Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-t6tmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-30T04:22:58.528Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

5 - German Prosecutors and the Rechtsstaat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Máximo Langer
University of California, Los Angeles
David Alan Sklansky
Stanford University, California
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Prosecutors and Democracy
A Cross-National Study
, pp. 109 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Primary Sources

Allan, T. R. S. “Rule of Law (Rechtsstaat) (1998),” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-T022-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, Sara Sun. “Prosecutorial Discretion in Three Systems: Balancing Conflicting Goals and Providing Mechanisms for Control,Discretionary Criminal Justice in a Comparative Context, Caianiello, Michelle and Hodgson, Jacqueline, eds., 2758. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Boyne, Shawn Marie. The German Prosecution Service: Guardians of the Law? Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela J. Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Elsner, Beatrix and Peters, Julia. “The Prosecution Service Function within the German Criminal Justice System” in Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe, eds. Jörg-Martin, Jehle and Wade, Marianne L., 207236. Berlin: Springer 2016.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Gwladys. Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe: A Comparative Analysis with Special Focus on Switzerland, France and Germany. Switzerland: Springer, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Ingo. Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pizzi, William T. Trials without Truth. New York: New York University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Weigend, Thomas. “The Prosecution Service in the German Administration of Criminal Justice,Tasks and Powers of the Prosecution Services in the EU Member States, Tak, P. J. P., ed., vol 1, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers (2004): 203222.Google Scholar
Worral, John and Nugent-Borakove, M. Elaine. (eds). The Changing Role of the American Prosecutor. Albany: State University of New York Press (2014): 9497.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Binavince, Emilio S.The Structure and Theory of the German Penal Code,American Journal of Comparative Law 24 (1976): 594601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, John. “Prosecutor Fired after Targeting Journalists,” Handelsblatt, August 5, 2015. Scholar
Brinkbäumer, Klaus. “Berlin’s NSA Fears: Treason Investigation Reveals Anxiety at the Top.” Der Spiegel, August 10, 2015. Scholar
Collin, Peter. “Die Geburt der Staatsanwaltschaft in PreuBen.” Forum Historiase luris (12 März 2001):118. Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan. “The Reality of Prosecutorial Discretion: Comments on a German Monograph,American Journal of Comparative Law 29 (1981): 119138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubber, Markus Dirk. “The Promise of German Criminal Law: A Science of Crime and Punishment,German Law Journal 6 (2005): 10491071. Scholar
Eisen, Lauren-Brooke, Fortier, Nicole, and Chettiar, Inimai. “Federal Prosecution for the 21st Century,” Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School (2014). Scholar
Frase, Richard S. and Weigend, Thomas. “German Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: Similar Problems, Better Solutions,Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 18 (1995): 330337.Google Scholar
Kozinski, Alex. “Criminal Law 2.0,Georgetown Law Journal Annual Review Criminal Procedure, 44 (2015): iiixliv. Scholar
Krygier, Martin. “Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat),” University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series No. 53 (October 2013): 117. Scholar
Langbein, John H.Land without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It,Michigan Law Review 78 (1979): 204225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Marc L. and Wright, Ronald F. “The Black Box,Iowa Law Review 94 (2008): 127196.Google Scholar
Rauxlouh, Regina. “Formalization of Plea Bargaining in Germany: Will the New Legislation Be Able to Square the Circle?,Fordham International Law Journal 34 (2011): 295331.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan. “Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything Is a Crime,Columbia Law Review Sidebar 113 (2013): 102108.Google Scholar
Schram, Glenn. “The Obligation to Prosecute in West Germany,The American Journal of Comparative Law 17 (1969): 627632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegismund, Eberhard. “The Public Prosecution Office in Germany: Legal Status, Functions, and Organization,” 120th International Senior Seminar Visiting Experts’ Papers (UNAFEI) (2001): 5876. Scholar
Spector, Horacio. “The Future of Legal Science in Civil Law Systems,Louisiana Law Review 65 (2004): 255269.Google Scholar
Weigend, Thomas. “Is the Criminal Process about Truth?: A German Perspective,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 26, No. 1 (Winter 2003): 157174.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems,Organization 7 (May 2000): 225246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Ronald F. “How Prosecutor Elections Fail Us,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 6 (2009): 509606.Google Scholar
Wright, Ronald F. and Miller, Mark L.The Worldwide Accountability Deficit for Prosecutors,Washington & Lee Law Review 67 (2010): 15871620.Google Scholar
Conrad, Naomi. “In Berlin, Probe into Netzpolitik Inquiry Drags On,” Deutsche Welle, August 19, 2015. Scholar
Crawford, David and Esterl, Mike. “Siemans Settlement Sets off Criticism of German Inquiries,” The Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2007. Scholar
Der Spiegel Online, May 23, 2013. “Hurried Action: Germany Criticized for Late Push on War Criminals,” Scholar
August 7, 2015. “Plugging Leaks: Merkel’s War on Germany’s Press and Parliament,” Scholar
Deutsche Welle, July 30, 2015. “German Prosecutors Investigate Internet Journalists for Treason,” Scholar
July 31, 2015. “German Press and Politicians Criticize ‘Absurd’ Netzpolitik Inquiry,” Scholar
August 1, 2015. “Thousands March in Berlin over Journalist ‘Treason’ Claims,” Scholar
August 1, 2015. “German Politicians Urge Chief Prosecutor to Resign over Treason Probe,” Scholar
August 3, 2015. “German Justice Ministry ‘Warned’ against Netzpolitik Treason Investigation,” Scholar
August 4, 2015. “German Justice Minister Maas Terminates Federal Prosecutor Range,” Scholar
August 4, 2015. “Federal Prosecutor Range Criticizes ‘Political Influence’ on Investigation,” Scholar
Eddy, Melissa. “German Drops Inquiry into Claims U.S. Tapped Angela Merkel’s Phone,” New York Times, June 12, 2015. Scholar
German Law Journal 2 (2001). “Germany’s Party Finance Scandal ‘Ends’ with Kohl’s Plea Bargain and Too Many Unanswered Questions,” Scholar
Human Rights Watch, December 2011. “The State Response to Hate Crimes in Germany,” Scholar
Jordans, Frank. “Top German Prosecutor Fired over Treason Investigation,” Business Insider, August 4, 2015. Scholar
Knight, Ben. “Outrage as Range Turns Netzpolitik Treason Storm into Constitutional Row,” Deutsche Welle, August 4, 2014. Scholar
Deutsche Welle, August 5, 2015. “How the World Misunderstood Germany’s Netzpolitik Affair,” Scholar
Mayr, Stefan. “Brisante Aktenvermerke im Fall Schottdorf,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 26, 2015. Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung, March 17, 2015. “Schwere Vorwürfe gegen CSU-Politiker,” Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung, March 19, 2015. “Gauweiler nicht mehr Anwalt von Schottdorf,” Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 13, 2015. “Schwere Vorwürfe gegen Generalstaatsawnwaltschaft im Fall Schottdorf,” Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 20, 2015. “Justiz im Zwielicht,” Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung, December 1, 2015. “Ex-Generalstaatsanwlat bestreitet politischen Einfluss im Fall Schottdorf,” Scholar
Rath, Christian. “Wie unabhängig sind Staatsanwälte?,” Vorwärts. August 6, 2015. Scholar
The Local De, August 6, 2015. “Critics Hunt Fresh Scalps in Treason Scandal,” Scholar
Trendafilova, Ekaternia and Róth, Werner. “Report on the Public Prosecution Service in Germany,” Promoting Prosecutorial Accountability, Independence and Effectiveness. Comparative Research. Open Society Institute, ed. Sofia: Open Society Institute, 2008: 213–246. Scholar
Richterbund, Deutscher. “Richterbund kritisiert Eingreifen des Bundesjustizministers,” Press Release, August 4, 2015. Scholar
“84 Recommendations for More Integrity: Transparency Germany Presents Its National Integrity Assessment for German,” Transparency International Press Release, January 19, 2012, Scholar
Center for Prosecutor Integrity, An Epidemic of Prosecutor MisConduct (2013): Appendix B, Scholar
Registry of Prosecutorial Misconduct, March 15, 2016. Scholar
Consultative Council of European Prosecutors: Questionnaire with a View of the Preparation of Opinion No. 7, replies from Germany (Strasbourg, February 7, 2010), www.coe/int/t/dghl/cooperation/ccpe/opinions/travaux/OP_7_Germany.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2000), Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec (2000)19 of the Committee of Ministers. www.wcd.coe/int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=376859.Google Scholar
Council of Europe, February 18, 2015, pp. 11–13, “Threats to the Rule of Law in Council of Europe Member States: Asserting the Parliamentary Assembly’s Authority, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Doc. 13713. Scholar
Pew Research Center, 2014 Global Attitudes Survey, Scholar
Report on European Judicial Systems-Edition 2014 (2012 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications, 2014), 363 (Table 11.47), Scholar
Civil Servants Framework Act, Sect. 31 (Beamtenrechtsrahmengestez, BRRG).Google Scholar
Code of Criminal Procedure, Sects 153, 153(d), 160(2), 172, 257, 296(2).Google Scholar
Courts Constitution Act, Art. 145, 146, 147, 150, 151, 152 (Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, GVG), May 9, 1975.Google Scholar
Federal Civil Service Act, Art. 56(2)d (Bundesbeamtengesetz,BBG).Google Scholar
Penal Code, Sect. 172 (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats