Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.333 Render date: 2021-12-07T06:21:28.661Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

4 - Sexual selection and communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Charles T. Snowdon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Peter M. Kappeler
Affiliation:
Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany
Carel P. van Schaik
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Darwin first wrote about sexual selection in 1871, but only since the 1970s has it become a topic of intense scientific study. The Göttinger Freilandtage (conference) on sexual selection in primates which resulted in this chapter, was held exactly 125 years after Darwin first published his paper on sexual selection on visual signals in primates (1876). How far have we come in understanding sexual selection of communication signals since Darwin's first introduction of the topic? We have had considerable advances in studying sexually selected vocalisations in anurans (e.g. Ryan & Rand, 1990) and birds (e.g. Searcy & Andersson, 1986); sexually selected visual traits in birds (e.g. Borgia, 1985; Petrie, 1994) and invertebrates (e.g. Wilkinson & Reillo, 1994); as well as chemical signals in invertebrates (e.g. Eisner & Meinwald, 1995). The major focus of most of these studies has been on variation in male traits that provide a basis for female choice.

As I have surveyed the primate literature relating communication signals to sexual selection, my assessment is that we have very little real understanding of the role of sexual selection on primate communication that is comparable to our knowledge of other taxa. I think there are several reasons for this lack of progress since Darwin. First, primatologists have lost track of the steps needed for a truly scientific validation of sexual selection, which often requires controlled experimentation. A clear understanding of sexual selection requires not only attempting to understand ultimate causes, but also close attention to proximate mechanisms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sexual Selection in Primates
New and Comparative Perspectives
, pp. 57 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, G. G. & Snowdon, C. T. 2002. Costs of caregiving: weight loss in captive adult male cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) following the birth of infants. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 179–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielert, C. 1982. Experimental examination of baboon (Papio ursinus) sex stimuli. In Primate Communication, ed. C. T. Snowdon, C. H. Brown & M. R. Petersen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373–95
Bielert, C. 1986. Sexual interactions between captive adult male and female chacma baboons as related to the female's menstrual cycle. Journal of Zoology, London, 209, 521–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielert, C. & Anderson, C. M. 1985. Baboon sexual swellings and male response: a possible operational mammalian supernormal stimulus and response interaction. International Journal of Primatology, 6, 377–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielert, C. & Walt, L. A. 1982. Male chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) sexual arousal: mediation by visual cues from female conspecifics. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 7, 31–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielert, C., Howard-Tripp, M. E. & Walt, L. A. 1981. Environmental and social factors influencing seminal emission in chacma baboon (Papio ursinus). Psychoneuroendocrinology, 5, 287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgia, G. 1985. Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis. Animal Behaviour, 33, 266–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, A. A. & Isbell, L. A. 2001. Causes and consequences of single-male and multimale mating in free-ranging patas monkeys, Erythrocebus patas. Animal Behaviour, 62, 1047–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, L. A., Carlson, A. A., Ziegler, T. E. & Snowdon, C. T. 1995. Communication of ovulatory state to mates by female pygmy marmosets (Cebuella pygmaea). Animal Behaviour, 49, 615–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cords, M. 1987. Forest guenons and patas monkeys: male–male competition in one-male groups. In Primate Societies, ed. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham & T. T. Struhsaker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 98–111
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray
Darwin, C. 1876. Sexual selection as related to monkeys. Nature, 15, 18–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deputte, B. L. 1982. Duetting in male and female songs of the white-cheeked gibbon (Hylobates concolor lucogenys). In Primate Communication, ed. C. T. Snowdon, C. H. Brown & M. R. Petersen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–93
Deputte, B. L. & Goustard, M. 1980. Copulatory vocalizations of female macaques (Macaca fascicularis): variability factors analysis. Primates, 21, 83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digby, L. J. 1995. Infant care, infanticide and female reproductive strategies in polygynous groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixson, A. F. 1998. Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimans, Monkeys, Apes and Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dixson, A. F. & Lloyd, S. A. C. 1988. The hormonal and hypothalamic control of primate sexual behaviour. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 80, 81–117Google Scholar
Dixson, A. F. & Lloyd, S. A. C. 1989. Effects of male partners on proceptivity in ovariectomized estradiol-treated marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Hormones and Behavior, 23, 211–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domb, L. G. & Pagel, M. 2001. Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature, 410, 204–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domjan, M., Blesbois, E. & Williams, J. 1998. Pavlovian conditioning of sperm release. Psychological Science, 9, 411–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, T. & Meinwald, J. 1995. The chemistry of sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 92, 50–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epple, G. 1985. Communication by chemical signals. In Comparative Primate Biology. Vol. 2A: Behavior, Conservation, and Ecology, ed. G. Mitchell & J. Erwin. New York, NY: Alan R. Liss, pp. 531–80
Epple, G. & Katz, Y. 1984. Social influences on oestrogen excretion and ovarian cyclicity in saddle back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). American Journal of Primatology, 6, 215–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C. F., Snowdon, C. T., King, J. A.et al. 2001. Functional imaging of brain activity in conscious monkeys responding to sexually-arousing cues. Neuro Report, 12, 2231–6Google ScholarPubMed
Fischer, J., Hammerschmidt, K., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. 2002. Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: influence of context, age and individuality. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 111, 1465–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, P. A., Moya, L. & Malaga, C. 1984. A preliminary study of the mustached tamarin (Saguinus mystax) in northeastern Peru: questions concerned with the evolution of a communal breeding system. Folia Primatologica, 42, 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, J.-P. & Gautier, A. 1977. Communication in Old World Monkeys. In How Animals Communicate, ed. T. A. Sebeok. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 890–964
Girolami, L. & Bielert, C. 1987. Female perineal swelling and its effects on male sexual arousal: an apparent sexual releaser in the chacma baboon (Papio ursinus). International Journal of Primatology, 8, 651–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfoot, D. A. 1982. Multiple channels of sexual communication in rhesus monkeys: role of olfactory cues. In Primate Communication, ed. C. T. Snowdon, C. H. Brown & M. R. Petersen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413–28
Goldfoot, D. A., Kravetz, M. A., Goy, R. W. & Freeman, S. K. 1976. Lack of effect of vaginal lavages and aliphatic acids on ejaculatory responses in rhesus monkeys. Hormones and Behavior, 7, 1–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, S. M. 1981. Sex differences and age gradations in vocalizations of Japanese and lion-tailed monkeys (Macaca fuscata and Macaca silenus). American Zoologist, 21, 165–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubernick, D. & Addington, R. L. 1994. The stability of social and mating preferences in the monogamous California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). Animal Behaviour, 47, 559–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymann, E. W. 2003. Scent marking, paternal care and sexual selection in Callitrichines. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Primates: New Perspectives and Directions, Special Topics in Primatology 4, ed. C. Jones. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss
Hollis, K. L., Cadieux, E. L. & Colbert, M. M. 1989. The biological function of Pavlovian conditioning: a mechanism for mating success in the blue gurami (Trichogaster tricopterus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 115–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, K. L., Pharr, V. L., Dumas, M. J., Britton, G. B. & Field, J. 1997. Classical conditioning provides paternity advantage for territorial male blue guramis (Trichogaster tricopeterus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 219–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. & Dixson, A. F. 1986. Anteromedial hypothalamic lesions block proceptivity but not receptivity in the female common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Brain Research, 375, 221–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kippin, T. E., Talianakis, S., Schatterman, L., Bartholomew, S. & Pfaus, J. G. 1998. Olfactory conditioning of sexual behavior in the male rat (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 389–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koksal, F. & Domjan, M. 1998. Observational conditioning of sexual behavior in the domesticated quail. Animal Learning and Behavior, 26, 427–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characteristics. Evolution, 34, 292–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaro-Perea, C. 2001. Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 62, 11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaro-Perea, C., Castro, C. S. S., Harrison, R.et al. 2000. Behavioral and demographic changes following the loss of the breeding female in cooperatively breeding marmosets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 137–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, R. P. & Keverne, E. B. 1970. Primate sex pheromones of vaginal origin. Nature, 225, 84–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, R. P., Keverne, E. B. & Bonsall, R. W. 1971. Pheromones: isolation of male sexual attractant from a female primate. Science, 172, 964–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C. 1985a. Location-specific responses of gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) to male songs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 70, 219–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C. 1985b. Gibbon song duets and intergroup spacing. Behaviour, 92, 59–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C. 1985c. Sexual selection and male orangutan long calls. Animal Behaviour, 33, 272–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitani, J. C. 1988. Male gibbon (Hylobates agilis) singing behavior: natural history, song variations and function. Ethology, 79, 177–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, C. L. 1999. The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates: the graded signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58, 229–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagel, M. 1994. The evolution of conspicuous oestrous advertisement in Old World monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1333–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, M. 1994. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature, 371, 598–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaus, J. G., Kippin, T. E. & Centeno, S. 2001. Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 291–321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pusey, A., Williams, J. & Goodall, J. 1999. The influence of dominance rank on reproductive success in female chimpanzees. Science, 277, 828–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosis (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution, 44, 305–14Google Scholar
Sanchez, S., Pelaez, F., Gil-Burmann, C. & Kaumanns, W. 1999. Costs of infant carrying in the cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). American Journal of Primatology, 48, 99–1113.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, A., Ziegler, T. E. & Snowdon, C. T. 1988. Sociosexual development, pair bond formation and mechanisms of fertility suppression in female cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). American Journal of Primatology, 14, 345–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. B. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 507–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semple, S. 1998. The function of Barbary macaque copulation calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 287–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semple, S. & McComb, K. 2000. Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 267, 707–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semple, S., McComb, K., Alberts, S. & Altmann, J. 2002. Information content of female copulation calls in yellow baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 56, 43–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. 1997. Some general features of vocal development in nonhuman primates. In Social Influences on Vocal Development, ed. C. T. Snowdon & M. Hausberger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–73
Singh, D. & Bronstad, P. M. 2001. Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. E. & Abbott, D. H. 1998. Behavioral discrimination between circumgenital odor from peri-ovulatory dominant and anovulatory female common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 46, 265–843.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowdon, C. T. 1996. Infant care in cooperatively breeding species. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 25, 643–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallman, R. R. & Froehlich, J. W. 2000. Primate sexual swellings as coevolved signal systems. Primates, 41, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, K. & McClintock, M. K. 1998. Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature, 392, 177–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaik, C. P., Assink, P. & Salafsky, N. 1992. Territorial behavior in Southeast Asian langurs: resource defense or mate defense?American Journal of Primatology, 26, 233–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villarreal, R. & Domjan, M. 1998. Pavlovian conditioning of social-affiliative behavior in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, P. M. 1977. Individual recognition, intragroup cohesion and intergroup spacing: evidence from sound playback to forest monkeys. Behaviour, 60, 28–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waser, P. M. 1982. The evolution of male loud calls. In Primate Communication, ed. C. T. Snowdon, C. H. Brown & M. R. Petersen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–45
Washabaugh, K. & Snowdon, C. T. 1998. Chemical communication of reproductive status in female cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). American Journal of Primatology, 45, 337–493.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, J. M. 1987. Vocally mediated reciprocity between neighbouring groups of mantled howler monkeys, Alouatta palliata palliata. Animal Behaviour, 35, 1615–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. & Reillo, P. R. 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 255, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, T. E., Epple, G., Snowdon, C. T.et al. 1993. Detection of chemical signals of ovulation in the cotton-top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus. Animal Behaviour, 45, 313–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×