Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-pp4sz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-29T01:31:23.524Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

3 - Decisions, risk and the brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Layla Skinns
University of Cambridge
Michael Scott
University of Cambridge
Tony Cox
University of Cambridge
Get access


The ability to make good decisions about future courses of action under conditions of uncertainty is essential for the survival of most animals, including humans. Whether it is deciding which item to choose from a restaurant menu, when to cross a busy road or what career path to follow, we are constantly faced with the need to make decisions of varying degrees of importance in terms of their implications for our future well-being. Often the outcomes of such decisions are highly uncertain, and we must therefore take into account not only the pros and cons of the outcomes associated with different courses of action but also the uncertainties or ‘risk’ attached to such outcomes. On the whole, humans are rather good at making decisions, as exemplified by our incredible success as a species. The root of that success necessarily lies in the machinery contained in our brain, a highly efficient computer weighing approximately 1.36 kg that has been shaped by evolution to allow us the flexibility to make good decisions in diverse and rapidly changing environments. In this chapter, I will give a broad introduction to a new interdisciplinary field of study called ‘neuroeconomics’, which is concerned with elucidating how the brain is capable of enabling us to make such good decisions. I will outline our current understanding about how decisions are made by the brain, and I will highlight some of the outstanding questions for future research in this still nascent field of study.


The field of neuroeconomics has emerged through a fusion of approaches found in more traditional disciplines. These include not only neuroscience and economics, as one might have guessed from the perhaps clumsily put-together title, but also cognitive and behavioural psychology, computer science and artificial intelligence, engineering, robotics and behavioural ecology, among others (Glimcher et al., 2009). A core assumption behind neuroeconomics is (in common with much if not all contemporary neuroscience) that the brain can be treated as a computational device transforming input in the form of information reaching our sense organs (vision, touch, audition, smell and taste), into output in the form of the generation of behaviour. This transformation is mediated by the billions of highly interconnected neurons (nerve cells) contained in our brains. The main goal of neuroscience is to describe precisely how these neurons act on the incoming sensory information in order to produce a particular output, or, to return to the brain-as-computer analogy, to resolve the algorithms (or mathematical functions) used by the brain to achieve such transformations.

Risk , pp. 34 - 61
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Allais, M. 1953 Behaviour of the rational man before risk – criticism of American school postulates and axiomsEconometrica 21 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechara, A.Damasio, H.Damasio, A. R. 2000 ‘Emotion, decision-making and the orbitofrontal cortexCerebral Cortex 10 295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A.Damasio, A. R.Damasio, H.Andersion, S. W 1994 ‘Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortexCognition 50 7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentham, J. 1987 From an introduction to the principles of morals and legislationUtilitarianism and Other EssaysMill, J. S.Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. 1954 Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of riskEconometrica 22 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, A. J.Zatorre, R. J.Bermudez, P.Evans, A. C. 1999 ‘Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regionsNature Neuroscience 2 382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, H.Grabowski, T.Frank, R.Galaburda, A. M.Damasio, A. R. 1994 The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patientScience 264 1102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daw, N. D.O’Doherty, J. P.Dayan, P.Seymour, B.Dolan, R. J. 2006 Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humansNature 441 876CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Araujo, I. E.Kringelbach, M. L.Rolls, E. TMcGlone, F. 2003 Human cortical responses to water in the mouth, and the effects of thirstJournal of Neurophysiology 90 1865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Araujo, I. E.Oliveira-Maia, A. J.Sotnikova, T. D.Gainetdinov, R. R.Caron, M. G.Nicolelis, M. A. L.Simon, S. A. 2008 Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signalingNeuron 57 930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Martino, BKumaran, D.Seymour, B.Dolan, R. J 2006 Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brainScience 313 684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, R.Newman, J. L.Longe, O. A.Deakin, J. F. 2003 ‘Differential response patterns in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex to financial reward in humans: a parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging studyJournal of Neuroscience 23 303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, P. W.Camerer, C. F.Fehr, E.Poldrack, R. A. 2009 Introduction: A brief history of neuroeconomicsNeuroeconomics: Decision-making and the BrainGlimcher, P. W.Camerer, C. FFehr, E.Poldrack, R. A.LondonAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Grabenhorst, F.Rolls, E. T. 2008 ‘Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuliEuropean Journal of Neuroscience 27 723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlow, J. M. 1868 Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the headPublications of the Massachusetts Medical Society 2 327Google Scholar
Huettel, S.Song, A.McCarthy, G. 2004
Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. 1979 Prospect theory – an analysis of decision under riskEconometrica 47 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. 1984 Choices, values, and framesAmerican Psychologist 39 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.Wakker, P. P.Sarin, R. 1997 ‘Back to Bentham? – Explorations of experienced utilityQuarterly Journal of Economics 112 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.Shimojo, S.O’Doherty, J. P. 2006 ‘Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brainPLoS Biology 4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knutson, B.Fong, G. W.Adams, C. M.Varner, J. L.Hommer, D. 2001 Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRINeuroreport 12 3683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montague, P. R.Dayan, P.Sejnowski, T. J. 1996 A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learningJournal of Neuroscience 16 1936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J.Kringelbach, M. L.Rolls, E. T.Hornak, J.Andrews, C. 2001 Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortexNature Neuroscience 4 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J.Dayan, P.Schultz, J.Deichmann, R.Friston, K.Dolan, R. J. 2004 Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioningScience 304 452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J.Winston, J.Critchley, H.Perrett, D.Burt, D. M.Dolan, R. J. 2003 ‘Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractivenessNeuropsychologia 41 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Doherty, J.Rolls, E. T.Francis, S.Bowtell, R.McGlone, F.Kobal, G.Renner, B.Ahne, G. 2000 Neuroreport 11 893CrossRef
Plassmann, H.O’Doherty, J.Shiv, B.Rangel, A. 2008 ‘Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantnessProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105 1050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preuschoff, K.Bossaerts, P. 2007 Adding prediction risk to the theory of reward learningAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1104 135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preuschoff, K.Bossaerts, P.Quartz, S. R. 2006 Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structuresNeuron 51 381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, R. A.Wagner, A. R. 1972 A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcementClassical Conditioning II: Current Research and TheoryBlack, A. H.Prokasy, W. F.Appleton CroftsGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W. 1998 Predictive reward signal of dopamine neuronsJournal of Neurophysiology 80 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, V. L. 1982 Microeconomic systems as an experimental scienceAmerican Economic Review 72 923Google Scholar
Steiner, J. E.Glaser, D.Hawilo, M. E.Berridge, K. C. 2001 ‘Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primatesNeuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 25 53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, R. S.Barto, A. G. 1998 Reinforcement Learning: An IntroductionCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. 1898 Psychological ReviewNew YorkMacmillanGoogle Scholar
Tobler, P. N.O’Doherty, J. P.Dolan, R. J.Schultz, W. 2007 Reward value coding distinct from risk attitude-related uncertainty coding in human reward systemsJournal of Neurophysiology 97 1621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Neumann, JMorgenstern, O. 1944 Theory of Games and Economic BehaviourPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. 2008 Neuroeconomics: opening the gray boxNeuron 60 416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, P. W.Rustichini, A. 2004 Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decisionScience 306 447CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, P. W.Camerer, C. F.Fehr, E.Poldrack, R. A. 2009 Neuroeconomics: Decision-making and the BrainLondon: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Knutson, B.Bossaerts, P. 2007 Neural antecedents of financial decisionsJournal of Neuroscience 27 8174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knutson, B.Cooper, J. C. 2005 Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward predictionCurrent Opinion Neurology 18 411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J. P. 2004 Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimagingCurrent Opinion Neurobiology 14 769CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J. P.Hampton, A.Kim, H. 2007 Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision makingAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1104 35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rangel, A.Camerer, C.Montague, P. R. 2008 A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making’Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats