Book contents
- Prosecutors and Democracy
- ASCL Studies in Comparative Law
- Prosecutors and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Discretion and Accountability in a Democratic Criminal Law
- 2 Accounting for Prosecutors
- 3 The Democratic Accountability of Prosecutors in England and Wales and France: Independence, Discretion and Managerialism
- 4 The French Prosecutor as Judge. The Carpenter’s Mistake?
- 5 German Prosecutors and the Rechtsstaat
- 6 The Organization of Prosecutorial Discretion
- 7 Prosecutors, Democracy, and Race
- 8 Prosecuting Immigrants in a Democracy
- 9 Beyond Tough on Crime: Towards a Better Politics of Prosecution
- 10 Unpacking the Relationship between Prosecutors and Democracy in the United States
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
3 - The Democratic Accountability of Prosecutors in England and Wales and France: Independence, Discretion and Managerialism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2017
Book contents
- Prosecutors and Democracy
- ASCL Studies in Comparative Law
- Prosecutors and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Discretion and Accountability in a Democratic Criminal Law
- 2 Accounting for Prosecutors
- 3 The Democratic Accountability of Prosecutors in England and Wales and France: Independence, Discretion and Managerialism
- 4 The French Prosecutor as Judge. The Carpenter’s Mistake?
- 5 German Prosecutors and the Rechtsstaat
- 6 The Organization of Prosecutorial Discretion
- 7 Prosecutors, Democracy, and Race
- 8 Prosecuting Immigrants in a Democracy
- 9 Beyond Tough on Crime: Towards a Better Politics of Prosecution
- 10 Unpacking the Relationship between Prosecutors and Democracy in the United States
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prosecutors and DemocracyA Cross-National Study, pp. 40 - 75Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Ashworth, Andrew J. “Manslaughter: Direction to Jury – Diminished Responsibility.” Criminal Law Review October (2006): 88.Google Scholar
Aubert, Laura. “Systématisme pénale et alternatives aux poursuites en France: une politique pénale en trompe-L’œil.” Droit et Société. 74, no.1 (2010): 17–33.Google Scholar
Blackstock, Jodie, Cape, Ed, Hodgson, Jacqueline, Ogorodova, Anna, and Spronken, Taru. Inside Police Custody: An Empirical Account of Suspects’ Rights in Four Jurisdictions. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2014.Google Scholar
Cohen, Mathilde. “The Carpenter’s Mistake? The Prosecutor as Judge in France.” (this volume).Google Scholar
CPS. “Consultations.” The Crown Prosecution Service. www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/index.html.Google Scholar
CPS. Domestic Abuse Guidelines for Prosecutors. www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/domestic_abuse_guidelines_for_prosecutors/.Google Scholar
Di Federico, Giuseppe. “Prosecutorial Independence and the Democratic Requirement of Accountability in Italy,” British Journal of Criminology 38 (1998): 373.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine, Perdroille, Sylvie, Bernabé, Boris, and Charles, Kadri. La prudence et l’autorité: l’office du juge au XXIe siècle Rapport de l’IHEJ. Ministère de la Justice, 2013.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo and Pederzoli, Patrícia. The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford: OUP, 2002.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo. “Prosecution in Two Civil Law Countries: France and Italy.” In Comparing Legal Cultures, edited by Nelken, David, 183–93. Aldershot: Dartmouth Pub Co, 1997.Google Scholar
Hazareesingh, Sudhir. Political Traditions in Modern France. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
HMIC. The Joint Inspection of the Provision of Charging Decisions. HMIC. London, 2015. www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/wp-content/uploads/joint-inspection-of-the-provision-of-charging-decisions.pdf.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “Constructing the Pre-trial Role of the Defence in French Criminal Procedure: An Adversarial Outsider in an Inquisitorial Process?” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 6, no.1 (2002a): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “Hierarchy, Bureaucracy, and Ideology in French Criminal Justice: Some Empirical Observations.” Journal of Law and Society 29, no. 2 (2002b): 227–257.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “The French Prosecutor in Question.” Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 67 (2010): 1361–1412.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “Safeguarding Suspects’ Rights in EU Criminal Justice: A Comparative Perspective.” New Criminal Law Review 14, no. 4 (2011): 611–665.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “Guilty Pleas and the Changing Role of the Prosecutor in French Criminal Justice.” In The prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, edited by Luna, Erik and Wade, Marianne, 116–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “Making Custodial Legal Advice More Effective in France: Explores the Challenges in Accessing a Lawyer When in Police Custody.” Criminal Justice Matters 92, no. 1 (2013): 14–15.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. “The Role of Lawyers During Police Detention and Questioning: A Comparative Study.” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 7, no. 2 (2015): 47–56.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S., and Cape, Edward. “The Right to Access to a Lawyer at Police Stations: Making the European Union Directive Work in Practice.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 5, no. 4 (2014).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. and Soubise, Laurène. “Understanding the Sentencing Process in France.” Crime and Justice 45, no. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Langer, Vera. “Public Interest in Civil Law, Socialist Law, and Common Law Systems: The Role of the Public Prosecutor.” American Journal of Comparative Law 36 (1988): 279–280.Google Scholar
Léger, Philippe. Comité de réflexion sur la justice pénale. Paris: La documentation Française, 2009.Google Scholar
Magendie, Jean-Claude and Gomez, Jean-Jacques. Justices. Paris: Atlas Economica, 1986.Google Scholar
McConville, Mike, Hodgson, Jacqueline, Bridges, Lee, and Anita, Pavlovic. Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Milburn, Philip, Kostulski, Katia, and Salas, Denis. Les procureurs: entre vocation judiciaire et fonctions politiques. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2010.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Justice. Chiffres Clés de la Justice 2015. Directeur de la publication. Paris, 2015. www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/chiffres_cles_20151005.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Justice. Statistiques: Activité des parquets des TGI. Ministère de la Justice. Paris, 2015. www.justice.gouv.fr/statistiques.html.Google Scholar
Ministère de la Justice. Une réponse pénale pour 91% des auteurs d’infractions. Ministère de la Justice. Paris, 2015. www.justice.gouv.fr/budget-et-statistiques-10054/infostats-justice-10057/une-reponse-penale-pour-91-des-auteurs-dinfractions-28451.html.Google Scholar
Le Monde. “Jacques Chirac condamné à deux ans de prison avec sursis.” Last modified December 15, 2011. www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2011/12/15/verdict-attendu-dans-l-affaire-des-emplois-fictifs-de-la-ville-de-paris_1618652_3224.html.Google Scholar
Mouhanna, Christian and Bastard, Benoit. “Procureurs et substituts: l’évolution du système de production des décisions pénales.” Droit et Société 74, no. 1 (2010): 35–53.Google Scholar
Le Nouvel Observateur. “Chronologie: Affaire Chirac: 12 ans de procédure.” www.tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/societe/1920111215.OBS6852/chronologie-affaire-chirac-12-ans-de-procedure.html.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Crime in England and Wales: Year ending December 2015. London, 2015. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingdecember2015.Google Scholar
Perrodet, Antoinette. “The Public Prosecutor.” In European Criminal Procedures, edited by Delmas-Marty, Mireille and Spencer, John R., 422. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Salas, Denis. “Note sur l’histoire de l’instruction préparatoire en France.” In La mise en état des affaires pénales: Rapport de la Commission Justice Pénale et Droits de l’homme, edited by Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Annexe 2,248. Paris: La Documentation Française, 1991.Google Scholar
Soubise, Laurène. “Prosecutorial Discretion and Accountability: A Comparative Study of France and England and Wales.” PhD Thesis, University of Warwick 2016.Google Scholar
The Director of Public Prosecutions. Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide. London, 2014. www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/assisted_suicide_policy.html.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. “Prosecutors and Politics in Comparative Perspective.” In Prosecutors and Politics: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Tonry, Michael, 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Truche, Pierre. Rapport de la commission de réflexion sur la Justice. Paris: Documentation française, 1997.Google Scholar
Zemmour, Éric. “Justice et médias, les nouveaux aristocrates de la Ve.” Pouvoirs 4 (2001): 163–170.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by