Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:35:44.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Four - The Everyday Experiences of Russian Citizens in Justice of the Peace Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Marina Kurkchiyan
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Agnieszka Kubal
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

This chapter gives a glimpse into the experiences of ordinary Russian citizens in Courts of Justices of the Peace (JP). The main findings indicate that a number of factors contribute to making the use of a Russian court a highly distinctive experience. The first factor is the availability of direct access to a judge during a pre-trial session. These informal, non-recorded sessions give the claimants an opportunity to assess the strength of their cases, and, even more importantly, to evaluate the judges' opinions of them. The widespread use of pre-trial sessions combined with a characteristic reliance on the black letter of the law lead to most cases being decided before the hearings. As a result, many public hearings become mere formalities for the announcement of decisions, while a typical court user's opportunity to participate in the legal process is restricted to talking informally to the judge. Systematic observation of what people experience in Russian JP Courts reveals a pattern of relaxed procedural standards which are encouraged by an absence of barriers between court users and decision makers.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogdanova, E., Ezhova, L. and Olympyeva, I. (2008) Chto Nuzhno Znat o Mirovih Sudyah. St Petersburg: Aleteiia.Google Scholar
Chechina, N. A. (1999) ‘Miroviye Sudy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Sudebnaya reforma i novoye zamonodatelstvo)’, Pravovedeniye, 4: 229237.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2012b) ‘Assessing the role of the Justice-of-the-Peace courts in the Russian judicial system’, Review of Central and East European Law, 37(4): 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K. (2012a) ‘The unsung heroes of the Russian judicial system: the Justice-of-the-Peace courts’, The Journal of Eurasian Law, 5(3): 337366.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2011) ‘Varieties of legal dualism: making sense of the role of ;aw in contemporary Russia’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 29(2): 233–62.Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, M. (2012) ‘Perceptions of law and social order: a cross-national comparison of collective legal consciousness’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 29(2): 366–93.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lind, A. E., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnick, J. and Tyler, T. R. (1989) The Perception of Justice: Tort Litigants’ Views of Trial, Court-Annexed Arbitration, and Judicial Settlement Conferences. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation Report R-3708-ICJ.Google Scholar
Rimskiy, V. L. (2009) Obzor Sotciologicheskih Issledovaniy Sudebnoy Sistemi Rossii, Vipolnennyh v Period s Kontsa 1991 Goda po Nastoyashiy Moment. Moscow: Fond INDEM.Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, V. (2006) ‘Miroviye Sudy Rabotayut v “Shagovoy” Dostupnosti ot Moskvichey’, interview in Moskovskiy Komsomolets, 04 August 2006, accessed 26 November 2016, at http://ums.mos.ru/presscenter/mass-media/.).Google Scholar
Solomon, P. H. Jr (2008) ‘Assessing the courts in Russia: parameters of progress under Putin’, International Journal for Court Administration, 1(2): 2632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, P. H. Jr (2002) ‘Putin’s Judicial Reform’, East European Constitutional Review, 11: 117–24.Google Scholar
Solomon, P. H. Jr (1997) Reforming Justice in Russia, 1864–1996: Power, Culture, and the Limits of Legal Order. Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (2008) ‘Procedural justice and the courts’, Court Review, 44(1/2): 2631.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×