Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.808 Render date: 2022-10-01T15:43:52.004Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

5 - Normative and regulatory issues in cross-border reproductive health care

from Part I - International, cross-border and global issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Susan Golombok
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rosamund Scott
Affiliation:
King's College London
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
King's College London
Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aballea, P., Burstin, A. and Guedj, J. (2011). Etat des lieux et perspectives du don d'ovocytes en France. Rapport tôme I. IGAS: Inspection Généraledes Affairs Sociales.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2009). ‘Business booms at world's biggest sperm bank’. Available at www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hBNU1WQrNjmPogMWhQc1XYQly65Q?hl=en Last. Accessed 3 March 2014.
Bergmann, S. (2011). ‘Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 600–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chehtman, A. (2010). ‘The extraterritorial scope of the right to punish’. Law and Philosophy, 29, 127–57.Google Scholar
Corveleyn, A., Zika, E., Morris, M., Dequeker, E. et al. (2008). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Couture, V., Drouin, R., Tan, S.-L., Moutquin, J-M. et al. (2014). ‘Cross-border reprogenetic services: a narrative overview and thematic analysis of the literature’. Clinical Genetics, doi: 10.1111/cge.12418.Google Scholar
Dickens, B.M. and Cook, R.J. (2006). ‘Conflict of interests: legal and ethical aspects’. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 92, 192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondorp, W., De Wert, G., Pennings, G., Shenfield, F. et al. (2013). ‘ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 20: Sex selection for non-medical reasons’. Human Reproduction, 28, 1448–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downie, J. and Baylis, F. (2013). ‘Transnational trade in human eggs: law, policy, and (in)action in Canada’. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41, 224–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) (2013). ‘Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion’. Fertility and Sterility, 100, 645–50.PubMed
European Court of Human Rights (2014). Totally prohibiting the establishment of a relationship between a father and his biological children born following surrogacy arrangements abroad was in breach of the Convention. Press release issued by the Registrar of the Court, 26.06.2014. Available at www.hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng-press/pages/search.aspx?i=003--4804617--5854908.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2013). ‘Surrogacy overseas’. Available at www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/288902/Surrogacy_overseas__updated_February_2014_.pdf.
Glinos, I.A. and Wismar, M. (2013). ‘Hospital collaboration in border regions: observations and conclusions’, in Glinos, I.A. and Wismar, M. (eds.), Hospitals and Borders: 7 Case-Studies on Cross-border Collaboration and Health System Interactions, 1131. Observatory Studies Series 31. World Health Organization: Geneva. Available at www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/233515/e96935.pdf.Google Scholar
Grall, J.-Y. (2012). ‘Lettre du 21 Décembre 2012.’ Ministére des Affairs Sociales et de la Santé’. French Government.
Grall, J.-Y. (2013). ‘Lettre du 30 Avril 2013. Ministére des Affairs Sociales et de la Santé’. French Government.
Gürtin, Z.B. (2011). ‘Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 555–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harton, G., Braude, P., Lashwood, A., Schmutzler, A. et al. (2011). ‘ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD centre for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening’. Human Reproduction, 26, 1424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heng, B.C. (2006). ‘“Reproductive tourism”: should locally registered fertility doctors be held accountable for channelling patients to foreign medical establishments?Human Reproduction, 21, 840–2.Google Scholar
Hudson, N. and Culley, L. (2011). ‘Assisted reproductive travel: UK patient trajectories’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 573–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, N., Culley, L., Blyth, E., Norton, W. et al. (2011). ‘Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22, 673–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2009). ‘Considering fertility treatment abroad: issues and risks’. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/fertility-clinics-treatment-abroad.html.
Infertility Consumer Support for Infertility (2008). ‘Travelling abroad for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment’. Available at www.icsi.ws.
Inhorn, M.C. (2012). ‘Reproductive exile in global Dubai: South Asian stories’. Cultural Politics, 8, 283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M.C. and Patrizio, P. (2012). ‘The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millenium’. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24, 158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, S. (1987). ‘A theory of complicity’, in Gavison, R. (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Lannou, D. (2013). ‘Quelle stratégie pour améliorer le recrutement des donneurs de gamétes?Gynécologie Obstétrique et Fertilité, 41, 711–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas-Baloup, I. (2013). ‘GPA et AMP: soupçons / condamnations (les circulaires incohérentes)’. Gynéco Online, February 2013. Available at www.gyneco-online.com
McLeod, C. (2008). ‘Referral in the wake of conscientious objection to abortion’. Hypatia, 23, 3047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.S. (2007). ‘Causing, aiding, and superfluity of accomplice liability’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156, 395452.Google Scholar
Mutcherson, K.M. (2012). ‘Welcome to the Wild West: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States’. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 349–93.Google Scholar
Participants in the International Summit (2008). ‘The Declaration of Istanbul on organ trafficking and transplant tourism’. Kidney International, 74, 854–9.PubMed
Pennings, G. (1996). ‘Ethics of sex selection for family balancing – Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection’. Human Reproduction, 11, 2339–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. (2002). Personal desires of patients and social obligations of geneticists: applying preimplantation genetic diagnosis for non-medical sex selection. Prenatal Diagnosis, 22, 1123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. (2004). ‘Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe’. Human Reproduction, 19, 2689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennings, G. (2011). ‘Sperma op maat: een patiëntenrecht’. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 67, 1154–9.Google Scholar
Pennings, G., Autin, C., Decleer, W., Delbaere, A. et al. (2009). ‘Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium’. Human Reproduction, 24, 3108–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G., de Mouzon, J., Shenfield, F., Ferraretti, A.P. et al. (2014). ‘Socio-demographic and fertility related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries’. Human Reproduction, 29, 1076–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. and Gürtin, Z. (2012). ‘The legal and ethical regulation of transnational donation’, in Richards, M., Pennings, G. and Appleby, J. (eds.), Reproductive Donation: Policy, Practice, and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, R. (2011). ‘Reproductive entanglements: body, state, and culture in the dys/regulation of childbearing’. Social Research, 78, 693718.Google Scholar
Rozée Gomez, V. and De La Rochebrochard, E. (2013). ‘Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium’. Human Reproduction, 28, 3103–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenfield, F., de Mouzon, J., Pennings, G., Ferraretti, A.P. et al. (2010). ‘Cross border reproductive care in six European countries’. Human Reproduction, 25, 1361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenfield, F., Pennings, G., De Mouzon, J., Ferraretti, A.P. et al. (2011). ‘ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners’. Human Reproduction, 26, 1625–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speier, A.R. (2011). ‘Brokers, consumers and the internet: how North American consumers navigate their infertility journeys’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 592–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storrow, R.F. (2010). ‘The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care’. Human Reproduction, 25, 2939–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thijssen, A., Dhont, N., Vandormael, E., Cox, A. et al. (2014). ‘Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID): heterogeneity in sperm banking facilities on a single country (Belgium).’ Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn, 6, 5767.Google Scholar
Trimmings, K. and Beaumont, P.R. (eds.) (2013). International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International level. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
UK Association of Clinical Embryologists (2005). ‘Response to the ‘EU Draft technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells’. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_threats/human_substance/oc_tech_cell/docs/ev_20050624_co10_en.pdf. Accessed 2 March 2014.
Van Hoof, W., Pennings, G. and De Sutter, P. (2015). Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: a qualitative study into the experiences and moral perspectives of French women who go to Belgium for treatment with donor sperm. Social Science and Medicine, 124, 391–7, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Hoof, W. and Pennings, G. (2011). ‘Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment?Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 546–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, A.P.H., Shkrobot, L.V., Omar, A.B., Walsh, D.J. et al. (2010). ‘EU screening applied to anonymous oocyte donors from Ukraine: logistics, results and reproductive outcomes from an Irish IVF programme’. Human Reproduction, 25, i154.Google Scholar
Wells, D. and Fragouli, E. (2013). ‘Preimplantation genetic diagnosis’, in Coward, K. and Wells, D. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Embryology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willsher, K. (2014). French court blocks gay woman from adopting partner's child born by IVF. The Guardian, 2 May 2014.

Legislation

Belgian Parliament (2007). ‘Law on medically assisted reproduction and the destination of supernumerary embryos and gametes’, 17 June 2007. Belgisch Staatsblad, 177, 38575–86.
European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India (2010). ‘The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill – 2010’.

Legal cases

European Court of Human Rights, Grand chamber. (2011). Case of S.H. and others v. Austria. Strasbourg, 3 November 2011.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×