Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:12:42.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Euroskeptic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Robert J. Donia
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

As he moved forward with plans to create a Bosnian Serb state in late 1991, Karadžić was acutely aware that the new polity could not be established permanently unless it won European and U.S. recognition. He and Milošević had hoped that the Europeans would apply the international legal principle of self-determination to recognize the national aspirations of Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia. They were disappointed to learn that, while EC diplomats were prepared to grant self-determination to any of the six republics, they were loath to do the same for groups within a republic or across two or more republics. The Serb leaders seemed unaware that Europe was in the grip of its own euphoria at having established and maintained the kind of multicultural society that the Serbs were intent on dismantling. But Karadžić proved to be a Euroskeptic: he had no interest in the values of individual rights and majority rule, and he took offense when EC diplomats emphasized those values in dealing with the Yugoslav crisis. This chapter relates his encounters with European officials and examines how the Europeans’ viewpoints typically diverged from those of Karadžić and other Serb nationalists.

The EC Quest for Peace

Having successfully mediated an end to the brief war in Slovenia, EC negotiators were confident they could secure peace in Croatia as well. On August 28, 1991, as Serb-Croat violence was spreading in Croatia, the EC created two institutions to promote peace: the EC Conference on Yugoslavia, chaired by the former NATO Secretary General and British diplomat Lord Carrington; and an Arbitration Commission headed by French jurist Robert Badinter. The EC charged its Conference on Yugoslavia with ending hostilities through negotiations and its Arbitration Commission with establishing guidelines for EC recognition of new states emerging from Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. The commission was to apply principles of international law as fairly and quickly as possible to establish and maintain peace in the region. Its opinions suggest that the commission’s greatest concern was avoiding further war and imposing conditions on those states seeking independence. The EC was already complicit in Slovene and Croat declarations of independence, having in July 1991 persuaded those two republics to accept a ninety-day moratorium on the effective dates of their declarations of independence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Radovan Karadžič
Architect of the Bosnian Genocide
, pp. 135 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glaurdić, Josip, The Hour of Europe: Western Powers and the Breakup of Yugoslavia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011)
Terrett, Steve, The Dissolution of Yugoslavia and the Badinter Arbitration Commission: A Contextual Study of Peace-making Efforts in the Post–Cold War World (Burlington, VT: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 2000), p. 149
Ramcharan, B.G., ed., The International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia: Official Papers, Vol. 1 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 1259–1281
Roth, Brad R., “Secessions, Coups and the International Rule of Law: Assessing the Decline of the Effective Control Doctrine,” Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 11 (2010), pp. 409–415Google Scholar
Milić, Miloš, Dogovori u Karadjordjevo o podeli Bosne i Hercegovine (Sarajevo: Rabic, 1998)
Komšić, Ivo, Preživljena zemlja: Tko je, kada i gdje dilelio BiH (Zagreb: Promotej, 2006), p. 81

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Euroskeptic
  • Robert J. Donia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Radovan Karadžič
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683463.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Euroskeptic
  • Robert J. Donia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Radovan Karadžič
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683463.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Euroskeptic
  • Robert J. Donia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Radovan Karadžič
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683463.009
Available formats
×