
Mansbridge, J., 1998, ‘Feminism and democracy’, in Phillips, A. (ed.), Feminism and Politics (Oxford University Press), p. 148.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., 2003, ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97, p. 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. and Warren, M., 2012, ‘A systemic approach to deliberative democracy’, in Parkinson, J. R. and Mansbridge, J. (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge University Press), p. 1.Google Scholar
Outram, Q., 1999, ‘Liberia: Roots and Fruits of the Emergency’, Third World Quarterly 20, p. 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A., 1995, The Politics of Presence (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ruddick, S., 1980, ‘Maternal Thinking’, Feminist Studies 6, p. 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, A., 2005, Beyond Plunder: Toward Democratic Governance in Liberia (Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers, Inc.).Google Scholar
Sengbeh, D. K., 2013, ‘UNFPA Leads War on Teenage Pregnancy in Liberia’, Sengbeh’s News Blog (12 July), https://sengbeh.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/unfpa-leads-war-on-teenage-pregnancy-in-liberia/.
Steady, F. C., 2011, Women and Leadership in West Africa: Mothering the Nation and Humanizing the State (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., 1988, ‘Beyond the Republican Revival’, Yale Law Journal 97, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Too Many, 2014, December, FGM Let’s End It, Country Profile: FGM in Liberia’, www.refworld.org/pdfid/54bcdf574.pdf
United Nations Mission in Liberia, 2008, September/October, ‘Research on Prevalence and Attitudes to Rape in Liberia, p. 7, www.stoprapenow.org/uploads/advocacyresources/1282163297.pdf.
Urbinati, N., 2000, ‘Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation’, Political Theory 28, p. 758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R., 2000, ‘The Difference in Women’s Hedonic Lives: A Phenomenological Critique of Feminist Legal Theory’, Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 15, p. 149.Google Scholar
Williams, M. S., 1998, Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, S. H., 2004, Truth, Autonomy, and Speech: Feminist Theory and the First Amendment (New York University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, 2009, ‘Equality, representation, and challenge to hierarchy: Justifying electoral quotas for women’, in Williams, S. H. (ed.), Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press), p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Women in National Parliaments’, Interparliamentary Union, www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm (last updated 1 November 2018).
Young, M., 1997, Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Young, M., 2000, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×