Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T19:31:10.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

Anna Stetsenko
Affiliation:
City University of New York Graduate Center
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformative Mind
Expanding Vygotsky's Approach to Development and Education
, pp. 373 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ahern, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 109137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akomfrah, J. (2013). (Film director). The Stuart Hall project. Revolution, politics, culture and the new left experience. Documentary. Release date September 6, 2013 (UK). Released on BFI DVD on January 20, 2014.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S., eds. (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction and the problem of reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. J. (2011). Legacies, policies and prospects: One year on from the Cambridge primary review. Forum 53(1), 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. E. (2001). Essays on science and society: Is a new eugenics afoot? Science 294(5540), 5961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allman, P. (1999). Revolutionary social transformation: Democratic hopes, political possibilities and critical education (1st ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Allman, P. (2007). On Marx: An introduction to the revolutionary pedagogy of Karl Marx. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. (1992). Preface. In Frankl, Viktor, Man’s search for meaning (4rth ed., pp. 711). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Altman, I., and Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In Stokols, D. and Altman, I. (eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 740). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Amsler, S. S. (2008). Pedagogy against “dis-utopia”: From conscientization to the education of desire. In Dahms, H. F. (ed.) No social science without critical theory (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 25, pp. 291325). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. (1993). On Hegel and the rise of social theory: A critical appreciation of Herbert Marcuse’s reason and revolution, fifty years later. Sociological Theory 11(3), 243267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149, 91130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1997). Functional memory versus reproductive memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(1), 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anokhin, P. K. (1974). Biology and neurophysiology of the conditioned reflex and its role in adaptive behavior. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, G. (1990). La conciencia de la mestiza: Toward a new consciousness. In Anzaldúa, G. (ed.), Making face, making soul/ Haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color (pp. 377–89). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, G. (2006). Entering into the serpent. In Gilb, D. (ed.), Hecho en Tejas: An anthology of Texas-Mexican literature (pp. 253261). Southwestern Writers Collection Series. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press and the Southwestern Writers Collection, Texas State University.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, G. (2007). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture 12(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apperley, A. (1997). Foucault and the problem of method. In Lloyd, M. and Thacker, A. (eds.), The impact of Michel Foucault on the social sciences and humanities (pp. 1028). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. London: Allen Lane Penguin.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2015). The Complexities of Black folk. New York Times, April 16. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/kwame-anthony-appiah-the-complexities-of-black-folk/?_r=0 (accessed May 20, 2015).Google Scholar
Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. (2010). A response to Zeus Leonardo’s “Critical empiricism: Reading data with social theory.” Educational Researcher 39(2), 160161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1971/1977). The life of the mind. San Diego, CA: A Harvest Book, Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arievitch, I. M. (2003). A potential for an integrated view of development and learning: Galperin’s contribution to sociocultural psychology. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10, 278288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M. (2008). Exploring the links between external and internal activity from a cultural-historical perspective. In van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., and van der Veer, R. (eds.), The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 3858). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., and Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting socio-cultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist 40(3), 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., and Stetsenko, A. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Galperin’s perspective and its implications. Human Development 43, 6993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., and Stetsenko, A. (2014). The magic of signs: Developmental trajectory of cultural mediation. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R., and Ferrari, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 217244). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., and van der Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Galperin’s contribution. Human Development 38, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., and van der Veer, R. (2004). The role of non-automatic processes in activity regulation: From Lipps to Galperin. History of Psychology 7(2), 154182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronowitz, S., and Bratsis, P. (2005). Situations manifesto. Situations 1(1), 714.Google Scholar
Artiles, A. J. (2012). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational inequity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher 40(9), 431445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asante, M. K. (2015). Why Afrocentricity? New York Times, May 7. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/07/molefi-kete-asante-why-afrocentricity/?_r=0 (accessed September 9, 2015).Google Scholar
Au, W. (2007). Epistemology of the oppressed: The dialectics of Paulo Freire’s theory of knowledge. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 5(2), www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=100 (accessed September 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work 20(3), 161177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four Essays (Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans.; Holquist, M., ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Emerson, C., trans. and ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (McGee, V., trans.; Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, eds.; V. Liapunov, trans. and notes; K. Brostrom, supplement trans.). Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (Liapunov, V., trans.; Liapunov, V. and Holquist, M., eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review 61, 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhurst, D., and Padden, C. (1991). The Meshcheryakov experiment: Soviet work on the education of deafblind children. Learning and Instruction 1, 201215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1955/1984). Notes of a native son. Boston: Beacon Books.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1961/1993). Nobody knows my dream. New York: Vintage books.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology (vol. 52, pp. 126). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Bannerji, H. (2005). Building from Marx: Reflections on class and race. Social Justice 32(4), 144160.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, T. (2006 ). Making educational history: Qualitative inquiry, artistry, and the public interest. In Ladson-Billings, G. and Tate, W. F. (eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Barone, T. (2009). Narrative researchers as witnesses of injustice and agents of social change? Educational Researcher 38(8), 591597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1999). Sexual difference and collective identities: The new constellation. In O’Farrell, M. A. and Vallone, L. (eds.), Virtual gender: Fantasies of subjectivity and embodiment (pp. 217243). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2001). From identity politics to social feminism. In Melzer, A. M., Weinberger, J., and R. Zinman, M. (eds.), Turn of the century (pp. 2741). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1911). Matter and memory (Paul, N. M. and Palmer, W. S., trans.). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Berman, M. (1983). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity (2nd ed.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. N. (1966). Essays on the physiology of movement and physiology of activity [Oчерки по физиологии движения и физиологии активности]. Moscow: Nauka Press.Google Scholar
Beyer, L. E., and Liston, D. P. (1992). Discourse of moral action? A critique of postmodernism. Educational Theory 42(4), 371393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2012). A process ontology of persons and their development. In Martin, J. and Bickhard, M. H. (eds.), The new psychology of personhood [Special Issue]. New Ideas in Psychology 28, 107119.Google Scholar
Bidell, T. (1999). Vygotsky, Piaget and the dialectic of development. In Peter Lloyd and Charles Fernyhough (eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments, vol. 1 (pp. 261281). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory 57(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Doing emancipation differently: Transgression, equality and the politics of learning. Civitas Educationis: Education, Politics and Culture 1(1), 1530.Google Scholar
Biesta, G. J. J., and Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults 39, 132149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, P. (2008). Marixsm and ethics. International Socialism: A Quarterly Review of Socialist Theory 120. October 6. http://isj.org.uk/marxism-and-ethics/#120blackledge58 (accessed September 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Blanton, E. W., Moorman, G., and Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. Review of Research in Education 23, 235275.Google Scholar
Bloch, E. (1954). The principle of hope (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bodrova, E., and Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. New York: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bottomore, T. (1975). Marxist sociology. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (Nice, Richard, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1995). Physical space, social space, and habitus. Talk delivered at the University of Oslo, Norway, May 15, 1995. http://archives.library.illinois.edu/erec/University%20Archives/2401001/Production_website/pages/StewardingExcellence/Physical%20Space,%20Social%20Space%20and%20Habitus.pdf (accessed July 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boutte, G. S. (2016). Educating African American students: And how are the children? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. S. (2008). Commentary: The Vygotskian family in the supreme court of practice. Culture and Psychology 14, 3744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratus, B. S. (1988). Abnormalities of personality. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educational Psychologist 29(1), 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredo, E. (1998). Evolution, psychology, and John Dewey’s critique of the reflex arc concept. The Elementary School Journal 98(5), 447466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. G., and Slater, A. (2003). Theories of infant development. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology 28, 759775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist 32, 513532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J. (1976). The ascent of man. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Brown, R., and Renshaw, P. (2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity 13(3), 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research 54, 1132.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burbules, N., and Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences and limits. In Popkewitz, T. and Fendler, L. (eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics (pp. 45–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, I. (2008). Social selves: Theories of self and society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burman, E. (1997). Minding the gap: Positivism, psychology, and the politics of qualitative methods. Journal of Social Issues 53( 4), 78101.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahan, E. D. (1992). John Dewey and human development. Developmental Psychology 28, 205214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahan, E. D., and White, S. H. (1992). Proposals for a second psychology. American Psychologist 47, 224235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, D., LiPuma, E., and Postone, M. (1993). Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cammarota, J., and Fine, M. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In Cammarota, J. and Fine, M. (eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 112). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L., and Pedersen, O. K., eds. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camus, A. (2013). Algerian chronicles. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1958.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., and Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children’s social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 79151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, S. (2012). Centering Marxist-feminist theory in adult learning. Adult and Education Quarterly 62(1), 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 30, 271286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, C. (2002). Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1997). The power of Identity. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, C. (1995). Osip Mandelstam and the modernist creation of tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., and Miller, S. M. (eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 3964). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, E. (2012). Behavior genetics and post genomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(6), 331410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheah, P. (2008). Nondialectical materialism. Diacritics 38(1–2), 143157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Foucault, M. (2006). The Chomsky-Foucault debate on human nature. New York and London: The New Press.Google Scholar
Christians, C. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. C., and Bickhard, M. H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: Interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology 13(3), 259295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1991). Review of Rosenfield’s “The Invention of Memory.” Artificial Intelligence 50(2), 241284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2009). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 1134). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting mind, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., and Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis 58, 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, K., and Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K. B. (1989). Dark ghetto: Dilemmas of social power (2nd ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In Seeger, F., Voigt, J., and Waschescio, U. (eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, V. M. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146161). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (2003). Vygotsky and context. Where did the connection come from and what difference does it make? http://communication. ucsd.edu/lchc/People/MCole/lsvcontext.htm (accessed December 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Cole, M. (2009). The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. [Editorial]. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16(4), 291295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M., and Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Levitin, K., and Luria, A. R. (2010). The autobiography of Alexander Luria: A dialogue with the making of mind. New York and London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., and Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development 39, 250256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. (2011). Reflections on CHAT and Freire’s participatory action research from the West of Scotland: Praxis, politics, and the “struggle for meaningful life.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 18, 98114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collis, B., and Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Coole, D., and Frost, S., eds. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Connelly, J., and Costall, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of an historical psychology. Theory and Psychology 10, 147170.Google Scholar
Connery, C. M., John-Steiner, V. P., and Marjanovic-Shane, A. (eds.). (2010). Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior and Philosophy 32, 179195.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2006). “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition 15, 634654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costall, A. (2007). The windowless room: “Mediationism” and how to get over it. In Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 109–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costall, A., and Leudar, I. (2007). Getting over “the problem of other minds”: Communication in context. Infant Behavior and Development 30, 289295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crapanzano, V. (2004). Imaginative horizons: An essay in literary-philosophical anthropology. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Crook, S. (2003). Change, uncertainty and the future of sociology. Journal of Sociology 39(1), 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, W. E., Jr. (1991). Shades of black: Diversity in African-American identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Danforth, S. (2006). From epistemology to democracy: Pragmatism and the reorientation of disability research. Remedial and Special Education 27(6), 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T., and Ludvigsen, S., eds. (2009). Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dannefer, D. (1999). Freedom isn’t free: Power, alienation, and the social consequences of action. In Brandstädter, J. and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Action and self-development (pp. 105132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1993). Psychological objects, practice and history. Annals of Theoretical Psychology 8, 1547 and 7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 10, 245260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dar-Nimrod, I., and Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin 137(5), 800818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daston, L., and Galison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations 40, 81128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B., and Sumara, D. J. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: Towards a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research 5, 403422.Google Scholar
Davis, R., and Freire, P. (1981). Education for awareness: A talk with Paulo Freire. In Mackie, R. (ed.), Literacy and revolution: the pedagogy of Paulo Freire (pp. 5769). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Davydov, V. (1983). Leontiev’s theory of the connection between activity and mental reflection [Учение Леонтьев о взаимосвязи деятельностии психического отражения]. In Zaporozhets, A., Zinchenko, V., Ovchinnikova, O., and Tikhomirov, O. (eds.), A. N. Leontiev and contemporary psychology [Леонтьев и современная психология] (pp. 128140). Moscow: Moscow University.Google Scholar
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalizations in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
Davydov, V. V. (1998). The last talks [Последние выступления]. Riga: Polet.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus (Hurley, R., Seem, M., and Lane, H. R., trans.). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Delgado, R., and Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (Kamuf, Peggy, trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology 18, 187213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3(4), 357370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1908). Does reality possess practical character. In E. L. Thorndike (ed.), Essays in honor of William James (pp. 53–81). New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In J. Dewey, The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thought (pp. 1–19). New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1916/1922). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1920/1948). Reconstruction in philosophy (enlarged edition). Boston MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1929/1960). The quest for certainty: A study on the relation between knowledge and action. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1931). Science and society. From John Dewey: The later works (LW), 1925–1953 (vol. 6: 1931–1932, ed. J. A. Boydston, pp. 53–63). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Progressive organization of subject matter. LW (vol. 13, 1938–1939, ed. J. A. Boydston, pp. 48–60). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J., and Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., and Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science 318, 13871388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diggins, J. P. (1994). The promise of pragmatism: Modernism and the crisis of knowledge and authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., and Lerner, R. M. (1999). History and systems in developmental psychology. In Bornstein, M. H. and Lamb, M. E. (eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (4th ed., pp. 345). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1962). Mankind evolving: The evolution of the species. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (2000). The idea of culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (2003). Kettles boil, classes struggle: Review of “A defence of ‘History and class consciousness’: Tailism and the dialectic” by Lukács, Georg (Leslie, Esther, trans.), Verso, June 2002. London Review of Books 25(4), 1718.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (2007). I contain multitudes (review of Mikhail Bakhtin: The word in the world by Pechey, G.). London Review of Books 29(12), 1315.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. (2011) Why Marx was right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (2006). Second nature: Brain science and human knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhart, M. A., and Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, and J. Preissle (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643–680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, C. (1996). The outer word and inner speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the internalization of language. In Daniels, H. (ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 123142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M., and Schneiderhan, E. (2013). Dewey and Bourdieu on Democracy. In Gorski, P. (ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 131157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, M., and Mische, A. (1998). “What is agency?American Journal of Sociology 103, 9621023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F. (1873–1883/1961). Dialectics of nature [Диалектика природы] (including Chapter “The part played by labour in the transition from ape to man”). Collected works of K. Marx and F. Engels (vol. 20, 2nd ed., pp. 339–626). Moscow: State Publisher of Political Literature.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1886). Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Ludwig_Feurbach_and_the_End_of_German_Classical_Philosop.pdf (accessed May 5, 2016).Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punamaki, R.-L. (eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1938). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14(1), 133156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., and Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review 5, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. (2013). Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory 31, 219242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Feuer, L (1959). John Dewey and the back to the people movement. Journal of the History of Ideas 20, 545568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, M., and McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review 76(3): 297338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., and Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. S (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fish, S. (2010). Pragmatism’s Gift. New York Times, Opinionator, March 15. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/pragmatisms-gift/ (accessed March 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Fivush, R., Habermas, T., Waters, T. E. A., and Zaman, W. (2010). The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives and identity. International Journal of Psychology 46, 321345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Gordon, Colin, ed.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In J. Bernauer and G. Rasmussen (eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990). An aesthetics of existence. In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984 (ed. with an introduction by L. D. Kritzman, pp. 47–56). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginnings of the hermeneutics of the self. Political Theory 21(3), 198–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowers, B. J., and Richardson, F. C. (1996). Why is multiculturalism good? American Psychologist 51, 609621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S., Levitt, P., and Nelson, C. A. (2010). How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Development 81, 2840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankl, V. E. (1992). Man’s search for meaning (4rth ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1995). False antitheses: A response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler. In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (pp. 5974). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2002). Recognition without ethics. In Lash, S. and Featherstone, M. (eds.), Recognition and difference: Politics, identity, multiculture (pp. 2142). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N., and Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/post-modernism (pp. 1938). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, A. M., and Riediger, M. (2O06). Goals as building blocks of personality and development in adulthood. In Mroszek, D. K. and Little, T. D. (eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 353372). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. (30th anniversary edition published in 2005.)Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1982a). Education as the practice of freedom (Ramos, M. B., trans.). In Education for critical consciousness (pp. 184). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1982b). Extension or communication (Bigwood, L. and Marshall, M., trans.). In Education for critical consciousness (pp. 93164). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (Barr, R. R., trans., 2004 ed.). New York: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Frye, M. (1990). A response to lesbian ethics. Hypatia 5(3), 132137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C., and Hofkirchner, W. (2009). Autopoiesis and critical social systems theory. In Magalhães, R. and Sanchez, R. (eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice (pp. 111129). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2009). Philosophical antecedents to situated cognition. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3551). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galperin [Gal’perin], P. Ia. (1985). Methods of instruction and mental development of the child [Методы обучения и умственное развитие ребенка]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.Google Scholar
Galperin [Gal’perin], P. Ia. (1989). Study of the intellectual development of the child. Soviet Psychology 27, 2644. (Originally published in 1969).Google Scholar
Gardiner, M. (2000). “A very understandable horror of dialectics”: Bakhtin and Marxist phenomenology. In Brandist, C. and G. Tihanov (eds.), Materializing Bakhtin: The Bakhtin circle and social theory (pp. 119141). London: Palgrave and MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (2006). Principal theoretical notions. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action (Rawls, A., ed.) (pp. 101189). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Garrison, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism, and educational research. Educational Researcher 23(1), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8, 275296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40, 266275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., and Freeman, M. (2015). The promise of qualitative inquiry. The American Psychologist 70, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1991). An odyssey in learning and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J., and Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review 62, 3241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. (1983a). Critical perspectives in social theory: Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. A. (1983b). Ideology and agency in the process of schooling. Journal of Education 165, 1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroux, H. (1994). Doing cultural studies: Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review 64(3), 278309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitlin, A. (2005 ). Inquiry, imagination, and the search for a deep politic. Educational Researcher 34( 3), 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, R. D. (2001). On Paulo Freire’s philosophy of praxis and the foundations of liberation education. Educational Researcher 30(2), 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher 30, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (2003). On making behavioral genetics truly developmental. Human Development 46, 337355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (2006). Developmental neurobehavioral genetics: Development as explanation. In Jones, B. C. and Mormède, P. (eds.), Neurobehavioral genetics: Methods and applications (2nd ed., pp. 1727). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., and Lickliter, R. (2006). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 210257). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gould, C. C. (1978). Marx’s social ontology: Individuality and community in Marx’s theory of social reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gould, C. C. (1994). Marx after Marxism. In Artifacts, representations and social practice (pp. 377396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1988). The case of the creeping fox terrier clone. Natural History 96, 1624.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1993). Eight little piggies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1995). Dinosaur in a haystack. New York: Harmony Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1982). The two Marxisms: Contradictions and anomalies in the development of theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (selected and translated by Hoare, Q. and Smith, G. N.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Grant, T., and Woods, A. (2003). Reason in revolt. Vol. II: Dialectical philosophy and modern science. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
Great Writers of Fairy Tales (2006). Available at http://glinks.ru/gianni-rodari.html (accessed June 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review 24(1), 113131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (1997). Teaching as possibility: A light in dark times. The Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice 1, 111.Google Scholar
Greene, M. (2000). Lived spaces, shared spaces, public spaces. In Weis, L. and Fine, M. (eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth (pp. 293304). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Greiffenhagen, C., and Sharrock, W. (2008). School mathematics and its everyday other? Revisiting Lave’s “Cognition in Practice.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 69 (1), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guattari, F. (1984) Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. (2002). Hermeneutics, authenticity, and the aims of psychotherapy. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 22, 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and practice: The mediating discourse. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1726). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D. (2002). Studying cultural practices in urban learning communities. Human Development 45, 312321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D., and Larson, J. (2007). Discussing expanded spaces for learning. Language Arts 85, 6977.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., and Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity 41, 286303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, R. (2010). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 41, 132.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1994). Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state. In Taylor, C. and Gutman, A. (eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 107148). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). The liberating power of symbols: Philosophical essays (Dews, P., trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, T., and Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin 126(5), 748769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hallward, P. (2006). Out of this world: Deleuze and the philosophy of creation. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 4982). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory’s controversiality. Hypathia 19(1), 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (2002). Material objects in social worlds. Theory, Culture and Society 19(5–6), 2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Harrist, S., and Richardson, F. C. (2012). Disguised ideologies in counseling and social justice work. Counseling and Values 57, 3844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, N. C. M. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1996a). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1996b). Cities or urbanization? Cities 12, 3862.Google Scholar
Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: Commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine. Psychological Bulletin 137, 819824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatfield, G. (1995). Remaking the science of mind: Psychology as natural science. In Fox, C., Porter, R., and Wokler, R. (eds.), Inventing human science: Eighteenth-century domains (pp. 184231). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haug, W. F. (2001). From Marx to Gramsci – from Gramsci to Marx: Historical materialism and the philosophy of praxis. Rethinking Marxism 13(1), 6982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C. (2011). The obligation to resist oppression. The Journal of Social Philosophy 42, 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as a basis for instruction. In Moll, L. (ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 349371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedegaard, M., and Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning, and children’s development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory and Psychology 12(2), 147160.Google Scholar
Heron, J., and Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry 3(3), 274294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D. (2000). Self and other in Bakhtin’s early philosophical essays: Prelude to a theory of prose consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill Collins, P. (1991/2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirst, E. W. (2004). The diverse social contexts of a second language classroom and the construction of identity. In K. M. Leander and M. Sheehy (eds.), Space matters: Assertions of space in literacy practice and research (pp. 39–66). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hodges, D. C. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 5(4), 272290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., and James, D. (2007). Understanding learning cultures. Educational Review 59(4), 415427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Højgaard, L., and Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology 21, 338354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D., and Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 2, 115.Google Scholar
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., and Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holquist, M. (1982). Bakhtin and Rablais: Theory as praxis. Boundary 2 11, 5–19.Google Scholar
Holquist, M., and Kliger, I. (2005). Minding the gap: Toward a historical poetics of estrangement. Poetics Today 26(4), 613636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In Schraube, E. and Osterkamp, U. (eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233351). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Homskaya, E. D. (2001). Alexander Romanovich Luria: A scientific biography. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2004). Recognition and justice: Outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta Sociologica 47(11), 351364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110197). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (Noeri, G., ed.; Jephcott, E., trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Howe, K. R. (2003). Closing methodological divides: Toward democratic educational research. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Howe, K. R. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher 38(6), 428440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology 82(1), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, P. R. (2002). Neural plasticity: The effect of environment on the development of cerebral cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iljichev, L. F. (1983). Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary [Философский энциклопедический словарь]. Мoscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Ilyenkov, E. V. (2009/2012). The dialectic of the ideal. Historical Materialism 20(2), 149–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2000). Perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2004). Learning through doing and understanding in practice: CSAP Project Report. Birmingham, UK: C-SAP, The Higher Education Academy Subject Network for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics. www.c-sap.bham.ac.uk/CSAP/media/com_projectlog/docs/31_A_03.pdf (accessed July 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2007). The trouble with evolutionary biology. Anthropology Today 23(2), 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A 40, 17961810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivic, I. (1994). Lev S. Vygotsky. Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education 24(3–4), 471–485.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. www.gutenberg.org/files/5116/5116-h/5116-h.htm (accessed July 10, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (vol. 1). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (vol. 2). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (2006). Foreword. In Jean Paul Sartre: Critique of Dialectical Reason. Vol. 2 (A. Elkaim-Sartre, ed.; Q. Hoare, trans.; pp. ix–xxv). London and New York: Verso. (Originally published in 1985.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, N. (2011). Dialogic action for critical democracy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 9, 7294.Google Scholar
Johansson, L. (2013). The occurrence of the not-yet-seen in education – linearity, becoming and difference. Paper presented at NERA 2013 in Reykjavik, March 7–9.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. H., Grossmann, T., and Cohen-Kadosh, K. (2009). Mapping functional brain development: Building a social brain through interactive specialization. Developmental Psychology 45, 151159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, A. (2004). Against embodiment: The material ground of the immaterial subject. International Journal of Lacanian Studies 2, 230254.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. (2010). Badiou, Žižek and political transformations: The cadence of change. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jonathan, R. (1997). Illusory freedoms: Liberalism, education and the market. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, P. E. (2001). The ideal in cultural–historical activity theory: Issues and perspectives. In Chaiklin, S. (ed.), The theory and practice of cultural–historical psychology (pp. 283315). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Jones, P. E. (2003). New clothes for an old emperor: “Evolutionary psychology” and the cognitive counter-revolution. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10(2), 173180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. (2008). Language in cultural-historical perspective. In Van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., and Van der Veer, R. (eds.), The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 76–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, P. E. (2009). Breaking away from Capital? Theorising activity in the shadow of Marx. Outlines: Critical Practice Studies 1, 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. E., ed. (2011). Marxism and education: Renewing the dialogue, pedagogy, and culture. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaika, M. (2005). City of flows. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, D. (2004). Cultural Marxism and cultural studies. www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf (accessed December 12, 2010).Google Scholar
Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 18( 1), 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. L., Jr. (1965). Commencement address for Oberlin College, June, 1965. Oberlin, Ohio. www.oberlin.edu/external/EOG/BlackHistoryMonth/MLK/CommAddress.html (accessed July 10, 2016).Google Scholar
King, M. L., Jr. (1968). The role of the behavioral scientist in the Civil Rights movement. American Psychologist 23(3), 180186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirschner, S. R., and Martin, J. (2010). The sociocultural turn: An introduction and an invitation. In Kirschner, S. R. and Martin, J. (eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology (pp. 127). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kitchener, R. F. (1996). The nature of the social for Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development 39, 243249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, J. E. (1993). Translator’s introduction. In Vygotsky, L. S. and Luria, A. R., Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child (Golod, V. I. and Knox, J. E., eds. and trans.) (pp. 135). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kolb, B., and Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 20(4), 265276.Google ScholarPubMed
Kontopodis, M. (2012). Neoliberalism, pedagogy and human development: Exploring time, mediation and collectivity in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., and Goldsmith, M. (1995). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist 41, 264274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucsera, J., and Orfield, G. (2014). New York State’s extreme school segregation: Inequality, inaction and a damaged future. Los Angeles: UCLA, The Civil Rights Project.Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, K., and Renshaw, P. (2007). Culture and learning: A special theme issue. International Journal of Educational Research 46(34), 109–15.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher 35(7), 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G., and Donnor, J. (2005). The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. In Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 279301). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Langemeyer, I. (2006). Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 7(1), Art. 12 – January. www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/ (accessed August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., ed. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., and Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural approach to second language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., and Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M. P. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141158). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Larkin, M., Eatough, V., and Osborn, M. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and embodied active situated cognition. Theory and Psychology 21(3), 318337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrain, A., and Hayes, A. (2012). Discursive analysis of experience: Alterity, positioning, and tension. Discourse and Society 23(5), 596601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lather, P. (2003). Applied Derrida: (Mis)Reading the work of mourning in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(3), 257270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lather, P. (2009). Getting lost: Social science and/as philosophy. 2007 Kneller Lecture, AESA. Educational Studies 45, 342357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lather, P. (2012a). Rancière as post-Foucauldian. In M. Whittaker (Chair), Taking Rancière to school: An impossible curriculum. Symposium conducted at 2012 American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC. Extended abstract retrieved from AERA’s online repository. www.aera.net/ (accessed June 5, 2016).Google Scholar
Lather, P. (2012b). The ruins of neoliberalism and the construction of a new (scientific) subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education 7, 10211025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society 10(2–3), 205229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005a). What is given in experience? A Review of Isabelle Stengers “Penser avec Whitehead.” Boundary 32(2), 222237.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005b). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds.). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C., and Smagorinsky, P., eds. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., and Harpalani, V. (2003). “Every shut eye ain’t asleep”: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher 32, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Nicolson-Smith, Donald, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehrman, D. S. (1953). Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. The Quarterly Review of Biology 28(4), 337363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehrman, D. S. (1970). Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In Aronson, L. R., Tobach, E., Lehrman, D. S., and Rosenblatt, J. S. (eds.), Development and evolution of behavior: Essays in memory of T. C. Schneirla (pp. 1752). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In Kirshner, D. and Whitson, J. A. (eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 3756). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. (2002). Becoming the village: Education across lives. In Wells, G. and Claxton, G. (eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of Education (pp. 3445). London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, S. (2014). Back to utopia. Dissent (Winter), 3032.Google Scholar
Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher 33(6), 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontiev, A. A. (2001). Active mind [Деятельный ум]. Мoscow: Smysl.Google Scholar
Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Russian edition published 1975.)Google Scholar
Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1981a). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1981b). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 3771). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental-contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology 27, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (2004). Diversity in individual-context relations as the basis for positive development across the life span: A developmental systems perspective for theory, research, and application. Research in Human Development 1, 327346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (editors-in-chief) and Lerner, R. M. (vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 117). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M., and Overton, W. F. (2008). Exemplifying the integrations of the relational developmental system: Synthesizing theory, research, and application to promote positive development and social justice. Journal of Adolescent Research 23, 245255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, E. (1989). The Levinas reader (Hand, S., ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development 71, 3643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. 1995. Genes, environment, and organisms. In Silvers, R., ed. Hidden histories of science (pp. 115-138). New York: New York Review of Books Publishers.Google Scholar
Li, S. H. (2013). Neuromodulation and developmental contextual influences on neuraland cognitive plasticity across the lifespan. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 37, 22012208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lickliter, R., and Honeycutt, H. (2003). Evolutionary approaches to cognitive development: Status and strategy. Journal of Cognition and Development 4, 459473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linehan, C., and McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8(2), 129147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liss, J. E. (1998). Diasporic identities: The science and politics of race in the work of Franz Boas and W. E. B. Du Bois, 1894–1919. Cultural Anthropology 13(2), 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lompscher, J. (2004). Lernkultur und Kompetenzentwicklung aus kulturhistoricher Sicht: Lernen Erwachsener im Arbeitsprozess [Learning culture and competence development in a cultural–historical perspective: Adult learning in the process of work]. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.Google Scholar
Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., and Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin 136, 659676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubovskij, D. V. (2007). Introduction into methodological foundations of psychology [Введение в методологические основы психологии]. Moscow: МОДЭК. http://lib100.com/book/common_psychology/meth_foundations_l/html/ (accessed December 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (2012). The dynamic lexicon. www.princeton.edu/~harman/Courses/PHI534-2012–13/Ludlow/Dynamic_Lexicon.docx (accessed January 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (Haigh, B., trans.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1982). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luttrell, W. (1996). Becoming somebody in and against school: Toward a psychocultural theory of gender and self-making. In Levinson, B. A., Foley, D. E., and Holland, D. C. (eds.), The cultural production of the educated person (pp. 93117). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Luttrell, W., and Parker, C. (2001). High school students’ literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading 24(3), 235247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, K. (1999). Equality studies, the academy and the role of research in emancipatory social change. The Economic and Social Review 30(1), 4169.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1983). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacMurray, J. (1961). The form of the personal. Vol. 2: Persons in relation. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Malik, K. (2001). Review of Louis Menand, The metaphysical club. New Statesman, October 22. www.kenanmalik.com/reviews/menand_metaphysical.html (accessed December 12, 2006).Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1969). Repressive tolerance. In Wolff, R. P., Moore, B. Jr., and Marcuse, H. (eds.), A critique of pure tolerance (pp. 95137). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1972). Counterrevolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. (2010). Pragmatism’s advantage: American and European philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: the dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2012). Objectification in common sense thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19, 207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange 35, 185208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. (2005). Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35(3), 231253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., and McLellan, A.-M. (2013). The education of selves: How psychology transformed students. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., and Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J., and Sugarman, J. (2001). Interpreting human kinds: Beginnings of a hermeneutic psychology. Theory and Psychology 11, 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., Sugarman, J., and Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1844/1978a). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 66125). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1844/1978b). For a ruthless criticism of everything existing. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 1215). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1845/1978). Theses on Feuerbach. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 143145). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1852/1978). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 594617). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1891/1978). Wage-labour and capital. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 203217). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1845–1846/1978). The German ideology. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 146200). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1848/1978). Manifesto of the Communist party. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 473500). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (1987). Realer than real: The simulacrum according to Deleuze and Guattari. Copyright 1, 9096.Google Scholar
Mattson, M., and Kemmis, S. (2007). Praxis-related research: Serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture and Society 15, 185214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R., and Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 26(3), 324348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, P. (1994). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In H. Giroux and P. McLaren (eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies (pp. 192–222). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLaren, P., and Jaramillo, N. (2007). Pedagogy and praxis in the age of empire: Towards a new humanism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, K.C., Pasupathi, M., and Pals, J. L. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11, 262278.Google Scholar
McNay, L. (1999). Subject, psyche and agency: The work of Judith Butler. Theory, Culture, Society 16, 175193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
McQueen, K. (2013). The terrorist teachers of Lev Vygotsky. History of Education Review 42(2), 185198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meacham, J. (1997). Autobiography, voice, and developmental theory. In Amsel, E. and Renninger, K. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 4360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Means, A. (2011). Jacques Rancière: Education and the art of citizenship. Review of Pedagogy, Education, and Cultural Studies 33, 2847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medin, D., Lee, C. D., and Bang, M. (2014). Point of view affects how science is done. Scientific American, October 1. www.scientificamerican.com/article/point-of-view-affects-how-science-is-done/ (accessed June 16, 2015).Google Scholar
Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Smith, C., trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and non-sense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (Lingis, A., trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human re-search: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meshcheryakov, A. (1979). Awakening to life: Forming behaviour and the mind in deaf-blind children. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Miceli, M., and Castelfranchi, C. (2002). The mind and the future: The (negative) power of expectations. Theory and Psychology 12, 335366.Google Scholar
Miettinen, R. (2001). Artifact mediation in Dewey and in cultural–historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8(4), 297308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, C., Tobin, K., and Degenero, D., eds. (2014). Sociocultural studies and implications for science education: The experiential and the virtual. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. (1986). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12(3), 333358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, S. P. (2001). Can our values be objective? On ethics, aesthetics, and progressive politics. New Literary History 34(4), 803833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 7489). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, L. C., ed. (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, S., and John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., and Csikszentmihalyi, M.. Creativity and development (pp. 6190). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (2005a). Moving gender, positivism and feminist possibilities. Feminism and Psychology 15, 408414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (2005b). Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences 18, 77105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (2011). Our debates: Findings, fixing, and enacting reality. Theory and Psychology 21, 260274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (2012). The importance of history to social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W. and Stroebe, W. (eds.), The handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 1942). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. Ball and S. W. Freedman (eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 315–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S., and Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morss, J. R. (2004). Gilles Deleuze and the space of education: Poststructuralism, critical psychology, and schooled bodies. In Marshall, J. D. (ed.), Poststructuralism, philosophy, pedagogy (pp. 8597). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. (2006). Redundancy, plasticity, and detachment: The implications of comparative genomics for evolutionary thinking. Philosophy of Science 73, 930946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L., and Pavesich, V. (2011). Science, normativity and skill: Reviewing and renewing the anthropological basis of critical theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37(2), 139165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostov, J. (1989). Karl Marx as democratic theorist. Polity 22(2), 195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, P., and Hames-Garcia, M. R., eds. (2000). Reclaiming identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, U., and Carpendale, J. I. M. (2000). The role of social interaction in Piaget’s theory: Language for social cooperation and social cooperation for language. New Ideas in Psychology 18, 139156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, N. S. (2005). Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: Strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(1), 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, N. S., and Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research 76(4), 449475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasir, N. S., and Saxe, G. B. (2003). Emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher 32(5), 1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, S. (2014). Race, gender, and the activism of black feminist theory: Working with Audre Lorde. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1975). Perceiving, anticipating and imagining. In W. Savage (ed.), Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology (pp. 89–105). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U., and Winograd, E. (1988). Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. A., and Luciana, M. (2001). Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K., and Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental model. Psychological Review 111, 486511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66, 6092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, F., and Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newton, R. G. (2009). How physics confronts reality. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, T. (2014). Scientific revolutions. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer Edition) (Edward N. Zalta, ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/scientific-revolutions/ (accessed November 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Niemi, W. L. (2011). Karl Marx’s sociological theory of democracy: Civil society and political rights. The Social Science Journal 48, 3951(accessed October 7, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Diane, F. Halpern, D. F., and Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist 67, 130159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, M. (2000). Practice research: Critical psychology in and through practices. Annual Review of Critical Psychology 2, 145–179.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2010). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Ollman, B. (1993). Dialectical investigations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. B. (2005). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory 5, 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, W. F. (1984). World views and their influence on psychological theory and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan. In Reese, H. W. (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (vol. 18, pp. 191226). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Overton, W. F. (2006). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, methodology. In W. Damon (series ed.) and R. M. Lerner (vol. ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1, Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 18–88). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Overton, W. F. (2008). Embodiment from a relational perspective. In Overton, W. F., Mueller, U., and Newman, J. L. (eds.), Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 118). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Overton, W. F., and Ennis, M. (2006). Relationism, ontology and other concerns. Human Development 49, 180183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, W. (2004). Dialectic of the past/disjuncture of the future: Derrida and Benjamin on the concept of messianism. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 5(2), 99114.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution’s eye. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, M. (2006). Is there Vygotsky after Marx? www.mathcs.duq.edu/~packer/Pubs/PDFs/Packer%20AERA06.pdf (accessed August 20, 2015).Google Scholar
Packer, M. J. (2011). The science of qualitative research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Packer, M. J., and Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist 35(4), 227241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, I. (1998). Realism, relativism and critique in psychology. In Parker, I. (ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism (pp. 19). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasupathi, M. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development. Psychological Bulletin 127, 651672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penuel, W. R., and O’Connor, K. (2010). Learning research as a human science: Old wine in new bottles? In Penuel, W. R. and O’Connor, K. (eds.), National Society for the Study of Education 109, 268283.Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1996). La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale (2nd ed.). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. C., and Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Phillips, L. (2002). Recontextualizing Kenneth B. Clark: An Afrocentric perspective on the paradoxical legacy of a model psychologist–activist. In W. E. Pickren and D. A. Dewsbury (eds.), Evolving perspectives on the history of psychology (pp. 575–606). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Phillips, L. (2004). Antiracist work in the desegregation era: The scientific activism of Kenneth Bancrof Clark. In Winston, A. S. (ed.), Defining difference: Race and racism in the history of psychology (pp. 233260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). Autobiography. In E. G. Boring et al. (eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (vol. 4, pp. 237–256). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York: W. W. Norton. (Originally published in 1970.)Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1977). Foreword to H. E. Gruber and J. Voneche (eds.), The essential Piaget. London (pp. xi–xii). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 103128). New York: Wiley. (Originally published in 1970.)Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies (L. Smith, ed.; L. Smith et al. trans.) London: Routledge. (Originally published in 1977.)Google Scholar
Pick, H. L. (1992). Eleanor J. Gibson: Learning to perceive and perceiving to learn. Developmental Psychology 28, 787794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plekhanov, G. (1940). Essays in historical materialism. New York: International.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal 35(4), 535570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Is the National Research Council Committee’s report on Scientific Research in Education scientific? On trusting the manifesto. Qualitative Inquiry 10(1), 6278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkewitz, T. S., and Brennan, M. (eds.) (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Port, R. F., and van Gelder, T., eds. (1995). Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature (in collaboration with Isabelle Stengers). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., and Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist 52, 517535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Procter, J. (2004). Stuart Hall. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puzyrei, A. A. (2007). Contemporary psychology and Vygotsky’s cultural–historical theory. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 45(1), 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarshie, R. (2008). English for students with diverse backgrounds. http://ite.org.uk/ite_readings/english_for_pupils_with_diverse_backgrounds_20080326.pdf (accessed October 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, A. W. (2015 ). Respecifying the study of social order – Garfinkel’s transition from theoretical conceptualization to practices in details. In H. Garfinkel, Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action (edited by Rawls, A., pp. 198). Oxon, UK, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reason, P., and Torbert, W. R. (2001). Toward a transformational science: A further look at the scientific merits of action research. Concepts and Transformations 6(1), 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, T. (2010) Being neurologically human today: Life and science and adult cerebral plasticity. American Ethnologist 37, 150166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, H. W. (1991). Contextualism and developmental psychology. In H. W. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 23 (pp. 187–230). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reese, H. W., and Overton, W. F. (1970). Models of development and theories of development. In Goulet, L. R. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 115145). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, U. E. (2010). When value judgments masquerade as science. Economix Blog, New York Times, August 27. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/when-value-judgments-masquerade-as-science/?_r=0 (accessed March 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Richardson, F., Fowers, B., and Guignon, C. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2007). A natural history of pragmatism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riegel, K. F. (1979). Foundations of dialectical psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rilke, R.-M. (1904). Letters to young poet. www.carrothers.com/rilke8.htm (accessed August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Robbins, P., and Aydede, M., eds. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M. (2010). Risk the game: On William James. The Nation, December 13. www.thenation.com/article/risk-game-william-james/ (accessed July 27, 2015).Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Open University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., and Lave, J., eds. (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rooney, E. (1995). Better read than dead: Althusser and the fetish of ideology. Yale French Studies 88, 183200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. (1998). Lifelines: Biology, freedom, determinism. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (2005a). The Future of the brain: The promise and perils of tomorrow's neuroscience. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (2005b). Human agency in the neurocentric age. EMBO reports, volume 6, issue 11, 1001–1005, November 1, 2005. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/sj.embor.7400566/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S., Lewontin, R. C., and Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, I. (1988). The invention of memory: A new view of the brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M., and Lee, Y.-J. (2007). Vygotsky’s neglected legacy: Cultural–historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research 77(2), 186232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. (2010). The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, D. (1969). The Chicago pragmatists. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A., Vaughn-Blount, K., and Ball, L. C. (2010). Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, social change, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 34, 460473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, O. (1987). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars: Seven paradoxical tales. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Säljö, R. (2003). Epilogue: From transfer to boundary-crossing. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. and Engeström, Y. (eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 311321). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Said, E. (2000). Reflections on exile and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Said, E. (2003). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books. (Originally published in 1978.)Google Scholar
Saito, N. (2002). Pragmatism and the tragic sense: Deweyan growth in an age of nihilism. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36( 2), 247–263).Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In Kessen, W. (ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: History, theory, and methods (pp. 237294). New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development 81(1), 622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, E. E. (1981). Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist 36, 730743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sannino, A. (2011). Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. Theory and Psychology 21, 571597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., and Gutiérrez, K. (eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J-P. (1966). The psychology of imagination. New York: Citadel.Google Scholar
Sartre, J‐P. (1968). Search for a method. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sawchuk, P. (2003). Adult learning and technology in working-class life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sawchuk, P., and Stetsenko, A. (2008). Sociology for a non-canonical activity theory: Exploring intersections and complementarities. Mind, Culture and Activity 15(4), 339360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, J., and Stetsenko, A. (2014). Lev Vygotsky’s approach to language and speech. In P. Brooks and V. Kempe (eds.), Encyclopedia of language development (pp. 663–666). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K., and Greeno, J. (2009). Situativity and learning. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 347367). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schneirla, T. C. (1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In Harris, D. B. (ed.), The concept of development (pp. 78108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (1997). Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechenov, I. M. (1947). Izbrannye filosofskie i psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected philosophical and psychological works]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (Originally published in 1871.)Google Scholar
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaull, R. (1970/2005). Foreword. In P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. (30th anniversary ed., pp. 29–34.)Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement (exp. 2nd ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1991). Art as device. In Theory of Prose (Sher, Benjamin, trans., pp. 114). Elmwood Park, IL: Dalkey Archive.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life: Social constructionism, rhetoric and knowing of the third kind. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2006). Peripheral vision. Understanding process from within: An argument for “withness” thinking. Organization Studies 27(4): 585604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoumakova, N. B. (1986). Research activity in the form of questions at various age periods [Исследовательская активность в форме вопросов в разные возрастные периоды]. Problems of Psychology [Вопросы психологии] 1, 5359.Google Scholar
Simons, J. (1995). Foucault and the political. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Slife, B. (2004). Taking practice seriously: Toward a relational ontology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24(2), 157178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, A., and Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real. American Psychologist 60, 1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. E. (1988). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. B. (1994). Selfhood at risk: Postmodern perils and the perils of postmodernism. American Psychologist 49, 405411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 34(3), 427450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1995). The language of human nature. In Fox, C., Porter, R., and Wokler, R. (eds.), Inventing human science: Eighteenth-century domains (pp. 88111). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smith-Maddox, R., and Solórzano, D. G. (2002). Using critical race theory, Paulo Freire’s problem-posing method, and case study research to confront race and racism in education. Qualitative Inquiry 8(1), 6684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, M. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23, 605–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, E. (2012). The mind and distributed cognition: The place of knowing in a maths class. Theory and Psychology 22(6), 717737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springs, J. A. (2007). The priority of democracy to social theory. Contemporary Pragmatism 4(1), 4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, W. (1992). Curriculum for utopia. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2002a). Penser avec Whitehead: Une libre et sauvage création de concepts. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2002b). A “cosmo-politics” – risk, hope, change. In Zournasi, Mary (ed.), Hope: New philosophies for change (pp. 240272). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2007). Diderot’s egg: Divorcing materialism from eliminativism. Radical Philosophy 144 (July/August), 715.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. (2008a). Unity through divergence. applied process thought: Initial explorations in theory and research (Dibben, Mark and Kelly, Thomas, eds., pp. 119136). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I. (2008b). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review 11(1), 183196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I. (2011). Wondering about materialism. In Bryant, Levi R., Srnicek, Nick, and Harman, Graham (eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 368380). Melbourne, Australia: Re.press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (1990). On the role and status of methodology in contemporary psychology. [О роли и статусе методологического знания в психологии]. The Herald of MGU, ser. Psychology [Vestnik MGU, Serija Psihologija] 2, 3950.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (1995a). The role of the principle of object-relatedness in the theory of activity. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. Special Issue: The Legacy of A. N. Leont’ev 33, 2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (1995b). The psychological function of children’s drawing: Vygotskian perspective. In Lange-Kuttner, C. and Thomas, G. V. (eds.) Drawing and looking: Theoretical approaches to pictorial representation in children (pp. 147–58). Hemel Hemstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (1999). Social interaction, cultural tools, and the zone of proximal development: In search of a synthesis. In Hedegaard, M., Chaiklin, S., Boedker, S., and Jensen, U. J. (eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 235253). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2001). Commentary: Sociocultural activity as a unit of analysis: How Vygotsky and Piaget converge in empirical research on collaborative cognition. In Bearison, D. and Dorval, B. (eds.) Collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing (pp. 123135) Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2002). The illusive nature of social change: Whence is a change and how does it relate to human development? PsycCRITIQUES 47(2), 151153.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2003). Alexander Luria and the cultural-historical activity theory: Pieces for the history of an outstanding collaborative project in psychology. Review of Homskaya, E. D. (2001), Alexander Romanovich Luria: A scientific biography. Mind, Culture, and Acitivity 10(1), 9397.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2004). Introduction to “Tool and Sign” by Vygotsky, Lev. In Rieber, R. and Robbinson, D. (eds.), Essential Vygotsky (pp. 499510). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12(1), 7088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2007a). Agency and society: Lessons from the study of social change. Special issue on Agency and Social Change (Silbereisen, R., guest ed.) (invited commentary article). International Journal of Psychology 42(2), 110112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2007b). Being-through-doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education 2, 2537.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education 3, 465485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2009). Vygotsky and the conceptual revolution in developmental sciences: Towards a unified (non-additive) account of human development. In Fleer, M., Hedegaard, M., Tudge, J., and Prout, A. (eds.) World year book of education. Constructing childhood: Global–local policies and practices (pp. 125142). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2010a). Standing on the shoulders of giants: A balancing act of dialectically theorizing conceptual understanding on the grounds of Vygotsky’s project. In Roth, W.-M. (ed.), Re/structuring science education: ReUniting psychological and sociological perspectives (pp. 5372). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2010b). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of historical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal 5, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2011). Darwin and Vygotsky on development: An exegesis on human nature. In Kontopodis, M., Wulf, Ch., and Fichtner, B. (eds.), Children, development and education (pp. 2541). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology 30, 144153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2013a). Theorizing personhood for the world in transition and change: Reflections from a transformative activist stance. In Martin, J. and Bickhard, M. H. (eds.), The psychology of personhood (pp. 181202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2013b). The challenge of individuality in cultural-historical activity theory: “Collectividual” dialectics from a transformative activist stance. Outlines – Critical Practice Studies (special issue on transformative social practices edited by I. Langemeyer and S. Schmachtel) 14(2), 728.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: Inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In Corcoran, T. (ed.), Psychology in education: Critical theory/practice (pp. 181198). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2015). Theory for and as social practice of realizing the future: Implications from a transformative activist stance. In Martin, J., Sugarman, J., and Slaney, K. (eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 102116). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (in press). Putting the radical notion of equality in the service of disrupting inequality in education: Research findings and conceptual advances. Review of Research in Education (special issue on Disrupting Inequalities, ed. by M. Winn and M. Souto-Manning).Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. P. (1988). The diachronic principle in the historical analysis of psychological conceptions [О диахроническом принципе историко-психологического анализа научных концепций]. In Zhdan, A. (ed.), Izuchenije traditsij i nauchnih shkol v istorii sovetskoj psihologii [Scientific schools and traditions in the history of Soviet psychology] (pp. 4651). Moscow: Moscow University Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4, 160173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. (2002). Teaching, learning and development: A post-Vygotskian perspective. In Wells, G. and Claxton, G. (eds.), Learning for life in the twenty-first century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 8487). London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. M. (2004a). Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation: History, politics, and practice in knowledge construction. The International Journal of Critical Psychology 12(4), 5880.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. M. (2004b). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory and Psychology 14(4), 475503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Arievitch, I. M. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory: Foundational worldview and major principles. In Martin, J. and Kirschner, S. (eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 231253). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Ho, G. (2015). The serious joy and the joyful work of play: Children becoming agentive actors in co-authoring themselves and their world through play. International Journal of Early Childhood 47( 2), 221234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A., and Vianna, E. (2009 ). Bridging developmental theory and educational practice: Lessons from the Vygotskian project. In Barbarin, O. and Wasik, B. H. (eds.), Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice (pp. 3854). New York: Guilford Press. Available on www.academia.edu.Google Scholar
Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., and Barnier, A. J. (2011). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9, 521560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swyngedouw, E., and Kaika, M. (2000). The environment of the city or … the urbanisation of nature. In Bridge, G. and Watson, S. (eds.), A companion to the city (pp. 567–580). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1993). Engaged agency and background in Heidegger. In Guignon, C. B. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 317–336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2013). Backlash against American psychology: An indigenous reconstruction of the history of German critical psychology. History of Psychology 16 (1), 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teo, T. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist 70(3), 243254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tharp, R. G., and Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis. American Psychologist 50, 7995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thelen, E. (2000). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. Infancy 1(1), 328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thelen, E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 15, 255283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., and Bates, E. A. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science 6, 378391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., and Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, D., and Brown, J. S. (2009). Learning for a world of constant change: Homo sapiens, homo faber and homo Ludens revisited. www.johnseelybrown.com/Learning%20for%20a%20World%20of%20Constant%20Change.pdf (accessed July 6, 2011).Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography (Qualitative Research Methods Series, No. 26). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. The Modern Language Journal 89, 393409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tihanov, G. (2000). The master and the slave: Lukacs, Bakhtin, and the ideas of their time. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobach, E. (1972). Social Darwinism rides again. In Tobach, E. (ed.), The four horsemen: Racism, sexism, militarism and social Darwinism (pp. 319). New York: Behavioral Publications.Google Scholar
Todd, P. N., and Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 727780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todes, D. (1989). Darwin without Malthus: The struggle for existence in Russian evolutionary thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1979). The inwardness of mental life. Critical Inquiry 6(1), 1. http://philpapers.org/rec/TOUTIO-2 (accessed July 12, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1988). The recovery of practical philosophy. The American Scholar 57(3), 337352.Google Scholar
Ukhtomsky, A. A. (1924/2002). The dominant: Works from 1887–1939 [Dominanta: Statji raznih let, 1887–1939]. Saint Petersburg: Peter.Google Scholar
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2006). Engaging young people: Learning in informal contexts. Review of Research in Education 30, 239278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadeboncoeur, J. A., and Collie, R. J. (2013). Locating social and emotional learning in schooled environments: A Vygotskian perspective on learning as unified. Mind, Culture, and Activity 20, 201225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberg, B. (1999). Levinas and the ethical context of human development. Human Development 42, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., and Steenbeck, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review 25, 408442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., and van der Veer, R., eds. (2008). The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural–historical activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J. (1992). Ethical know-how. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyuk, F. (1988). The psychology of experiencing. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Vianna, E. (2009). Collaborative transformations in foster care: Teaching-learning as a developmental tool in a residential program. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Vianna, E., and Stetsenko, A. (2006). Embracing history through transforming it: Contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory and Psychology (Special Issue on activity theory edited by Holzman, Lois) 16 (1), 81108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vianna, E., and Stetsenko, A. (2011). Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development 54, 313338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vianna, E., and Stetsenko, A. (2014 ). Research with a transformative activist agenda: Creating the future through education for social change. In Vadeboncoeur, J. (ed.), Learning in and across contexts: Reimagining education. National Society for the Studies of Education Yearbook 113( 2), 575602.Google Scholar
Vianna, E., Hougaard, N., and Stetsenko, A. (2014). The dialectics of collective and individual transformation. In Blunden, A. (ed.), Collaborative projects (pp. 5987). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brille Publishers.Google Scholar
von Glasersfeld, E. (1997). Homage to Jean Piaget (1896–1982). Irish Journal of Psychology 18, 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygodskaya, G., and Lifanova, T. (1996). Lev Semenovich Vygotsky: Life, activity, and portrait outlines [Lev Semenovich Vygotskij: Zhizn, dejatelnost i shtrikhi k portrety]. Moscow: Smysl.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (Rieber, R. W. and Carton, A. S., eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 2: The fundamentals of defectology (Rieber, R. W. and Carton, A. S., eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J. (eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338354). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Rieber, R. W. and Wollock, J., eds.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions (Rieber, R. W., ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Educational psychology (Silverman, R., trans.). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press. (Originally published in 1926.)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 5: Child psychology (Rieber, R. W., ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 6: Scientific legacy (Rieber, R.W., ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Wartofsky, M. (1983 ). The child’s construction of the world and the world’s construction of the child: From historical epistemology to historical psychology. In Kessel, F. S. and Siegel, A. W. (eds.), The child and other cultural inventions (pp. 188215). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Watson, M. C. (2014). Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and subalternist cosmopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society 31, 7598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L., and Dillaway, H. (2001). Understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality: Case studies. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education. In Lee, C. and Smagorinsky, P. (eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G., and Claxton, G. (2002). Introduction: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In Wells, G. and Claxton, G. (eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 117). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, C., Brown, B., and Altman, I. (2002). Planning and doing transactionally-oriented research: Examples and strategies. In Stokols, D. and Altman, I. (eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology II (pp. 203221). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2000). Intersubjectivity and alterity in human communication. In Budwig, N., Uzgiris, I. C., and Wertsch, J. V. (eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 1732). New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2005). Essay review of “Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development” by Bronfenbrenner, U.. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23, 143151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V., and Sohmer, R. (1995). Vygotsky on learning and development. Human Development 38, 332337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. (1989). The American evasion of philosophy: A genealogy of pragmatism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. (1991). The ethical dimensions of Marxist thought. New York: The Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
West, C. (1993). The limits of neo-pragmatism. In Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
West, C. (1999). On prophetic pragmatism. In The Cornel West reader (pp. 149173). New York: Civitas Books.Google Scholar
Westbrook, R. B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
White, S. H. (2000a). Conceptual foundations of IQ testing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6, 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. H. (2000b). The social roles of child study. Human Development 43, 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (corrected ed.). Griffin, D. R. and Sherburne, D. W. (eds.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1980). Problems in materialism and culture: Selected essays. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Williams, R. N., and Gantt, E. E. (1998). Intimacy and heteronomy: On grounding psychology in the ethical. Theory and Psychology 8, 253267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A., and Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall ed.) (Edward N. Zalta, ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/ (accessed June 30, 2015).Google Scholar
Winston, A. S. (2004). Introduction: Histories of psychology and race. In Winston, A. S. (ed.), Defining difference: Race and racism in the history of psychology (pp. 318). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar