Book contents
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Love, literature, and philosophy
- Chapter 2 The subjects of personification and personhood
- Chapter 3 Mothers, sons, and metaphysics: others’ agency and self-identity in the Roman Stoic notion of a person
- Chapter 4 Girl behind the woman: Cicero and Tullia, Lucretius and the life of the body-mind
- Chapter 5 Embodied persons and bodies personified: the phenomenology of perspectives in Seneca, Ep. 121
- Chapter 6 Nature’s property in On Duties 1: the feminine communism of Cicero’s radical aesthetics
- Conclusion: repairing the text
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Book contents
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Love, literature, and philosophy
- Chapter 2 The subjects of personification and personhood
- Chapter 3 Mothers, sons, and metaphysics: others’ agency and self-identity in the Roman Stoic notion of a person
- Chapter 4 Girl behind the woman: Cicero and Tullia, Lucretius and the life of the body-mind
- Chapter 5 Embodied persons and bodies personified: the phenomenology of perspectives in Seneca, Ep. 121
- Chapter 6 Nature’s property in On Duties 1: the feminine communism of Cicero’s radical aesthetics
- Conclusion: repairing the text
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy , pp. 256 - 293Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Primary Sources
Adams, C., and Tannery., P. (1897–1909) Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Paris. [Abbreviated AT.]Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Edited with prolegomena, critical apparatus, translation, and commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1987) Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Naturae iv, 1030–1287. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dougan, T. W. (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tuscularum Disputationum Libri Quinque, Vol. i, Books 1 and 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1925) Lucrèce, De rerum natura; commentaire exégétique et critique, Vol. i. Paris.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002a) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book 2, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goetz, G., and Schoel, F., eds. (1910) M. Terenti Varronis De Lingua Latina Quae Supersunt. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Halm, C. (1863) Rhetores Latini Minores. Leipzig.
Halliwell, S., Russell, D., and Innes., D. (1999) Aristotle: Poetics; Demeterius: On the Sublime; Longinus: On Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Keulen, A. J. (2001) L. Annaeus Seneca Troades: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Leonard, W., and Smith., S. (1942) T. Lucretius Cari: De Rerum Natura. Edited with a commentary and introduction. Madison.Google Scholar
Lobel, E., and Page, D.. (1955) Poetarum Lesbiorum Fragmenta. Oxford.
Long, A. A., and Bastianini., G. (1992) Ierocle. In Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, Vol. i. Florence. 268–441.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley., D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Abbreviated LS.]Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1918) Tusculanae Disputationes. In Marci Tullii Ciceronis Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia. Fasc. 44. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. (2006) Cicero: De Re Publica; De Legibus; Cato Maior De Senectute; Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1965) Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Edited by Reynolds., L. D. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1977) Lucii Annaei Senecae Dialogorum Libri Duodecim. Oxford Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Rhys Roberts, W. (1910) Demetrius on Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De Elocutione. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1977) Propertius, Elegies I–IV. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Norman.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1964) “Longinus” on the Sublime. Oxford.
Reynolds, L. D. (1999) On the Sublime. In Halliwell, Russell, and Innes 1999, 143–307.
Schiller, F. (1967 [1795]) On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Edited by Wilkinson, E. M. and Willoughby., L. A. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stroebel, E. (1915) De Inventione. In Marci Tullii Ciceronis Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia. Fasc. 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. S. (1997) Catullus. Edited with a Textual and Interpretive Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Thulin, C. (1971) Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum, Opusculum Agrimensorum Veterum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Von Arnim, H. (1903–5) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 3 vols. Leipzig. [Abbreviated SVF.]Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. S. (1903) Cicero: Rhetorica, Vol. ii: Brutus; Orator; De Optimo Genere Oratorum; Partitiones Oratoriae; Topica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1994) Cicero: De Officiis. Edited by Winterbottom., M. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1970) Marci Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Libri Duodecim. Edited by Winterbottom., Michael 2 vols. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wisse, J., Winterbottom, M., and Fantham., E. (2008) M. Tullius Cicero: De Oratore Libri III. A Commentary on Book i3, 96–230. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (1991) On Stoic Good and Evil: De Finibus 3 and Paradoxa Stoicorum. Warminster.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abrams, M. H. (1953) The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1991) “On Lyric Poetry and Society.” In Notes to Literature, Vol. i. New York. 37–54.
Adorno, T. (1998) “On Subject and Object.” In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York. 245–59.Google Scholar
Alberti, A. (1995) “The Epicurean Theory of Law and Justice.” In Laks and Schofield 1995, 160–90.
Algra, K. (1997) “Lucretius and the Epicurean Other.” In Algra, Koenen, and Shrijvers 1997, 141–50.
Algra, K. (2003) “The Mechanism of Social Appropriation and its Role in Hellenistic Ethics.” OSAP 25, 265–97.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds. (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K., Koenen, M. H., and Shrijvers, P. J., eds. (1997) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2005) “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 14–35.
Allewaert, M. (2013) Ariel’s Ecology: Plantations, Personhood, and Colonialism in the American Tropics. Minneapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpers-Gölz, R. (1976) Der Begriff Σκοπός in der Stoa und seine Vorgeschichte. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Alston, R., and Spentzou., E. (2011) Reflections of Romanity: Discourses of Subjectivity in Imperial Rome. Columbus.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1970) “Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’état: Notes pour une recherche.” La pensée 151, 3–38.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (2006) Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978–(1987). London.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2008a) “How to Interpret Cicero’s Dialogue on Divination.” Interpretation 35.2, 105–23.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2008b) “Tullia’s Secret Shrine: Birth and Death in Cicero’s de Finibus.” AP 28, 373–93.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2009) “Womanly Humanism in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations.” TAPA 139, 411–45.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2010) “The Truly False Basis of Cicero’s Platonism.” McNeese Review 40, 37–56.Google Scholar
Altman, W., ed. (2015). Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero. Leiden.
Andreau, J., and Bruhns., H. (1990a) “Introduction.” In Andreau and Bruhns 1990b, vii–xxii.
Andreau, J., and Bruhns, H., eds. (1990b) Parenté et strategies familials dans l’antiquité romaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1989) “Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property.” In Griffin and Barnes 1989, 151–73.
Annas, J. (1991) “Epicurus’ Philosophy of Mind.” In Everson 1991a, 84–101.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: étude sur les images de Séneèque. Paris.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1991) “La métaphore et l’abstraction dans la prose de Sénèque.” In Hijmans and Grimal 1991, 99–131.
Arweiler, A., and Möller, M., eds. (2008) Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit/Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H., eds. (1995) The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990) “Seneca’s ‘On the Happy Life’ and Stoic Individualism.” Apeiron 23.4, 219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1995) “Philodemus on Censorship, Moral Utility, and Formalism in Poetry.” In Obbink 1995, 148–77.
Asmis, E. (1996) “The Stoics on Women.” In Ward 1996, 68–92.
Asmis, E. (2004) “The State as a Partnership: Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica in His Work On the State.” History of Political Thought 25, 569–98.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2005) “A New Kind of Model: Cicero’s Roman Constitution in De Republica.” AJP 126, 377–416.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2009) “Seneca on Fortune and the Kingdom of God.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 115–38.
Atherton, C. (1988) “Hand over First: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric.” Classical Quarterly 38.2, 392–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, C. (2005) “Lucretius on what Language is not.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 101–38.
Austin, M. M., and Vidal-Naquet., P. (1977) Economic and Social History of Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Axtell, H. L. (1907) The Deification of Abstract Ideas in Roman Literature and Inscriptions. Chicago.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (1994) “Subjection and Subjectivation.” In Copjec 1994, 1–15.
Balibar, E. (2009) “On the Aporias of Marxian Politics: From Civil War to Class Struggle.” Diacritics 39.2, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hansen, R. L., eds. (1989) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2013a) “Cicero’s Consolatio ad se: Character, Purpose and Impact of a Curious Treatise.” In Baltussen 2013b, 67–91.
Baltussen, H., ed. (2013b) Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife. Swansea.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001) “The Crossing.” In Harrison 2001, 142–63.
Barchiesi, A. (2005) “Lane-Switching and Jughandles in Contemporary Interpretations of Roman Poetry.” TAPA 135, 135–62.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S., eds. (2004) Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. Munich.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., and Scheidel, W., eds. (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, R. (2003) “A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, 303–40.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1970) “To Write – An Intransitive Verb?” In Macksey and Donato 1970, 134–45.
Barthes, R. (1988) “The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Mémoire.” In The Semiotic Challenge. Berkeley. 11–94.Google Scholar
Bartky, S. (1990) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York.Google Scholar
Barton, C. (2001) Roman Honor: The Fire in the Bones. Berkeley.
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2009) “Senecan Metaphor and Stoic Self-Instruction.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 190–217.
Basson, A. F., and Dominik, W., eds. (2003) Literature, Art, History. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Long., A. A. (1992) “Hierocles.” In Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini 1, Vol. i. Florence. 268–51.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1998) “Der römische Weg zur Subjektivität: Vom Siedlungsgenossen zu Person und Personlichkeit.” In Fetz, Hagenbüchle, and Schulz 1998, 204–54.
Benatouïl, T. (2003) “Deux usage de Stoïcisme: Deleuze, Foucault.” In Gros and Lévy 2003, 17–49.
Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser., N. (1995) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010) “A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism.” In Coole and Frost 2010, 47–69.
Benveniste, E. (1946) “Relationship of Persons in the Verb.” In Benveniste 1971, 195–204.
Benveniste, E. (1958a) “Subjectivity in Language.” In Benveniste 1971, 223–30.
Benveniste, E. (1958b) “Categories of Thought and Language.” In Benveniste 1971, 55–64.
Benveniste, E. (1962) “‘Structure’ in Linguistics.” In Benveniste 1971, 79–83.
Benveniste, E. (1969) Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Berger, H. (2005) Situated Utterances: Texts, Bodies, and Cultural Representations. New York.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2003) “L’utilité des technai.” In Lévy, Besnier, and Gigandet 2003, 33–48.
Bettini, M. (2000) Le orrechie di Hermes: Studi di antropologia e letterature classiche. Turin.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2011) The Ears of Hermes: Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World. Columbus.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. (2014) The Feminine Symptom: Aleatory Matter in the Aristotelian Cosmos. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (1998) “Taking the Sex out of Sexuality: Foucault’s Failed History.” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 42–60.
Bloomfield, M. W. (1963) “A Grammatical Approach to Personification Allegory.” Modern Philology 60.3, 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1997) “Prospect for a Theory of Nonconceptuality.” In Shipwreck with Spectator: Paradigm for a Metaphor of Existence. Cambridge. 81–102.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1990) “Parental Nature and Stoic Οίκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10, 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, M., and Helmig, C., eds. (2007) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bonte, P., and Copet-Rougier., E. (1990) “Groupes de parenté et strategies matrimoniales.” In Andreau and Bruhns 1990b, 253–66.
Bordo, S. (1987) The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991) “Introduction à la socioanalyse.” Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 90, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2003) “Participant Objectivation.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9, 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G., ed. (2003) Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2013) “Seneca against Plato: Letters 58 and 65. Long 2012, 128–46.
Bradley, K. (1986a) “Wet-Nursing at Rome: A Study in Social Relations.” In Rawson 1987, 201–29.
Bradley, K. (1994) “The Nurse and the Child at Rome: Duty, Affect and Socialisation.” Thamyris 1.2, 137–56.Google Scholar
Braund, S., and Gill, C., eds. (1997) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar
Brennan, Teresa. (1999) “Essence against Identity.” In Bianchi 1999, 59–72.
Brennan, Tad. (2005b) “Brennan on Mitsis on Long.” Southern Journal of Philosophy. Special Supplement 43, 250–6.Google Scholar
Breton, A. (1960 [1928]). Nadja. New York.
Brink, C. O. (1956) “Οἰκείωσις and Οἰκειότης: Theophrastus and Zeno on Nature in Moral Theory.” Phronesis 1, 123–45.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. (2012) Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1961) “Aspects of the Christianization of the Roman Aristocracy.” JRS 51, 1–11.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1988) The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2012) Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. (1994) “‘Supposing Truth Were a Woman … ’: Plato’s Subversion of Masculine Discourse.” In Tuana 1994, 157–80.
Brunschwig, J. (1986) “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism.” In Schofield and Striker 1986, 113–44.
Brunschwig, J. (1994a) “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Trans. Lloyd., J. Cambridge. 92–157.CrossRef
Brunschwig, J. (1994b) “On a Stoic Way of Not Being.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Trans. Lloyd., J. Cambridge. 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J., and Nussbaum, M., eds. (1993) Passions and Perceptions. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, V., Hewson, J., and Rose, S., eds. (2009) Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1982) “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” Philosophical Review 91, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1991) “Imitation and Gender Insubordination.” In Fuss 1991, 13–31.
Butler, J. (1995) “Contingent Foundations.” In Benhabib, Butler, Cornell, and Fraser 1995, 35–58.
Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Žižek., S. (2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London.Google Scholar
Butler, S., and Purves, A., eds. (2013) Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Cabisius, G. (1984) “Social Metaphor and the Atomic Cycle of Lucretius.” CJ 80, 109–20.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1977) “Paganism and Literature in Late Fourth Century Rome.” In Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en occident. Vandoeuvres. 1–30.Google Scholar
Cancik-Lindemaier., (1998) “Seneca’s Collection of Epistles: A Medium of Philosophical Communication.” In Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture: Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz. Edited by A. Y. Collins., Atlanta. 88–109.Google Scholar
Carrithers, M., Collins, S., and Lukes, S., eds. (1985) The Category of the Person. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cassell, J. (1977) A Group Called Women: Sisterhood and Symbolism in the Feminist Movement. New York.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (1997) “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” The Philosophical Review 106, 309–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1999) “Something and Nothing: The Stoic on Concepts of Universals.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17, 145–214.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. (1995) In Spite of Plato: A Feminist Rewriting of Ancient Philosophy. New York.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. (2011) “Inclining the Subject: Ethics, Alterity, and Natality.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 194–204.
Celentano, M. S., Chiron, P., and Noël, M.-P., eds. (2004) “Skhèma/Figura”: formes et figures chez les anciens: rhétorique, philosophie, littérature. Paris.Google Scholar
Centlivres Challet, C.-E. (2013) Like Man, Like Woman: Roman Women, Gender Qualities and Conjugal Relationships at the Turn of the First Century. Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, J.-M. (1999) Displaced Persons: The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius. Madison.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1996) “‘The Bright Frontier of Friendship’: Augustine and the Christian Body as Frontier.” In Mathisen and Sivan 1996, 217–29.
Clark, G. (1998) “The Old Adam: The Fathers and the Unmaking of Masculinity.” In Foxhall and Salmon 1998, 170–82.
Clark, G., and Rajak, T., eds. (2002) Philosophy and Power in the Greco-Roman World. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, B. (1999) “Lucretius’ Erotic Mother: Maternity as a Poetic Construct in De Rerum Natura.” Helios 26, 69–84.Google Scholar
Code, A. (1986) “Aristotle: Essence and Accident.” In Grandy and Warner 1986, 411–40.
Cohen, S. M., and Keyt., D. (1992) “Analysing Plato’s Arguments: Plato and Platonism.” In Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues. Edited by J. C. Klagg and N. D. Smith. Oxford. 173–200.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (2005) “Pre-Modern Property and Self-Ownership before Locke: Or, When Did Common Decency Become a Private rather than a Public Virtue?” European Journal of Political Theory 4, 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. (2004) “Mapping the Boundary of the Known and the Unknown.” In Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens 2004, 161–8.
Connolly, J. (2007a) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007b) “Virile Tongues: Rhetoric and Masculinity.” In Dominik and Hall 2007, 83–97.
Conybeare, C. (2012) “Quotquot haec legerint meminerint: All Who Read This Will Remember.” MLN 127.5, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D., and Frost, S., eds. (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (2004) Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, K. J., ed. (2001) Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. (1984–1991) Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vols. i–ii. Cambridge. [Abbreviated CSM 1 or 2.]Google Scholar
Craik, E. M., ed. (1990) “Owls to Athens”: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1986a) “Women in Roman Succession.” In Rawson 1986a, 58–82.
Crook, J. A. (1986b) “Feminine Inadequacy and the Senatusconsultum Velleianum.” In Rawson 1986a, 83–92.
Crystal, I. M. (2002) Self-Intellection and its Epistemological Origins in Ancient Greek Thought. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Culham, P. (2004) “Women in the Roman Republic.” In Flower 2004, 139–59.
Dagger, R. (1989) “Rights.” In Ball, Farr, and Hanson 1989, 292–308.
Danto, A. C. (1985) “Philosophy as/and/of Literature.” In Rajchman and West 1985, 65–83.
Dasen, V. and Späth, T., eds. (2010) Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I., and Sullivan, P., eds. (1994) Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1945) “The Stoic Categories as Methodological Principles.” TAPA 76, 246–63.
De Pretis, A. (2003) “‘Insincerity,’ ‘Facts,’ and ‘Epistolarity’: Approaches to Pliny’s Epistles to Culpurnia.” Arethusa 36.2, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2012) “Le città personificate nella Roma repubblicana: fenomenologia di un motivo letterario tra retorica e poesia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 215–47.
Delphy, C. (1993) “Rethinking Sex and Gender.” Women’s Studies International Forum 16.1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, M., and Obbink, D., eds. (2000b) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1971) “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.” In Derrida 1982, 207–72.
Derrida, J. (1972) “Signature Event Context.” In Derrida 1982, 307–30.
Derrida, J. (1987) “My Chances/Mes chances: A Rendezvous with Some Epicurean Stereophonies.” In Psyche, Vol. i. Stanford. 344–76.Google Scholar
Detel, W. (2005) Foucault and Classical Antiquity: Power, Ethics and Knowledge. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M., and Vernant., J.-P. (1978) Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Chicago.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, C. (1996) “Autonomy in the Light of Difference.” In Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory. Edited by Hirschmann, Di Stefano. 95–116.
Dillon, J. and Long., A. A. (1988a) “Introduction.” In Dillon and Long 1988b: 1–14.
Dillon, J., and Long, A. A., eds. (1988b) The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. (1984) “Infirmitas Sexus: Womanly Weakness in Roman Law.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedeneis/Legal History Journal 52, 343–71.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. (1986) “Family Finances: Terentia and Tullia.” In Rawson 1986a, 93–120.
Dixon, S. (2004) “Exemplary Housewife or Luxurious Slut? Cultural Representations of Women in the Roman Economy.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 56–74.
Dominik, W., ed. (1997) Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C., and Kurke., L. (1993) “Introduction.” In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. Cambridge. 1–19.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) “Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations.” In Powell 1995b, 197–218.
Douglas, S., and McFarlane, B.. (2013) “Defining Property Rights.” In Penner and Smith 2013b, 219–43.
Dozier, C. (2014) “Quintilian’s Ratio Discendi (Institutio Oratoria 12.8) and the Rhetorical Dimension of the Institutio Oratoria.” Arethusa 47, 71–88.
Dressler, A. (2011) “The Sophist and the Swarm: Feminism, Platonism and Ancient Philosophy in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon.” Ramus 40.1, 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. (2012) “‘You Must Change Your Life’: Metaphor and Exemplum, Theory and Practice, in Seneca’s Prose.” Helios 39.2, 145–92.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2013a) “Oedipus on Oedipus: Sophocles, Seneca, Politics, and Therapy.” In Ormand 2012, 507–22.
Dressler, A. (2013b) “Poetics of Conspiracy and Hermeneutics of Suspicion in Tacitus’s Dialogus de Oratoribus.” CA 32.1, 1–34.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2015) “Cicero’s Quarrels: Reception and Modernity from Horace to Tacitus.” In Altman 2015, 144–71.
Dryzek, J., Honig, B., and Phillips, A., eds. (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrueil, L. (2011) “Literature after Theory: Or, the Intellective Turn.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 237–48.
Duby, G., and Perrot, N., eds. (1992) A History of Women in the West: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2001) “Preventing Ciceronianism: C. Licinius Calvus’ Regimens for Sexual and Oratorical Self-Mastery.” CP 96.4, 400–28.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2008) Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echols, A. (1989) Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967–1975. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997) “Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters.” Greece and Rome 44, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. (2009) Free Yourself! Slavery, Freedom and the Self in Seneca’s Letters. In Bartsch and Wray (eds.) 2009, 139–59.
Emirbayer, M. (1997) “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103.2, 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990a) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis: Moral Development and Social Interaction in Early Stoic Philosophy. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990b) “Stoic Philosophy and the Concept of the Person.” In Gill 1990c, 109–35.
Engstrom, S., and Whiting, J., eds. (1996) Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ernout, A., and Meillet., A. (1951). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue Latine. Paris.Google Scholar
Esposito, R. (2011) “The Person and Human Life.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 205–19.
Everson, S. (1991b) “The Objective Appearance of Pyrrhonism.” In Everson 1991a, 121–47.
Everson, S. (1999) “Epicurean Psychology.” In Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield 1999, 542–59.
Farrell, J. (2001) Latin Language and Latin Culture: From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A., ed. (2009) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, S. (1973) “‘You were right to leave, Arthur Rimbaud’: Poetry and Modernity.” In Felman 2007, 79–107.
Felman, S. (2007) The Claims of Literature. Edited by Sun, E., Peretz, E., and Baer., U. New York.Google Scholar
Fetz, R., Hagenbüchle, R., and Schulz, P., eds. (1998) Geschichte und Vorgeschichte der modernen Subjektivität, Bd. 1. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, H., Hiltman, G., Olkowski, D., and Reichold, A., eds. (2007) The Other: Feminist Reflections in Ethics. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiévez, M. (1953) “‘Opera peregrinationis huius’ ou les étapes de la composition du De Officiis.” Latomus 12.3, 261–74.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2000) “Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?” The Philosophical Review 109.2, 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (2003) “Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern: The Cyrenaics, Sextus, and Descartes.” In Miller and Inwood 2003, 192–231.
Finley, M. I. (1968) “The Silent Women of Ancient Rome.” In Aspects of Antiquity. London. 129–42.Google Scholar
Flaschenriem, B. L. (1998) “Speaking of Women: ‘Female Voice’ in Propertius.” Helios 25.1, 46–64.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I., ed. (2004) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, T., and Lee, M., eds. (2009) Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forschner, M. (1981) Die stoische Ethik: Über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach-, und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W., ed. (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, Vol. i. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1983) “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Edited by Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow., P. Chicago. 208–28.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1985) The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, Vol. ii. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986) The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Vol. iii. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994a) “Self Writing.” In Foucault 1994e, 207–22.
Foucault, M. (1994b) “Technologies of the Self.” In Foucault 1994e, 223–51.
Foucault, M. (1994c) “The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Foucault 1994e, 281–301.
Foucault, M. (1994d) “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations.” In Foucault 1994e, 111–19.
Foucault, M. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. (1989) “Lucretius on Politics and History.” In Griffin and Barnes 1989, 120–50.
Fowler, D. (1994) “Postmodernism, Romantic Irony, and Classical Closure.” In De Jong and Sullivan 1994, 231–56.
Fowler, D. (2002a) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book 2, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002b) “The Feminine Principle: Gender in the De rerum natura.” In Fowler 2002a, 444–52.
Foxhall, L., and Salmon, J., eds. (1998) Thinking Men: Masculinity and its Self-Representations in the Classical Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Franchi, P. (2012) “Comminus portenta notare. Pretesa di realtà e crogiolo d’immaginari: il laboratorio allegorico della Psychomachia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 341–53.
Frank, J. (2005) A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy 68, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. (1999) “Autonomy, Necessity, and Love.” In Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge. 129–41.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political Philosophical Exchange. London.Google ScholarPubMed
Frede, D. (2003) “Stoic Determinism.” In Inwood 2003, 179–209.
Frede, D., and Inwood, B., eds. (2005) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 172–93.
Frei-Stolba, R., Bielman, A., and Bianchi, O., eds. (2003) Les femmes antiques entre sphère privée et sphère publique. Bern.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1953–1974), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. London. [Abbreviated SE.]Google Scholar
Fricker, M., and Hornsby, J., eds. (2000) The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1986) “Autonomy and the Split-Level Self.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24.1, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1998) “Feminism, Autonomy, and Emotion.” In Haber and Halfon 1998, 37–45.
Froman, W. (2005) “Merleau-Ponty and the Relations between the Logos Prophorikos and the Logos Endiathetos.” Analecta Husserliana 88, 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1979) “Persona, ein römische Rollenbegriff.” In Marquard and Stierle 1979, 83–106.
Gallagher, C. (1989) “Marxism and the New Historicism.” In Veeser 1989, 37–48.
Gamel, M.-K. (1998) “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy.” Helios 25.1, 79–95.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition, Vol. i. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gersh, S., and Moran, D., eds. (2006) Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., and Morrison, A.. (2007) “Introduction: What is a Letter?” In Morello and Morrison 2007, 1–16.
Gigandet, A. (1996) “Natura gubernans (Lucrèce V, 77).” In Lévy 1996a, 213–25.
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1985) “Ancient Psychotherapy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46, 307–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, C. (1988) “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6, 169–200.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1990b) “Introduction.” In Gill 1990a, 1–17.
Gill, C. (1994) “Peace of Mind and Being Yourself: Panaetius to Plutarch.” ANRW 2.36.7, 4599–640.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2008) “The Self and Hellenistic-Roman Philosophical Therapy.” In Arweiler and Möller 2008, 359–80.
Gillespie, S., and Hardie, P., eds. (2007) Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) “Probabile, veri simile and Related Terms.” In Powell 1995b, 115–43.
Goldberg, J. (2009) The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in the Renaissance. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F. (2000) “Socrates on Loving One’s Own: A Traditional Concept of Philia Radically Transformed.” CP 95, 379–98.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (1983) “Oikeiosis in Arius Didymus.” In Fortenbaugh 1983, 165–89.
Goulon, A. (1972) “La malheure de l’homme à naissance.” Revue des etudes augustinienne 18, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeser, A. (1978) “The Stoic Theory of Meaning.” In Rist 1978, 77–100.
Graver, M. (1998) “The Manhandling of Maecenas: Senecan Abstractions of Masculinity.” TAPA 119. 4, 607–32.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1990) “Aristotelian Rhetoric, Dialectic, and the Traditions of the Ἀντίστροφος.” Rhetorica 8.1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1989) “Towards a Poetics of Culture.” In Veeser 1989, 1–14.
Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1988) “Philosophy for Statesmen: Cicero and Seneca.” Gymnasium 9, 133–50.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) “Philosophical Badinage in Cicero’s Letters to his Friend.” In Powell 1995b, 325–46.
Griffin, M. T., and Barnes, J., (2003) “De Beneficiis and Roman Society.” JRS 93, 92–113.
Grimal, P. (1992b) “Philosophie et langue.” In Grimal 1992a, 1–5.
Grimal, P. (1992c) “Le vocabulaire de l’intériorité dans l’oeuvre philosophique de Sénèque.” In Grimal 1992a, 141–60.
Grimal, P. (1992d) “La langue latine, langue de la philosophie.” In Grimal 1992a, 335–46.
Grosz, E. (2010) “Feminism, Materialism, and Freedom.” In Coole and Frost (eds.) 2010, 139–57.
Gualandri, I., and Mazzoli, G., eds. (2003) Gli Annei: Una famiglia nella storia e nella cultura di Roma imperiale. Como.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1972) “The Classical Doctrine of Politics in Relation to Social Philosophy.” In Theory and Practice. Boston. 41–81.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1991) “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s de Amicitia.” Apeiron 23, 165–85.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N., and Schiesaro, A., eds. (1997a) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N., and Schiesaro, A.. (1997b) “Introduction.” In Habinek and Schiesaro 1997a, xv–xxi.
Hadot, P. (1979) “Les divisions de la philosophie dans l’antiquité.” Museum Helveticum 36, 201–23.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1996) “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity?’” In Hall and Gay 1996, 1–17.
Hallett, J. (1984b) “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism.” In Peradotto and Sullivan 1984, 241–62.
Hallett, J. (1989) “Women as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite.” Helios 16.1, 59–78.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (1997) “Female Homoeroticism and the Denial of Roman Reality in Latin Literature.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 255–73.
Hallett, J. (2004) “Matriot Games: Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, and the Forming of Family-Oriented Roman Values.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 26–39.
Hallett, J. (2006–2007) “Sulpica and her ‘Fama’: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering her Latin Literary Image.” CW 100.1, 37–42.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (2009) “Corpus erat: Sulpicia’s Elegiac Text and Body in Ovid’s Pygmalion Narrative (Metamorphoses 10.238–97)” In Fögen and Lee 2009, 111–24.
Halperin, D. (1994) “Plato and the Erotics of Narrativity,” in Shankman 1994, 43–75.
Hammer, D. (2008) Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988) “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14.3, 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991) “‘Gender’ for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word.” In Cyborgs, Simians, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London. 127–48.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1991) “Who Knows?: Identities and Feminist Epistemology.” In (En)Gendering Knowledge: Feminists in Academe. Edited by Hartman, J. and Messer-Davidow, E.. Knoxville. 100–15.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1998) “Can Men Be Subjects of Feminist Thought?” In Digby 1998, 171–96.
Harich, H. (1994) “Zu Seneca, Ep. 104, Tacitus, Ann. XV, 60, 2–64 und Montaigne, Essay II, 35.” Latomus 53.2, 354–65.Google Scholar
Harlow, M. (1998) “In the Name of the Father: Procreation, Paternity and Patriarchy.” In Foxhall and Salmon 1998, 155–69.
Harlow, M., and Laurence, R.. (2002) Growing Up and Growing Old in Ancient Rome: A Life Course Approach. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., ed. (2001) Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. A., and Sheppard, A., eds. (2010) Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. London.Google Scholar
Hartsock, N. (1990) “Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?” Feminism/Postmodernism. Edited by L. Nicholson. 157–76.
Hasker, W. (2001) “Persons as Emergent Substances.” In Corcoran 2001, 107–19.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992 [1816]) The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part 1 of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusatze. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963) Le Vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2005) Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J., Fowler, P. J., and Harrison, S. J., eds. (2007) Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, B. L., and Grimal, P., eds. (1991) Sénèque et la prose latine: neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar
Hindness, B., and Hirst, P. Q.. (1977) Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. (2001) “Cinna, Statius, and ‘Immanent Literary History’ in the Cultural Economy.” In Schmidt 2001, 221–57.
Hinds, S. (2007) “Ovid among the Conspiracy Theorists.” In Heyworth, Fowler, and Harrison 2007, 194–220.
Holmes, B. (2005) “Daedala Lingua: Crafted Speech in De Rerum Natura.” AJP 126.4, 527–85.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2012) “Deleuze, Lucretius, and the Simulacrum of Nature.” In Holmes and Shearin 2012, 316–41.
Holmes, B. (2013) “The Poetic Logic of Negative Exceptionalism in Lucretius, Book 5.” In Lehoux, Morrison, and Sharrock 2013, 153–91.
Holmes, B. and Shearin, W. H., eds. (2012) Dynamic Reading. Oxford.
Holzberg, N. (1998–1999) “Four Poets and a Poetess or a Portrait of the Poet as a Young Man? Thoughts on Book 3 of the ‘Corpus Tibullianum.’” CJ 94.2, 169–91.Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2010) “Antigone’s Two Laws: Greek Tragedy and the Politics of Humanism.” NLH 41.1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1972) Critical Theory. New York.
Houdt, T., Partoens, G., and Roskan, G.. (2004) “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Virtus.” In Partoens, Roskam, and Houdt 2004, 1–26.
Husserl, E. (1970 [1931]) Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993) “The Stoic Division in Philosophy.” Phronesis 38, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (1999) ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.
Imperio, O. (2012) “Personificazioni dell’arte poetica e metafore parentali: La maternità letteraria tra commedia e filosofia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 29–51.
Innes, D., Hine, H., Pelling, C. and Russell, D. A., eds. (1995) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984) “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century A.D.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2, 151–84.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1986) “Goal and Target in Stoicism.” The Journal of Philosophy 83, 547–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007b) “The Importance of Form in Seneca’s Philosophical Letters.” In Morello and Morrison 2007, 133–48.
Inwood, B., and Donini, P.. (1999) “Stoic Ethics.” In Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield 1999, 675–738.
Isnardi Parente, M. (1989) “Ierocle Stoico: Oikeiosis e doveri sociali.” ANRW 36.3, 2201–2226.Google Scholar
Jaffro, L. (2003) “Foucault et le stoïcisme: sur l’historiographie de L’hemeneutique du sujet.” In Gros and Lévy 2003, 51–83.
Jaggar, A. (1977) “Political Philosophies of Women’s Liberation.” In Feminism and Philosophy. Edited by M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. A. Elliston, and J. English. Totowa. 5–21.Google Scholar
James, S. (2010) “‘Ipsa dixerat’: Women’s Words in Roman Love Elegy.” Pheonix 64, 314–44.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (2005) Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London.Google Scholar
Janan, M. W. (1994) When the Lamp is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Illinois.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1995) “Reconstructing Philodemus’ On Poems.” In Obbink 1995, 69–96.
Jauss, H. R. (2005) “Modernity and Literary Tradition.” Critical Inquiry 31, 329–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen-Wigelsworth, A. (2013) “Political Bedfellows: Tullia, Dolabella, and Caelius.” Arethusa 46, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. R. (2013) “Nature, Spontaneity, and Voluntary Action in Lucretius.” In Lehoux, Morrison, and Sharrock 2013, 99–130.
Joshel, S. (1986) “Nurturing the Master’s Child: Slavery and the Roman Child-Nurse.” Signs 12.1, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshel, S. (1992) “The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia.” In Richlin 1992b, 112–30.
Joshel, S., and Murnaghan, S., eds. (1998a) Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations. London.Google Scholar
Joshel, S., and Murnaghan, S.. (1998b) “Introduction: Differential Equations.” In Joshel and Murnaghan 1998a, 1–23.
Judovitz, D. (1988) Subjectivity and Representation in Descartes: The Origins of Modernity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Just, R. (1985) “Freedom, Slavery, and the Female Psyche.” In Crux: Essays Presented to G.E.M. de St. Croix on his 75th Birthday. Edited by Cartledge, P. and Harvey, F.. Exeter. 169–88.Google Scholar
Kahane, D. (1998) “Male Feminism as Oxymoron.” In Digby 1998, 213–36.
Kahn, C. H. (1988) “Discovering the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine.” In Dillon and Long 1988b, 234–59.
Kany-Turpin, J. (1999) “Les conceptions de la nature chez Lucrèce.” In Cusset 1999, 91–102.
Kapust, D. (2011) Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapust, D. (2015) “Rethinking Rousseau’s Tyranny of Orators: Cicero’s On Duties and the Beauty of True Glory.” In The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept. Edited by Farr, J. and Williams, D.. Cambridge. 175–96.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2002) “The Taxonomy of Patience, or When Is ‘Patientia’ Not a Virtue?” Classical Philology 97.2, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2005) Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, R. (2000) “Red Kant, or The Persistence of the Third Critique in Adorno and Jameson.” Critical Inquiry 26, 682–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1997) “Tandem venit amor: A Roman Woman Speaks of Love.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 295–310.
Kennedy, D. (2002) Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2004) “Nocturnal Writers in Imperial Rome: The Culture of Lucubratio.” CP 99, 209–42.
Ker, J. (2006) “Seneca, Man of Many Genres.” In Volk and Williams 2006, 19–42.
Ker, J. (2009b) “Seneca on Self-Examination: Rereading De ira 3.36.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 160–87.
Kerferd, G. B. (1972) “The Search for Personal Identity in Stoic Thought.” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55, 177–96.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. (1991) “The Feminist View of the Past: A Comment on the ‘Decentering’ of the Poems of Ovid.” Helios 17.2, 221–35.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1971) “Stoic Intermediates and the Ends for Man.” In Long 1971, 150–72.
Kim, J. (1990) “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy 21, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1993) Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Dependency, and Equality. New York.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. and Meyers, D. T., eds. (1987) Women and Moral Theory. Totowa.
Klagge, J., and Smith, N. D., eds. (1992) “Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues”, OSAP, Suppl. Vol. ii. Oxford.
Klimchuck, D. (2013) “Property and Necessity.” In Penner and Smith 2013b, 47–67.
Konstan, D. (2002) “Enacting Erōs.” In Nussbaum and Sihvola 2002, 354–73.
Konstan, D. (2003) “Lucretian Friendship.” In Basson and Dominik 2003, 1–7.
Krostenko, B. (2001) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago.Google Scholar
Kühner, R., and Stegmann, C.. (1914) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hannover. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kurke, L., and Dougherty, C.. (1998) “Introduction.” In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece. Edited by L. Kurke and C. Dougherty. Oxford. 1–14.
Lacan, J. (1953) “Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en analyse.” In Lacan 1971, 237–322.
Laclau, E. (1996) “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.” In Mouffe 1996, 47–67.
Langlands, R. (2004) “A Woman’s Influence on a Roman Text: Marcia and Seneca.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 115–26.
Larmour, D., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C., eds. (1998) Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D., Gold, B., and Perkins, J., eds. (2013) Roman Literature, Gender, and Reception: Domina Illustris. New York.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1969) “De Exemplo meo Ipse Aedificato: An Organizing Idea in the Mostellaria.” Hermes 97, 318–32.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (2002) “Love’s Authority.” In Contours of Agency: Essays in Honor of Harry Frankfurt. Edited by Buss, S.. Cambridge. 279–92.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-U. (2002) Oikeiosis: Stoische Ethik in naturphilosphischer Perspektive. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A., eds. (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentricchia, F. (1989) “Foucault’s Legacy: A New Historicism?” In Veeser 1989, 231–42.
Lesses, G. (1993) “Austere Friends: The Stoics and Friendship.” Apeiron 26.1, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leumann, M., Hoffmann, J., and Szantyr, A.. (1963) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) “La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV de De finibus.” REL 62, 111–27.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1989) “Le De Officiis dans l’oeuvre philosophique de Cicéron.” Via Latina 116, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992a) Cicero Academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992b) “Cicéron créateur du vocabulaire latin de la connaissance.” In Grimal 1992a, 91–106.
Lévy, C., (1996b) “Philosopher à Rome.” In Lévy 1996a, 7–20.
Lévy, C., (1996c) “Doxographie et philosophie chez Cicéron.” In Lévy 1996a, 109–23.
Lévy, C., (1999) “Lucrèce et les Stoïciens.” In Poignault 1999, 87–98.
Lévy, C. (2003) “Y a-t-il quelqu’un derrière le masque? A propos de la théorie des personae chez Cicéron.” Qaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica 19, 127–40.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2004) “Les lumières de la rhétorique: les significations rhétorique, politique et philosophique des figures dans l’‘Orator».” In Celentano, Chiron, and Noël 2004, 229–41.
Lévy, C., Besnier, B., and Gigandet, A., eds. (2003) “Ars et ratio”: sciences, art et métiers dans la philosophie hellénistique et romaine. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1960) “Conscience and Conscious.” In Studies in Words. Cambridge. 181–213.Google ScholarPubMed
L’Hoir, F. S. (1992) The Rhetoric of Gender Terms: “Man”, “Woman”, and the Portrayal of Character in Roman Prose. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1973–1974) “Roman Religion and Ethical Thought: Abstraction and Personification.” Classical Journal 69.2, 108–19.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. (2006) “Surfing the Third Wave? Postfeminism and the Hermeneutics of Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas 2006, 55–66.
Lloyd, A. C. (1964). “Nosce teipsum and Conscientia.” Arch. Gesch. Philos. 46, 188–200.Google Scholar
Loesberg, J. (2005) A Return to Aesthetics: Autonomy, Indifference, and Postmodernism. Stanford.Google Scholar
Loewald, H. (1951) “Ego and Reality.” In Loewald 1980, 3–20.
Loewald, H. (1978) “Primary Process, Secondary Process, and Language.” In Loewald 1980, 178–206.
Loewald, H. (1976) “The Early Stoic Concept of Moral Choice.” In Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Edited by Verbeke, G.. Leuven. 77–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995a) “Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle.” In Powell 1995b, 37–61.
Long, A. A. (1995b) “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In Laks and Schofield 1995, 213–40.
Long, A. A. (1997) “Stoic Philosophers on Persons, Property-Ownership and Community.” BICS 41, 13–31.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2003) “Roman Philosophy.” In Sedley 2003, 184–210.
Long, A. A. (2005) “Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine’s De dialectica.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 36–55.
Long, A. A. (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, T. A. (1965) “Strawson and the Pains of Others.” Australasian Journal of Philolsophy 43.1, 73–7.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008) “Cicero on Caesar or Exemplum and Inability in the Brutus.” In Arweiler and Möller 2008, 131–54.
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2011) “Divided Voices and Imperial Identity in Propertius 4.1 and Derrida, Monolingualism of the Other and Politics of Friendship.” Dictynna 8.11 (online). Available at: http://dictynna.revues.org/711 (accessed September 30, 2013).
Luraghi, S. (1986) “On the Distribution of Instrumental and Agent Markers for Human and non-Human Agents of Passive Verbs in Some Indo-European Languages.” Indogermanische Forshungen 91, 48–66.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2009) “The Origin of the Feminine Gender in Proto-Indo-European: An Old Problem in a New Perspective.” In Bubenik, Hewson, and Rose 2009, 3–13.
Lyons, J. (2005) Before Imagination: Embodied Thought from Montaigne to Rousseau. Stanford.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (1998) “Servitium Amoris: Amor Servitii.” In Joshel and Murnaghan 1998a, 174–92.
McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2010) “First-Person Poetry.” In Barchiesi and Scheidel 2010, 435–49.
McDuffie, F. (2007) “Augustine’s Rhetoric of the Feminine in the Confessions: Woman as Mother, Woman as Other.” In Stark 2007, 97–118.
McHardy, F., and Marshall, E., eds. (2004) Women’s Influence on Classical Civilization. London.Google Scholar
McInerney, J. (2003) “Plutarch’s Manly Women.” In Rosen and Sluiter 2003, 319–44.
McKeon, R. (1987) “The Methods of Rhetoric and Philosophy: Invention and Judgment.” In Rhetoric: Essays in Invention and Discovery. Woodbridge. 56–65.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (2006) “What is a Human Body?” In The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, Vol. i. Cambridge. 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1978a) “The Meaning of Property.” In Macpherson 1978c, 1–13.
Macpherson, C. B. (1978b) “Liberal Democracy and Property.” In Macpherson 1978c, 199–207.
Macksey, R., and Donato, E., eds. (1970) The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (1991) L’οἰκείωσις peripatetica in Ario Didimo e nel ‘De finibus’ di Cicerone. Florence.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (1990) “Making a Virtue of Perversity: The Poetry of Prudentius.” Ramus 19.1, 64–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaspina, E. (1996) “Arria Maggiore: una ‘donna virile’ nelle epistole di Plinio? (Ep. III, 16).” In De tuo tibi: omaggio degli allievi a Italo Lana. Bologna. 319–38.Google Scholar
Mann, W. R. (2000) The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and their Context. Princeton.Google Scholar
Manning, C. E. (1973) “Seneca and the Stoics on the Equality of the Sexes.” Mnemosyne 26, 170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1978) The Aesthetic Dimension. Toronto.
Marouzeau, J. (1936) “Le leçon par l’exemple.” REL 14, 58–64.
Martindale, C., and Thomas, R., eds. (2006) Classics and the Uses of Reception. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1975 [1844]). “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. 4, 1843–1844. Moscow. 299–348.
Marx, K. (1976 [1845]) “Theses on Feuerbach.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. v: 1845–1847. Moscow. 3–9.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1986 [1857–8]) “Economic Manuscripts of 1857–58 (First Version of Capital).” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. xxviii. Moscow. 5–537.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1976 [1848]) “Manifesto for the Communist Party.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. vi. Moscow. 477–519.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1975 [1985–6]) The German Ideology. In Marx and Engels: Collected Works, Vol. v. Moscow. 19–585.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. (2008) The Roman Self in Late Antiquity: Prudentius and the Poetics of the Soul. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. G. (2012) “La Fortuna Populi Romani e l’ascesa egemonica di Roma fra tradizione antica e riletture moderne.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 301–24.
Mathisen, R., and Sivan, H., eds. (1996) Shifting Frontiers in Late Antiquity. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1985) “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of a Person; the Notion of Self.” In Carrithers, Collins, and Lukes 1985, 1–25.
Mazzoli, G. (2000) “Le ‘Voci’ dei Dialoghi di Seneca.” In Seneca e il suo tempo: Atti del convegno internazionale di Roma-Cassino, 11–14 novembre (1998). Edited by Paronni, . Roma. 249–60.Google Scholar
Mehl, D. (1999) “The Intricate Translation of the Epicurean Doctrine of PSUKHH in Book 3 of Lucretius.” Philologus 143, 272–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. (1982) “Infancy, Parenting and Nourishment in Augustine’s Confessions.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50, 349–64.Google Scholar
Miller, J., and Inwood, B., eds. (2003) Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1999) “Women, Identity, and Philosophy.” In Bianchi 1999, 35–49.
Miller, P. A. (1998) “Catullan Consciousness, the ‘Care of the Self,’ and the Force of the Negative in History.” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 171–203.
Miller, P. A. (2001) “Why Propertius is a Woman: French Feminism and Augustan Elegy.” Classical Philology 96.2, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. (2002) “Sulpicia’s (Corpo)Reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tibullus] 3.13.” Classical Antiquity 21.2, 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1993) “Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura.” MD 31, 111–28.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1999) “The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights.” In Ierodiakonou 1999, 153–77.
Mitsis, P. (2003) “Locke’s Offices.” In Miller and Inwood 2003, 45–61.
Mitsis, P. (2005) “The Stoics on Property and Politics.” Southern Journal of Philosophy. Special Supplement 43, 230–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monet, A., ed. (2003) Le jardin romain: Epicurisme et poésie à Rome. Villaneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Morello, R., and Morrison, A. D.. (2007) Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, G. (2012) “Allegorie della Legge. Prosopopea delle legge e appello alle leggi personificate: un topos retorico (e le sue transformazione) dal Critone platonico alla tradizione declamatoria.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 53–119.
Moretti, G., and Bonandini, A., eds. (2012) Persona ficta: La personificazione allegorica nella cultura antica fra letteratura, retorica e iconografia. Trento.Google Scholar
Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers: From the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. W. (1989) “The Stranger’s Stratagem: Self-Disclosure and Self-Sufficiency in Greek Culture.” JHS 109, 114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1985) “Subjective and Objective.” In Rajchman and West 1985, 31–47.
Nagy, G. (2009) “The ‘New Sappho’ Reconsidered in the Light of the Athenian Reception of Sappho.” In The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Edited by Greene, E. and Skinner, M.. Washington. 176–99.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1998) The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2008) “Republican Visions.” In Dryzek, Honig, and Phillips 2008, 193–210.
Newman, R. J. (1989) “Cotidie meditare: Theory and Practice of the Meditatio in Imperial Stoicism.” ANRW 2.36.3, 1473–1517.Google Scholar
Newton, J. L. (1989) “History as Usual? Feminism and the ‘New Historicism.’” In Veeser 1989, 152–67.
Nielsen, H. (1990) “Delicia in Roman Literature and in the Urban Inscriptions.” ARID 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W., and Sedley, D. N., eds. (2010) Ancient Models of Mind. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1985) Allegory and Poetics: The Structure and Imagery of Prudentius’ “Psychomachia.” Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Ausonius’ ‘Late Antique’ Poetics and ‘Post-Modern’ Literary Theory.” Ramus 19, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1994) “Mater Matters: The Female in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura.” Colby Quarterly 30.3, 179–205.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001a) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001b) “Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 54.3, 38–52.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) “The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman.” In Nussbaum and Sihvola 2002, 283–326.
Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA.